Agent skill

Multi Jurisdiction Matrix

by mukul975 in mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

Guides building a multi-jurisdiction privacy compliance matrix for organisations operating across multiple countries.

Apache-2.0Auto-check passedLegal & Compliance

Install Multi Jurisdiction Matrix

skills CLI
$ npx skills add mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills --skill multi-jurisdiction-matrix -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills multi-jurisdiction-matrix --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/privacy/multi-jurisdiction-matrix .claude/skills/multi-jurisdiction-matrix && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
multi-jurisdiction-matrix
GitHub stars
301
Token cost
~2.7k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,164 words
Files
5 (incl. scripts, references, assets)
Skills in repo
280
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Apache-2.0

At a glance

Guides building a multi-jurisdiction privacy compliance matrix for organisations operating across multiple countries.

  • Works in 3 steps: Map Current Controls → Identify Gaps → Design Remediation
  • Tasks that involve Privacy and GDPR
  • SKILL.md covers Overview, Compliance Matrix Structure, Cross-Jurisdiction Requirement… and Harmonised Control Framework, plus 3 more sections
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder

What it does

Multi Jurisdiction Matrix is an agent skill from mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills. Guides building a multi-jurisdiction privacy compliance matrix for organisations operating across multiple countries. Covers common requirements identification, jurisdiction-specific deltas, gap analysis, and harmonised control frameworks. Keywords: multi-jurisdiction, compliance matrix, harmonised controls, gap analysis, jurisdiction mapping.

Its SKILL.md is about 2.7k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 7 other files, including scripts, reference files and assets (for example `assets/template.md`, `references/standards.md` and `references/workflows.md`).

It sits in Legal & Compliance, covering Privacy and GDPR. The repository describes itself as: 282+ structured privacy & data protection skills for AI agents. GDPR, CCPA, EU AI Act, HIPAA, LGPD, PIPL, DPDP Act. The licence is Apache-2.0.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Privacy and GDPR

Example prompts

  • “Use the multi-jurisdiction-matrix skill to guide building a multi-jurisdiction privacy compliance matrix for organisations operating across multiple…”
  • “/multi-jurisdiction-matrix”

Requirements

  • Python 3

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Map Current Controls
  2. Identify Gaps
  3. Design Remediation

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 9b2ef9e. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 1 file in scripts/ (Python), which the agent can run.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Multi Jurisdiction Matrix loads about 2.7k tokens when it runs, and up to ~4.4k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 93 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,164 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~93
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.7k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~4.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills at commit 9b2ef9e, republished under its Apache-2.0 licence (© mukul975). 1,164 words, ~2,689 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/multi-jurisdiction-matrix/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 4 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
multi-jurisdiction-matrix
description
Guides building a multi-jurisdiction privacy compliance matrix for organisations operating across multiple countries. Covers common requirements identification, jurisdiction-specific deltas, gap analysis, and harmonised control frameworks. Keywords: multi-jurisdiction, compliance matrix, harmonised controls, gap analysis, jurisdiction mapping.
license
Apache-2.0
metadata.author
mukul975
metadata.version
1.0
metadata.domain
privacy
metadata.subdomain
global-privacy-regulations
metadata.tags
multi-jurisdiction, compliance-matrix, harmonised-controls, gap-analysis, jurisdiction-mapping

Multi-Jurisdiction Privacy Compliance Matrix

Overview

Organisations operating across multiple jurisdictions face the challenge of complying with overlapping, divergent, and sometimes conflicting privacy requirements. A multi-jurisdiction compliance matrix provides a structured approach to identifying common requirements across all applicable privacy laws, mapping jurisdiction-specific variations (deltas), identifying gaps between current compliance posture and legal requirements, and designing harmonised controls that satisfy the most stringent requirements across all jurisdictions.

