Agent skill

Security Review

by mohitagw15856 in mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

Review a design, PR, or feature for security issues before it ships.

MITAuto-check passedSecurity

Install Security Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill security-review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills security-review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/security-review .claude/skills/security-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
security-review
GitHub stars
1.4k
Token cost
~973 tokens
SKILL.md length
441 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
1,348
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Review a design, PR, or feature for security issues before it ships.

  • Works in 6 steps: AuthN / AuthZ — is identity verified,… → Input handling — validation/encoding;… → Secrets & crypto — hard-coded secrets,… → …
  • Asked to do a security review
  • SKILL.md covers Required Inputs, Output Format, Quality Checks and Anti-Patterns, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Security Review is an agent skill from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills. Review a design, PR, or feature for security issues before it ships. Use when asked to do a security review, security-review a change/PR, or check a feature for vulnerabilities. Produces a structured review across the common risk areas (authn/authz, input handling, secrets, data exposure, dependencies), findings ranked by severity with concrete fixes, and a ship / fix-first verdict. For code and systems you own or are authorized to review.

Its SKILL.md is about 970 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Security, covering Security review, Authentication and Authorization and RBAC. The repository describes itself as: 1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Asked to do a security review
  • Security-review a change/PR
  • Check a feature for vulnerabilities

Example prompts

  • “/security-review”

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. AuthN / AuthZ — is identity verified, and is every action authorized (incl. object-level / IDOR, privilege escalation)?
  2. Input handling — validation/encoding; injection (SQL/command/template), SSRF, path traversal, deserialization, XSS.
  3. Secrets & crypto — hard-coded secrets, key handling, weak/absent crypto, tokens in logs/URLs.
  4. Data exposure — over-broad responses, PII in logs/errors, missing encryption in transit/at rest, verbose errors.
  5. Dependencies & config — known-vuln libraries, insecure defaults, missing security headers, CORS, permissions.
  6. Abuse & availability — rate-limiting, resource exhaustion, business-logic abuse, missing audit logging.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 1cbf1f0. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Security Review loads about 973 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 115 tokens; SKILL.md has 441 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~115
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~973

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills at commit 1cbf1f0, republished under its MIT licence (© mohitagw15856). 441 words, ~973 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/security-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
security-review
description
Review a design, PR, or feature for security issues before it ships. Use when asked to do a security review, security-review a change/PR, or check a feature for vulnerabilities. Produces a structured review across the common risk areas (authn/authz, input handling, secrets, data exposure, dependencies), findings ranked by severity with concrete fixes, and a ship / fix-first verdict. For code and systems you own or are authorized to review.

Security Review Skill

A security review is a focused pass for the ways a change could be abused — before it reaches production. This skill reviews a design, PR, or feature against the recurring risk areas, ranks findings by severity, and gives a clear verdict with concrete fixes. It's for code/systems you own or are authorized to review, and it complements (not replaces) automated scanners and a formal pentest.

Not quite this? Use vendor-security-review when you are assessing a third-party vendor rather than your own design.

Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:

  • What's under review — the design/diff/feature, and what it does.
  • Context — the stack, where it runs, what data/permissions it touches, who can reach it (internet-facing? authenticated?).
  • Sensitivity — the assets involved (PII, credentials, money, admin capability) and the threat context.

Output Format

Security review: [change/feature]

Summary & verdict — one-line read and a call: ✅ ship / 🔁 fix-first / ⛔ block, with the gating issue(s).

Review by risk area — scan each and note findings:

  1. AuthN / AuthZ — is identity verified, and is every action authorized (incl. object-level / IDOR, privilege escalation)?
  2. Input handling — validation/encoding; injection (SQL/command/template), SSRF, path traversal, deserialization, XSS.
  3. Secrets & crypto — hard-coded secrets, key handling, weak/absent crypto, tokens in logs/URLs.
  4. Data exposure — over-broad responses, PII in logs/errors, missing encryption in transit/at rest, verbose errors.
  5. Dependencies & config — known-vuln libraries, insecure defaults, missing security headers, CORS, permissions.
  6. Abuse & availability — rate-limiting, resource exhaustion, business-logic abuse, missing audit logging.

Findings (ranked) — each with severity, where, why it's exploitable, and the fix:

SeverityAreaFinding (how it's exploited)Fix
🔴 Critical/High
🟡 Medium
🔵 Low / hardening

What's done well — controls already in place (so they're kept).

Follow-ups — anything needing a scanner, a pentest, or a deeper look.

