Agent skill

Roadmap Planner

by FerroxLabs in FerroxLabs/wayland

Product roadmap creation expert covering Now-Next-Later format, outcome-based roadmaps, theme-based roadmaps, dependency mapping, stakeholder alignment, review cadence, metric-driven prioritization…

Apache-2.0Auto-check passedProduct & Project Management

Install Roadmap Planner

skills CLI
$ npx skills add FerroxLabs/wayland --skill roadmap-planner -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install FerroxLabs/wayland roadmap-planner --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FerroxLabs/wayland.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/src/process/resources/skills-library/bodies/skills/business-strategy/roadmap-planner .claude/skills/roadmap-planner && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
roadmap-planner
GitHub stars
608
Token cost
~4.9k tokens
SKILL.md length
768 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
1,194
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Apache-2.0

At a glance

Product roadmap creation expert covering Now-Next-Later format, outcome-based roadmaps, theme-based roadmaps, dependency mapping, stakeholder alignment, review cadence, metric-driven prioritization…

  • Works in 6 steps: Define interfaces early: Agree on API… → Use mocks/stubs: Allow parallel… → Minimize cross-team dependencies: Prefer… → …
  • The user asks about roadmap planner
  • SKILL.md covers Roadmap Philosophy, Roadmap Formats, Dependency Mapping and Metric-Driven Prioritization, plus 5 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Roadmap Planner is an agent skill from FerroxLabs/wayland. Product roadmap creation expert covering Now-Next-Later format, outcome-based roadmaps, theme-based roadmaps, dependency mapping, stakeholder alignment, review cadence, metric-driven prioritization, and roadmap communication. Use when the user asks about roadmap planner, roadmap planner best practices, or needs guidance on roadmap planner implementation. Do NOT use when the user needs a different specialized skill or is asking about an unrelated technology domain.

Its SKILL.md is about 4.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Product & Project Management, covering Product roadmapping. The repository describes itself as: Wayland - The AI Agent That Perceives. Reasons. Acts. Evolves. The licence is Apache-2.0.

When your agent uses it

  • The user asks about roadmap planner
  • Roadmap planner best practices
  • Needs guidance on roadmap planner implementation
  • The user needs a different specialized skill

Example prompts

  • “/roadmap-planner”

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Define interfaces early: Agree on API contracts/schemas before implementation
  2. Use mocks/stubs: Allow parallel development by mocking dependencies
  3. Minimize cross-team dependencies: Prefer vertical (full-stack) teams
  4. Make dependencies visible: Track them on the roadmap explicitly
  5. Regular sync cadence: Teams with dependencies meet weekly minimum
  6. Buffer for dependencies: External dependencies need larger buffers

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 4c030c7. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are markdown).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Roadmap Planner loads about 4.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 121 tokens; SKILL.md has 768 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~121
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from FerroxLabs/wayland at commit 4c030c7, republished under its Apache-2.0 licence (© FerroxLabs). 768 words, ~4,857 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/roadmap-planner/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
roadmap-planner
description
Product roadmap creation expert covering Now-Next-Later format, outcome-based roadmaps, theme-based roadmaps, dependency mapping, stakeholder alignment, review cadence, metric-driven prioritization, and roadmap communication. Use when the user asks about roadmap planner, roadmap planner best practices, or needs guidance on roadmap planner implementation. Do NOT use when the user needs a different specialized skill or is asking about an unrelated technology domain.
license
Apache-2.0
metadata.author
foundry-skills
metadata.version
1.0.0
metadata.tags
project-management strategy planning
metadata.category
business-strategy
metadata.subcategory
product-management
metadata.disclaimer
none
metadata.difficulty
intermediate

Roadmap Planner

You are an expert Product Roadmap Planner who helps teams create, communicate, and maintain product roadmaps that drive alignment and enable strategic decision-making. You understand that roadmaps are strategic communication tools, not detailed project plans, and you guide teams accordingly.

Roadmap Philosophy

What a Roadmap IS
  • A strategic communication tool showing direction and priorities
  • A living document that evolves as you learn
  • An alignment mechanism across teams and stakeholders
  • A framework for making trade-off decisions
What a Roadmap is NOT
  • A detailed project plan with exact dates
  • A promise or commitment to specific features
  • A list of everything you could possibly build
  • A fixed document that never changes
The Cardinal Sin

The single most damaging roadmap mistake: listing features with exact dates for 12+ months out. This creates false precision, kills flexibility, and sets unrealistic expectations. The further out you look, the less certain you should be.

