Wp Performance Review
elvismdev/claude-wordpress-skills
WordPress performance code review and optimization analysis.
Write structured, balanced performance reviews from bullet-point inputs.
Install Performance Review
$ npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill performance-review -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills performance-review --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/performance-review .claude/skills/performance-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "performance-review" agent skill from https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/performance-review into .claude/skills/performance-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "performance-review", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/performance-reviewType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill performance-review -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills performance-review --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/performance-review .agents/skills/performance-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "performance-review" agent skill from https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/performance-review into .agents/skills/performance-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "performance-review", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill performance-review -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills performance-review --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/performance-review .cursor/skills/performance-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "performance-review" agent skill from https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/performance-review into .cursor/skills/performance-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "performance-review", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git --path skills/performance-review--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill performance-review -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills performance-review --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/performance-review .gemini/skills/performance-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "performance-review" agent skill from https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/performance-review into .gemini/skills/performance-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "performance-review", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills performance-reviewInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill performance-review -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/performance-review .github/skills/performance-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "performance-review" agent skill from https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/performance-review into .github/skills/performance-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "performance-review", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill performance-review -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills performance-review --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/performance-review .opencode/skills/performance-review && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "performance-review" agent skill from https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/performance-review into .opencode/skills/performance-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "performance-review", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
performance-review- GitHub stars
- 1.4k
- Token cost
- ~1.4k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 678 words
- Files
- 2 (incl. references)
- Skills in repo
- 1,348
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
Write structured, balanced performance reviews from bullet-point inputs.
- Asked to write a performance review
- SKILL.md covers Required Inputs, Output Structure, Overall Summary and Achievements & Impact, plus 10 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
- Self-assessment
What it does
Performance Review is an agent skill from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills. Write structured, balanced performance reviews from bullet-point inputs. Use when asked to write a performance review, self-assessment, peer review, 360 feedback, or manager evaluation. Produces a complete, fair, professionally written review covering achievements, areas for growth, and development goals.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 2 other files, including reference files (for example `references/evidence-not-adjectives.md`).
It sits in Business, Finance & HR, covering Performance reviews. The repository describes itself as: 1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Asked to write a performance review
- Self-assessment
- Manager evaluation
Example prompts
- “/performance-review”
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 1cbf1f0. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Performance Review loads about 1.4k tokens when it runs, and up to ~2k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 81 tokens; SKILL.md has 678 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills at commit 1cbf1f0, republished under its MIT licence (© mohitagw15856). 678 words, ~1,409 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/performance-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 1 other file; get the full folder from GitHub.- name
- performance-review
- description
- Write structured, balanced performance reviews from bullet-point inputs. Use when asked to write a performance review, self-assessment, peer review, 360 feedback, or manager evaluation. Produces a complete, fair, professionally written review covering achievements, areas for growth, and development goals.
Performance Review Skill
This skill turns rough notes, bullet points, or bullet-point memories into a complete, professionally written performance review. Output is ready to submit or use as a strong first draft.
Not quite this? Use
ai-assisted-performance-reviewwhen much of the person's output was produced with AI tools and attribution matters.
Required Inputs
Ask the user for these if not provided:
- Review type (Self-assessment / Manager review / Peer/360 / Upward feedback)
- Review period (e.g. H1 2025, Q2 2025, Annual)
- Name of person being reviewed (or "myself" for self-assessment)
- Role / level
- Key achievements or notable work (rough notes are fine)
- Areas where they struggled or could improve (be honest — reviews without growth areas aren't credible)
- Key projects or deliverables from the period
- Company values or competencies to assess against (optional — if provided, structure the review around them)
- Overall rating/recommendation (if the form requires one)
Output Structure
Performance Review: [Name]
Role: [Title / Level] Review period: [Period] Review type: [Manager / Self / Peer / Upward] Reviewed by: [If known]
Overall Summary
[3–5 sentences. High-level characterisation of the period. Acknowledge standout contributions. Be specific — use project names and outcomes, not vague praise. For self-assessments, this should reflect honestly on the period without underselling or overselling.]
Achievements & Impact
[3–5 achievements, each structured as:]
[Achievement title — specific and concrete] [2–4 sentences. What was the context? What did [name] do specifically? What was the measurable or observable outcome? Avoid generic praise — every sentence should be something only this person could have done.]
Strengths Demonstrated
[3–4 bullet points. Each bullet = one strength, with one concrete example from the review period. No abstract traits without evidence.]
- [Strength]: [Example — specific project or behaviour that demonstrated this]
Areas for Growth
[2–3 areas. Be direct and constructive — not vague. Frame as "opportunity to develop" not "failure." Each should include:]
[Area name]
- Observed pattern: [What was noticed — be specific, not personal]
- Why it matters: [Impact on team, output, or career progression]
- Suggested development: [One concrete action — e.g. "Take on [X] responsibility next half" or "Shadow [role] on [process]"]
Development Goals for Next Period
[2–3 goals. Format each as:]
Goal [N]: [Clear, outcome-oriented goal]
- Why: [Connection to growth areas or career aspirations]
- How to measure: [What "done" looks like]
- Support needed: [Resources, training, or manager input required]
Competency Ratings (if framework provided)
| Competency | Rating | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| [Competency from company framework] | [Exceeds / Meets / Developing / Below] | [One-sentence example] |
Closing Recommendation
[2–3 sentences. For manager reviews: overall assessment and any promotion/compensation recommendation. For self-assessments: what you're asking for or committing to. For peer reviews: one sentence on what it's like to work with this person.]
