Agent skill

Protein Therapeutic Design

by lamm-mit in lamm-mit/scienceclaw

ToolUniverse workflow — Protein Therapeutic Design. An agent skill from lamm-mit/scienceclaw.

Apache-2.0Auto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Protein Therapeutic Design

skills CLI
$ npx skills add lamm-mit/scienceclaw --skill protein-therapeutic-design -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install lamm-mit/scienceclaw protein-therapeutic-design --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lamm-mit/scienceclaw.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/protein-therapeutic-design .claude/skills/protein-therapeutic-design && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
protein-therapeutic-design
GitHub stars
246
Token cost
~4.5k tokens
SKILL.md length
653 words
Files
3 (incl. scripts)
Skills in repo
86
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Apache-2.0

At a glance

ToolUniverse workflow — Protein Therapeutic Design. An agent skill from lamm-mit/scienceclaw.

  • Works in 8 steps: Report-First Approach (MANDATORY) → Design Documentation (MANDATORY) → Target → …
  • Tasks that involve Protein structure and design
  • SKILL.md covers When to Use, Critical Workflow Requirements, Phase 0: Tool Verification and Workflow Overview, plus 5 more sections
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder

What it does

Protein Therapeutic Design is an agent skill from lamm-mit/scienceclaw. ToolUniverse workflow — Protein Therapeutic Design

Its SKILL.md is about 4.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 4 other files, including scripts (for example `scripts/run.py`).

It sits in Research & Science, covering Protein structure and design. The licence is Apache-2.0.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Protein structure and design

Example prompts

  • “/protein-therapeutic-design”

Requirements

  • Python 3

Workflow steps

8 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Report-First Approach (MANDATORY)
  2. Design Documentation (MANDATORY)
  3. Target
  4. Backbones
  5. Sequences
  6. Validation
  7. Developability
  8. Deliverables

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit ab9aba1. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 2 files in scripts/ (Python), which the agent can run.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Protein Therapeutic Design loads about 4.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 19 tokens; SKILL.md has 653 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~19
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.5k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from lamm-mit/scienceclaw at commit ab9aba1, republished under its Apache-2.0 licence (© lamm-mit). 653 words, ~4,489 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/protein-therapeutic-design/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 2 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
protein-therapeutic-design
description
ToolUniverse workflow — Protein Therapeutic Design
source
https://github.com/mims-harvard/ToolUniverse/tree/main/skills/tooluniverse-protein-therapeutic-design

name: tooluniverse-protein-therapeutic-design description: Design novel protein therapeutics (binders, enzymes, scaffolds) using AI-guided de novo design. Uses RFdiffusion for backbone generation, ProteinMPNN for sequence design, ESMFold/AlphaFold2 for validation. Use when asked to design protein binders, therapeutic proteins, or engineer protein function.

Therapeutic Protein Designer

AI-guided de novo protein design using RFdiffusion backbone generation, ProteinMPNN sequence optimization, and structure validation for therapeutic protein development.

KEY PRINCIPLES:

  1. Structure-first design - Generate backbone geometry before sequence
  2. Target-guided - Design binders with target structure in mind
  3. Iterative validation - Predict structure to validate designs
  4. Developability-aware - Consider aggregation, immunogenicity, expression
  5. Evidence-graded - Grade designs by confidence metrics
  6. Actionable output - Provide sequences ready for experimental testing
  7. English-first queries - Always use English terms in tool calls (protein names, target names), even if the user writes in another language. Only try original-language terms as a fallback. Respond in the user's language

When to Use

Apply when user asks:

  • "Design a protein binder for [target]"
  • "Create a therapeutic protein against [protein/epitope]"
  • "Design a protein scaffold with [property]"
  • "Optimize this protein sequence for [function]"
  • "Design a de novo enzyme for [reaction]"
  • "Generate protein variants for [target binding]"

