Agent skill

Xedit Conflict Audit

by hashgraph-online in hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

A skill your agent uses when auditing conflicts in a Bethesda plugin set — determining for a record (or a plugin's records) which override wins, what the conflict label is, what references it, and…

Apache-2.0Auto-check passed

Install Xedit Conflict Audit

skills CLI
$ npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill xedit-conflict-audit -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins xedit-conflict-audit --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/plugins/BB-84C/bgs-modding-superpowers/skills/xedit-conflict-audit .claude/skills/xedit-conflict-audit && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
xedit-conflict-audit
GitHub stars
1.3k
Token cost
~3.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,542 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
716
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Apache-2.0

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when auditing conflicts in a Bethesda plugin set — determining for a record (or a plugin's records) which override wins, what the conflict label is, what references it, and…

  • Works in 9 steps: Bootstrap session. xedit_session({}).… → Sanity-check capabilities.… → Scope the audit. Decide whether the… → …
  • Auditing conflicts in a Bethesda plugin set — determining for a record (or a plugins records) which override wins
  • SKILL.md covers Purpose, When To Use, Tools and 补丁 vs 改顺序决策 / Patch-vs-reorder…, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Xedit Conflict Audit is an agent skill from hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins. Use when auditing conflicts in a Bethesda plugin set — determining for a record (or a plugin's records) which override wins, what the conflict label is, what references it, and whether the configuration is safe or breaking.

Its SKILL.md is about 3.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: A curated list of awesome OpenAI Codex / ChatGPT plugins, skills, and resources. The 1 Codex Marketplace. See live plugins at: https://hol.org/plugins/best-codex-plugins. The licence is Apache-2.0.

When your agent uses it

  • Auditing conflicts in a Bethesda plugin set — determining for a record (or a plugins records) which override wins
  • What the conflict label is
  • What references it
  • Whether the configuration is safe

Example prompts

  • “/xedit-conflict-audit”

Workflow steps

9 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Bootstrap session. xedit_session({}). Confirm gameMode, consentEnabled not needed here (read-only), and loadOrderSize matches expectation.
  2. Sanity-check capabilities. xedit_list_capabilities({}). Read the drift.onlyInLive and drift.onlyInDigest arrays plus the r6 support keys…
  3. Scope the audit. Decide whether the audit is per-record, per-plugin, per-signature, or parent-scoped (e.g. all REFRs under a CELL).
  4. Locate records with the narrowest supported query.
  5. Inspect conflicts with child-group awareness. For each focused target, prefer xedit_inspect_conflicts({ file, formId }). For broad…
  6. Collect references efficiently. On r6+, xedit_call({ command: "records.references", args: { file, formId, recursive: true } }) gives a…
  7. Classify verdicts. Read the verdict field from the intent tool or map the raw records.conflict_status result with the same W2 labels
  8. For non-trivial verdicts, read the actual record. xedit_read_record({ file, formId }). Compare record.fields vs winningOverride vs…
  9. Summarise. Produce a short report: one row per record or child-group signature bucket audited, columns [file, formId, editorId/signature…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 3e1456a. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are dot).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Xedit Conflict Audit loads about 3.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 61 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,542 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~61
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~3.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins at commit 3e1456a, republished under its Apache-2.0 licence (© hashgraph-online). 1,542 words, ~3,346 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/xedit-conflict-audit/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
xedit-conflict-audit
description
Use when auditing conflicts in a Bethesda plugin set — determining for a record (or a plugin's records) which override wins, what the conflict label is, what references it, and whether the configuration is safe or breaking.

xEdit Conflict Audit (W2)

Inherits the hub xedit-automation skill. Do not restate routing or anti-patterns here; this skill is the W2 workflow only.

Purpose

For a record or a plugin in scope, produce a verdict: no_conflict | itpo | itm | minor | breaking, plus the winning override, the override chain, and a list of plugins that reference the record. Output is a concise summary, not the raw daemon round-trips.

When To Use

  • "Why is this mod's change not showing up?" → audit the affected records.
  • "Which plugins overlap on this NPC / weapon / armour / keyword?" → audit by editor ID / form ID.
  • "Is this load order safe to ship?" → audit a representative sample of records.

