Agent skill

Subcontractor Scorecard

by mohitagw15856 in mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

Score a subcontractor's performance across schedule reliability, quality, safety, paperwork, and change-order behaviour with weighted anchors.

MITAuto-check passed

Install Subcontractor Scorecard

skills CLI
$ npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill subcontractor-scorecard -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills subcontractor-scorecard --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/subcontractor-scorecard .claude/skills/subcontractor-scorecard && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
subcontractor-scorecard
GitHub stars
1.4k
Token cost
~1.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
657 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
1,348
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Score a subcontractor's performance across schedule reliability, quality, safety, paperwork, and change-order behaviour with weighted anchors.

  • Asked to evaluate a sub
  • SKILL.md covers What This Skill Produces, Required Inputs, Scoring Framework and Output Format, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
  • Build a subcontractor scorecard

What it does

Subcontractor Scorecard is an agent skill from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills. Score a subcontractor's performance across schedule reliability, quality, safety, paperwork, and change-order behaviour with weighted anchors. Use when asked to evaluate a sub, build a subcontractor scorecard, decide whether to rebid or rehire a trade, review sub performance for prequalification, or justify removing a sub from the bid list. Produces a weighted scorecard with per-dimension anchored ratings, evidence notes, and an award/retention recommendation.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: 1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Asked to evaluate a sub
  • Build a subcontractor scorecard
  • Decide whether to rebid
  • Review sub performance for prequalification

Example prompts

  • “/subcontractor-scorecard”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 1cbf1f0. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Subcontractor Scorecard loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 122 tokens; SKILL.md has 657 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~122
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills at commit 1cbf1f0, republished under its MIT licence (© mohitagw15856). 657 words, ~1,376 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/subcontractor-scorecard/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
subcontractor-scorecard
description
Score a subcontractor's performance across schedule reliability, quality, safety, paperwork, and change-order behaviour with weighted anchors. Use when asked to evaluate a sub, build a subcontractor scorecard, decide whether to rebid or rehire a trade, review sub performance for prequalification, or justify removing a sub from the bid list. Produces a weighted scorecard with per-dimension anchored ratings, evidence notes, and an award/retention recommendation.

Subcontractor Scorecard Skill

Every GC has a mental list of subs they'd hire again and subs they'd rather eat the higher bid to avoid. This skill turns that instinct into a defensible record: five weighted dimensions, anchored 1–5 scales so two reviewers score alike, evidence per rating, and a recommendation you can put in front of a preconstruction meeting — or a sub's principal — without it reading as a grudge.

What This Skill Produces

  • A weighted scorecard across five dimensions with a 0–100 composite score
  • Anchored 1–5 ratings per dimension with the evidence behind each
  • A recommendation tier: preferred / approved / conditional / do-not-rebid
  • Feedback points suitable for a performance conversation with the sub
  • Optional side-by-side comparison when scoring multiple subs in a trade

Required Inputs

Ask for what's missing; from partial data, score what's evidenced and mark unscored dimensions [insufficient data] rather than guessing:

  • Sub and trade, projects covered by the evaluation, contract values
  • Schedule facts — milestones hit/missed, manpower vs. commitments, recovery behaviour
  • Quality facts — punch item counts vs. trade norms, rework/back-charges, inspection failures, submittal quality
  • Safety facts — recordables/near-misses on your sites, EMR if known, toolbox/permit compliance
  • Paperwork facts — timeliness of lien waivers, certified payroll, insurance certs, closeout docs
  • Change-order behaviour — pricing reasonableness, claims posture, T&M ticket discipline

Scoring Framework

Score each dimension 1–5 against the anchors, then weight:

DimensionWeight1 (fails)3 (solid)5 (excellent)
Schedule reliability30%Chronic slips, ghost crews, drives the critical path lateHits most dates; slips flagged early with recovery planHits dates, staffs to plan, accelerates when asked without drama
Quality / rework25%Repeated failed inspections, punch counts far above trade norm, back-charged reworkNormal punch volume, closes items promptly, rare reworkFirst-time-quality culture; punch list light and closed fast
Safety20%Recordable(s) from ignored controls; fights the safety programCompliant; participates in briefings; near-misses reportedBrings hazards to you first; crews self-police; clean record
Paperwork discipline10%Chases required for waivers/certs; closeout drags monthsMostly on time with remindersBilling, waivers, and closeout docs arrive right, first time
Change-order behaviour15%Weaponises COs — lowball bid, then claims on every RFIPrices changes fairly with backup; negotiates in good faithFlags cost issues before they're changes; transparent pricing

Composite = Σ(rating × weight) × 20, giving 0–100. Map to a recommendation:

  • 85–100 Preferred — invite to negotiate, consider for design-assist
  • 70–84 Approved — keep on the bid list
  • 55–69 Conditional — rebid with specific conditions (named super, weekly look-ahead, tighter retainage)
  • <55 Do-not-rebid — document why; a low bid from this sub isn't a low cost

Safety scores of 1–2 cap the overall recommendation at Conditional regardless of composite — a sub who hurts people isn't "preferred" at any price.

Show full SKILL.md (219 more words)Show less

Output Format

Subcontractor Scorecard: [Sub] — [Trade] — [Period/projects]

1. Composite score & recommendation tier — with the one-paragraph justification. 2. Dimension table — | Dimension | Weight | Rating (1–5) | Evidence | 3. Trend note — improving, stable, or declining vs. prior projects, if history given. 4. Conditions / feedback points — specific, evidence-backed items for the sub conversation. 5. Data gaps — dimensions scored on thin evidence, flagged [insufficient data].

