Agent skill

Children Deletion Requests

by mukul975 in mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

Manages deletion requests for children's personal data. An agent skill from mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills.

Apache-2.0Auto-check passedLegal & Compliance

Install Children Deletion Requests

skills CLI
$ npx skills add mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills --skill children-deletion-requests -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills children-deletion-requests --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/privacy/children-deletion-requests .claude/skills/children-deletion-requests && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
children-deletion-requests
GitHub stars
301
Token cost
~4.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
2,089 words
Files
5 (incl. scripts, references, assets)
Skills in repo
280
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Apache-2.0

At a glance

Manages deletion requests for children's personal data. An agent skill from mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills.

  • Works in 6 steps: Receive and Log Request → Verify Requester Identity and Authority → Determine Scope of Deletion → …
  • Tasks that involve Privacy and GDPR
  • SKILL.md covers Overview, Legal Framework, Who Can Request Deletion and Deletion Request Processing…, plus 5 more sections
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder

What it does

Children Deletion Requests is an agent skill from mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills. Manages deletion requests for children's personal data. Covers parental-initiated versus child-initiated requests, age of capacity assessment, identity verification, scope determination, third-party notification obligations, and regulatory timelines under GDPR Art. 17, COPPA Section 312.6, and UK AADC Standard 15. Keywords: deletion, children, right to erasure, parental request, data deletion, COPPA.

Its SKILL.md is about 4.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 7 other files, including scripts, reference files and assets (for example `assets/template.md`, `references/standards.md` and `references/workflows.md`).

It sits in Legal & Compliance, covering Privacy and GDPR. The repository describes itself as: 282+ structured privacy & data protection skills for AI agents. GDPR, CCPA, EU AI Act, HIPAA, LGPD, PIPL, DPDP Act. The licence is Apache-2.0.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Privacy and GDPR

Example prompts

  • “Use the children-deletion-requests skill to manage deletion requests for children's personal data. An agent skill from…”
  • “/children-deletion-requests”

Requirements

  • Python 3

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Receive and Log Request
  2. Verify Requester Identity and Authority
  3. Determine Scope of Deletion
  4. Execute Deletion
  5. Confirm Deletion
  6. Post-Deletion Verification

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 9b2ef9e. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 1 file in scripts/ (Python), which the agent can run.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Children Deletion Requests loads about 4.6k tokens when it runs, and up to ~9.3k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 108 tokens; SKILL.md has 2,089 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~108
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.6k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~9.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills at commit 9b2ef9e, republished under its Apache-2.0 licence (© mukul975). 2,089 words, ~4,622 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/children-deletion-requests/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 4 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
children-deletion-requests
description
Manages deletion requests for children's personal data. Covers parental-initiated versus child-initiated requests, age of capacity assessment, identity verification, scope determination, third-party notification obligations, and regulatory timelines under GDPR Art. 17, COPPA Section 312.6, and UK AADC Standard 15. Keywords: deletion, children, right to erasure, parental request, data deletion, COPPA.
license
Apache-2.0
metadata.author
mukul975
metadata.version
1.0
metadata.domain
privacy
metadata.subdomain
children-data-protection
metadata.tags
deletion, children, right-to-erasure, parental-request, data-deletion, coppa

Managing Deletion Requests for Children's Data

Overview

Deletion of children's personal data operates under heightened obligations compared to adult data deletion. Under GDPR Article 17, the right to erasure applies with particular force when data was collected from a child — Article 17(1)(f) explicitly creates a right to erasure where personal data has been collected in relation to the offer of information society services to a child under Article 8(1). COPPA Section 312.6 requires operators to provide parents with the ability to review and delete personal information collected from their child. The UK AADC Standard 15 requires prominent and accessible tools to help children exercise their data protection rights. This skill provides a comprehensive framework for processing deletion requests involving children's data, including the complex questions of who can request deletion, verification procedures, scope determination, and third-party notification.

GDPR Article 17(1)(f) — Right to Erasure for Children's Data

"The data subject shall have the right to obtain from the controller the erasure of personal data concerning him or her without undue delay and the controller shall have the obligation to erase personal data without undue delay where [...] the personal data have been collected in relation to the offer of information society services directly to a child referred to in Article 8(1)."