Tools

Use these MCP intent tools (do not drop to xedit_call unless an intent tool does not fit):

  • xedit_session (always first; once per conversation).
  • xedit_list_capabilities (once per conversation; sanity-check drift).
  • xedit_find_record (locate the record(s) you want to audit).
  • xedit_inspect_conflicts (the verdict tool).
  • xedit_read_record (when you need to see the actual conflicting field values).
  • xedit_call for r6-only daemon fields that no intent wrapper exposes yet: records.references, records.conflict_status, and records.apply_filter.

If the conflict is broad (many records across many plugins), do not loop through them one by one in the orchestrator — delegate to a read-only investigator sub-agent (see Hub skill, "Sub-agent delegation recipes").

补丁 vs 改顺序决策 / Patch-vs-reorder decision

This is the judgment gate after the tool surface tells you what wins. xEdit shows the override chain; it does not decide whether the right answer is accept, reorder, clean, remove, or patch. BB84's rule is situational thought over ritual: most overlap is normal, sorting is a single-choice lever, and exhaustive FormID stitching is not realistic at pack scale.

Use this section only to choose the remedy. If the verdict becomes PATCH, stop here and hand off; this W2 skill audits conflicts and names intent, it does not author patch records.

dot
digraph patch_vs_reorder {
  rankdir=TB;
  node [shape=box];

  start [shape=doublecircle, label="Focused conflict readback\n(record fields + winning override)"];
  behavior [shape=diamond, label="Does this conflict explain\nreal broken/missing behavior?"];
  normal [shape=doublecircle, label="ACCEPT\nnormal overlap / chosen winner"];
  itm [shape=diamond, label="Is the losing/winning edit\njust copied vanilla?"];
  clean [shape=doublecircle, label="CLEAN\nITM candidate; do not invent meaning"];
  systemic [shape=diamond, label="Is one side a systemic rule\nand the other incidental author tweak?"];
  reorder [shape=doublecircle, label="REORDER\nlet the systemic rule win"];
  needed [shape=diamond, label="Are needed fields split\nacross multiple plugins?"];
  patch [shape=doublecircle, label="PATCH\nselectively forward needed fields"];
  remove [shape=doublecircle, label="REMOVE / REJECT\nmod role or data not worth repair debt"];

  start -> behavior;
  behavior -> normal [label="no"];
  behavior -> itm [label="yes / suspicious"];
  itm -> clean [label="yes"];
  itm -> systemic [label="no"];
  systemic -> reorder [label="yes"];
  systemic -> needed [label="no"];
  needed -> patch [label="yes"];
  needed -> remove [label="no: data not needed / role fails"];
}
DecisionUse whenDo not use when
ACCEPTThe later winner is the intended rule, or the lost edit is not needed for this pack.You have not read the actual fields; "no crash" is not proof.
REORDEROne plugin expresses a broader systemic rule and the other edit is incidental. Let the rule win to reduce patch surface.Needed fields are split across both sides; order can only choose one winner.
PATCHMultiple plugins carry needed data for the same FormID, and sorting would lose required behavior either way.You only feel uncomfortable seeing red; most data overlap is normal.
CLEANThe record is an unchanged copy of vanilla / ITM candidate.You are about to delete a value whose purpose you have not understood.
REMOVE / REJECTThe conflict reveals the mod's relevant data is not needed, off-role, or not worth the repair debt.The source is silent on a hard removal threshold; do not invent one.
KB query discipline

This decision section is game-agnostic. Do not inline game-specific xEdit lore, record-class gotchas, or community patch-position folklore here.

Use KB when the conflict family depends on current game or ecosystem facts:

text
bgs_kb_query({ query: "xedit patch vs reorder conflict family", domains: ["xedit", "load-order"], games: ["<current game>"] })

If KB is silent, mark [GAP] instead of inventing a game-specific rule.

