New: 98,000+ skills indexed from GitHub repos with 100+ stars · every skill safety-checkedBrowse top skillsTop skills
Esc to closeBrowse all skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills

Agent skill

Iatf 16949 Audit

by hashgraph-online in hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

Conduct an IATF audit, check supplemental requirements, or prepare for a manufacturing process audit or IATF 16949:2016 third-party assessment.

MITAuto-check passedLegal & Compliance

Install Iatf 16949 Audit

skills CLI
$ npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill iatf-16949-audit -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins iatf-16949-audit --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/plugins/RBraga01/Quality-Engineering-Skills/skills/audit/iatf-16949-audit .claude/skills/iatf-16949-audit && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
iatf-16949-audit
GitHub stars
1.3k
Token cost
~4k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,938 words
Files
2 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
716
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Conduct an IATF audit, check supplemental requirements, or prepare for a manufacturing process audit or IATF 16949:2016 third-party assessment.

  • Works in 3 steps: QMS audit — covers the entire quality… → Manufacturing process audit —… → Product audit — product-specific,…
  • Internal IATF audits
  • SKILL.md covers Goal, When to use, Required IATF Audit Checklist and Key IATF 16949 supplemental…, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Iatf 16949 Audit is an agent skill from hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins. Conduct an IATF audit, check supplemental requirements, or prepare for a manufacturing process audit or IATF 16949:2016 third-party assessment. Covers customer-specific requirements (CSR), all 16 automotive supplemental clauses, and the three required audit types: QMS audit, manufacturing process audit, and product audit. Use for internal IATF audits or supplier quality audits at automotive organisations.

Its SKILL.md is about 4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 2 other files, including reference files (for example `references/supplemental-requirements.md`).

It sits in Legal & Compliance, covering Audit readiness. The repository describes itself as: A curated list of awesome OpenAI Codex / ChatGPT plugins, skills, and resources. The 1 Codex Marketplace. See live plugins at: https://hol.org/plugins/best-codex-plugins. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Internal IATF audits
  • Supplier quality audits at automotive organisations

Example prompts

  • “/iatf-16949-audit”

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. QMS audit — covers the entire quality management system (ISO 9001 + IATF supplementals)
  2. Manufacturing process audit — process-based, covers all manufacturing processes at least annually
  3. Product audit — product-specific, verifies product conformance to specifications

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 3e1456a. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Iatf 16949 Audit loads about 4k tokens when it runs, and up to ~7.9k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 106 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,938 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~106
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~7.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins at commit 3e1456a, republished under its MIT licence (© hashgraph-online). 1,938 words, ~4,004 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/iatf-16949-audit/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 1 other file; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
iatf-16949-audit
description
Conduct an IATF audit, check supplemental requirements, or prepare for a manufacturing process audit or IATF 16949:2016 third-party assessment. Covers customer-specific requirements (CSR), all 16 automotive supplemental clauses, and the three required audit types: QMS audit, manufacturing process audit, and product audit. Use for internal IATF audits or supplier quality audits at automotive organisations.
license
MIT
metadata.author
RBraga01
metadata.version
1.1
metadata.iatf-16949
9.2.2
metadata.domain
quality-engineering
metadata.subdomain
audit
metadata.industries
automotive,electronics
metadata.status
approved
metadata.created
2026-06-01
metadata.last_updated
2026-06-03

IATF 16949:2016 Internal Audit — Supplemental Requirements

Goal

Audit the automotive-specific supplemental requirements of IATF 16949:2016, including CSR compliance and the three mandatory internal audit streams. Use in conjunction with iso-9001-internal-audit for a complete IATF audit.

When to use

This skill covers the IATF 16949 supplemental requirements — the automotive additions to ISO 9001.

IATF 16949 requires three types of internal audit (§9.2.2.1). All three must be planned, executed, and recorded within the audit programme cycle:

  1. QMS audit — covers the entire quality management system (ISO 9001 + IATF supplementals)
  2. Manufacturing process audit — process-based, covers all manufacturing processes at least annually
  3. Product audit — product-specific, verifies product conformance to specifications

All manufacturing processes must be audited at least annually, with increased frequency for high-risk or poor-performing areas.

