Agent skill

Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation

by GPTomics in GPTomics/bioSkills

Detect cluster marker genes and assign manual cell type labels in single-cell RNA-seq using Scanpy (Python) and Seurat (R).

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-single-cell-markers-annotation -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install GPTomics/bioSkills bio-single-cell-markers-annotation --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GPTomics/bioSkills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/single-cell/markers-annotation .claude/skills/bio-single-cell-markers-annotation && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
bio-single-cell-markers-annotation
GitHub stars
1.2k
Used in
1 other repo
Token cost
~3.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,409 words
Files
4
Skills in repo
559
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Detect cluster marker genes and assign manual cell type labels in single-cell RNA-seq using Scanpy (Python) and Seurat (R).

  • Finding genes that distinguish clusters
  • SKILL.md covers Version Compatibility, Governing principle, Choosing a marker / DE method and Defaults that bite (verify…, plus 10 more sections
  • Runs Python and R scripts from its folder; calls pip
  • Ranking markers for annotation

What it does

Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation is an agent skill from GPTomics/bioSkills. Detect cluster marker genes and assign manual cell type labels in single-cell RNA-seq using Scanpy (Python) and Seurat (R). Use when finding genes that distinguish clusters, ranking markers for annotation, scoring gene signatures, hand-labeling clusters, or deciding between Wilcoxon marker ranking and pseudobulk condition DE.

Its SKILL.md is about 3.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 4 other files (for example `examples/find_markers_scanpy.py` and `usage-guide.md`).

It sits in Research & Science, covering Bioinformatics. It works with Scanpy and Python. The repository describes itself as: a set of SKILLS.md for doing bioinformatics with agents like claude code. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Finding genes that distinguish clusters
  • Ranking markers for annotation
  • Scoring gene signatures
  • Hand-labeling clusters

Example prompts

  • “/bio-single-cell-markers-annotation”

Requirements

  • Python 3

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit d91ed3d. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships script files (Python and R), which the agent can run.

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • pip

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use pip, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation loads about 3.4k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 91 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,409 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~91
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~3.4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from GPTomics/bioSkills at commit d91ed3d, republished under its MIT licence (© GPTomics). 1,409 words, ~3,394 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/bio-single-cell-markers-annotation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 3 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
bio-single-cell-markers-annotation
description
Detect cluster marker genes and assign manual cell type labels in single-cell RNA-seq using Scanpy (Python) and Seurat (R). Use when finding genes that distinguish clusters, ranking markers for annotation, scoring gene signatures, hand-labeling clusters, or deciding between Wilcoxon marker ranking and pseudobulk condition DE.
tool_type
mixed
primary_tool
Seurat

Version Compatibility

Reference examples tested with: scanpy 1.10+, Seurat 5.0+, anndata 0.10+

Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:

  • Python: pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures
  • R: packageVersion('<pkg>') then ?function_name to verify parameters

If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.

Marker Gene Detection and Manual Annotation

"Find marker genes for my clusters" -> Rank genes that separate each cluster from the rest, then map clusters to cell types using canonical markers.

  • Python: sc.tl.rank_genes_groups() -> filter by effect size + fraction expressing -> adata.obs[...].map(labels)
  • R: Seurat::FindAllMarkers() -> filter by avg_log2FC + pct.1/pct.2 -> RenameIdents()

Governing principle

Marker detection is descriptive ranking, NOT inference. Two distinct questions get sloppily called "DE" and must never be conflated: (1) marker detection - "which genes are higher in cluster X vs the rest?" is a ranking/annotation task where the cell is the unit and Wilcoxon is an acceptable heuristic; (2) condition DE - "which genes change in cell type X between treated and control?" is a population claim that requires biological replicates, where the unit of replication is the sample/donor, not the cell. Question 2 must use pseudobulk (aggregate raw counts per sample x cell type, then DESeq2/edgeR/limma-voom); treating cells as replicates is pseudoreplication and inflates false positives by orders of magnitude (Squair 2021). Post-clustering marker p-values are double-dipping. Clusters were defined to maximize between-group separation, so testing those same clusters for markers tests a hypothesis built from the data used to test it. The Wilcoxon/t-test null assumes fixed a-priori labels; under a single homogeneous population the statistic does not follow its nominal null, type-I error approaches 1 as resolution rises, and BH correction does nothing because the p-values are invalid before correction. Cluster-marker p-values are descriptive labels, never evidence that a cluster is a real cell type. Rank and filter markers by effect size and fraction-expressing, not by p-value; a gene can be "significant" at p=1e-40 (n is thousands) yet useless as a marker (60% in-group vs 55% out-group).