Show full SKILL.md (158 more words)Show less

Quality Checks

  • Every standard risk area is considered (authz incl. IDOR, input/injection, secrets, data exposure, deps, abuse)
  • Findings are ranked by severity with a concrete, actionable fix each
  • Exploitability is explained — why it's a real issue in this context, not a generic warning
  • A clear ship / fix-first / block verdict names the gating issues
  • Existing good controls are acknowledged; deeper follow-ups (scanner/pentest) are flagged

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not produce a generic checklist — tie each finding to this code/design and its exploit path
  • Do not rank everything the same — separate critical from hardening nits
  • Do not report an issue without a fix — give the concrete remediation
  • Do not miss authorization (IDOR/privilege) — it's the most common real-world web flaw
  • Do not review code you don't own or aren't authorized to assess

Based On

Secure code/design review practice (OWASP Top 10 & ASVS risk areas, severity-ranked findings, actionable remediation).

Example Trigger Phrases

  • "Do a security review?"
  • "Security-review a change/PR."
  • "Check a feature for vulnerabilities."

© mohitagw15856, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in skills/security-review of mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 1cbf1f0

Compare with similar skills

Security Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Security Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Security Review this skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills1.4k—~973Automated safety check: PassMIT
Security Review ChecklistZeroDeng01/sublinkPro1.7k—~2.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Security ConvexIgorWarzocha/Opencode-Workflows122—~3.1kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Discover Securityrand/cc-polymath181—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Frontend Review Securitymizchi/skills360—~1.7kAutomated safety check: NotesNone
Cb Security HardeningBlkLeg/CircuitBreaker201—~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Security Review Checklist

    ZeroDeng01/sublinkPro

    Checklist-driven security review for changes to authentication, authorization, MFA, secrets, input validation and other security-critical code.

    1.7k GitHub stars~2.3k tokensUpdated yesterday
    SecurityAuto-check passed
  • Security Convex

    IgorWarzocha/Opencode-Workflows

    Review Convex security audit patterns for authentication and authorization.

    122 GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated 8 mo ago
    SecurityAuto-check passed
  • Discover Security

    rand/cc-polymath

    Automatically discover security skills when working with authentication, authorization, input validation, security headers, vulnerability assessment, or secrets management.

    181 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 7 mo ago
    SecurityAuto-check passed
  • A skill your agent uses when conducting a frontend security review — static analysis (risky HTML patterns, env var exposure), authentication/authorization audit (token storage, route guards…

    360 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    SecurityAuto-check: notes
  • Cb Security Hardening

    BlkLeg/CircuitBreaker

    Enforces Circuit Breaker security hardening conventions across backend, frontend, Docker, and nginx.

    201 GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Backend & APIsAuto-check passed
  • Absolute Audit

    maddhruv/absolute

    Vulnerability and security scan (defensive, your own repo): dependency CVEs plus risky code patterns (secrets, injection, weak authz), severity x reachability triaged and remediated without…

    219 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.2k tokens
    SecurityAuto-check passed

More from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

All 1,348 skills in this repo
  • Car Tco

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Compare the total cost of car ownership across buy-new, buy-used, lease, and keep-your-current-car — depreciation, insurance, maintenance ramp, and fuel over a real horizon, not just the monthly…

    1.4k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Cs Health Scorecard

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Build a customer health scorecard for a specific account. An agent skill from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.

    1.4k GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Exit Waterfall

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Compute who gets what at each exit price from a cap table — liquidation preferences, conversion points, and where the founders' share collapses.

    1.4k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Feature Prioritisation

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Apply prioritisation frameworks (RICE, MoSCoW, Kano, ICE, Opportunity Scoring) to rank features and backlog items.

    1.4k GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Fire Number

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Compute a financial-independence (FIRE) target and years-to-reach with every assumption labeled as an assumption — plus a sensitivity table instead of a single false-precision answer.

    1.4k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Freelance Rate

    mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills

    Derive a freelance day/hourly rate backwards from target income, honest billable utilization, overhead, and the self-employment tax premium — the arithmetic that proves a rate is not salary÷2000.

    1.4k GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Security Review

What does Security Review do?

Review a design, PR, or feature for security issues before it ships. Security Review is an agent skill from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills. Review a design, PR, or feature for security issues before it ships.

When should I use Security Review?

Security Review fits situations like: asked to do a security review; security-review a change/PR; check a feature for vulnerabilities.

How do I install Security Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill security-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/security-review in mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills) into .claude/skills/security-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Security Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill security-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/security-review in mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills) into .agents/skills/security-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Security Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill security-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/security-review, .gemini/skills/security-review, .github/skills/security-review and .opencode/skills/security-review in your project.

What does Security Review need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Security Review is instructions for the agent only.

Does Security Review access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Security Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Security Review use?

Security Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Security Review use?

About 973 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Security Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Security Review: Security Review Checklist (ZeroDeng01/sublinkPro, 1.7k stars), Security Convex (IgorWarzocha/Opencode-Workflows, 122 stars), Discover Security (rand/cc-polymath, 181 stars) and Frontend Review Security (mizchi/skills, 360 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Security Review?

mohitagw15856 (a GitHub user) maintains it in mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills, which has 1,434 GitHub stars. The repository holds 1,348 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 9, 2026.

Source: mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.