Critical Workflow Requirements

1. Report-First Approach (MANDATORY)
  1. Create the report file FIRST:

    • File name: [TARGET]_protein_design_report.md
    • Initialize with section headers
    • Add placeholder: [Designing...]
  2. Progressively update as designs are generated

  3. Output separate files:

    • [TARGET]_designed_sequences.fasta - All designed sequences
    • [TARGET]_top_candidates.csv - Ranked candidates with metrics
2. Design Documentation (MANDATORY)

Every design MUST include:

markdown
### Design: Binder_001

**Sequence**: MVLSPADKTN...
**Length**: 85 amino acids
**Target**: PD-L1 (UniProt: Q9NZQ7)
**Method**: RFdiffusion → ProteinMPNN → ESMFold validation

**Quality Metrics**:
| Metric | Value | Interpretation |
|--------|-------|----------------|
| pLDDT | 88.5 | High confidence |
| pTM | 0.82 | Good fold |
| ProteinMPNN score | -2.3 | Favorable |
| Predicted binding | Strong | Based on interface pLDDT |

*Source: NVIDIA NIM via `NvidiaNIM_rfdiffusion`, `NvidiaNIM_proteinmpnn`, `NvidiaNIM_esmfold`*

Phase 0: Tool Verification

NVIDIA NIM Tools Required
ToolPurposeAPI Key Required
NvidiaNIM_rfdiffusionBackbone generationYes
NvidiaNIM_proteinmpnnSequence designYes
NvidiaNIM_esmfoldFast structure validationYes
NvidiaNIM_alphafold2High-accuracy validationYes
NvidiaNIM_esm2_650mSequence embeddingsYes
Parameter Verification
ToolWRONG ParameterCORRECT Parameter
NvidiaNIM_rfdiffusionnum_stepsdiffusion_steps
NvidiaNIM_proteinmpnnpdbpdb_string
NvidiaNIM_esmfoldseqsequence

Workflow Overview

Phase 1: Target Characterization
├── Get target structure (PDB, EMDB cryo-EM, or AlphaFold)
├── Identify binding epitope
├── Analyze existing binders
├── Check EMDB for membrane protein structures (NEW)
└── OUTPUT: Target profile
    ↓
Phase 2: Backbone Generation (RFdiffusion)
├── Define design constraints
├── Generate multiple backbones
├── Filter by geometry quality
└── OUTPUT: Candidate backbones
    ↓
Phase 3: Sequence Design (ProteinMPNN)
├── Design sequences for each backbone
├── Sample multiple sequences per backbone
├── Score by ProteinMPNN likelihood
└── OUTPUT: Designed sequences
    ↓
Phase 4: Structure Validation
├── Predict structure (ESMFold/AlphaFold2)
├── Compare to designed backbone
├── Assess fold quality (pLDDT, pTM)
└── OUTPUT: Validated designs
    ↓
Phase 5: Developability Assessment
├── Aggregation propensity
├── Expression likelihood
├── Immunogenicity prediction
└── OUTPUT: Developability scores
    ↓
Phase 6: Report Synthesis
├── Ranked candidate list
├── Experimental recommendations
├── Next steps
└── OUTPUT: Final report

Phase 1: Target Characterization

1.1 Get Target Structure
python
def get_target_structure(tu, target_id):
    """Get target structure from PDB, EMDB, or predict."""
    