This skill covers marker discovery for clusters plus manual labeling. Automated reference-based label transfer (SingleR, CellTypist, Azimuth, scANVI) lives in single-cell/cell-annotation. Cross-condition compositional change lives in single-cell/differential-abundance.

Choosing a marker / DE method

MethodQuestion answeredUse whenFails when
Wilcoxon rank-sum (presto)Rank cluster markersDefault for labeling a cluster vs rest; fast, non-parametricQuoted as inference; double-dipping on the clustered data
t-testRank cluster markersQuick first pass; scanpy method=None defaultHeavy-tailed sparse counts violate normality; less robust than Wilcoxon
logistic regression (logreg/LR)Markers controlling covariatesNeed to adjust for batch/covariate when rankingSlow; needs enough cells; still descriptive
ROC (roc, Seurat)Classification power per geneWant an AUC ranking of marker discriminativenessNo p-value; pure ranking
ClusterDE / count splittingAre the cluster's markers real (FDR-honest)?Validating that a split is not spurious before naming itAdds a synthetic-null / data-thinning step; assumptions on the noise model
Pseudobulk + DESeq2/edgeR/limma-voomCondition DE within a cell typeTreatment vs control with >=3 biological replicates per conditionn=1/condition (dispersion unidentifiable); cells-as-replicates

Marker tools (rank_genes_groups, FindMarkers) will technically run a treatment-vs-control contrast cell-by-cell and return tidy tiny p-values. That is statistically invalid for a population claim. The tool not stopping the user is why this error is so common. When methods compete, verify current defaults against installed docs.

Defaults that bite (verify before trusting tutorials)

ToolFolkloreActual default
scanpy rank_genes_groupsDefaults to Wilcoxonmethod=None resolves to t-test; pass method='wilcoxon' explicitly
Seurat v5 FindMarkers logfc.threshold0.250.1 in v5 (was 0.25 in v4); permissive, returns more hits
Seurat v5 FindMarkers min.pct0.10.01 in v5 (was 0.1 in v4)
Seurat test.use='wilcox'Always fastFast only if presto is installed; else silent slow base-R fallback
Pseudobulk inputNormalized/log valuesAggregate RAW counts (summed), never normalized

Scanpy marker detection

Goal: Rank cluster-specific markers and filter them by specificity, not p-value alone.

Approach: Run Wilcoxon explicitly (scanpy's default is t-test), pull results to a DataFrame with pts=True for in/out fraction, then keep genes with a large positive log fold change and a high in-group / low out-group fraction.

python
import scanpy as sc

adata = sc.read_h5ad('clustered.h5ad')

sc.tl.rank_genes_groups(adata, groupby='leiden', method='wilcoxon', pts=True, corr_method='benjamini-hochberg')
markers = sc.get.rank_genes_groups_df(adata, group=None)

specific = markers[(markers['logfoldchanges'] > 1) & (markers['pct_nz_group'] > 0.5) & (markers['pct_nz_reference'] < 0.25)]
print(specific.groupby('group').head(10)[['group', 'names', 'logfoldchanges', 'pct_nz_group', 'pct_nz_reference']])

Seurat marker detection

Goal: Rank markers per cluster and keep specific ones for labeling.