Compliance Matrix Structure

Dimension 1: Requirement Categories
CategorySub-Categories
Lawful basis for processingConsent, legitimate interest, contract, legal obligation, vital interests, public interest
Individual rightsAccess, correction, deletion/erasure, portability, restriction, objection, automated decision review
Consent managementForm, withdrawal, children, sensitive data, separate consent
Data collection and noticeNotice content, timing, language, format
Cross-border transfersMechanisms, adequacy, contractual safeguards, data localisation
Data protection officerAppointment criteria, qualifications, independence, functions
Breach notificationAuthority notification, individual notification, timelines, content
Impact assessmentWhen required, contents, review cycle
Security safeguardsTechnical measures, organisational measures, encryption, access control
Retention and deletionLimitation periods, destruction methods, legal holds
Enforcement and penaltiesAdministrative fines, criminal penalties, civil liability
Record-keepingProcessing records, consent records, transfer records, breach records
Dimension 2: Jurisdictions

For Zenith Global Enterprises, the compliance matrix covers:

JurisdictionPrimary LawRegulator
European UnionGDPRNational DPAs / EDPB
United KingdomUK GDPR + DPA 2018ICO
BrazilLGPD (Lei 13.709/2018)ANPD
ChinaPIPLCAC
South KoreaPIPAPIPC
IndiaDPDP Act 2023DPBI
ThailandPDPA B.E. 2562PDPC
SingaporePDPA 2012PDPC
JapanAPPIPPC
AustraliaPrivacy Act 1988OAIC
United StatesState laws (CCPA/CPRA, etc.)State AGs / CPPA (California)

Cross-Jurisdiction Requirement Comparison

Lawful Bases Comparison
JurisdictionConsentContractLegitimate InterestLegal ObligationVital InterestsOther Unique Bases
EU (GDPR)Art. 6(1)(a)Art. 6(1)(b)Art. 6(1)(f)Art. 6(1)(c)Art. 6(1)(d)Public interest (Art. 6(1)(e))
Brazil (LGPD)Art. 7, IArt. 7, VArt. 7, IXArt. 7, IIArt. 7, VIICredit protection (Art. 7, X); Research (Art. 7, IV); Public policy (Art. 7, III); Health (Art. 7, VIII); Exercise of rights (Art. 7, VI)
China (PIPL)Art. 13(1)Art. 13(2)NoneArt. 13(3)Art. 13(4)Publicly disclosed (Art. 13(6)); Other statutory (Art. 13(7))
Korea (PIPA)Art. 15(1)(1)Art. 15(1)(4)Art. 15(1)(6) (2023)Art. 15(1)(2)Art. 15(1)(5)Public institution duty (Art. 15(1)(3))
India (DPDP)Section 6N/A (under legitimate uses)N/ASection 7(c)Section 7(d)Employment (Section 7(f)); State functions (Section 7(b))
Japan (APPI)Implied consentPermitted purposeNone (use limitation approach)Statutory basisLife protectionPseudonymous processing (relaxed rules)
Breach Notification Timeline Comparison
JurisdictionAuthority TimelineIndividual TimelineThreshold
EU (GDPR)72 hours from awarenessWithout undue delayRisk to rights and freedoms
UK GDPR72 hours from awarenessWithout undue delayRisk to rights and freedoms
Brazil (LGPD)3 business days3 business daysRelevant risk or damage
China (PIPL)Promptly (no fixed deadline)PromptlyAny PI security incident
Korea (PIPA)72 hours (1,000+ individuals)Without delayAny breach
India (DPDP)72 hours (draft rules)72 hours (draft rules)Likely harm to data principal
Thailand (PDPA)72 hoursWithout delay if high riskAffects rights and freedoms
Singapore (PDPA)3 calendar days after assessmentAs soon as practicableSignificant harm OR 500+ individuals
Japan (APPI)3-5 business days (preliminary)PromptlyPPC-defined thresholds
Australia (Privacy Act)As soon as practicable (30-day assessment)As soon as practicableLikely serious harm
Children's Age Thresholds
JurisdictionAge ThresholdParental Consent Mechanism
EU (GDPR)16 (Member States may lower to 13)Art. 8: Parental consent for ISS
Brazil (LGPD)Best interest standardAt least one parent's consent
China (PIPL)Under 14 = minor PIParent/guardian consent
Korea (PIPA)Under 14Legal representative consent
India (DPDP)Under 18Verifiable parental consent
Thailand (PDPA)Under 10 for parental consentParent/guardian consent
Singapore (PDPA)No specific age (reasonable expectations)Not specified
Japan (APPI)No specific thresholdGeneral consent rules apply
AustraliaUnder 18 (reform amendments)Best interests standard; children's code

Harmonised Control Framework

Principle: Highest Common Denominator

The harmonised control framework applies the most stringent requirement from any jurisdiction as the baseline control, ensuring compliance across all operating jurisdictions.

