Agent skill

Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis

by joshzyj in joshzyj/open-scholar-skill

Conduct a systematic literature review AND develop theory and hypotheses in one integrated workflow.

Custom licenceAuto-check: notesResearch & Science

Install Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis

skills CLI
$ npx skills add joshzyj/open-scholar-skill --skill scholar-lit-review-hypothesis -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install joshzyj/open-scholar-skill scholar-lit-review-hypothesis --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joshzyj/open-scholar-skill.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/scholar-lit-review-hypothesis .claude/skills/scholar-lit-review-hypothesis && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
scholar-lit-review-hypothesis
GitHub stars
168
Token cost
~15k tokens
SKILL.md length
4,688 words
Files
5 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
30
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Custom licence

At a glance

Conduct a systematic literature review AND develop theory and hypotheses in one integrated workflow.

  • Works in 5 steps: LITERATURE SEARCH → SYNTHESIS — WHAT WE KNOW AND DON'T KNOW → FRAMEWORK SELECTION AND MECHANISM → …
  • The user wants to map existing knowledge
  • SKILL.md covers Core Logic, Arguments, PHASE 1: LITERATURE SEARCH and PHASE 2: SYNTHESIS — WHAT WE…, plus 6 more sections
  • Calls bash, pdftotext and sqlite3; needs PDF_KEY

What it does

Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis is an agent skill from joshzyj/open-scholar-skill. Conduct a systematic literature review AND develop theory and hypotheses in one integrated workflow. Use when the user wants to map existing knowledge, identify gaps, select theoretical frameworks that address those gaps, specify mechanisms, and derive testable hypotheses — producing a publication-ready Literature Review and Theory section. Works best after /scholar-idea. Replaces running /scholar-lit-review and /scholar-hypothesis separately.

Its SKILL.md is about 15k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 5 other files, including reference files (for example `references/gap-to-hypothesis.md`, `references/search-strategies.md` and `references/synthesis-guide.md`).

It sits in Research & Science, covering Literature review. The repository describes itself as: Open scholar skill, a claude code plugin, for academic research.

When your agent uses it

  • The user wants to map existing knowledge
  • Select theoretical frameworks that address those gaps
  • Specify mechanisms
  • Derive testable hypotheses — producing a publication-ready Literature Review and Theory section

Example prompts

  • “/scholar-lit-review-hypothesis”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. LITERATURE SEARCH
  2. SYNTHESIS — WHAT WE KNOW AND DON'T KNOW
  3. FRAMEWORK SELECTION AND MECHANISM
  4. HYPOTHESIS DERIVATION
  5. WRITE AND SAVE

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 6e5ac8e. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • bash
    • pdftotext
    • sqlite3
    • python3

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names these keys or tokens, usually read from environment variables:

    • PDF_KEY

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis loads about 15k tokens when it runs, and up to ~25k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 119 tokens; SKILL.md has 4,688 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~119
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~15k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~25k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check: notes

The automated check noted patterns worth knowing about, such as sudo or a known installer.

  • NoteMentions a .env fileSKILL.md:187
    R/zotero.sqlite (auto-detected or set in .env; copy to /tmp; .bak fallback)

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

Its licence (Custom licence) doesn't allow us to republish the file, so here is its outline and opening line. It has 4,688 words (~14,629 tokens).

“You are an expert sociologist conducting a rigorous, publication-quality literature review that flows directly into theoretical framework development and hypothesis derivation. Your output should meet the standards of ASR, AJS, Demography, Nature Human Behaviour, and Science Advances.”

— opening of SKILL.md by joshzyj, Custom licence
name
scholar-lit-review-hypothesis
tools
WebSearch, WebFetch, Read, Bash, Write
argument-hint
[RQ or topic] [optional: target journal, population, method preferences]
user-invocable
true

Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub

Files

SKILL.md and 4 other files (references) in .claude/skills/scholar-lit-review-hypothesis of joshzyj/open-scholar-skill.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/gap-to-hypothesis.md
  • references/search-strategies.md
  • references/synthesis-guide.md
  • references/theory-frameworks.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 6e5ac8e

Compare with similar skills

Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis this skilljoshzyj/open-scholar-skill168—~15kAutomated safety check: NotesCustom licence
Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills47k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Systematic Review ScreenerImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~8.4kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent12620 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Preprint Search on bioRxivLigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper73912 repos~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~16kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Nature Paper Card

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Systematic Review Screener

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Screens records for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews against fixed eligibility rules, using two blinded AI reviewers and a third adjudicator, with traceable PRISMA counts.