This ground for erasure is distinct from the other Art. 17(1) grounds because:

  • It does not require that the original lawful basis has been withdrawn (unlike Art. 17(1)(b) consent withdrawal)
  • It does not require that the data is no longer necessary (unlike Art. 17(1)(a))
  • It applies specifically because the data was collected from a child, regardless of whether the data subject is still a child at the time of the request
  • The CJEU has confirmed in Case C-131/12 (Google Spain) that the right to erasure is especially important where the data was collected when the data subject was a minor
GDPR Article 17(2) — Third-Party Notification

"Where the controller has made the personal data public, the controller shall, taking account of available technology and the cost of implementation, take reasonable steps, including technical measures, to inform controllers which are processing the personal data that the data subject has requested the erasure [...] of any links to, or copy or replication of, those personal data."

GDPR Article 12(3) — Response Timeline

"The controller shall provide information on action taken on a request under Articles 15 to 22 to the data subject without undue delay and in any event within one month of receipt of the request."

COPPA Section 312.6 — Parental Access and Deletion Rights
  • 312.6(a): Operator must provide a parent, upon request, with a description of the specific types of personal information collected from the child, and the opportunity to refuse to permit the operator's further use or future online collection of personal information from that child, and to direct the operator to delete the personal information collected from that child
  • 312.6(b): The operator must delete the child's personal information within a reasonable time after receiving the parental request
UK AADC Standard 15 — Online Tools

"Provide prominent and accessible tools to help children exercise their data protection rights and report concerns."

Who Can Request Deletion

Parental-Initiated Deletion

Applicable When: The child is below the age at which they can independently exercise data protection rights.

JurisdictionAge Below Which Parent ActsLegal Basis
GDPR (default)16 (or national threshold 13-16)Art. 8(1) — parental consent grounds extend to parental exercise of rights
UK13 (DPA 2018 Section 9)ICO guidance: parent exercises rights for children who cannot understand the implications
US (COPPA)1316 CFR 312.6 — explicit parental right to direct deletion
France15Loi Informatique et Libertes Art. 45
Germany16GDPR default
Spain14Organic Law 3/2018 Art. 7

Verification Requirements:

  • Verify that the requester is the parent or legal guardian of the child
  • Verification methods (proportionate to risk): match against existing parental account, email verification to registered parent email, knowledge-based questions, government ID (for high-risk scenarios)
  • Verify the identity of the child whose data is to be deleted (match against account records)
Child-Initiated Deletion

Applicable When: The child has reached sufficient maturity to understand and exercise their data protection rights independently.

Age of Capacity Assessment:

The capacity of a child to independently exercise data protection rights is not determined solely by the Art. 8 age threshold. The ICO has stated that a child who is competent to understand their rights may exercise them independently, regardless of the Art. 8 threshold. This is analogous to the Gillick competency principle in UK common law.

ScenarioWho InitiatesCapacity Assessment
Child aged 10 requests deletionParent must submit the requestChild below Art. 8 threshold in all jurisdictions; lacks capacity
Child aged 14 in Belgium (threshold 13) requests deletionChild can submit independentlyAbove national threshold; presumed competent
Child aged 14 in Germany (threshold 16) requests deletionDepends on maturity assessmentBelow national threshold; controller may accept if child demonstrates understanding
Former child (now 18) requests deletion of childhood dataFormer child submits independentlyAdult; full capacity; Art. 17(1)(f) explicitly protects this scenario
Former Child (Adult) Requesting Deletion of Childhood Data

Art. 17(1)(f) does not require the data subject to still be a child at the time of the request. An adult may request deletion of personal data collected when they were a child. This is particularly relevant for:

  • Social media posts from adolescence
  • Educational records from childhood
  • Health data from paediatric treatment
  • Photos and videos uploaded by the child or their parents during childhood

The GDPR explicitly supports this by creating Art. 17(1)(f) as a standalone ground — the passage of time does not diminish the right.

