Meeting Note Summarizer

Example 1: Messy Notes → Clean Summary

Raw Input: "meeting with sarah about the website redesign. she likes the new hero section but thinks the CTA is too small. we need to make it bigger and maybe red. also the testimonial section needs real photos not stock. she'll send us the client photos by wed. i need to update the mockup by friday. we decided to drop the animations page since it's out of scope. next meeting next tuesday?"

Output:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│         MEETING SUMMARY                 │
│  Topic: Website Redesign Feedback       │
│  Participants: Sarah; others not identified │
│  Duration: Not provided                 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                         │
│  🎯 DECISIONS                           │
│  • Drop the animations page (out of scope) │
│                                         │
│  ✅ ACTION ITEMS                        │
│  • Send client photos → **Sarah** → **Wed** │
│  • Update mockup → **Speaker ("I"; identity not provided)** → **Fri** │
│  • Increase CTA size → **Unassigned** → **No deadline stated** │
│                                         │
│  💬 KEY DISCUSSION POINTS               │
│  • Sarah likes the hero section; a larger CTA was requested │
│  • Making the CTA red was suggested, not decided │
│  • Testimonials need real client photos, not stock │
│  • Animations page cut from scope       │
│                                         │
│  ⏭️ NEXT STEPS                          │
│  • Next Tuesday was proposed; confirmation needed │
│                                         │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

Example 2: Brainstorm Session

Raw Input: "brainstorm for new newsletter format. someone suggested a weekly roundup of tools. another idea was a deep dive into one topic per issue. also could do founder interviews. sarah said the roundup might be too generic. mark said deep dive would take too long. we all liked the interview idea. tom will reach out to 3 potential guests. let's test one interview format and see open rates."

Output:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│      BRAINSTORM: NEWSLETTER FORMAT      │
│  Named participants: Sarah, Mark, Tom; others not identified │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                         │
│  💡 IDEAS GENERATED                     │
│  • Weekly tool roundup (concern: may be too generic) │
│  • Single deep-dive (concern: may take too long) │
│  • Founder interviews (favored; final decision not recorded) │
│                                         │
│  ✅ ACTION ITEMS                        │
│  • Reach out to 3 potential guests → **Tom** → **No deadline stated** │
│  • Test one interview format → **Unassigned** → **No deadline stated** │
│                                         │
│  ⏭️ NEXT STEPS                          │
│  • Clarify whether the interview direction is approved │
│  • Assign timing for the test issue and define the open-rate comparison │
│                                         │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

Pro Tips

• Capture decisions explicitly: Record the decision and its rationale when the source states them; keep later recollections labeled as such.
• Expose missing ownership: Keep a real task even when its owner or deadline is unknown, and label the gap for follow-up.
• Flag ambiguity: If a decision was deferred or a question left unanswered, make that explicit. Don't smooth it over.
• Draft promptly when useful: Return a share-ready draft, but do not send or publish it without the user's explicit authorization.
• Organize only on request: Offer project tags or a running document, but do not persist meeting content unless the user asks and identifies the destination.