Agent skill

Review Response

by JCLiuGroup in JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist

Orchestrate semi-automatic computational responses to peer review.

Custom licenceAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Review Response

skills CLI
$ npx skills add JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist --skill review-response -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist review-response --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/procedures/review-response .claude/skills/review-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
review-response
GitHub stars
145
Used in
1 other repo
Token cost
~2.1k tokens
SKILL.md length
885 words
Files
27 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
21
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Custom licence

At a glance

Orchestrate semi-automatic computational responses to peer review.

  • Works in 5 steps: Ingestion contract → Method baseline → Comment triage → …
  • A manuscript and reviewer comments are provided and the agent must identify which comments require computation
  • SKILL.md covers Phase 0 — Ingestion contract, Phase 1 — Method baseline, Phase 2 — Comment triage and Phase 3–4 — Execution and…, plus 3 more sections
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder

What it does

Review Response is an agent skill from JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist. Orchestrate semi-automatic computational responses to peer review. Use when a manuscript and reviewer comments are provided and the agent must identify which comments require computation, plan and run calculations consistent with the manuscript's methods, validate whether each result actually addresses the concern, and draft response-letter and SI material.

Its SKILL.md is about 2.1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 32 other files, including reference files (for example `examples/README.md`, `examples/toy-contradicts-au-vs-cu/README.md` and `examples/toy-contradicts-au-vs-cu/escalation.md`).

It sits in Research & Science, covering Email writing and Peer review.

When your agent uses it

  • A manuscript and reviewer comments are provided and the agent must identify which comments require computation
  • Plan and run calculations consistent with the manuscripts methods
  • Validate whether each result actually addresses the concern
  • Draft response-letter and SI material

Example prompts

  • “/review-response”

Requirements

  • Python 3

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Ingestion contract
  2. Method baseline
  3. Comment triage
  4. 4 — Execution and reviewer-bar validation
  5. Response semantics

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit e27b555. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships script files (Python, from the files we listed), which the agent can run.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Review Response loads about 2.1k tokens when it runs, and up to ~6.3k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 94 tokens; SKILL.md has 885 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~94
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.1k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~6.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

Its licence (Custom licence) doesn't allow us to republish the file, so here is its outline and opening line. It has 885 words (~2,112 tokens).

“This procedure owns reviewer-comment triage, method consistency, per-comment satisfaction criteria, scientific outcome semantics, and response-package decisions. It coordinates literature-to-calculation, comp-chem-workflow, research-orchestrator, engine skills, and report; it does not replace them or run engines itself.”

— opening of SKILL.md by JCLiuGroup, Custom licence
name
review-response

Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub

Files

SKILL.md and 26 other files (references) in procedures/review-response of JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist.

  • SKILL.md
  • examples/README.md
  • examples/toy-contradicts-au-vs-cu/README.md
  • examples/toy-contradicts-au-vs-cu/escalation.md
  • examples/toy-contradicts-au-vs-cu/expected-output.md
  • examples/toy-contradicts-au-vs-cu/inputs/manuscript.md
  • examples/toy-contradicts-au-vs-cu/inputs/reviews.md
  • examples/toy-contradicts-au-vs-cu/method-fingerprint.md
  • examples/toy-contradicts-au-vs-cu/response-workflow.md
  • examples/toy-contradicts-au-vs-cu/scripts/vacancy.py
  • examples/toy-contradicts-au-vs-cu/triage.md
  • examples/toy-vacancy-pt-vs-au/README.md
  • examples/toy-vacancy-pt-vs-au/expected-output.md
  • examples/toy-vacancy-pt-vs-au/inputs/manuscript.md
  • examples/toy-vacancy-pt-vs-au/inputs/reviews.md
  • … and 12 more

Open the folder on GitHubat commit e27b555

Used in 1 other repository

We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Review Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Review Response compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Review Response this skillJCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist1451 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Peer Reviewspacering-net/codeg3.8k18 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Scholar Evaluationspacering-net/codeg3.8k12 repos~3.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~16kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
LLM Counciltenfoldmarc/llm-council-skill8192 repos~4.2kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Academic Paper ReviewerImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~11kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Peer Review

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.

    3.8k GitHub starsUsed in 18 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Scholar Evaluation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and…

    3.8k GitHub starsUsed in 12 repos~3.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Writing Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.

    51k GitHub stars~16k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • LLM Council

    tenfoldmarc/llm-council-skill

    Run any question, idea, or decision through a council of 5 AI advisors who independently analyze it, peer-review each other anonymously, and synthesize a final verdict.

    819 GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~4.2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Reviewer

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Simulates a journal peer review of a manuscript with a five-seat reviewer panel, an editorial synthesizer and several review modes.

    51k GitHub stars~11k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Peer Review

    K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-writer

    Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments.

    2.4k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

More from JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist

All 21 skills in this repo
  • Research Orchestrator

    JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist

    Define and maintain machine-readable research project state for multi-stage computational chemistry work.

    145 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.8k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Comp Chem Workflow

    JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist

    Entry point and controller for computational chemistry and materials workflows.

    145 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.4k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Cp2k

    JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist

    Prepare, validate, run, and troubleshoot CP2K calculations for periodic and large molecular systems.

    145 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.7k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Deepmd

    JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist

    DeePMD-kit and Deep Potential Molecular Dynamics workflows. An agent skill from JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist.

    145 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~780 tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Gaussian

    JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist

    Prepare, validate, and troubleshoot Gaussian molecular quantum chemistry jobs.

    145 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Gromacs

    JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist

    Prepare, validate, run, resume, troubleshoot, and analyze GROMACS molecular dynamics.

    145 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.7k tokens
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Review Response

What does Review Response do?

Orchestrate semi-automatic computational responses to peer review. Review Response is an agent skill from JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist. Orchestrate semi-automatic computational responses to peer review.

When should I use Review Response?

Review Response fits situations like: A manuscript and reviewer comments are provided and the agent must identify which comments require computation; plan and run calculations consistent with the manuscripts methods; validate whether each result actually addresses the concern; draft response-letter and SI material.

How do I install Review Response in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist --skill review-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (procedures/review-response in JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist) into .claude/skills/review-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Review Response in Codex?

Run `npx skills add JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist --skill review-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (procedures/review-response in JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist) into .agents/skills/review-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Review Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist --skill review-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/review-response, .gemini/skills/review-response, .github/skills/review-response and .opencode/skills/review-response in your project.

What does Review Response need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Review Response needs Python for the scripts in its folder. Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Review Response access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Review Response safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Review Response use?

Review Response has a licence file (the repository's licence) that doesn't match a standard licence. Read it on GitHub before reusing the skill.

How many tokens does Review Response use?

About 2.1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 8.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 4.2k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Review Response?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Review Response: Peer Review (spacering-net/codeg, 3.8k stars), Scholar Evaluation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.8k stars), Academic Paper Writing Pipeline (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars) and LLM Council (tenfoldmarc/llm-council-skill, 819 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Review Response?

JCLiuGroup (a GitHub organization) maintains it in JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist, which has 145 GitHub stars. The repository holds 21 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 27, 2026.

Source: JCLiuGroup/AI-Computational-Chemist on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.