Required IATF Audit Checklist

☐ Verify all three audit streams are planned and executed within the programme cycle ☐ Confirm CSR register is current and that changes trigger QMS document updates ☐ Check contingency plans are documented, reviewed, and tested (not just written) ☐ Verify special characteristics are consistent across all documents (drawing, DFMEA, PFMEA, CP, WI) ☐ Confirm supplier monitoring and escalation are active with defined thresholds ☐ Check Control Plan ↔ PFMEA linkage is current ☐ Verify traceability and suspect material isolation capability (24-hour test) ☐ Review temporary deviations for approval, expiry, and active control ☐ Verify problem-solving methodology is applied with objective evidence of effectiveness ☐ Confirm management review includes all IATF supplemental inputs ☐ Do not accept verbal confirmation — verify by observing the process, interviewing personnel, and reviewing records

Key IATF 16949 supplemental requirements — audit questions

§4.3.2 — Customer-specific requirements (CSR)

This is the most commonly non-conforming IATF clause.

Questions:

  • Is there a register of all applicable customer-specific requirements (CSRs)?
  • For each OEM customer: have the latest CSRs been downloaded and reviewed?
  • Are CSR requirements addressed in the QMS (procedures, control plans, work instructions)?
  • Are personnel who deal with each customer aware of their specific requirements?
  • CSR review must be revision-controlled and linked to implementation evidence in affected documents — is this traceable?
  • Evidence: CSR register, evidence that each CSR has been reviewed and implemented, CSR revision dates vs. QMS document dates

High-risk CSR areas: PPAP requirements, problem-solving format requirements, special characteristics symbols, labelling specifications, sub-supplier approval requirements.

§5.1.1.1 — Corporate responsibility
  • Is there a documented corporate responsibility policy (ethics, anti-bribery)?
  • Is there an escalation process for reporting ethical concerns?
  • Are employees aware of how to report ethical concerns confidentially?
  • Evidence: code of conduct, ethics policy, reporting mechanism (hotline or similar)
§5.3.1 — Organisational roles, responsibilities, and authorities — supplemental
  • Is there a person responsible for customer satisfaction?
  • Are responsibilities for special characteristics defined?
  • Is there a process for communicating customer requirements to all relevant functions?
  • Evidence: roles matrix with customer satisfaction ownership identified
§6.1.2.1 — Risk analysis (supplemental)
  • Does the risk analysis consider lessons learned from similar products?
  • Is warranty data, field returns, and customer complaints included as inputs?
  • Evidence: risk analysis records with warranty/field data inputs
§6.1.2.3 — Contingency plans

IATF requires documented contingency plans for:

  • Key equipment failure
  • Key supplier failure or disruption
  • Labour shortages
  • IT/infrastructure failure
  • Natural disasters or site incidents affecting delivery

Questions:

  • Are contingency plans documented for each of these scenarios?
  • Are plans reviewed periodically (at least annually)?
  • Are they tested or rehearsed?
  • Does top management know who activates contingency plans?
  • Do contingency plans include customer communication protocols and recovery priorities?
  • Evidence: contingency plan document, last review date, test/simulation records
§7.2.3 — Internal auditor competency
  • Are internal auditors formally qualified or trained?
  • Do auditors have process knowledge for the areas they audit?
  • Is there evidence of auditor training (certification, OJT, qualification test)?
  • Are auditors independent of the area they audit?
  • Is auditor effectiveness periodically reviewed based on audit quality and finding accuracy?
  • Evidence: auditor qualification records, audit schedule showing independence
§7.2.4 — Second and third-party auditor competency
  • For supplier audits: are supplier auditors trained and qualified?
  • For customer audits: are there designated contacts?
§8.3.2.1 — Design and development — supplemental
  • Are special characteristics (SC) identified and documented in DFMEA and drawings?
  • Are customer-specific SC symbols used correctly?
  • Are SC characteristics flowed down to PFMEA, Control Plan, and work instructions?
  • Evidence: drawing with SC marked, DFMEA with SC, PFMEA with SC, Control Plan with SC, WI with SC
§8.3.3.3 — Special characteristics
  • Is there a process to identify, document, and control all special characteristics?
  • Do all documents (drawing, DFMEA, PFMEA, CP, WI) use consistent SC symbols?
  • Are operators aware of which characteristics are special?
  • Any inconsistency in SC identification across documents must be treated as a significant audit finding due to control failure — is SC consistency actively verified?
  • Evidence: SC registry or matrix cross-referencing all documents
§8.4.1.2 — Customer-directed sources (directed buy)
  • When the customer directs a specific supplier (directed buy), is this documented?
  • Is the directed supplier included in the approved supplier list?
  • Is quality monitoring applied even if the customer selected the supplier?
§8.4.2.3 — Supplier monitoring

IATF requires active supplier monitoring with specific actions for non-performing suppliers.