Roadmap Formats

┌─────────────────┬──────────────────┬──────────────────┐
│      NOW         │      NEXT        │      LATER       │
│  (This Quarter)  │ (Next Quarter)   │   (Future)       │
│  High Confidence │ Medium Confidence│ Low Confidence   │
├─────────────────┼──────────────────┼──────────────────┤
│ ■ Search         │ ○ Personalized   │ ◇ AI-powered     │
│   improvements   │   recommendations│   product search │
│                  │                  │                  │
│ ■ Checkout       │ ○ International  │ ◇ Subscription   │
│   optimization   │   payments       │   commerce       │
│                  │                  │                  │
│ ■ Mobile app     │ ○ Push           │ ◇ AR product     │
│   performance    │   notifications  │   previews       │
├─────────────────┼──────────────────┼──────────────────┤
│ Specific items   │ Themes and       │ Strategic bets   │
│ with acceptance  │ rough scope      │ and explorations │
│ criteria         │                  │                  │
└─────────────────┴──────────────────┴──────────────────┘

Benefits:

  • Reduces false precision for distant items
  • Encourages strategic thinking over feature listing
  • Easy to communicate to any audience
  • Natural conversation about what moves from Next to Now
Outcome-Based Roadmap
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ OUTCOME: Increase new user activation from 30% to 50%           │
├──────────────────────┬───────────────────┬──────────────────────┤
│ Q1                   │ Q2                │ Q3                   │
├──────────────────────┼───────────────────┼──────────────────────┤
│ Hypothesis: Simpli-  │ Hypothesis: Person│ Hypothesis: Social   │
│ fied onboarding will │ alized welcome    │ features will drive  │
│ increase activation  │ will increase     │ retention post-      │
│ by 10%               │ activation by 5%  │ activation           │
│                      │                   │                      │
│ Key Results:         │ Key Results:      │ Key Results:         │
│ - Time to first      │ - Welcome email   │ - 50% of new users   │
│   value < 3 min      │   CTR > 25%       │   connect with 3+    │
│ - Drop-off at step   │ - In-app guidance │   people in week 1   │
│   2 reduced by 40%   │   completion > 60%│                      │
│                      │                   │                      │
│ Initiatives:         │ Initiatives:      │ Initiatives:         │
│ - Redesign signup    │ - Segment-based   │ - Team invitation    │
│   flow               │   onboarding      │   flow               │
│ - Interactive        │ - Dynamic welcome │ - Activity feed      │
│   tutorial           │   dashboard       │                      │
└──────────────────────┴───────────────────┴──────────────────────┘

Benefits:

  • Focuses on WHY (business outcomes) not WHAT (features)
  • Allows teams to discover the best solutions
  • Makes it clear when to pivot (hypothesis proven/disproven)
  • Connects product work to business strategy
Theme-Based Roadmap
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    PRODUCT ROADMAP 2025                       │
├──────────────┬──────────┬──────────┬──────────┬─────────────┤
│ Theme        │ Q1       │ Q2       │ Q3       │ Q4          │
├──────────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼─────────────┤
│ Performance  │ ████████ │ ████     │          │             │
│ & Reliability│ DB optim │ CDN      │          │             │
│              │ Caching  │          │          │             │
├──────────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼─────────────┤
│ Growth &     │          │ ████████ │ ████████ │ ████        │
│ Acquisition  │          │ Referral │ SEO      │ Partnerships│
│              │          │ program  │ optimiz  │             │
├──────────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼─────────────┤
│ Enterprise   │ ████     │ ████     │ ████████ │ ████████    │
│ Features     │ SSO      │ Audit    │ RBAC     │ Compliance  │
│              │          │ logs     │          │ reporting   │
├──────────────┼──────────┼──────────┼──────────┼─────────────┤
│ Platform &   │ ██       │ ██       │ ██       │ ██          │
│ Tech Debt    │ (ongoing)│ (ongoing)│ (ongoing)│ (ongoing)   │
└──────────────┴──────────┴──────────┴──────────┴─────────────┘

Benefits:

  • Shows strategic investment areas over time
  • Helps leadership understand where effort is going
  • Makes trade-offs between themes visible
  • Good for organizations with multiple product lines
Timeline Roadmap (Use Sparingly)
Best used for: Fixed-deadline projects, compliance timelines, migration projects
Avoid for: Feature-based product development (creates false precision)

Jan        Feb        Mar        Apr        May        Jun
|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|
[=== Phase 1: Foundation ===]
  [DB Migration]
  [API v2 Development]
           [=== Phase 2: Migration ===]
              [Service A Migration]
                       [Service B Migration]
                                 [=== Phase 3: Cutover ===]
                                    [Parallel Run]
                                              [Switch]
                                                      [Decom v1]

Dependency Mapping

Dependency Types
1. Technical Dependencies:
   - Service A must be deployed before Service B can integrate
   - Database migration must complete before new features can launch

2. Team Dependencies:
   - Platform team must deliver API before product team can build feature
   - Design must complete mockups before frontend development begins

3. External Dependencies:
   - Third-party API availability
   - Vendor contract negotiations
   - Regulatory approval

4. Data Dependencies:
   - Historical data migration required before new analytics features
   - Training data needed before ML model deployment
Dependency Visualization
┌──────────┐     ┌──────────┐     ┌──────────┐
│ Auth     │────>│ User     │────>│ Team     │
│ Service  │     │ Profile  │     │ Features │
│ (Team A) │     │ (Team A) │     │ (Team B) │
└──────────┘     └──────────┘     └──────────┘
                       │
                       ▼
                 ┌──────────┐
                 │ Notific- │
                 │ ations   │
                 │ (Team C) │
                 └──────────┘

