Agent skill

Nature Review Studio

by mumdark in mumdark/nature-review-studio

Multi-perspective manuscript review and point-by-point response generation, distilled from 1287 Nature Peer-Review-File PDFs (2025–2026).

No licenceAuto-check passedDocuments & Office

Install Nature Review Studio

skills CLI
$ npx skills add mumdark/nature-review-studio --skill nature-review-studio -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install mumdark/nature-review-studio nature-review-studio --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mumdark/nature-review-studio.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skill .claude/skills/nature-review-studio && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
nature-review-studio
GitHub stars
146
Token cost
~974 tokens
SKILL.md length
322 words
Files
8 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
1
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
None found

At a glance

Multi-perspective manuscript review and point-by-point response generation, distilled from 1287 Nature Peer-Review-File PDFs (2025–2026).

  • Works in 4 steps: Editor letter and revision-level banner. → Each reviewer in Overall assessment… → Cross-review consensus, without… → …
  • 多视角审稿、高水平审稿、Nature 风格审稿、 审稿回复、逐条回复、修订程度、修改任务表、蒸馏审稿语料、审稿知识库更新
  • SKILL.md covers Interfaces, Locked output contract, Formal content order and Language, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Nature Review Studio is an agent skill from mumdark/nature-review-studio. Multi-perspective manuscript review and point-by-point response generation, distilled from 1287 Nature Peer-Review-File PDFs (2025–2026). Review and respond each produce exactly two synchronized deliverables: one formal DOCX and one clean Markdown file with the same base name. Output language follows the user's prompt. Also trigger on 多视角审稿、高水平审稿、Nature 风格审稿、 审稿回复、逐条回复、修订程度、修改任务表、蒸馏审稿语料、审稿知识库更新。

Its SKILL.md is about 970 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 8 other files, including reference files (for example `README.md`, `references/adversarial-checklist.md` and `references/render-docx.md`).

It sits in Documents & Office, covering Peer review and Word documents. It works with Microsoft Word.

When your agent uses it

  • 多视角审稿、高水平审稿、Nature 风格审稿、 审稿回复、逐条回复、修订程度、修改任务表、蒸馏审稿语料、审稿知识库更新
  • Tasks that involve Peer review
  • Tasks that involve Word documents

Example prompts

  • “/nature-review-studio”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Editor letter and revision-level banner.
  2. Each reviewer in Overall assessment followed by numbered Major concerns
  3. Cross-review consensus, without divergence or editor-decision hints.
  4. Revision task table.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 665eca9. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Nature Review Studio loads about 974 tokens when it runs, and up to ~9.5k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 105 tokens; SKILL.md has 322 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~105
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~974
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~9.5k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

Without a licence we can't republish the file, so here is its outline and opening line. It has 322 words (~974 tokens).

“For review and respond, create exactly two synchronized user-facing files:”

— opening of SKILL.md by mumdark
name
nature-review-studio
version
1.4.1
inputs
manuscript (PDF / DOCX / TXT), reviewer_reports (optional PDF / DOCX / TXT), revised_manuscript (optional PDF / DOCX / TXT), target_journal (optional string)…
outputs
exactly one formal .docx file for review or respond, exactly one same-stem .md companion for review or respond, update_report for update only
references
references/workflow.md, references/review-axes.md, references/response-axes.md, references/adversarial-checklist.md, references/source-basis.md…

Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub

Files

SKILL.md and 7 other files (references) in skill of mumdark/nature-review-studio.

  • SKILL.md
  • README.md
  • references/adversarial-checklist.md
  • references/render-docx.md
  • references/response-axes.md
  • references/review-axes.md
  • references/source-basis.md
  • references/workflow.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 665eca9

Compare with similar skills

Nature Review Studio next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Nature Review Studio compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Nature Review Studio this skillmumdark/nature-review-studio146—~974Automated safety check: PassNone
AI Review SkillNeuroDong/Ai-Review628—~2.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Review Papermaxwell2732/my-submission-formatting-agent111—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Scholar Evaluationaipoch/medical-research-skills1.9k—~932Automated safety check: PassMIT
Sci Paper Revieweraipoch/medical-research-skills1.9k—~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Response Letteraipoch/medical-research-skills1.9k—~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • AI Review Skill

    NeuroDong/Ai-Review

    Generates structured AI paper reviews (SoT style) for LaTeX, PDF, and Word manuscripts.