Approach: Run FindAllMarkers with only.pos=TRUE, install presto so Wilcoxon is fast, then rank within cluster by avg_log2FC and require a pct.1-pct.2 gap.

r
library(Seurat)
library(dplyr)

all_markers <- FindAllMarkers(seurat_obj, only.pos = TRUE, logfc.threshold = 0.25, min.pct = 0.1)

specific <- all_markers %>%
    filter(p_val_adj < 0.05, avg_log2FC > 1, (pct.1 - pct.2) > 0.2) %>%
    group_by(cluster) %>%
    slice_max(n = 10, order_by = avg_log2FC)
print(specific)

Seurat v5 lowers thresholds to 0.1/0.01, so explicit logfc.threshold=0.25 and a pct.1-pct.2 filter restore a marker-grade (specific) shortlist from a permissive run.

Gene signature scoring

Goal: Score each cell for a curated panel without library-size confounding.

Approach: Both tools subtract an expression-binned control set; thresholds are dataset-relative and must never be ported as absolute cutoffs.

python
t_cell_panel = ['CD3D', 'CD3E', 'CD4', 'CD8A', 'CD8B']
sc.tl.score_genes(adata, gene_list=t_cell_panel, ctrl_size=50, n_bins=25, score_name='T_cell_score')
r
seurat_obj <- AddModuleScore(seurat_obj, features = list(c('CD3D', 'CD3E', 'CD4', 'CD8A', 'CD8B')), ctrl = 100, name = 'T_cell_score')

scanpy uses 25 control bins, Seurat uses 24 by default (both follow Tirosh 2016) - a real cross-ecosystem non-reproducibility source for small panels.

Cell-cycle scoring

Goal: Assign each cell an S and G2/M score and a phase, to diagnose (and optionally regress) cell-cycle-driven structure.

Approach: Score the Tirosh S and G2/M gene panels; both tools ship the lists. Regression is optional and confounded with biology (cycling is a real state in proliferating populations) - diagnose first and regress only when the cycle is a confound, not reflexively.

python
sc.tl.score_genes_cell_cycle(adata, s_genes=s_genes, g2m_genes=g2m_genes)
r
seurat_obj <- CellCycleScoring(seurat_obj, s.features = cc.genes.updated.2019$s.genes, g2m.features = cc.genes.updated.2019$g2m.genes)

Provide s_genes/g2m_genes as the Tirosh 2016 panels (Seurat's cc.genes.updated.2019 exposes both lists directly); scanpy ships no built-in list, so load the panels from the reference or a regev-lab gene file.

Show full SKILL.md (525 more words)Show less

Manual cluster labeling

Goal: Map cluster ids to cell type names after marker inspection.

Approach: Build a cluster->label dictionary from canonical-marker evidence, map it onto cells, and flag unmapped clusters rather than silently dropping them.

python
cluster_labels = {'0': 'CD4 T', '1': 'CD14 Mono', '2': 'B', '3': 'CD8 T', '4': 'NK', '5': 'FCGR3A Mono'}
adata.obs['cell_type'] = adata.obs['leiden'].map(cluster_labels).fillna('Unassigned')
r
new_ids <- c('0' = 'CD4 T', '1' = 'CD14 Mono', '2' = 'B', '3' = 'CD8 T', '4' = 'NK', '5' = 'FCGR3A Mono')
seurat_obj <- RenameIdents(seurat_obj, new_ids)
seurat_obj$cell_type <- Idents(seurat_obj)

Condition DE the correct way (pseudobulk)

Goal: Test which genes change between conditions within a cell type, with valid FDR.

Approach: Aggregate RAW counts to one profile per sample x cell type, then hand the count matrix to a bulk engine (DESeq2/edgeR/limma-voom) which estimates dispersion across biological replicates. Run each cell type separately so a one-cell-type effect is not diluted.

python
import scanpy as sc

cell_type = adata[adata.obs['cell_type'] == 'CD14 Mono']
pseudobulk = sc.get.aggregate(cell_type, by='sample', func='sum')
counts_df = pseudobulk.layers['sum']
r
pb <- AggregateExpression(seurat_obj, group.by = c('cell_type', 'sample'), assays = 'RNA', layer = 'counts')$RNA

Pull the summed counts slot, build a sample-level design (condition + covariates), and run DESeq2/edgeR; see differential-expression/deseq2-basics for the modeling step. Never run DE on batch-corrected or normalized expression.