Show full SKILL.md (495 more words)Show less
Harmonised Controls for Zenith Global Enterprises
Control AreaHarmonised StandardDriven By
ConsentFree, specific, informed, unambiguous, separate per purpose, with easy withdrawalEU GDPR + China PIPL separate consent
Breach notification72 hours to authority + individuals simultaneouslyEU GDPR / Korea PIPA / India DPDP
Children's consentParental consent for all processing of under-18 dataIndia DPDP (18 threshold)
DPO appointmentAppoint in all jurisdictions with >500 employees or significant processingEU GDPR / Thailand PDPA / Brazil LGPD
Impact assessmentConduct for all high-risk processing, cross-border transfers, automated decisionsEU GDPR + China PIPL + Australia (2024)
RetentionDelete within 5 days of purpose fulfilmentKorea PIPA (most stringent)
SecurityAES-256 encryption at rest and TLS 1.3 in transitCross-jurisdiction best practice
Cross-border transferContractual safeguards + TIA + consent where requiredEU GDPR SCCs + China PIPL mechanisms
Record-keeping7-year retention for consent records, processing records, transfer recordsIndia DPDP (7-year consent manager), extended by statutory requirements
Automated decisionsTransparency notice + human review + impact assessmentEU GDPR Art. 22 + Australia 2024

Jurisdiction-Specific Deltas

Requirements Unique to Specific Jurisdictions
DeltaJurisdictionRequirementHarmonised Approach
Credit protection basisBrazilArt. 7, X — lawful basis for credit protectionDocument where Brazil-specific basis is relied upon
Separate consent (单独同意)ChinaFive specific separate consent triggersImplement separate consent globally where any trigger is met
Pre-transfer informationJapanProvide destination country PI protection system info before consentInclude in all cross-border consent forms globally
DNC Registry checkSingaporeMandatory check before telephone/SMS marketingImplement DNC checking in Singapore; voluntary in other jurisdictions
Data localisationChina (CIIO)CIIO must store data in PRCLocal storage for PRC data; process copies abroad
Resident registration number encryptionKoreaMandatory encryption for RRNEncrypt all government identifiers in all jurisdictions
Consent ManagerIndiaRegistered intermediary for consent managementIntegrate with consent manager in India; optional elsewhere
Pseudonymisation frameworkKorea / JapanStatutory pseudonymisation frameworksImplement pseudonymisation programme meeting both PIPA and APPI standards

Gap Identification Process

Step 1: Map Current Controls
  1. Document existing privacy controls, policies, and procedures.
  2. Map each control to the requirements of each applicable jurisdiction.
  3. Identify controls that satisfy requirements in multiple jurisdictions.
Step 2: Identify Gaps
  1. For each jurisdiction, identify requirements not met by existing controls.
  2. Classify gaps as: critical (legal non-compliance), significant (enforcement risk), or minor (best practice deficit).
  3. Prioritise gaps based on: regulatory activity in the jurisdiction, potential penalty exposure, data subject volume.
Step 3: Design Remediation
  1. Where possible, design a single harmonised control that addresses the gap across all jurisdictions.
  2. Where harmonisation is not possible (conflicting requirements), design jurisdiction-specific controls.
  3. Estimate remediation effort and timeline.
  4. Assign ownership and track implementation.

Compliance Matrix Governance

ElementDetail
Matrix ownerChief Privacy Officer, Zenith Global Enterprises
Update frequencyQuarterly for law changes; annual comprehensive review
Change triggerNew jurisdiction entry, significant law amendment, enforcement action
Review committeePrivacy Steering Committee (CPO, regional DPOs, Legal, IT Security)
ToolCompliance matrix maintained in GRC platform with automated law change alerts

© mukul975, Apache-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 4 other files (scripts, references, assets) in skills/privacy/multi-jurisdiction-matrix of mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • assets/template.md
  • references/standards.md
  • references/workflows.md
  • scripts/process.py

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 9b2ef9e

Compare with similar skills

Multi Jurisdiction Matrix next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Multi Jurisdiction Matrix compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Multi Jurisdiction Matrix this skillmukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills301—~2.7kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
C15tc15t/c15t1.9k1 repos~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
HIPAA Safe Harbor Coverage Auditmaziyarpanahi/openmed5.5k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Korean Privacy Termskimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms587—~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Gdpr ComplianceSushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance9461 repos~3.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hipaa ComplianceSushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance9461 repos~2.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • C15t

    c15t/c15t

    Work with c15t consent management docs, APIs, and integrations for Next.js, React, and JavaScript.

