Interview Prep

Interview preparation

Interviews fail in the preparation, not the conversation. This skill covers pre-interview research, question design, logistics, and follow-up.

When to use

• Preparing to interview a source
• Developing question frameworks for recurring interview types
• Managing interview logistics and consent
• Planning follow-up after initial interviews
• Training new reporters on interview technique

Pre-interview research checklist

Background research

## Source background check

### Public records
- [ ] Professional licenses verified
- [ ] Court records checked (civil/criminal)
- [ ] Business registrations confirmed
- [ ] Property records (if relevant)
- [ ] Campaign finance (if political figure)
- [ ] SEC filings (if corporate)

### Professional background
- [ ] LinkedIn profile reviewed
- [ ] Current employer confirmed
- [ ] Previous employers noted
- [ ] Published work reviewed
- [ ] Conference appearances checked
- [ ] Professional associations

### Social media audit
- [ ] All platforms identified (X, Bluesky, Threads, Mastodon, Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube, Substack, etc.)
- [ ] Post history reviewed
- [ ] Connections/followers analyzed
- [ ] Previous statements on topic found
- [ ] Any deleted content recovered? (See **web-archiving** skill for Wayback / Archive.today retrieval)

### Media appearances
- [ ] Previous interviews found
- [ ] Statements consistent with current position?
- [ ] Other journalists' assessments
- [ ] Any retractions or corrections involving them?

Context research

## Topic preparation

### Essential knowledge
- [ ] Key facts about the topic confirmed
- [ ] Timeline of events established
- [ ] Other stakeholders identified
- [ ] Conflicting accounts noted
- [ ] Documents/data reviewed

### What to know before you dial
- [ ] How do they fit into the story?
- [ ] What do I NEED from this interview?
- [ ] What might they be reluctant to discuss?
- [ ] What have they said publicly before?

Question framework

The essential questions

Every interview should be built to answer:

1. What happened? (Facts)
2. Why did it happen? (Causes)
3. What did you do/decide/see? (Actions)
4. What does it mean? (Significance)
5. What's next? (Implications)

Question types

Question templates by interview type

Profile interview:

1. Background: "Tell me about where you grew up / how you got started."
2. Turning point: "When did you realize [X] was your path?"
3. Challenge: "What was the hardest moment in [period]?"
4. Values: "What principle guides your work?"
5. Future: "What are you working on next?"

Investigative interview:

1. Establish rapport: Non-threatening background questions first
2. Timeline: "Walk me through [event] from the beginning."
3. Details: "Who else was there? What did you see/hear?"
4. Documentation: "Do you have any records of this?"
5. Corroboration: "Who else can confirm this?"
6. Response: "What did [other party] say when you raised this?"

Expert/explainer interview:

1. Credentials: "What's your expertise in this area?"
2. Plain language: "Explain [concept] as if I'm not a specialist."
3. Context: "How common/unusual is [situation]?"
4. Significance: "Why does this matter?"
5. Sources: "Where can I learn more? Who else should I talk to?"

Victim/sensitive interview:

1. Control: "Take your time. You can stop at any point."
2. Open: "Tell me what you're comfortable sharing."
3. Specific: "Can you describe [specific detail]?"
4. Impact: "How has this affected you?"
5. Agency: "What do you want people to understand?"
6. Check-in: "Are you okay to continue?"

Recording and consent

Recording laws by state

State recording-consent law is jurisdiction-specific and shifts. Some states distinguish telephone from in-person recording; others treat electronic communications under a separate statute; case law in several states (e.g., Massachusetts, Michigan, Connecticut) has narrowed or expanded the original statutory rule.

The single most reliable reference is the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press Reporter's Recording Guide at rcfp.org/reporters-recording-guide. It is maintained continuously and provides per-state breakdowns covering one-party vs. all-party consent, phone-vs-in-person distinctions, hidden-recording rules, and federal preemption.

General categories:

• One-party consent (federal default). You can record without telling the other person if you are a party to the conversation. You should tell them anyway for ethical reasons.
• All-party (two-party) consent. All participants must consent. As of 2025-2026 this category includes (non-exhaustive, verify against RCFP before relying): California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Washington. Several other states (Connecticut, Michigan, Oregon, Delaware, Vermont, Hawaii) apply two-party rules in some contexts but not all, RCFP has the per-context details.
• Cross-state calls. When the parties are in different states, the stricter state's law generally controls. If you are in a one-party state interviewing someone in a two-party state, get consent.

Always do, regardless of jurisdiction:

• State clearly at the start: "I'm recording this interview. Is that okay?"
• Get affirmative consent on the recording itself.
• Note the consent in your notes.

This protects you legally everywhere and is the ethical baseline.

Consent template

## Recording consent

Date: [date]
Interviewer: [your name]
Subject: [their name]
Medium: [phone/video/in-person]

[At start of recording:]
"This is [your name] with [publication], interviewing [their name] on [date].
I'm recording this conversation. Do I have your permission to record?"

[Their response: yes/no]

"And you understand this may be used for publication?"

[Their response: yes/no]

Attribution guidelines

On the record (default)

• Everything can be published with full name and title
• This is the standard expectation unless otherwise agreed

On background

• Information can be used, but source not identified by name
• Agree on description: "a senior official," "someone familiar with the matter"
• Confirm exact wording before interview ends

Deep background

• Information can guide reporting but cannot be attributed at all
• Verify independently before publishing
• Rarely appropriate, push for at least background