Canonical PBMC markers (context-dependent, validate per dataset)

Cell typeMarkersCell typeMarkers
CD4 TCD3D, CD4, IL7RNKNKG7, GNLY, NCAM1
CD8 TCD3D, CD8A, CD8BCD14 MonoCD14, LYZ, S100A8
BMS4A1, CD79A, CD19FCGR3A MonoFCGR3A, MS4A7
DCFCER1A, CST3PlateletPPBP, PF4

A marker is a conditional statement, not a property of a gene: a marker in blood may be expressed broadly in tumor, and "vs rest" markers depend on what "rest" is. Re-validate any ported panel.

Common Errors

SymptomCauseFix
Thousands of "significant" markers between two visually-similar clustersOver-clustering + double-dipping inflationSignificance-test the split (scSHC/ClusterDE) or merge; never quote raw marker p-values as proof of a cell type
Marker p-values used as evidence clusters are realSelective-inference violation; BH cannot fix invalid p-valuesReport markers as descriptive labels; validate identity with orthogonal markers
Condition DE returns huge gene lists, none replicateCells treated as replicates (pseudoreplication)Aggregate to pseudobulk per sample x cell type; test across donors
FindAllMarkers hangs for minutespresto not installed; slow base-R Wilcoxoninstall.packages('presto') (or remotes::install_github('immunogenomics/presto'))
Same top markers in every clusterResolution too high; clusters split one populationLower resolution / merge; check stability
Gene cutoff ported from another dataset misclassifies cellsModule scores are dataset-relativeSet thresholds from this dataset's score distribution
NaN / degenerate logFC and p-values from marker rankingOnly one cluster present, so the "vs rest" reference is emptyMarker ranking needs >=2 groups; subcluster the population or report it as a single homogeneous type
"DE genes" between conditions but no gene changed per cellSubpopulation proportions shifted (compositional confound)Pair condition DE with single-cell/differential-abundance
  • clustering - Cluster cells before finding markers
  • preprocessing - Normalize and select features before marker detection
  • cell-annotation - Automated reference-based label transfer (complements manual marker labeling)
  • differential-abundance - Test whether cell-type proportions changed between conditions
  • differential-expression/deseq2-basics - Pseudobulk condition DE engine for the aggregated counts
  • differential-expression/de-results - Shrink, filter, and interpret pseudobulk DE results
  • pathway-analysis/go-enrichment - Functional interpretation of marker / DE gene lists

References

  • Squair et al. 2021, Nat Commun 12:5692 - cells-as-replicates inflate false positives; top DE methods aggregate to pseudobulk.
  • Crowell et al. 2020, Nat Commun 11:6077 - muscat; pseudobulk gives well-calibrated FDR for multi-sample multi-condition DS analysis.
  • Neufeld et al. 2024, Biostatistics 25(1):270-287 - count splitting / valid post-clustering inference; Poisson thinning breaks under overdispersion.
  • Lee & Han 2024, Bioinformatics 40(8):btae498 - properly-offset pseudobulk is statistically equivalent to a GLMM.
  • Tirosh et al. 2016, Science 352:189-196 - control-set module scoring underlying score_genes / AddModuleScore.

© GPTomics, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 3 other files in single-cell/markers-annotation of GPTomics/bioSkills.

  • SKILL.md
  • examples/find_markers_scanpy.py
  • examples/find_markers_seurat.R
  • usage-guide.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit d91ed3d

Used in 1 other repository

We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in GPTomics/bioSkills, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation this skillGPTomics/bioSkills1.2k1 repos~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Anndatadavila7/claude-code-templates33k11 repos~2.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
ScanpyK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills48k1 repos~5.1kAutomated safety check: PassBSD-3-Clause
AnndataK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills48k1 repos~3.9kAutomated safety check: NotesBSD-3-Clause
Bio Single Cell Data IoFreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills3.1k1 repos~2kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Bio Single Cell PreprocessingFreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills3.1k1 repos~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassNone

Similar skills

  • Anndata

    davila7/claude-code-templates

    This skill should be used when working with annotated data matrices in Python, particularly for single-cell genomics analysis, managing experimental measurements with metadata, or handling…

    33k GitHub starsUsed in 11 repos~2.5k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Scanpy

    K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

    Performs Scanpy single-cell RNA-seq QC, normalization, HVG selection, PCA/UMAP/t-SNE, clustering, exploratory marker ranking, pseudobulk preparation, visualization, and Seurat or…

    48k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~5.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Anndata

    K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

    Handles annotated matrices in single-cell analysis, .h5ad and Zarr files, and integration with the scverse ecosystem.

    48k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Bio Single Cell Data Io

    FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills

    Read, write, and create single-cell data objects using Seurat (R) and Scanpy (Python).

    3.1k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Bio Single Cell Preprocessing

    FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills

    Quality control, filtering, and normalization for single-cell RNA-seq using Seurat (R) and Scanpy (Python).

    3.1k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.4k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Bio Single Cell Clustering

    FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills

    Dimensionality reduction and clustering for single-cell RNA-seq using Seurat (R) and Scanpy (Python).

    3.1k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from GPTomics/bioSkills

All 559 skills in this repo
  • Bio Alignment Io

    GPTomics/bioSkills

    Read, write, and convert multiple sequence alignment files using Biopython Bio.AlignIO.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~4.9k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • bioSkills Installer

    GPTomics/bioSkills

    Installs the bioSkills collection of 425 bioinformatics skills in one step, or only chosen categories, so sequencing, RNA-seq, single-cell and variant tasks get specialized help.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~789 tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Bio Write Sequences

    GPTomics/bioSkills

    Write biological sequences to files (FASTA, FASTQ, GenBank, EMBL) using Biopython Bio.SeqIO.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~2.1k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Amplicon Primer Clipping

    GPTomics/bioSkills

    Soft- or hard-clips PCR primer footprints from aligned amplicon BAMs so primer bases stop masquerading as confirmed reference sequence.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.2k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Filters BAM alignments by FLAG bits, mapping quality and regions with samtools view or pysam, with recipes for common keep and drop cases.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.6k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Bio Alignment Indexing

    GPTomics/bioSkills

    Create and use BAI/CSI indices for BAM/CRAM files using samtools and pysam.

    1.2k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.4k tokens
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Questions about Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation

What does Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation do?

Detect cluster marker genes and assign manual cell type labels in single-cell RNA-seq using Scanpy (Python) and Seurat (R). Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation is an agent skill from GPTomics/bioSkills. Detect cluster marker genes and assign manual cell type labels in single-cell RNA-seq using Scanpy (Python) and Seurat (R).

When should I use Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation?

Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation fits situations like: finding genes that distinguish clusters; ranking markers for annotation; scoring gene signatures; hand-labeling clusters.

How do I install Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-single-cell-markers-annotation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (single-cell/markers-annotation in GPTomics/bioSkills) into .claude/skills/bio-single-cell-markers-annotation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-single-cell-markers-annotation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (single-cell/markers-annotation in GPTomics/bioSkills) into .agents/skills/bio-single-cell-markers-annotation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add GPTomics/bioSkills --skill bio-single-cell-markers-annotation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/bio-single-cell-markers-annotation, .gemini/skills/bio-single-cell-markers-annotation, .github/skills/bio-single-cell-markers-annotation and .opencode/skills/bio-single-cell-markers-annotation in your project.

What does Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation needs Python and R for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (pip). Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Its commands use pip, which can reach the network depending on how they are called. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation use?

Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation use?

About 3.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 14k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation: Anndata (davila7/claude-code-templates, 33k stars), Scanpy (K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills, 48k stars), Anndata (K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills, 48k stars) and Bio Single Cell Data Io (FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills, 3.1k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Bio Single Cell Markers Annotation?

GPTomics (a GitHub organization) maintains it in GPTomics/bioSkills, which has 1,218 GitHub stars. The repository holds 559 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on August 15, 2026.

Source: GPTomics/bioSkills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.