Red flags (STOP)
ThoughtReality
"Red means broken; fix every red cell."Red means overlapping data. Most overlap is normal; chase behavior-breaking conflicts.
"Just reorder until both changes work."Reordering is a single-choice lever: A wins or B wins. It cannot merge values.
"The rightmost value wins, so the rest is irrelevant."Earlier columns are evidence of lost behavior; read them before deciding.
"I'll drag the field directly into the winning mod."That mutates the source mod and creates cleanup debt. Make a patch if both values are needed.
"xEdit can patch everything, so order doesn't matter."True in principle, impractical at real pack scale. Use order to reduce patch debt.
"xEdit shows the conflict, so xEdit alone proves the cause."Some problems are script-use or presentation mismatches; mark uncertainty instead of guessing.
Rationalizations
ExcuseReality
"Sorting is easier; I'll avoid patches."Sorting chooses one side. If both sides contain needed fields, you are still dropping data.
"I'll patch all conflicts now so future me is safe."Exhaustive FormID stitching is repair debt. Patch only the conflicts tied to intended behavior.
"The later mod is newer, so its override must be intended."Later means winner, not correct. Compare the field's meaning against the pack's need.
"The game boots, so the conflict is acceptable."Lost fields can silently disable features. Booting is not semantic success.
"The field label is obvious enough."Some data names are abstract. If you do not know the purpose, investigate before forwarding.

When the verdict is PATCH, route to xedit-automation (see its ## 补丁创作判断 section).

R6 broad-audit shortcuts (capability gated)

Check xedit_list_capabilities and branch on system.capabilities.supports.*. Use these r6+ one-call forms when available; old child-by-child and record-by-record loops remain the fallback for pre-r6 daemons.

Recursive references (supports.referencesRecursive)

For CELL/WRLD/DIAL/QUST targets, prefer:

text
xedit_call({
  command: "records.references",
  args: { file, formId, recursive: true }
})

recursive: true unions outgoing references across ChildGroup descendants, so one call replaces the old "list every ChildGroup child, then reference-probe each child" loop. Deep reference: xedit.references-recursive.v1.

ChildGroup conflict summary (supports.conflictStatusChildGroup)

When records.conflict_status returns result.childGroup, read that block before expanding individual records. It summarizes per-signature child-group state as { total, conflicting } and includes a capped conflictingHits array (cap 20) for the first concrete children to inspect.

This is the broad-audit starting point for CELL/WRLD/DIAL/QUST conflicts: summarize the childGroup block, then deep-read only conflictingHits or a small representative sample. Deep reference: xedit.conflict-status-childgroup.v1.

Show full SKILL.md (651 more words)Show less
apply_filter regex + parentFormId (supports.applyFilterExtensions)

Use records.apply_filter to collapse broad candidate discovery into a single server-side query when the daemon advertises supports.applyFilterExtensions (or the narrower .regex / .multiPattern subkeys, if exposed separately).

  • Regex fields: editorIdRegex, displayNameRegex, fullNameRegex, baseEditorIdRegex, baseDisplayNameRegex.
  • Regex engine: System.RegularExpressions.TRegEx.
  • Guardrails: 100ms per-record timeout, 4-worker semaphore, and a RegexSlotsExhausted response counter so saturation is distinguishable from no matches.
  • Multi-pattern OR: each *Pattern and *Regex field may be a scalar string or an array with OR semantics; max 32 entries.
  • parentFormId: single-call ancestor filtering, e.g. "all REFRs whose container chain contains CELL X" without building your own parent walk.

Deep reference: xedit.apply-filter-extensions.v1.

