DeepTutor CLI
HKUDS/DeepTutor
Teaches the agent to set up and run DeepTutor from the command line: chat and capabilities, knowledge bases, partners, memory, sessions, notebooks and the server or Web app.
Review a deck against a rubric instead of taste — the five dimensions (argument, evidence, density, arc, honesty), the severity-sorted feedback that separates broken from suboptimal, and the review…
Install Deck Review Rubric
$ npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill deck-review-rubric -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills deck-review-rubric --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/deck-review-rubric .claude/skills/deck-review-rubric && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "deck-review-rubric" agent skill from https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/deck-review-rubric into .claude/skills/deck-review-rubric/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "deck-review-rubric", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/deck-review-rubricType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill deck-review-rubric -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills deck-review-rubric --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/deck-review-rubric .agents/skills/deck-review-rubric && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "deck-review-rubric" agent skill from https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/deck-review-rubric into .agents/skills/deck-review-rubric/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "deck-review-rubric", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill deck-review-rubric -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills deck-review-rubric --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/deck-review-rubric .cursor/skills/deck-review-rubric && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "deck-review-rubric" agent skill from https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/deck-review-rubric into .cursor/skills/deck-review-rubric/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "deck-review-rubric", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git --path skills/deck-review-rubric--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill deck-review-rubric -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills deck-review-rubric --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/deck-review-rubric .gemini/skills/deck-review-rubric && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "deck-review-rubric" agent skill from https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/deck-review-rubric into .gemini/skills/deck-review-rubric/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "deck-review-rubric", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills deck-review-rubricInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill deck-review-rubric -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/deck-review-rubric .github/skills/deck-review-rubric && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "deck-review-rubric" agent skill from https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/deck-review-rubric into .github/skills/deck-review-rubric/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "deck-review-rubric", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill deck-review-rubric -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills deck-review-rubric --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/deck-review-rubric .opencode/skills/deck-review-rubric && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "deck-review-rubric" agent skill from https://github.com/mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills/tree/main/skills/deck-review-rubric into .opencode/skills/deck-review-rubric/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "deck-review-rubric", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
deck-review-rubric- GitHub stars
- 1.4k
- Token cost
- ~1.5k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 695 words
- Files
- 1
- Skills in repo
- 1,348
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
Review a deck against a rubric instead of taste — the five dimensions (argument, evidence, density, arc, honesty), the severity-sorted feedback that separates broken from suboptimal, and the review…
- Works in 5 steps: Argument first — the skim test: read… → Evidence per claim: each headline's… → Severity discipline is the review's… → …
- Asked review my deck
- SKILL.md covers What This Skill Produces, Required Inputs, Framework: The Rubric Rules and Output Format, plus 7 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
Deck Review Rubric is an agent skill from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills. Review a deck against a rubric instead of taste — the five dimensions (argument, evidence, density, arc, honesty), the severity-sorted feedback that separates broken from suboptimal, and the review conversation that improves the deck without rewriting it in the reviewer's voice. Use when asked review my deck, give feedback on this presentation, is this ready for the board, or our deck reviews are just font opinions. Produces the rubric scores with evidence, the severity-sorted feedback, the…
Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.
It sits in Education, covering Quizzes and assessments. The repository describes itself as: 1255 professional Agent Skills for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor & Codex — PRDs, postmortems, leases, medical bills, layoffs, go-bags, new countries. Plain markdown, MIT, in… The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- Asked review my deck
- Give feedback on this presentation
- Is this ready for the board
- Our deck reviews are just font opinions
Example prompts
- “/deck-review-rubric”
Workflow steps
5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Argument first — the skim test: read only the headlines: is there a case with an ask? Topic-titled slides, missing asks, and sequences…
- Evidence per claim: each headline's slide either proves it or doesn't — overclaimed charts, anecdotes carrying prevalence claims, and the…
- Severity discipline is the review's value: 🔴 = fails in the room (broken argument, dishonest chart, no ask) · 🟡 = costs force (walls of…
- Two fixes, named: the closing call — "fix these two and this deck works: (1) the ask is missing, add slide 9; (2) slides 4–6 are one…
- Review the deck, not your deck: the reviewer's restructuring instinct ("I'd tell this differently") is ⚪ unless the current structure…
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 1cbf1f0. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
Deck Review Rubric loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 146 tokens; SKILL.md has 695 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills at commit 1cbf1f0, republished under its MIT licence (© mohitagw15856). 695 words, ~1,457 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/deck-review-rubric/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).- name
- deck-review-rubric
- description
- Review a deck against a rubric instead of taste — the five dimensions (argument, evidence, density, arc, honesty), the severity-sorted feedback that separates broken from suboptimal, and the review conversation that improves the deck without rewriting it in the reviewer's voice. Use when asked review my deck, give feedback on this presentation, is this ready for the board, or our deck reviews are just font opinions. Produces the rubric scores with evidence, the severity-sorted feedback, the two-fixes-that-matter-most call, and the reviewer discipline notes.