Deletion Request Processing Workflow

Step 1: Receive and Log Request
Request received
│
├─ Channel: email / parental dashboard / in-app tool / postal mail
├─ Requester identity: parent / child / former child (adult)
├─ Child identifier: account ID / name / email
├─ Scope requested: full account deletion / specific data categories
├─ Timestamp: [logged automatically]
├─ Reference number assigned: DEL-CHILD-[YEAR]-[SEQ]
│
└─ Acknowledgement sent within 48 hours
Step 2: Verify Requester Identity and Authority
RequesterVerification MethodEscalation
Parent (existing account)Match request email against registered parent email + security questionIf match fails, request government ID
Parent (no existing account)Request proof of parental relationship (birth certificate or equivalent) + matching identificationManual review by DPO
Child (above threshold, existing account)Match request against child's registered email + account securityIf match fails, involve parent
Child (below threshold)Redirect to parent; inform child their parent can submit the requestProvide parent contact mechanism
Former child (adult)Standard identity verification (email + security question or ID)Manual review if account is historical
Step 3: Determine Scope of Deletion
Scope ElementDefault InclusionExceptions
Account profile data (name, DOB, email)YESNone
Activity/usage logsYESAnonymised aggregate retained for analytics
Content created by child (posts, projects, uploads)YESOffer download before deletion
Communication records (messages, chats)YESMay retain if needed for ongoing safeguarding investigation
Parental consent recordsRETAINED for 6 yearsLegal compliance: statute of limitations for GDPR enforcement
Financial transaction recordsRETAINED for applicable periodLegal compliance: tax and accounting obligations
Safety/moderation logsRETAINED if active investigationSafeguarding obligation override per Art. 17(3)(d)
Backup copiesYES (scheduled purge)Deleted within backup rotation cycle (max 30 days)
Third-party copiesNOTIFIED for deletionArt. 17(2) obligation to inform third-party controllers
Show full SKILL.md (929 more words)Show less
Step 4: Execute Deletion

Timeline: Within one month of verified request (Art. 12(3)). Extension of up to two additional months permitted for complex requests, with notification to the requester within the initial one-month period.

Technical Deletion Process:

  1. Primary database: Execute DELETE operations across all tables containing the child's personal data
  2. Search indices: Remove the child's data from Elasticsearch, Solr, or equivalent search indices
  3. Caches: Invalidate all cached entries containing the child's data (Redis, CDN, application cache)
  4. File storage: Delete uploaded files (photos, documents, audio) from primary storage (S3, Azure Blob, GCS)
  5. Analytics databases: Remove or anonymise records in analytics systems (BigQuery, Redshift, Snowflake)
  6. Logs: Purge application logs containing the child's personal data (ELK stack, Splunk, CloudWatch)
  7. Machine learning models: If the child's data was used to train ML models, assess whether the model must be retrained or whether the training data inclusion is irreversible (document the assessment)
  8. Backups: Schedule deletion from backup systems within the next backup rotation cycle (max 30 days)
  9. Third-party notification: Send deletion requests to all third parties that received the child's data per Art. 17(2)
Step 5: Confirm Deletion
json
{
  "deletion_reference": "DEL-CHILD-2026-0284",
  "child_identifier": "child_bp_8f3a2d",
  "requester": "parent_bp_c7e4f1",
  "requester_type": "parent",
  "request_date": "2026-02-15T09:00:00Z",
  "verification_date": "2026-02-16T11:30:00Z",
  "deletion_scope": {
    "account_data": "deleted",
    "activity_logs": "deleted",
    "content": "deleted (download offered, declined by parent)",
    "communications": "deleted",
    "consent_records": "retained (legal compliance, expiry 2032-02-16)",
    "backups": "scheduled_purge_2026-03-16"
  },
  "third_party_notifications": [
    {
      "recipient": "AWS (hosting provider)",
      "notification_date": "2026-02-17",
      "scope": "all stored objects for child account",
      "confirmation": "pending"
    }
  ],
  "deletion_completed_date": "2026-02-17T14:00:00Z",
  "backup_purge_date": "2026-03-16T02:00:00Z",
  "confirmation_sent_to_requester": "2026-02-17T14:30:00Z"
}
Step 6: Post-Deletion Verification
  1. Attempt to retrieve the child's data from all systems listed in Step 4
  2. Confirm that no personal data is returned from any system (except legally retained records)
  3. Log the verification outcome
  4. Schedule backup purge verification for 30 days after primary deletion