Workflow

  1. Bootstrap session. xedit_session({}). Confirm gameMode, consentEnabled not needed here (read-only), and loadOrderSize matches expectation.
  2. Sanity-check capabilities. xedit_list_capabilities({}). Read the drift.onlyInLive and drift.onlyInDigest arrays plus the r6 support keys. If a target command you intend to use is missing from live, stop and tell the user.
  3. Scope the audit. Decide whether the audit is per-record, per-plugin, per-signature, or parent-scoped (e.g. all REFRs under a CELL).
  4. Locate records with the narrowest supported query.
    • Per-record by FormID: xedit_find_record({ file, formId }).
    • Per-editor-ID: xedit_find_record({ editorId }).
    • Parent-scoped or regex candidate set on r6+: xedit_call({ command: "records.apply_filter", args: { file?, signature?, parentFormId?, editorIdRegex?, ... } }).
    • Per-plugin fallback: xedit_call({ command: "records.list", args: { file, signature? } }), then iterate or delegate if large.
  5. Inspect conflicts with child-group awareness. For each focused target, prefer xedit_inspect_conflicts({ file, formId }). For broad CELL/WRLD/DIAL/QUST targets on r6+, call records.conflict_status through xedit_call if you need the raw result.childGroup summary; expand only conflictingHits or a representative sample instead of probing every child.
  6. Collect references efficiently. On r6+, xedit_call({ command: "records.references", args: { file, formId, recursive: true } }) gives a ChildGroup-wide outgoing-reference union. On pre-r6, fall back to the old child walk or delegate the loop.
  7. Classify verdicts. Read the verdict field from the intent tool or map the raw records.conflict_status result with the same W2 labels:
    • no_conflict → safe.
    • itpo / itm → likely safe; consider cleaning.
    • minor → human review.
    • breaking → halt and surface.
  8. For non-trivial verdicts, read the actual record. xedit_read_record({ file, formId }). Compare record.fields vs winningOverride vs baseRecord. Identify the diverging fields.
  9. Summarise. Produce a short report: one row per record or child-group signature bucket audited, columns [file, formId, editorId/signature, verdict, winningFile, referencerCount, childGroupConflicts]. Surface only the breaking/minor verdicts to the user by default; the rest are appendix.

Verification (what counts as semantic pass)

  • The audit's verdict for each spot-checked record matches what manual xEdit GUI inspection would show.
  • For breaking verdicts, you have read the actual record fields and can name the diverging fields.
  • The output report is concise: one row per record or child-group signature bucket, no raw daemon envelopes.
  • The session's audit log (.opencode/artifacts/xedit-mcp/audit/YYYY-MM-DD.jsonl) contains one entry per MCP tool call you made.

If you cannot meet these for a record, mark it unknown in the report and explain why — do not guess.

Common Mistakes

  • Calling xedit_call records.conflict_status directly when xedit_inspect_conflicts would do it with the verdict label already mapped; use raw records.conflict_status only when you need r6 response blocks such as result.childGroup.
  • Treating no_conflict as proof of safety without reading at least one representative record.
  • Looping through hundreds of records in the orchestrator's context when r6 recursive, childGroup, apply_filter, or delegation would collapse the work.
  • Forgetting to call xedit_session first; downstream tools will refuse with state_violation.
  • Asking the daemon for a file that is not in the load order; LOAD001 will fire — load it via the session first.

Delegation hints

This workflow is a strong candidate for read-only sub-agent delegation in two cases:

  1. Large scope (> ~10 records to audit) — the round-trips will fill the orchestrator's context. Delegate the loop; receive the per-record summary table.
  2. Exploratory diagnosis ("I don't know which record is causing this in-game issue") — let a sub-agent triangulate by editor ID and signature; you'll get the candidates back.

When delegating, include this skill and the hub skill in the sub-agent's prompt and provide the scope + budget.

© hashgraph-online, Apache-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in plugins/BB-84C/bgs-modding-superpowers/skills/xedit-conflict-audit of hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 3e1456a

Compare with similar skills

Xedit Conflict Audit next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Xedit Conflict Audit compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Xedit Conflict Audit this skillhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1.3k—~3.3kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Production Auditaffaan-m/ECC277k1 repos~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Aims Auditalirezarezvani/claude-skills28k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Geo Auditsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills47k1 repos~3.4kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
OmniRoute Audit and Policy CLIdiegosouzapw/OmniRoute75k—~733Automated safety check: PassMIT
Audit Preparationsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills47k1 repos~5.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Production Audit

    affaan-m/ECC

    Local-evidence production readiness audit for shipped apps, pre-launch reviews, post-merge checks, and "what breaks in prod?" questions without sending repo data to an external audit service.