    51k GitHub stars~8.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Literature Review

    neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent

    Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).

    126 GitHub starsUsed in 20 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Preprint Search on bioRxiv

    LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper

    Searches bioRxiv life sciences preprints by keyword, author, date range or category with a Python script, returning JSON metadata and optional PDF downloads.

    739 GitHub starsUsed in 12 repos~3.7k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Writing Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.

    51k GitHub stars~16k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Deep Research Workflow

    TokenRhythm/opensquilla

    Runs multi-round research in three stages with a persisted state file, evidence tracking and a long-form report with per-claim citations.

    7.1k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from joshzyj/open-scholar-skill

All 30 skills in this repo
  • Scholar Annotate

    joshzyj/open-scholar-skill

    Turn unstructured text into validated, structured variables at corpus scale with LLMs: codebook design, dev/gold-set construction, DSPy prompt optimization, a hard reliability gate (Cohen κ ≥ 0.70)…

    168 GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated 22 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Scholar Auto Research

    joshzyj/open-scholar-skill

    Stable, deterministic social-science research-paper pipeline from idea or data to verified manuscript, citations, replication package, and final md/docx/tex/pdf outputs.

    168 GitHub stars~21k tokensUpdated 22 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Scholar RAG

    joshzyj/open-scholar-skill

    Build and query a local vector database + GraphRAG over your entire reference library (Zotero or a PDF folder) for literature review.

    168 GitHub stars~7.4k tokensUpdated 22 days ago
    Auto-check: notes
  • Scholar Causal

    joshzyj/open-scholar-skill

    Comprehensive causal inference toolkit for social science research.

    168 GitHub stars~10k tokensUpdated 22 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Scholar Data

    joshzyj/open-scholar-skill

    Comprehensive open data directory (100+ datasets across 14 categories) with auto-fetch capability, plus data collection instrument design, variable dictionaries, data management, IRB materials, and…

    168 GitHub stars~23k tokensUpdated 22 days ago
    Auto-check: notes
  • Scholar Eda

    joshzyj/open-scholar-skill

    Conduct exploratory data analysis (EDA) before hypothesis testing.

    168 GitHub stars~12k tokensUpdated 22 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis

What does Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis do?

Conduct a systematic literature review AND develop theory and hypotheses in one integrated workflow. Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis is an agent skill from joshzyj/open-scholar-skill. Conduct a systematic literature review AND develop theory and hypotheses in one integrated workflow.

When should I use Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis?

Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis fits situations like: the user wants to map existing knowledge; select theoretical frameworks that address those gaps; specify mechanisms; derive testable hypotheses — producing a publication-ready Literature Review and Theory section.

How do I install Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add joshzyj/open-scholar-skill --skill scholar-lit-review-hypothesis -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.claude/skills/scholar-lit-review-hypothesis in joshzyj/open-scholar-skill) into .claude/skills/scholar-lit-review-hypothesis in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis in Codex?

Run `npx skills add joshzyj/open-scholar-skill --skill scholar-lit-review-hypothesis -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.claude/skills/scholar-lit-review-hypothesis in joshzyj/open-scholar-skill) into .agents/skills/scholar-lit-review-hypothesis in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add joshzyj/open-scholar-skill --skill scholar-lit-review-hypothesis -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/scholar-lit-review-hypothesis, .gemini/skills/scholar-lit-review-hypothesis, .github/skills/scholar-lit-review-hypothesis and .opencode/skills/scholar-lit-review-hypothesis in your project.

What does Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis needs the command-line tools its instructions call (bash, pdftotext, sqlite3 and python3) and credentials named PDF_KEY.

Does Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found notes only (mentions a .env file), nothing it rates as a warning. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis use?

Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis has a licence file (the repository's licence) that doesn't match a standard licence. Read it on GitHub before reusing the skill.

How many tokens does Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis use?

About 15k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 59k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 10k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis: Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars), Systematic Review Screener (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars), Literature Review (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars) and Preprint Search on bioRxiv (LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper, 739 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Scholar Lit Review Hypothesis?

joshzyj (a GitHub user) maintains it in joshzyj/open-scholar-skill, which has 168 GitHub stars. The repository holds 30 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 18, 2026.

Source: joshzyj/open-scholar-skill on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.