BrightPath Learning Inc. — Deletion Implementation

Deletion Channels
ChannelDescriptionResponse Time
Parental dashboardOne-click "Delete Account" button with confirmation dialogImmediate processing
In-app (child)"Delete my stuff" button in privacy centre (for children above threshold)Immediate processing
Emailprivacy@brightpathlearning.euAcknowledgement within 48 hours
PostalBrightPath Learning Inc., 200 Education Lane, Amsterdam, 1012 AB, NetherlandsAcknowledgement within 5 business days
Deletion Flow (Parental Dashboard)
Parent clicks "Delete Alex's Account"
│
├─ Confirmation dialog:
│  "This will permanently delete Alex's account and all their data,
│   including learning progress and any work they've saved.
│   This cannot be undone."
│  [Download Alex's data first]  [Delete everything]  [Cancel]
│
├─ If "Download first" selected:
│  ├─ Generate data export (JSON + PDF progress report)
│  ├─ Email download link to parent (valid for 7 days)
│  └─ Return to deletion confirmation
│
├─ If "Delete everything" selected:
│  ├─ Re-verify parent identity (password or security question)
│  ├─ Execute deletion across all systems
│  ├─ Send confirmation email to parent
│  └─ Display confirmation: "Alex's account and data have been deleted.
│      Backup copies will be removed within 30 days."
│
└─ If "Cancel" selected:
   └─ Return to dashboard (no action taken)
Handling Competing Interests
ScenarioOutcomeRationale
Parent requests deletion; child wants to keep accountParent's request takes priority for children below thresholdParent holds consent authority under Art. 8
Child (16+) requests deletion; parent wants to retainChild's request takes priorityChild above UK threshold; autonomous rights holder
School requests deletion of student data; parent wants to retainDelete from BrightPath; inform parent they may retain their own copiesSchool's FERPA/contractual authority governs school-directed data
Safeguarding investigation active on the child's accountRetention of relevant data permitted under Art. 17(3)(d)Vital interests / public interest in protection of the child
Child's data needed for ongoing legal claimRetention permitted under Art. 17(3)(e)Legal claims exception

Exception Grounds — When Deletion Can Be Refused

Art. 17(3) provides exceptions where the right to erasure does not apply:

ExceptionArt. 17(3) ReferenceApplication to Children's Data
Freedom of expressionArt. 17(3)(a)Rarely applies to children's data; would require compelling journalistic or artistic purpose
Legal obligationArt. 17(3)(b)Tax records of transactions; mandatory educational records under national law
Public healthArt. 17(3)(c)Vaccination records; public health surveillance data
Archiving in public interestArt. 17(3)(d)Educational research (with ethical approval and anonymisation)
Legal claimsArt. 17(3)(e)Data needed for establishment, exercise, or defence of legal claims

Important: Even where an exception applies, the controller should delete as much data as possible and retain only the minimum necessary to satisfy the exception.

Common Compliance Failures

  1. No child-accessible deletion tool: Requiring children to navigate adult-oriented privacy settings or contact forms to exercise deletion rights
  2. Parental deletion blocked by verification failure: Overly burdensome verification requirements that prevent parents from exercising deletion rights
  3. Incomplete deletion scope: Deleting the account profile but retaining activity logs, analytics data, or cached copies
  4. No backup deletion: Deleting from production systems but retaining data indefinitely in backups
  5. No third-party notification: Failing to notify third parties that received the child's data per Art. 17(2)
  6. Exceeding the one-month timeline: Processing deletion requests beyond the Art. 12(3) one-month deadline without notifying the requester of an extension
  7. No deletion of historical data on adult request: Refusing to delete childhood data when the (now adult) data subject requests it, on the grounds that the data is "old" or "archived"

Enforcement Precedents

  • Google (CJEU, C-131/12, Google Spain, 2014): Established the right to erasure including for data published during minority; the Court emphasised the importance of erasure for information that is "inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive"
  • TikTok (ICO, 2023): GBP 12.7 million fine included findings on failure to provide adequate mechanisms for parents and children to exercise rights including deletion
  • Musical.ly/TikTok (FTC, 2019): USD 5.7 million settlement required TikTok to delete all information collected from children under 13 and provide a mechanism for parents to request deletion going forward
  • Edmodo (FTC, 2023): USD 6 million penalty; order required Edmodo to delete children's personal information collected in violation of COPPA and establish a deletion program
  • Google (CNIL France, 2022): EUR 150 million fine for making it difficult for users to refuse cookies; the CNIL noted the platform's large child user base as an aggravating factor, and the difficulty children would face in exercising opt-out rights

Integration Points

  • Children's Data Minimisation: Data minimisation reduces the scope and complexity of deletion — less data collected means less data to delete
  • COPPA Compliance: COPPA Section 312.6 provides explicit parental deletion rights that operate alongside GDPR Art. 17
  • GDPR Parental Consent: The parent who gave consent under Art. 8 has the authority to request deletion by withdrawing consent under Art. 7(3)
  • EdTech Privacy Assessment: School-directed EdTech must handle deletion requests from both parents and schools, with end-of-year deletion as standard
  • UK AADC Implementation: AADC Standard 15 requires prominent, accessible deletion tools designed for children