    277k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.9k tokens
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Aims Audit

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    /cs:aims-audit <scope — ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS internal-audit 6-question forcing interrogation.

    28k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Geo Audit

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Full website GEO+SEO audit with parallel subagent delegation.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.4k tokens
    Marketing & SEOAuto-check: notes
  • OmniRoute Audit and Policy CLI

    diegosouzapw/OmniRoute

    Command reference for omniroute's audit, logs, policy and telemetry commands: search and export audit trails, manage access policies and review request history for compliance work.

    75k GitHub stars~733 tokensUpdated today
    SecurityAuto-check passed
  • Audit Preparation

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Audit preparation register: required document, period covered, request and receipt dates, preparer and reviewer, auditor queries and adjustments.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~5.3k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Qms Audit Expert

    davila7/claude-code-templates

    Senior QMS Audit Expert for internal and external quality management system auditing.

    33k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.7k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

More from hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

All 715 skills in this repo
  • Anime Reaction Gif

    hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

    Create original anime-style reaction stickers as looping GIFs and MP4 previews, using generated character pose sheets and timed key poses.

    1.3k GitHub stars~922 tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Calibredb

    hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

    Manage and query Calibre libraries with the calibredb CLI (local paths or Calibre Content server URLs).

    1.3k GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Rust API Test Harness

    hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

    A skill your agent uses when adding, changing, testing, or debugging Rust HTTP APIs and services, especially when Codex needs black-box integration tests, random-port app startup, real database test…

    1.3k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Art

    hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

    Make a studio's game look like something at build time — a cover from a real frame of the game (free), painted covers, backdrops, textures and character plates from image models through the…

    1.3k GitHub stars~2.5k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Calle

    hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

    Use CALL-E from Codex through the calle CLI. An agent skill from hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins.

    1.3k GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Game Balance Economy

    hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

    Balance game difficulty, resources, rewards, probability, progression, economies, and dominant strategies.

    1.3k GitHub stars~618 tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Xedit Conflict Audit

What does Xedit Conflict Audit do?

A skill your agent uses when auditing conflicts in a Bethesda plugin set — determining for a record (or a plugin's records) which override wins, what the conflict label is, what references it, and…. Xedit Conflict Audit is an agent skill from hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins. Use when auditing conflicts in a Bethesda plugin set — determining for a record (or a plugin's records) which override wins, what the conflict label is, what references it, and whether the configuration is safe or breaking.

When should I use Xedit Conflict Audit?

Xedit Conflict Audit fits situations like: auditing conflicts in a Bethesda plugin set — determining for a record (or a plugins records) which override wins; what the conflict label is; what references it; whether the configuration is safe.

How do I install Xedit Conflict Audit in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill xedit-conflict-audit -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/BB-84C/bgs-modding-superpowers/skills/xedit-conflict-audit in hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins) into .claude/skills/xedit-conflict-audit in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Xedit Conflict Audit in Codex?

Run `npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill xedit-conflict-audit -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/BB-84C/bgs-modding-superpowers/skills/xedit-conflict-audit in hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins) into .agents/skills/xedit-conflict-audit in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Xedit Conflict Audit in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill xedit-conflict-audit -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/xedit-conflict-audit, .gemini/skills/xedit-conflict-audit, .github/skills/xedit-conflict-audit and .opencode/skills/xedit-conflict-audit in your project.

What does Xedit Conflict Audit need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Xedit Conflict Audit is instructions for the agent only.

Does Xedit Conflict Audit access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Xedit Conflict Audit safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Xedit Conflict Audit use?

Xedit Conflict Audit is published under the Apache-2.0 licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Xedit Conflict Audit use?

About 3.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 13k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Xedit Conflict Audit?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Xedit Conflict Audit: Production Audit (affaan-m/ECC, 277k stars), Aims Audit (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars), Geo Audit (sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, 47k stars) and OmniRoute Audit and Policy CLI (diegosouzapw/OmniRoute, 75k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Xedit Conflict Audit?

hashgraph-online (a GitHub organization) maintains it in hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins, which has 1,267 GitHub stars. The repository holds 716 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 10, 2026.

Source: hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.