    # Try PDB first (X-ray/NMR)
    pdb_results = tu.tools.PDB_search_by_uniprot(uniprot_id=target_id)
    
    if pdb_results:
        # Get highest resolution structure
        best_pdb = sorted(pdb_results, key=lambda x: x['resolution'])[0]
        structure = tu.tools.PDB_get_structure(pdb_id=best_pdb['pdb_id'])
        return {'source': 'PDB', 'pdb_id': best_pdb['pdb_id'], 
                'resolution': best_pdb['resolution'], 'structure': structure}
    
    # Try EMDB for cryo-EM structures (valuable for membrane proteins)
    protein_info = tu.tools.UniProt_get_protein_by_accession(accession=target_id)
    emdb_results = tu.tools.emdb_search(
        query=protein_info['proteinDescription']['recommendedName']['fullName']['value']
    )
    
    if emdb_results and len(emdb_results) > 0:
        # Get highest resolution cryo-EM entry
        best_emdb = sorted(emdb_results, key=lambda x: x.get('resolution', 99))[0]
        # Get associated PDB model if available
        emdb_details = tu.tools.emdb_get_entry(entry_id=best_emdb['emdb_id'])
        if emdb_details.get('pdb_ids'):
            structure = tu.tools.PDB_get_structure(pdb_id=emdb_details['pdb_ids'][0])
            return {'source': 'EMDB cryo-EM', 'emdb_id': best_emdb['emdb_id'],
                    'pdb_id': emdb_details['pdb_ids'][0], 
                    'resolution': best_emdb.get('resolution'), 'structure': structure}
    
    # Fallback to AlphaFold prediction
    sequence = tu.tools.UniProt_get_protein_sequence(accession=target_id)
    structure = tu.tools.NvidiaNIM_alphafold2(
        sequence=sequence['sequence'],
        algorithm="mmseqs2"
    )
    return {'source': 'AlphaFold2 (predicted)', 'structure': structure}
1.1b EMDB for Membrane Proteins (NEW)

When to prioritize EMDB: Membrane proteins, large complexes, and targets where conformational states matter.

python
def get_cryoem_structures(tu, target_name):
    """Get cryo-EM structures for membrane proteins/complexes."""
    
    # Search EMDB
    emdb_results = tu.tools.emdb_search(
        query=f"{target_name} membrane OR receptor"
    )
    
    structures = []
    for entry in emdb_results[:5]:
        details = tu.tools.emdb_get_entry(entry_id=entry['emdb_id'])
        structures.append({
            'emdb_id': entry['emdb_id'],
            'resolution': entry.get('resolution', 'N/A'),
            'title': entry.get('title', 'N/A'),
            'conformational_state': details.get('state', 'Unknown'),
            'pdb_models': details.get('pdb_ids', [])
        })
    
    return structures

Output for Report:

markdown
### 1.1b Cryo-EM Structures (EMDB)

| EMDB ID | Resolution | PDB Model | Conformation |
|---------|------------|-----------|--------------|
| EMD-12345 | 2.8 Å | 7ABC | Active state |
| EMD-23456 | 3.1 Å | 8DEF | Inactive state |

**Note**: Cryo-EM structures capture physiologically relevant conformations for membrane protein targets.

*Source: EMDB*
1.2 Identify Binding Epitope
python
def identify_epitope(tu, target_structure, epitope_residues=None):
    """Identify or validate binding epitope."""
    
    if epitope_residues:
        # User-specified epitope
        return {'residues': epitope_residues, 'source': 'user-defined'}
    
    # Find surface-exposed regions
    # Use structural analysis to identify potential epitopes
    return analyze_surface(target_structure)
1.3 Output for Report
markdown
## 1. Target Characterization

### 1.1 Target Information

| Property | Value |
|----------|-------|
| **Target** | PD-L1 (Programmed death-ligand 1) |
| **UniProt** | Q9NZQ7 |
| **Structure source** | PDB: 4ZQK (2.0 Å resolution) |
| **Binding epitope** | IgV domain, residues 19-127 |
| **Known binders** | Atezolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab |

### 1.2 Epitope Analysis

| Residue Range | Type | Surface Area | Druggability |
|---------------|------|--------------|--------------|
| 54-68 | Loop | 850 Ų | High |
| 115-125 | Beta strand | 420 Ų | Medium |
| 19-30 | N-terminus | 380 Ų | Medium |