    628 GitHub stars~2.5k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed
  • Review Paper

    maxwell2732/my-submission-formatting-agent

    Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, methodology, citation completeness, writing quality, and potential referee objections.

    111 GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed
  • Scholar Evaluation

    aipoch/medical-research-skills

    Implements the ScholarEval framework to evaluate scholarly documents; trigger when the user provides a PDF/DOCX/TXT file or pasted text and requests critique, scoring, or quality assessment.

    1.9k GitHub stars~932 tokensUpdated 24 days ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed
  • Sci Paper Reviewer

    aipoch/medical-research-skills

    Simulates a strict SCI peer-review workflow; trigger when a user uploads or pastes a manuscript (PDF/DOC/DOCX/TXT) and requests an innovation score (1–12) plus experimental-logic vulnerability…

    1.9k GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 24 days ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed
  • Response Letter

    aipoch/medical-research-skills

    Helps organize reviewer comments and generate a standardized Word (.docx) response letter that maps each change to its exact location (page/paragraph/line).

    1.9k GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated 24 days ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed
  • Paper Sprint Review

    aipoch/medical-research-skills

    Scrum-inspired paper review, revision, and R&R workflow. An agent skill from aipoch/medical-research-skills.

    1.9k GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated 24 days ago
    Documents & OfficeAuto-check passed

Works with

Questions about Nature Review Studio

What does Nature Review Studio do?

Multi-perspective manuscript review and point-by-point response generation, distilled from 1287 Nature Peer-Review-File PDFs (2025–2026). Nature Review Studio is an agent skill from mumdark/nature-review-studio. Multi-perspective manuscript review and point-by-point response generation, distilled from 1287 Nature Peer-Review-File PDFs (2025–2026).

When should I use Nature Review Studio?

Nature Review Studio fits situations like: 多视角审稿、高水平审稿、Nature 风格审稿、 审稿回复、逐条回复、修订程度、修改任务表、蒸馏审稿语料、审稿知识库更新; tasks that involve Peer review; tasks that involve Word documents.

How do I install Nature Review Studio in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add mumdark/nature-review-studio --skill nature-review-studio -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skill in mumdark/nature-review-studio) into .claude/skills/nature-review-studio in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Nature Review Studio in Codex?

Run `npx skills add mumdark/nature-review-studio --skill nature-review-studio -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skill in mumdark/nature-review-studio) into .agents/skills/nature-review-studio in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Nature Review Studio in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add mumdark/nature-review-studio --skill nature-review-studio -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/nature-review-studio, .gemini/skills/nature-review-studio, .github/skills/nature-review-studio and .opencode/skills/nature-review-studio in your project.

What does Nature Review Studio need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Nature Review Studio is instructions for the agent only.

Does Nature Review Studio access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Nature Review Studio safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Nature Review Studio use?

No licence was found for Nature Review Studio or its repository. Without one, default copyright applies: ask the author before reusing or redistributing it.

How many tokens does Nature Review Studio use?

About 974 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 8.5k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Nature Review Studio?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Nature Review Studio: AI Review Skill (NeuroDong/Ai-Review, 628 stars), Review Paper (maxwell2732/my-submission-formatting-agent, 111 stars), Scholar Evaluation (aipoch/medical-research-skills, 1.9k stars) and Sci Paper Reviewer (aipoch/medical-research-skills, 1.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Nature Review Studio?

mumdark (a GitHub user) maintains it in mumdark/nature-review-studio, which has 146 GitHub stars. The repository was last updated on August 29, 2026.

Source: mumdark/nature-review-studio on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.