Deck Review Rubric Skill
Deck reviews default to taste: font opinions, color takes, and "I'd reorder this" — the reviewer's aesthetic imposed at slide grain while the deck's actual failure (no argument, no ask, dishonest chart) sails through unexamined. The rubric reviews what decks fail at: argument (do the headlines make a case — deck-outline-first skim test), evidence (does each slide prove its claim — evidence-grading weight), density (billboard or wall — slide-density-rules), arc (does tension carry the room — deck-narrative-arc), and honesty (axes, claims, caveats — citation-hygiene). Findings sort by severity — broken beats suboptimal beats taste — and the review ends with the only sentence presenters can act on: the two fixes that matter most.
What This Skill Produces
- The rubric scores — the five dimensions, each with the evidence for its score (cited slides, not vibes)
- The severity-sorted findings — 🔴 broken (would fail in the room) / 🟡 suboptimal (costs force) / ⚪ taste (offered, labeled)
- The two-fixes call — the highest-leverage changes, because forty comments produce paralysis and two produce a better deck
- The reviewer discipline — the review-comments-resolver contract honored from the giving side
Required Inputs
Ask for these if not provided:
- The deck and its job — audience, ask, time slot; a deck can't be reviewed against an unknown mission (the most common finding is that the mission itself is undefined — that's a 🔴, not a formatting note)
- The review's timing — outline stage (structure feedback is cheap — the ideal), draft (full rubric), night-before (triage: 🔴 only, kindly)
- The presenter's stakes and experience — a first-time board presenter needs the confidence-preserving version: same findings, framed as upgrades
- What the presenter wants checked — their stated worry gets explicit attention (and the review says what it found there)
Framework: The Rubric Rules
- Argument first — the skim test: read only the headlines: is there a case with an ask? Topic-titled slides, missing asks, and sequences that don't argue are 🔴 findings that outrank everything visual — a beautiful deck with no argument is a screensaver.
- Evidence per claim: each headline's slide either proves it or doesn't — overclaimed charts, anecdotes carrying prevalence claims, and the missing caveat are the substance findings. The honesty sweep rides here: axes, windows, sources, the "studies show" ban.
- Severity discipline is the review's value: 🔴 = fails in the room (broken argument, dishonest chart, no ask) · 🟡 = costs force (walls of text, buried wow, sagging middle) · ⚪ = taste (labeled as such, take-or-leave). A review that presents font kerning and a missing ask at equal volume has abdicated its job.
- Two fixes, named: the closing call — "fix these two and this deck works: (1) the ask is missing, add slide 9; (2) slides 4–6 are one claim, merge them" — because the presenter has one evening, and the rubric's forty observations compress into the two that move the outcome.
- Review the deck, not your deck: the reviewer's restructuring instinct ("I'd tell this differently") is ⚪ unless the current structure fails the rubric — the deck stays the presenter's (house-style-enforcer voice-preservation logic). Timing shapes kindness: night-before reviews deliver 🔴s only, with the fix attached, and save the 🟡 education for the retro.
Show full SKILL.md (194 more words)Show less
Output Format
Deck Review: [deck] — for [audience/ask] · stage: [outline/draft/final]
Rubric Scores
| Dimension | Score | Evidence (slides cited) |
|---|---|---|
| [Argument · Evidence · Density · Arc · Honesty] |
Findings (severity-sorted)
🔴 Broken: [each: slide, what fails in the room, the fix] 🟡 Costs force: […] ⚪ Taste (labeled): […]
The Two Fixes
[1 · 2 — the highest-leverage pair, with why]
On Your Stated Worry
[What the review found about the thing they asked about]
Quality Checks
- All five dimensions scored with slide citations
- Every finding carries its severity honestly — no taste smuggled into 🟡
- The two-fixes call exists and is genuinely highest-leverage
- The presenter's stated worry got an explicit answer
- Night-before reviews delivered 🔴 only
Anti-Patterns
- Do not review taste at finding volume — label it ⚪ or leave it home
- Do not equalize severities — the missing ask and the font choice are different emergencies
- Do not rewrite the deck in your voice — rubric failures get fixes; style differences get silence
- Do not deliver forty comments — the two-fixes compression is the review's actual deliverable
- Do not soften 🔴s for kindness — the room will deliver them unsoftened tomorrow
Example Trigger Phrases
- "Review my deck."
- "Give feedback on this presentation."