Quality Checks

  • Every rating cites specific evidence (project, event, count) — no vibes-only scores
  • Weights sum to 100% and the composite math is shown
  • Safety cap rule applied if safety scored 1–2
  • Recommendation tier follows from the score — or the override is stated and justified
  • Feedback points are usable in a face-to-face with the sub's principal without escalating

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not let one bad final month erase a good project — score the whole evaluation period
  • Do not score paperwork as highly as schedule — the weights exist because the failure modes aren't equal
  • Do not average away a safety failure inside the composite — apply the cap rule
  • Do not write "poor attitude" as evidence — describe the behaviour and its project impact
  • Do not score dimensions you have no data for — mark [insufficient data] and say what record-keeping would fix it

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Evaluate a sub."
  • "Build a subcontractor scorecard."
  • "Decide whether to rebid."
  • "Rehire a trade."
  • "Review sub performance for prequalification."

© mohitagw15856, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in skills/subcontractor-scorecard of mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 1cbf1f0

Compare with similar skills

Subcontractor Scorecard next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Subcontractor Scorecard compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Subcontractor Scorecard this skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.4k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Scheduleasgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks69k—~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassCC0-1.0
Scheduleasgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks69k—~597Automated safety check: PassCC0-1.0
Claw Scoreopenclaw/openclaw392k—~2.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Cron Scheduleruvnet/ruflo74k—~257Automated safety check: PassMIT
Harness Scoreruvnet/ruflo74k—~605Automated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Schedule

    asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks

    Create, update, list, or run scheduled cloud agents (routines) that execute on a cron schedule.

    69k GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Productivity & AutomationAuto-check passed
  • Schedule

    asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks

    Create or update a scheduled task that runs automatically. An agent skill from asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks.

    69k GitHub stars~597 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Productivity & AutomationAuto-check passed
  • Claw Score

    openclaw/openclaw

    Audit or refresh OpenClaw maturity scorecard docs from root taxonomy, maturity scores, and QA evidence artifacts without using maintainer discrawl data or committed inventory reports.

    392k GitHub stars~2.5k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Cron Schedule

    ruvnet/ruflo

    Schedule persistent background workers via CronCreate. An agent skill from ruvnet/ruflo.

    74k GitHub stars~257 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Productivity & AutomationAuto-check passed
  • Harness Score

    ruvnet/ruflo

    5-dimension harness readiness scorecard from metaharness score {path}.

    74k GitHub stars~605 tokensUpdated yesterday
    DevelopmentAuto-check: notes
  • Scheduling

    asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks

    Find meeting or appointment times, create private calendar holds or invitations, and reschedule or cancel events within the user's authorization.

    69k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed

More from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

All 1,348 skills in this repo
  • Car Tco

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Compare the total cost of car ownership across buy-new, buy-used, lease, and keep-your-current-car — depreciation, insurance, maintenance ramp, and fuel over a real horizon, not just the monthly…

    1.4k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Cs Health Scorecard

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Build a customer health scorecard for a specific account. An agent skill from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.

    1.4k GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Exit Waterfall

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Compute who gets what at each exit price from a cap table — liquidation preferences, conversion points, and where the founders' share collapses.

    1.4k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Feature Prioritisation

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Apply prioritisation frameworks (RICE, MoSCoW, Kano, ICE, Opportunity Scoring) to rank features and backlog items.

    1.4k GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Fire Number

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Compute a financial-independence (FIRE) target and years-to-reach with every assumption labeled as an assumption — plus a sensitivity table instead of a single false-precision answer.

    1.4k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Freelance Rate

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Derive a freelance day/hourly rate backwards from target income, honest billable utilization, overhead, and the self-employment tax premium — the arithmetic that proves a rate is not salary÷2000.

    1.4k GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Subcontractor Scorecard

What does Subcontractor Scorecard do?

Score a subcontractor's performance across schedule reliability, quality, safety, paperwork, and change-order behaviour with weighted anchors. Subcontractor Scorecard is an agent skill from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills. Score a subcontractor's performance across schedule reliability, quality, safety, paperwork, and change-order behaviour with weighted anchors.

When should I use Subcontractor Scorecard?

Subcontractor Scorecard fits situations like: asked to evaluate a sub; build a subcontractor scorecard; decide whether to rebid; review sub performance for prequalification.

How do I install Subcontractor Scorecard in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill subcontractor-scorecard -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/subcontractor-scorecard in mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills) into .claude/skills/subcontractor-scorecard in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Subcontractor Scorecard in Codex?

Run `npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill subcontractor-scorecard -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/subcontractor-scorecard in mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills) into .agents/skills/subcontractor-scorecard in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Subcontractor Scorecard in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill subcontractor-scorecard -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/subcontractor-scorecard, .gemini/skills/subcontractor-scorecard, .github/skills/subcontractor-scorecard and .opencode/skills/subcontractor-scorecard in your project.

What does Subcontractor Scorecard need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Subcontractor Scorecard is instructions for the agent only.

Does Subcontractor Scorecard access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Subcontractor Scorecard safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Subcontractor Scorecard use?

Subcontractor Scorecard is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Subcontractor Scorecard use?

About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Subcontractor Scorecard?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Subcontractor Scorecard: Schedule (asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks, 69k stars), Schedule (asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks, 69k stars), Claw Score (openclaw/openclaw, 392k stars) and Cron Schedule (ruvnet/ruflo, 74k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Subcontractor Scorecard?

mohitagw15856 (a GitHub user) maintains it in mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills, which has 1,434 GitHub stars. The repository holds 1,348 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 9, 2026.

Source: mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.