**Selected Epitope**: Residues 54-68 (PD-1 binding interface)

*Source: PDB 4ZQK, surface analysis*

Phase 2: Backbone Generation

2.1 RFdiffusion Design
python
def generate_backbones(tu, design_params):
    """Generate de novo backbones using RFdiffusion."""
    
    backbones = tu.tools.NvidiaNIM_rfdiffusion(
        diffusion_steps=design_params.get('steps', 50),
        # Additional parameters depending on design type
    )
    
    return backbones
2.2 Design Modes
ModeUse CaseKey Parameters
UnconditionalDe novo scaffolddiffusion_steps only
Binder designTarget-guided bindertarget_structure, hotspot_residues
Motif scaffoldingFunctional motif embeddingmotif_sequence, motif_structure
2.3 Output for Report
markdown
## 2. Backbone Generation

### 2.1 Design Parameters

| Parameter | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| **Method** | RFdiffusion via NVIDIA NIM |
| **Design mode** | Unconditional scaffold generation |
| **Diffusion steps** | 50 |
| **Number generated** | 10 backbones |

### 2.2 Generated Backbones

| Backbone | Length | Topology | Quality |
|----------|--------|----------|---------|
| BB_001 | 85 aa | 3-helix bundle | Good |
| BB_002 | 92 aa | Beta sandwich | Good |
| BB_003 | 78 aa | Alpha-beta | Good |
| BB_004 | 88 aa | All-alpha | Moderate |
| BB_005 | 95 aa | Mixed | Good |

**Selected for sequence design**: BB_001, BB_002, BB_003, BB_005 (top 4)

*Source: NVIDIA NIM via `NvidiaNIM_rfdiffusion`*

Phase 3: Sequence Design

3.1 ProteinMPNN Design
python
def design_sequences(tu, backbone_pdb, num_sequences=8):
    """Design sequences for backbone using ProteinMPNN."""
    
    sequences = tu.tools.NvidiaNIM_proteinmpnn(
        pdb_string=backbone_pdb,
        num_sequences=num_sequences,
        temperature=0.1  # Lower = more conservative
    )
    
    return sequences
3.2 Sampling Parameters
ParameterConservativeModerateDiverse
Temperature0.10.20.5
Sequences per backbone4816
Use caseValidated scaffoldExplorationDiversity
Show full SKILL.md (254 more words)Show less
3.3 Output for Report
markdown
## 3. Sequence Design

### 3.1 Design Parameters

| Parameter | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| **Method** | ProteinMPNN via NVIDIA NIM |
| **Temperature** | 0.1 (conservative) |
| **Sequences per backbone** | 8 |
| **Total sequences** | 32 |

### 3.2 Designed Sequences (Top 10 by Score)

| Rank | Backbone | Sequence ID | Length | MPNN Score | Predicted pI |
|------|----------|-------------|--------|------------|--------------|
| 1 | BB_001 | Seq_001_A | 85 | -1.89 | 6.2 |
| 2 | BB_002 | Seq_002_C | 92 | -1.95 | 5.8 |
| 3 | BB_001 | Seq_001_B | 85 | -2.01 | 7.1 |
| 4 | BB_003 | Seq_003_A | 78 | -2.08 | 6.5 |
| 5 | BB_005 | Seq_005_B | 95 | -2.12 | 5.4 |

### 3.3 Top Sequence: Seq_001_A

Seq_001_A (85 aa, MPNN score: -1.89) MVLSPADKTNVKAAWGKVGAHAGEYGAEALERMFLSFPTTKTYFPHFDLSH GSAQVKGHGKKVADALTNAVAHVDDMPNALSALSDLHAHKL


*Source: NVIDIA NIM via `NvidiaNIM_proteinmpnn`*

Phase 4: Structure Validation

4.1 ESMFold Validation
python
def validate_structure(tu, sequence):
    """Validate designed sequence by structure prediction."""
    