© mukul975, Apache-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 4 other files (scripts, references, assets) in skills/privacy/children-deletion-requests of mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • assets/template.md
  • references/standards.md
  • references/workflows.md
  • scripts/process.py

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 9b2ef9e

Compare with similar skills

Children Deletion Requests next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Children Deletion Requests compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Children Deletion Requests this skillmukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills301—~4.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
C15tc15t/c15t1.9k1 repos~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
HIPAA Safe Harbor Coverage Auditmaziyarpanahi/openmed5.5k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Korean Privacy Termskimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms587—~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Gdpr ComplianceSushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance9461 repos~3.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hipaa ComplianceSushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance9461 repos~2.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • C15t

    c15t/c15t

    Work with c15t consent management docs, APIs, and integrations for Next.js, React, and JavaScript.

    1.9k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.6k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Checks OpenMed de-identified clinical text against the 18 HIPAA Safe Harbor identifier categories and reports gaps and residual re-identification risk.

    5.5k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated today
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Korean Privacy Terms

    kimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms

    처리방침·이용약관 자동 생성 스킬 패키지 (v4.0). An agent skill from kimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms.

    587 GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Gdpr Compliance

    Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance

    Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing…

    946 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.9k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Hipaa Compliance

    Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance

    Expert HIPAA compliance assistant for healthcare and software contexts.

    946 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.3k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Pii Contract Analyze

    gregmos/PII-Shield

    Universal legal document processor with PII anonymization. An agent skill from gregmos/PII-Shield.

    150 GitHub stars~8.9k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check: notes

More from mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

All 280 skills in this repo
  • Age Gating Services

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age.

    301 GitHub stars~3.7k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Data Retention

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Manages AI model retention and machine unlearning requirements.

    301 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Dpia

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Conducts Data Protection Impact Assessments for AI and ML systems per EDPB Guidelines 04/2025 on AI processing.

    301 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Dpia Mitigation Plan

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Structures risk mitigation planning and residual risk tracking for Data Protection Impact Assessments under GDPR Article 35(7)(d).

    301 GitHub stars~846 tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Gdpr Accountability

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Guides implementation of the GDPR accountability principle under Articles 5(2) and 24, including documentation requirements for policies, DPIAs, RoPA, training records, and breach logs.

    301 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Pia Threshold Screening

    mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills

    Conducts pre-DPIA threshold screening to determine whether a full Data Protection Impact Assessment is required under GDPR Article 35.

    301 GitHub stars~880 tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Children Deletion Requests

What does Children Deletion Requests do?

Manages deletion requests for children's personal data. An agent skill from mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills. Children Deletion Requests is an agent skill from mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills. Manages deletion requests for children's personal data.

When should I use Children Deletion Requests?

Children Deletion Requests fits situations like: tasks that involve Privacy and GDPR.

How do I install Children Deletion Requests in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills --skill children-deletion-requests -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/privacy/children-deletion-requests in mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills) into .claude/skills/children-deletion-requests in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Children Deletion Requests in Codex?

Run `npx skills add mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills --skill children-deletion-requests -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/privacy/children-deletion-requests in mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills) into .agents/skills/children-deletion-requests in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Children Deletion Requests in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills --skill children-deletion-requests -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/children-deletion-requests, .gemini/skills/children-deletion-requests, .github/skills/children-deletion-requests and .opencode/skills/children-deletion-requests in your project.

What does Children Deletion Requests need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Children Deletion Requests needs Python for the scripts in its folder. Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Children Deletion Requests access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Children Deletion Requests safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Children Deletion Requests use?

Children Deletion Requests is published under the Apache-2.0 licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Children Deletion Requests use?

About 4.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 18k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 4.7k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Children Deletion Requests?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Children Deletion Requests: C15t (c15t/c15t, 1.9k stars), HIPAA Safe Harbor Coverage Audit (maziyarpanahi/openmed, 5.5k stars), Korean Privacy Terms (kimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms, 587 stars) and Gdpr Compliance (Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance, 946 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Children Deletion Requests?

mukul975 (a GitHub user) maintains it in mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills, which has 301 GitHub stars. The repository holds 280 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on March 16, 2026.

Source: mukul975/Privacy-Data-Protection-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.