Questions:

  • Is there a supplier performance monitoring system (PPM, on-time delivery, quality issues)?
  • Is supplier performance reviewed at a defined frequency (minimum quarterly)?
  • Are supplier development or escalation actions triggered based on defined performance thresholds?
  • For poor performers: is there a documented escalation and improvement process?
  • Are suppliers assessed for delivery of conforming product (not just quality level)?
  • Evidence: supplier scorecards, last 4 quarters of performance data, improvement plans for poor performers
§8.5.1.1 — Control plan

Questions:

  • Is there a control plan for each production part?
  • Does it cover: pre-launch, production, and reaction plan?
  • Are all special characteristics in the control plan with specific control methods?
  • Is the control plan linked to the PFMEA (detection controls match)?
  • Are reaction plans in the Control Plan understood and applied at the point of use — not only documented?
  • Was it updated after the last process or product change?
  • Evidence: control plan, PFMEA (verify linkage), latest revision date vs. last process change date
§8.5.2.1 — Identification and traceability — supplemental
  • Is full traceability from raw material to finished product maintained?
  • Can suspect material be isolated within 24 hours?
  • Is there a procedure for handling suspect material?
  • Are lot sizes defined to limit the scope of recalls?
  • Evidence: traceability records, suspect material handling procedure, sample traceability exercise (ask for a part and trace it backwards)
§8.5.6.1.1 — Control of changes — supplemental (temporary change)

IATF requires that temporary process changes (deviations) be strictly controlled.

Questions:

  • Is there a process for managing temporary deviations (substituting a process step or material)?
  • Are deviations approved in writing with defined expiry dates?
  • Is there a register of all open temporary deviations?
  • Are expired deviations actively closed or extended — not left open silently?
  • Is the customer notified when required by their CSR?
  • Evidence: deviation register, sample open deviation with expiry date and approval
§8.7.1.1 — Customer notification
  • Is there a procedure for notifying the customer when suspect material may have been shipped?
  • Does it define when notification is required (not just when the customer asks)?
  • Does the procedure specify notification timelines (e.g., 24 hours for safety-related escapes per CSR)?
  • Has the procedure been triggered recently? Were notifications timely?
  • Evidence: notification procedure, last notification records (if any)
Show full SKILL.md (770 more words)Show less
§9.2.2.1 — Internal audit programme — supplemental

IATF requires three audit streams — most organisations fail by only conducting clause-based audits:

  1. QMS audit — covers clauses; must cover entire QMS within the audit programme cycle
  2. Manufacturing process audit — process-based, all manufacturing processes annually minimum; uses VDA 6.3 or equivalent scoring
  3. Product audit — product/shipment audits at defined frequency

Questions:

  • Are all three audit types in the programme?
  • Is the manufacturing process audit process-based (turtle diagram approach)?
  • Are all processes and products covered within the audit cycle?
  • Is the audit programme risk-based (higher risk = higher audit frequency)?
  • Low process audit scores must trigger corrective action, management review, and re-audit planning — is this in place?
  • Evidence: annual audit programme, audit reports for all three types, process audit records (not just clause audits)
§9.3.2.1 — Management review — supplemental inputs

IATF management review must include (in addition to ISO 9001 §9.3.2):

  • Cost of poor quality (COPQ)
  • Warranty performance (if applicable)
  • Customer satisfaction and field performance review
  • Status of CSR compliance
  • Manufacturing feasibility assessments

Questions:

  • Are these topics covered in the management review agenda?
  • Is there data for each topic?
  • Are decisions from these IATF-specific inputs translated into actions with owners and due dates?
  • Evidence: management review minutes with IATF-required topics explicitly addressed
§10.2.3 — Problem solving
  • Is there a documented problem-solving methodology (8D or equivalent)?
  • Is the methodology applied consistently across all quality escapes?
  • Does the 8D identify root cause of occurrence AND root cause of escape?
  • Is effectiveness verified before closure?
  • Evidence: problem-solving procedure, sample 8D reports, verification of effectiveness records
§10.2.4 — Error proofing
  • Is there a documented approach to applying error-proofing (poka-yoke)?
  • Are poka-yoke devices tested at defined intervals (IATF requires: minimum at every start of production)?
  • Are test records maintained?
  • Are failed or bypassed error-proofing checks treated as production stop / reaction plan triggers where applicable?
  • Are poka-yoke failures treated as non-conformances requiring CAPA?
  • Evidence: poka-yoke register, test frequency, test records, last test date vs. interval
§10.3.1 — Continual improvement plan
  • Is there a formal, documented continual improvement plan?
  • Does it include manufacturing process effectiveness (not just quality KPIs)?
  • Is it reviewed at management review?
  • Evidence: CI plan document, last review, evidence of CI activities

Product audit — §9.2.2.3

A product audit verifies that finished products meet all requirements before shipment. It is one of the three mandatory IATF audit streams.

Focus areas for product audit:

  • Product conformity to drawing and specification (dimensional, functional, visual)
  • Packaging and labelling compliance (OEM label format, part number, revision, quantity)
  • Traceability and release status (is the product formally released and traceable to its records?)
  • Audit frequency based on risk, customer issues, and product criticality

Evidence required: product audit reports, measurement records, packaging inspection records, release documentation.

Manufacturing process audit — turtle diagram approach

A manufacturing process audit (required annually for each process) uses a turtle diagram to assess:

InputQuestion
Who (Man)Qualification requirements, training, availability
With what (Machine)Equipment capability, maintenance, calibration
Using what methodWork instructions, current, at point of use
With what materialIncoming material control, traceability
With what measurementGauges, MSA, SPC
EnvironmentCleanroom, temperature, ESD, contamination
Process outputFirst-pass yield, defect rate, scrap
Customer feedbackPPM, complaints, warranty

For each element: is it adequate? Is it controlled? Is there objective evidence?

Each turtle element should be verified by direct observation, interview, and record review — not by document review alone.

A process audit must result in a process audit score (VDA 6.3 uses a percentage score by process element P1-P7). Low scores must trigger corrective action, management review input, and re-audit planning.

Common IATF audit failures

  1. CSR register not updated when customer publishes new CSR revision
  2. No manufacturing process audits — only clause-based audits in the programme
  3. Contingency plans exist but were never tested
  4. Temporary deviations without expiry dates or expired deviations not closed
  5. SC not consistently marked across drawing, PFMEA, control plan, and work instruction
  6. Error-proofing not tested at every start of production (frequency not defined or records not kept)
  7. Problem-solving procedure exists but CARs in practice skip root cause or VOE

Output Format

At the start of each use, ask the user:

"How would you like to receive the output? A — Structured Markdown (formatted tables and sections, ready to copy) B — Plain tables (simplified structure for Excel or Word) C — Narrative report (flowing text for a formal document or email)

Default: A."

Adapt all output sections to the chosen format. If the platform or session context already defines a format preference, skip this question.

Reference files

Changelog

VersionDateAuthorChange
1.02026-06-01@RBraga01Initial release
1.12026-06-03@migmccAdded supplemental requirements reference and CSR audit coverage

© hashgraph-online, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 1 other file (references) in plugins/RBraga01/Quality-Engineering-Skills/skills/audit/iatf-16949-audit of hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/supplemental-requirements.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 3e1456a

Compare with similar skills

Iatf 16949 Audit next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Iatf 16949 Audit compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Iatf 16949 Audit this skillhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins1.3k—~4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
HIPAA Safe Harbor Coverage Auditmaziyarpanahi/openmed5.5k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
ISO Standards Readiness EvidenceK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills48k1 repos~4.6kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Iso42001Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance9461 repos~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Fleet Triagegoogle-labs-code/jules-sdk137—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
PCI DSS Compliancewshobson/agents40k11 repos~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • HIPAA Safe Harbor Coverage Audit

    maziyarpanahi/openmed

    Checks OpenMed de-identified clinical text against the 18 HIPAA Safe Harbor identifier categories and reports gaps and residual re-identification risk.