    # Fast validation with ESMFold
    predicted = tu.tools.NvidiaNIM_esmfold(sequence=sequence)
    
    # Extract quality metrics
    plddt = extract_plddt(predicted)
    ptm = extract_ptm(predicted)
    
    return {
        'structure': predicted,
        'mean_plddt': np.mean(plddt),
        'ptm': ptm,
        'passes': np.mean(plddt) > 70 and ptm > 0.7
    }
4.2 Validation Criteria
MetricThresholdInterpretation
Mean pLDDT>70Confident fold
pTM>0.7Good global topology
RMSD to backbone<2 ÅDesign recapitulated
4.3 Output for Report
markdown
## 4. Structure Validation

### 4.1 Validation Results

| Sequence | pLDDT | pTM | RMSD to Design | Status |
|----------|-------|-----|----------------|--------|
| Seq_001_A | 88.5 | 0.85 | 1.2 Å | ✓ PASS |
| Seq_002_C | 82.3 | 0.79 | 1.5 Å | ✓ PASS |
| Seq_001_B | 85.1 | 0.82 | 1.3 Å | ✓ PASS |
| Seq_003_A | 79.8 | 0.76 | 1.8 Å | ✓ PASS |
| Seq_005_B | 68.2 | 0.65 | 2.8 Å | ✗ FAIL |

### 4.2 Top Validated Design: Seq_001_A

| Region | Residues | pLDDT | Interpretation |
|--------|----------|-------|----------------|
| Helix 1 | 1-28 | 92.3 | Very high confidence |
| Loop 1 | 29-35 | 78.4 | Moderate confidence |
| Helix 2 | 36-58 | 91.8 | Very high confidence |
| Loop 2 | 59-65 | 75.2 | Moderate confidence |
| Helix 3 | 66-85 | 90.1 | Very high confidence |

**Overall**: Well-folded 3-helix bundle with high confidence core

*Source: NVIDIA NIM via `NvidiaNIM_esmfold`*

Phase 5: Developability Assessment

5.1 Aggregation Propensity
python
def assess_aggregation(sequence):
    """Assess aggregation propensity."""
    
    # Calculate hydrophobic patches
    # Calculate isoelectric point
    # Identify aggregation-prone motifs
    
    return {
        'aggregation_score': score,
        'hydrophobic_patches': patches,
        'risk_level': 'Low' if score < 0.5 else 'Medium' if score < 0.7 else 'High'
    }
5.2 Developability Metrics
MetricFavorableMarginalUnfavorable
Aggregation score<0.50.5-0.7>0.7
Isoelectric point5-94-5 or 9-10<4 or >10
Hydrophobic patches<33-5>5
Cysteine count0 or evenOddMultiple unpaired
5.3 Output for Report
markdown
## 5. Developability Assessment

### 5.1 Developability Scores

| Design | Aggregation | pI | Cysteines | Expression | Overall |
|--------|-------------|-----|-----------|------------|---------|
| Seq_001_A | 0.32 (Low) | 6.2 | 0 | High | ★★★ |
| Seq_002_C | 0.45 (Low) | 5.8 | 2 (paired) | Medium | ★★☆ |
| Seq_001_B | 0.38 (Low) | 7.1 | 0 | High | ★★★ |
| Seq_003_A | 0.58 (Med) | 6.5 | 0 | Medium | ★★☆ |

### 5.2 Recommendations

**Best candidate for expression**: Seq_001_A
- Low aggregation propensity
- Neutral pI (easy purification)
- No cysteines (no misfolding risk)
- Predicted high E. coli expression

*Source: Sequence analysis*

Report Template

markdown
# Therapeutic Protein Design Report: [TARGET]