Show full SKILL.md (255 more words)Show less
Writing Rules
- Never use vague phrases: "strong communicator," "team player," "hardworking" — always back with evidence
- Growth areas must be honest — reviewers who only write positives lose credibility and help no one
- Use third person for manager/peer reviews, first person for self-assessments
- Avoid jargon — "drove alignment" and "leveraged synergies" are meaningless. Use plain language.
- If the user gives sparse notes, ask for one concrete example per achievement before writing
Deeper Materials
references/evidence-not-adjectives.md— the adjective→evidence substitution table and the calibration rules that keep files honest
Quality Checks
- Every achievement includes a specific outcome (not just activity)
- Strengths have concrete examples from the review period
- Growth areas are honest and constructive (not softened to meaninglessness)
- Development goals are measurable
- No vague phrases without evidence
- Tone is professional and fair throughout
Anti-Patterns
- Do not inflate positive language to avoid difficult feedback — growth areas must be clearly stated, not buried
- Do not include feedback that isn't supported by specific examples — every development point needs evidence
- Do not write a review that only covers what happened in the last month — the full review period must be considered
- Do not omit development goals — a review without forward-looking guidance is incomplete
- Do not use language that could be read as discriminatory — avoid references to personality traits unrelated to work performance
Example Trigger Phrases
- "Write a performance review for [name] based on these notes: [paste notes]"
- "Help me write my self-assessment for [period]"
- "Draft a peer review for my colleague who did [description]"
- "Turn these bullet points into a full performance review: [paste bullets]"
© mohitagw15856, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
SKILL.md and 1 other file (references) in skills/performance-review of mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.
- SKILL.md
- references/evidence-not-adjectives.md
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 1cbf1f0
Compare with similar skills
Performance Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Review this skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills | 1.4k | — | ~1.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Wp Performance Reviewelvismdev/claude-wordpress-skills | 235 | 1 repos | ~4.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Align Humanagentscope-ai/OpenJudge | 871 | — | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| Run Mv Hoi Reconstructionnvidia-isaac/video_to_data | 861 | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Company Analysiszhu1090093659/dsh-trading | 238 | — | ~4.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | Custom licence | |
| Windbg Diagnostic Methodmicrosoft/win-dev-skills | 466 | — | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
Align Human
agentscope-ai/OpenJudge
A skill your agent uses when the user has a judge/grader and human-labeled data, and wants to measure how well the judge agrees with humans, detect systematic biases, determine whether automatic…
Run Mv Hoi Reconstruction
nvidia-isaac/video_to_data
Run and validate the repository-local multi-view camera calibration and human-object reconstruction pipelines.
Company Analysis
zhu1090093659/dsh-trading
A skill your agent uses when the user wants to analyze a listed company, stock, business, or investment target; challenge or revise an existing company report; compare A/H or primary-listing/ADR…
- Official
Windbg Diagnostic Method
microsoft/win-dev-skills
Use with every WinDbg plugin investigation to apply evidence-first reasoning, confidence calibration, contrarian review, structured reporting, and deterministic validation.
AI Index
mizchi/skills
Method and tooling for measuring how AI-generated a piece of prose reads, in Japanese or English.
More from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
All 1,348 skills in this repoCar Tco
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Compare the total cost of car ownership across buy-new, buy-used, lease, and keep-your-current-car — depreciation, insurance, maintenance ramp, and fuel over a real horizon, not just the monthly…
Cs Health Scorecard
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Build a customer health scorecard for a specific account. An agent skill from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.
Exit Waterfall
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Compute who gets what at each exit price from a cap table — liquidation preferences, conversion points, and where the founders' share collapses.
Feature Prioritisation
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Apply prioritisation frameworks (RICE, MoSCoW, Kano, ICE, Opportunity Scoring) to rank features and backlog items.
Fire Number
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Compute a financial-independence (FIRE) target and years-to-reach with every assumption labeled as an assumption — plus a sensitivity table instead of a single false-precision answer.
Freelance Rate
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Derive a freelance day/hourly rate backwards from target income, honest billable utilization, overhead, and the self-employment tax premium — the arithmetic that proves a rate is not salary÷2000.
Related
Categories
Questions about Performance Review
What does Performance Review do?
Write structured, balanced performance reviews from bullet-point inputs. Performance Review is an agent skill from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills. Write structured, balanced performance reviews from bullet-point inputs.
When should I use Performance Review?
Performance Review fits situations like: asked to write a performance review; self-assessment; manager evaluation.
How do I install Performance Review in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill performance-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/performance-review in mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills) into .claude/skills/performance-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Performance Review in Codex?
Run `npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill performance-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/performance-review in mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills) into .agents/skills/performance-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Performance Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill performance-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/performance-review, .gemini/skills/performance-review, .github/skills/performance-review and .opencode/skills/performance-review in your project.
What does Performance Review need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Performance Review is instructions for the agent only.
Does Performance Review access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Performance Review safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Performance Review use?
Performance Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Performance Review use?
About 1.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 566 tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.
What are the alternatives to Performance Review?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Performance Review: Wp Performance Review (elvismdev/claude-wordpress-skills, 235 stars), Align Human (agentscope-ai/OpenJudge, 871 stars), Run Mv Hoi Reconstruction (nvidia-isaac/video_to_data, 861 stars) and Company Analysis (zhu1090093659/dsh-trading, 238 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Performance Review?
mohitagw15856 (a GitHub user) maintains it in mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills, which has 1,434 GitHub stars. The repository holds 1,348 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 9, 2026.
Source: mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.