    5.5k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated today
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

  • ISO Standards Readiness Evidence

    K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

    Organizes scope, controlled documents, risk files and traceability into draft evidence for human review against ISO 13485, 14971, 17025 and 15189.

    48k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.6k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check: notes

  • Iso42001

    Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance

    Expert ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) compliance advisor.

    946 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.7k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

  • Fleet Triage

    google-labs-code/jules-sdk

    Official

    Cognitive triage of fleet audit findings. An agent skill from google-labs-code/jules-sdk.

    137 GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

  • PCI DSS Compliance

    wshobson/agents

    Reference for building payment systems that meet PCI DSS: the 12 requirements, merchant levels, data that must never be stored, tokenization and encryption.

    40k GitHub starsUsed in 11 repos~1.9k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

  • Trust Center Builder

    GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering

    Builds and deploys a serverless trust center that publishes a company's compliance posture, with gated access to audit reports and an admin dashboard.

    419 GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated 7 days ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

More from hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

All 715 skills in this repo

  • Anime Reaction Gif

    hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

    Create original anime-style reaction stickers as looping GIFs and MP4 previews, using generated character pose sheets and timed key poses.

    1.3k GitHub stars~922 tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed

  • Calibredb

    hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

    Manage and query Calibre libraries with the calibredb CLI (local paths or Calibre Content server URLs).

    1.3k GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed

  • Rust API Test Harness

    hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

    A skill your agent uses when adding, changing, testing, or debugging Rust HTTP APIs and services, especially when Codex needs black-box integration tests, random-port app startup, real database test…

    1.3k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed

  • Art

    hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

    Make a studio's game look like something at build time — a cover from a real frame of the game (free), painted covers, backdrops, textures and character plates from image models through the…

    1.3k GitHub stars~2.5k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed

  • Calle

    hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

    Use CALL-E from Codex through the calle CLI. An agent skill from hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins.

    1.3k GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed

  • Game Balance Economy

    hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins

    Balance game difficulty, resources, rewards, probability, progression, economies, and dominant strategies.

    1.3k GitHub stars~618 tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Iatf 16949 Audit

What does Iatf 16949 Audit do?

Conduct an IATF audit, check supplemental requirements, or prepare for a manufacturing process audit or IATF 16949:2016 third-party assessment. Iatf 16949 Audit is an agent skill from hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins. Conduct an IATF audit, check supplemental requirements, or prepare for a manufacturing process audit or IATF 16949:2016 third-party assessment.

When should I use Iatf 16949 Audit?

Iatf 16949 Audit fits situations like: internal IATF audits; supplier quality audits at automotive organisations.

How do I install Iatf 16949 Audit in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill iatf-16949-audit -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/RBraga01/Quality-Engineering-Skills/skills/audit/iatf-16949-audit in hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins) into .claude/skills/iatf-16949-audit in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Iatf 16949 Audit in Codex?

Run `npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill iatf-16949-audit -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/RBraga01/Quality-Engineering-Skills/skills/audit/iatf-16949-audit in hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins) into .agents/skills/iatf-16949-audit in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Iatf 16949 Audit in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins --skill iatf-16949-audit -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/iatf-16949-audit, .gemini/skills/iatf-16949-audit, .github/skills/iatf-16949-audit and .opencode/skills/iatf-16949-audit in your project.

What does Iatf 16949 Audit need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Iatf 16949 Audit is instructions for the agent only.

Does Iatf 16949 Audit access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Iatf 16949 Audit safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Iatf 16949 Audit use?

Iatf 16949 Audit is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Iatf 16949 Audit use?

About 4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 16k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 3.9k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Iatf 16949 Audit?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Iatf 16949 Audit: HIPAA Safe Harbor Coverage Audit (maziyarpanahi/openmed, 5.5k stars), ISO Standards Readiness Evidence (K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills, 48k stars), Iso42001 (Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance, 946 stars) and Fleet Triage (google-labs-code/jules-sdk, 137 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Iatf 16949 Audit?

hashgraph-online (a GitHub organization) maintains it in hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins, which has 1,267 GitHub stars. The repository holds 716 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 10, 2026.

Source: hashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.