**Generated**: [Date] | **Query**: [Original query] | **Status**: In Progress

---

## Executive Summary
[Designing...]

---

## 1. Target Characterization
### 1.1 Target Information
[Designing...]
### 1.2 Binding Epitope
[Designing...]

---

## 2. Backbone Generation
### 2.1 Design Parameters
[Designing...]
### 2.2 Generated Backbones
[Designing...]

---

## 3. Sequence Design
### 3.1 ProteinMPNN Results
[Designing...]
### 3.2 Top Sequences
[Designing...]

---

## 4. Structure Validation
### 4.1 ESMFold Validation
[Designing...]
### 4.2 Quality Metrics
[Designing...]

---

## 5. Developability Assessment
### 5.1 Scores
[Designing...]
### 5.2 Recommendations
[Designing...]

---

## 6. Final Candidates
### 6.1 Ranked List
[Designing...]
### 6.2 Sequences for Testing
[Designing...]

---

## 7. Experimental Recommendations
[Designing...]

---

## 8. Data Sources
[Will be populated...]

Evidence Grading

TierSymbolCriteria
T1★★★pLDDT >85, pTM >0.8, low aggregation, neutral pI
T2★★☆pLDDT >75, pTM >0.7, acceptable developability
T3★☆☆pLDDT >70, pTM >0.65, developability concerns
T4☆☆☆Failed validation or major developability issues

Completeness Checklist

Phase 1: Target
  • Target structure obtained (PDB or predicted)
  • Binding epitope identified
  • Existing binders noted
Phase 2: Backbones
  • ≥5 backbones generated
  • Top 3-5 selected for sequence design
  • Selection criteria documented
Phase 3: Sequences
  • ≥8 sequences per backbone designed
  • MPNN scores reported
  • Top 10 sequences listed
Phase 4: Validation
  • All sequences validated by ESMFold
  • pLDDT and pTM reported
  • Pass/fail criteria applied
  • ≥3 passing designs
Phase 5: Developability
  • Aggregation assessed
  • pI calculated
  • Expression prediction
  • Final ranking
Phase 6: Deliverables
  • Ranked candidate list
  • FASTA file with sequences
  • Experimental recommendations

Fallback Chains

Primary ToolFallback 1Fallback 2
NvidiaNIM_rfdiffusionManual backbone designScaffold from PDB
NvidiaNIM_proteinmpnnRosetta ProteinMPNNManual sequence design
NvidiaNIM_esmfoldNvidiaNIM_alphafold2AlphaFold DB
PDB structureNvidiaNIM_alphafold2AlphaFold DB

Tool Reference

See TOOLS_REFERENCE.md for complete tool documentation.

© lamm-mit, Apache-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 2 other files (scripts) in skills/protein-therapeutic-design of lamm-mit/scienceclaw.

  • SKILL.md
  • scripts/__pycache__/run.cpython-313.pyc
  • scripts/run.py

Open the folder on GitHubat commit ab9aba1

Compare with similar skills

Protein Therapeutic Design next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Protein Therapeutic Design compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Protein Therapeutic Design this skilllamm-mit/scienceclaw246—~4.5kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Alphafold Database Fetch And Analyzegoogle-deepmind/science-skills3.2k2 repos~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Alphafoldadaptyvbio/protein-design-skills1643 repos~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Pymol VisualizationChatMol/ChatMol373—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Complexa Binder DesignNVIDIA-BioNeMo/bionemo-agent-toolkit479—~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesApache-2.0
Bindcraftadaptyvbio/protein-design-skills1643 repos~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Alphafold Database Fetch And Analyze

    google-deepmind/science-skills

    Retrieve and analyze AlphaFold predicted structures for a protein.

    3.2k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~1.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Alphafold

    adaptyvbio/protein-design-skills

    Validate protein designs using AlphaFold2 structure prediction.

    164 GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~1.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Pymol Visualization

    ChatMol/ChatMol

    Generate publication-quality molecular visualization images using PyMOL.