- "Is this ready for the board?"
- "Our deck reviews are just font opinions."
© mohitagw15856, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
Just SKILL.md in skills/deck-review-rubric of mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 1cbf1f0
Compare with similar skills
Deck Review Rubric next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deck Review Rubric this skillmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills | 1.4k | — | ~1.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| DeepTutor CLIHKUDS/DeepTutor | 41k | — | ~2.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | Apache-2.0 | |
| AI Engineering Placement Quizrohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch | 67k | — | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Codebase to Coursezarazhangrui/codebase-to-course | 5.7k | — | ~4.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| AI Engineering Phase Quizrohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch | 67k | — | ~2.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Scholar EvaluationK-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer | 2.4k | 2 repos | ~2.9k | Automated safety check: Notes | MIT |
Similar skills
AI Engineering Placement Quiz
rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch
Runs a 10-question quiz across five areas to place a learner in the AI Engineering from Scratch curriculum, so they skip what they already know.
Codebase to Course
zarazhangrui/codebase-to-course
Turns a codebase into an interactive single-page HTML course for non-technical learners, with scroll modules, animated diagrams, quizzes and plain-English code translations.
AI Engineering Phase Quiz
rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch
Quizzes you on a completed phase of the AI Engineering from Scratch course, taking a phase number or name and mapping it to that phase's directory.
Scholar Evaluation
K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer
Provide qualitative-first, evidence-traceable developmental review of scholarly works and audit low-stakes research-assessment rubrics with optional local quality controls.
Evaluation
guanyang/open-agent-hub
This skill should be used when building agent evaluation systems: deterministic checks, regression suites, multi-dimensional rubrics, quality gates, production monitoring, baseline comparison, and…
More from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
All 1,348 skills in this repoCar Tco
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Compare the total cost of car ownership across buy-new, buy-used, lease, and keep-your-current-car — depreciation, insurance, maintenance ramp, and fuel over a real horizon, not just the monthly…
Cs Health Scorecard
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Build a customer health scorecard for a specific account. An agent skill from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills.
Exit Waterfall
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Compute who gets what at each exit price from a cap table — liquidation preferences, conversion points, and where the founders' share collapses.
Feature Prioritisation
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Apply prioritisation frameworks (RICE, MoSCoW, Kano, ICE, Opportunity Scoring) to rank features and backlog items.
Fire Number
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Compute a financial-independence (FIRE) target and years-to-reach with every assumption labeled as an assumption — plus a sensitivity table instead of a single false-precision answer.
Freelance Rate
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Derive a freelance day/hourly rate backwards from target income, honest billable utilization, overhead, and the self-employment tax premium — the arithmetic that proves a rate is not salary÷2000.
Related
Categories
Questions about Deck Review Rubric
What does Deck Review Rubric do?
Review a deck against a rubric instead of taste — the five dimensions (argument, evidence, density, arc, honesty), the severity-sorted feedback that separates broken from suboptimal, and the review…. Deck Review Rubric is an agent skill from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills. Review a deck against a rubric instead of taste — the five dimensions (argument, evidence, density, arc, honesty), the severity-sorted feedback that separates broken from suboptimal, and the review conversation that improves the deck without rewriting it in the reviewer's voice.
When should I use Deck Review Rubric?
Deck Review Rubric fits situations like: asked review my deck; give feedback on this presentation; is this ready for the board; our deck reviews are just font opinions.
How do I install Deck Review Rubric in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill deck-review-rubric -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/deck-review-rubric in mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills) into .claude/skills/deck-review-rubric in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install Deck Review Rubric in Codex?
Run `npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill deck-review-rubric -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/deck-review-rubric in mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills) into .agents/skills/deck-review-rubric in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use Deck Review Rubric in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills --skill deck-review-rubric -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/deck-review-rubric, .gemini/skills/deck-review-rubric, .github/skills/deck-review-rubric and .opencode/skills/deck-review-rubric in your project.
What does Deck Review Rubric need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Deck Review Rubric is instructions for the agent only.
Does Deck Review Rubric access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is Deck Review Rubric safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does Deck Review Rubric use?
Deck Review Rubric is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does Deck Review Rubric use?
About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.8k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to Deck Review Rubric?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Deck Review Rubric: DeepTutor CLI (HKUDS/DeepTutor, 41k stars), AI Engineering Placement Quiz (rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch, 67k stars), Codebase to Course (zarazhangrui/codebase-to-course, 5.7k stars) and AI Engineering Phase Quiz (rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch, 67k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains Deck Review Rubric?
mohitagw15856 (a GitHub user) maintains it in mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills, which has 1,434 GitHub stars. The repository holds 1,348 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 9, 2026.
Source: mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.