    1.9k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.6k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Checks OpenMed de-identified clinical text against the 18 HIPAA Safe Harbor identifier categories and reports gaps and residual re-identification risk.

    5.5k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated today
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Korean Privacy Terms

    kimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms

    처리방침·이용약관 자동 생성 스킬 패키지 (v4.0). An agent skill from kimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms.

    587 GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Gdpr Compliance

    Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance

    Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing…

    946 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.9k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Hipaa Compliance

    Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance

    Expert HIPAA compliance assistant for healthcare and software contexts.

    946 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.3k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Pii Contract Analyze

    gregmos/PII-Shield

    Universal legal document processor with PII anonymization. An agent skill from gregmos/PII-Shield.

    150 GitHub stars~8.9k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check: notes

More from mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

All 280 skills in this repo
  • Age Gating Services

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age.

    301 GitHub stars~3.7k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Data Retention

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Manages AI model retention and machine unlearning requirements.

    301 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Dpia

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Conducts Data Protection Impact Assessments for AI and ML systems per EDPB Guidelines 04/2025 on AI processing.

    301 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Dpia Mitigation Plan

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Structures risk mitigation planning and residual risk tracking for Data Protection Impact Assessments under GDPR Article 35(7)(d).

    301 GitHub stars~846 tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Gdpr Accountability

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Guides implementation of the GDPR accountability principle under Articles 5(2) and 24, including documentation requirements for policies, DPIAs, RoPA, training records, and breach logs.

    301 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Pia Threshold Screening

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Conducts pre-DPIA threshold screening to determine whether a full Data Protection Impact Assessment is required under GDPR Article 35.

    301 GitHub stars~880 tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Multi Jurisdiction Matrix

What does Multi Jurisdiction Matrix do?

Guides building a multi-jurisdiction privacy compliance matrix for organisations operating across multiple countries. Multi Jurisdiction Matrix is an agent skill from mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills. Guides building a multi-jurisdiction privacy compliance matrix for organisations operating across multiple countries.

When should I use Multi Jurisdiction Matrix?

Multi Jurisdiction Matrix fits situations like: tasks that involve Privacy and GDPR.

How do I install Multi Jurisdiction Matrix in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills --skill multi-jurisdiction-matrix -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/privacy/multi-jurisdiction-matrix in mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills) into .claude/skills/multi-jurisdiction-matrix in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Multi Jurisdiction Matrix in Codex?

Run `npx skills add mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills --skill multi-jurisdiction-matrix -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/privacy/multi-jurisdiction-matrix in mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills) into .agents/skills/multi-jurisdiction-matrix in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Multi Jurisdiction Matrix in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills --skill multi-jurisdiction-matrix -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/multi-jurisdiction-matrix, .gemini/skills/multi-jurisdiction-matrix, .github/skills/multi-jurisdiction-matrix and .opencode/skills/multi-jurisdiction-matrix in your project.

What does Multi Jurisdiction Matrix need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Multi Jurisdiction Matrix needs Python for the scripts in its folder. Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Multi Jurisdiction Matrix access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Multi Jurisdiction Matrix safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Multi Jurisdiction Matrix use?

Multi Jurisdiction Matrix is published under the Apache-2.0 licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Multi Jurisdiction Matrix use?

About 2.7k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 11k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 1.7k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Multi Jurisdiction Matrix?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Multi Jurisdiction Matrix: C15t (c15t/c15t, 1.9k stars), HIPAA Safe Harbor Coverage Audit (maziyarpanahi/openmed, 5.5k stars), Korean Privacy Terms (kimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms, 587 stars) and Gdpr Compliance (Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance, 946 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Multi Jurisdiction Matrix?

mukul975 (a GitHub user) maintains it in mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills, which has 301 GitHub stars. The repository holds 280 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on March 16, 2026.

Source: mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.