    373 GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Complexa Binder Design

    NVIDIA-BioNeMo/bionemo-agent-toolkit

    Run a complete protein binder design campaign with NVIDIA Proteina-Complexa: resolve a target structure and hotspots from a name/sequence/PDB, co-design binder sequence+structure with reward-guided…

    479 GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Bindcraft

    adaptyvbio/protein-design-skills

    End-to-end binder design using BindCraft hallucination. An agent skill from adaptyvbio/protein-design-skills.

    164 GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~1.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • DiffDock Molecular Docking

    K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

    Predicts how small molecules bind to a protein with DiffDock, covering batch docking, pose ranking by confidence and checks on the results; not for binding affinity.

    48k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

More from lamm-mit/scienceclaw

All 86 skills in this repo
  • Fred Economic Data

    lamm-mit/scienceclaw

    Query FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data) API for 800,000+ economic time series from 100+ sources.

    246 GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~3k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Drug Research

    lamm-mit/scienceclaw

    Generates comprehensive drug research reports with compound disambiguation, evidence grading, and mandatory completeness sections.

    246 GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~1.7k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Imaging Data Commons

    lamm-mit/scienceclaw

    Query and download public cancer imaging data from NCI Imaging Data Commons using idc-index.

    246 GitHub starsUsed in 5 repos~11k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Rowan

    lamm-mit/scienceclaw

    Cloud-based quantum chemistry platform with Python API. An agent skill from lamm-mit/scienceclaw.

    246 GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~3.1k tokens
    Auto-check: warnings
  • Infographics

    lamm-mit/scienceclaw

    Create professional infographics using Nano Banana Pro AI with smart iterative refinement.

    246 GitHub starsUsed in 6 repos~4.4k tokens
    Auto-check: notes
  • Disease Research

    lamm-mit/scienceclaw

    Generate comprehensive disease research reports using 100+ ToolUniverse tools.

    246 GitHub stars~946 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Protein Therapeutic Design

What does Protein Therapeutic Design do?

ToolUniverse workflow — Protein Therapeutic Design. An agent skill from lamm-mit/scienceclaw. Protein Therapeutic Design is an agent skill from lamm-mit/scienceclaw.

When should I use Protein Therapeutic Design?

Protein Therapeutic Design fits situations like: tasks that involve Protein structure and design.

How do I install Protein Therapeutic Design in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add lamm-mit/scienceclaw --skill protein-therapeutic-design -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/protein-therapeutic-design in lamm-mit/scienceclaw) into .claude/skills/protein-therapeutic-design in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Protein Therapeutic Design in Codex?

Run `npx skills add lamm-mit/scienceclaw --skill protein-therapeutic-design -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/protein-therapeutic-design in lamm-mit/scienceclaw) into .agents/skills/protein-therapeutic-design in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Protein Therapeutic Design in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add lamm-mit/scienceclaw --skill protein-therapeutic-design -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/protein-therapeutic-design, .gemini/skills/protein-therapeutic-design, .github/skills/protein-therapeutic-design and .opencode/skills/protein-therapeutic-design in your project.

What does Protein Therapeutic Design need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Protein Therapeutic Design needs Python for the scripts in its folder. Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Protein Therapeutic Design access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Protein Therapeutic Design safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Protein Therapeutic Design use?

Protein Therapeutic Design is published under the Apache-2.0 licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Protein Therapeutic Design use?

About 4.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 18k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Protein Therapeutic Design?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Protein Therapeutic Design: Alphafold Database Fetch And Analyze (google-deepmind/science-skills, 3.2k stars), Alphafold (adaptyvbio/protein-design-skills, 164 stars), Pymol Visualization (ChatMol/ChatMol, 373 stars) and Complexa Binder Design (NVIDIA-BioNeMo/bionemo-agent-toolkit, 479 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Protein Therapeutic Design?

lamm-mit (a GitHub user) maintains it in lamm-mit/scienceclaw, which has 246 GitHub stars. The repository holds 86 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on August 21, 2026.

Source: lamm-mit/scienceclaw on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.