Critical Path: Auth → User Profile → Team Features
Risk: Team B is blocked until Team A delivers User Profile
Mitigation: Define API contract early, allow parallel development with mocks
Dependency Management Strategies
  1. Define interfaces early: Agree on API contracts/schemas before implementation
  2. Use mocks/stubs: Allow parallel development by mocking dependencies
  3. Minimize cross-team dependencies: Prefer vertical (full-stack) teams
  4. Make dependencies visible: Track them on the roadmap explicitly
  5. Regular sync cadence: Teams with dependencies meet weekly minimum
  6. Buffer for dependencies: External dependencies need larger buffers

Metric-Driven Prioritization

RICE Framework
Score = (Reach x Impact x Confidence) / Effort

Reach: How many users affected per quarter?
Impact: How much will it move the target metric? (3=Massive, 2=High, 1=Medium, 0.5=Low, 0.25=Minimal)
Confidence: How certain are we? (100%=High, 80%=Medium, 50%=Low)
Effort: Person-months of work required

Example:
┌──────────────────────┬───────┬────────┬──────┬────────┬───────┐
│ Initiative           │ Reach │ Impact │ Conf │ Effort │ RICE  │
├──────────────────────┼───────┼────────┼──────┼────────┼───────┤
│ Search improvements  │ 5000  │ 2      │ 80%  │ 3      │ 2667  │
│ Mobile notifications │ 8000  │ 1      │ 80%  │ 2      │ 3200  │
│ AI recommendations   │ 3000  │ 3      │ 50%  │ 6      │  750  │
│ Checkout redesign    │ 10000 │ 2      │ 90%  │ 4      │ 4500  │
└──────────────────────┴───────┴────────┴──────┴────────┴───────┘
Priority: Checkout > Notifications > Search > AI
Weighted Scoring Model
Define criteria and weights:
- Business Value (30%)
- User Impact (25%)
- Strategic Alignment (20%)
- Technical Feasibility (15%)
- Risk (10%)

Score each initiative 1-10 on each criterion, multiply by weight, sum.

┌────────────────┬───────┬───────┬────────┬─────────┬──────┬───────┐
│ Initiative     │ BizVal│ User  │ Strat  │ Tech    │ Risk │ Total │
│                │ (30%) │ (25%) │ (20%)  │ (15%)   │ (10%)│       │
├────────────────┼───────┼───────┼────────┼─────────┼──────┼───────┤
│ Feature A      │ 8/2.4 │ 7/1.75│ 9/1.8  │ 6/0.9   │ 7/0.7│  7.55 │
│ Feature B      │ 6/1.8 │ 9/2.25│ 5/1.0  │ 8/1.2   │ 8/0.8│  7.05 │
│ Feature C      │ 9/2.7 │ 5/1.25│ 8/1.6  │ 4/0.6   │ 3/0.3│  6.45 │
└────────────────┴───────┴───────┴────────┴─────────┴──────┴───────┘
Cost of Delay
Cost of Delay = Value of feature per week * Weeks of delay

Use to decide sequencing:
- Feature A: $10K/week value, 4 weeks to build
  Weighted Shortest Job First (WSJF) = 10/4 = 2.5
- Feature B: $20K/week value, 12 weeks to build
  WSJF = 20/12 = 1.67
- Feature C: $5K/week value, 1 week to build
  WSJF = 5/1 = 5.0

Build order: C → A → B (highest WSJF first)

Stakeholder Alignment

Roadmap Review Process
Monthly Cadence:
Week 1: Product team updates roadmap based on new data/learnings
Week 2: Cross-functional review (engineering, design, data)
Week 3: Leadership review and alignment
Week 4: Communicate updates to broader organization

Quarterly Deep Dive:
- Full strategic review of roadmap direction
- Re-evaluate themes and priorities
- Update Now-Next-Later based on quarterly outcomes
- Adjust based on market changes and competitive landscape
Stakeholder Communication Matrix
┌─────────────────┬────────────────┬─────────────┬───────────────┐
│ Audience        │ Format         │ Frequency   │ Detail Level  │
├─────────────────┼────────────────┼─────────────┼───────────────┤
│ Board/C-Suite   │ Theme-based    │ Quarterly   │ Strategic     │
│                 │ 1-pager        │             │ outcomes only │
├─────────────────┼────────────────┼─────────────┼───────────────┤
│ VP/Directors    │ Outcome-based  │ Monthly     │ Themes +      │
│                 │ roadmap        │             │ key initiatives│
├─────────────────┼────────────────┼─────────────┼───────────────┤
│ Engineering     │ Now-Next-Later │ Bi-weekly   │ Initiatives + │
│ Teams           │ with details   │             │ dependencies  │
├─────────────────┼────────────────┼─────────────┼───────────────┤
│ Sales/CS        │ Feature-focused│ Monthly     │ What's coming │
│                 │ timeline       │             │ + customer    │
│                 │                │             │ impact        │
├─────────────────┼────────────────┼─────────────┼───────────────┤
│ Customers       │ High-level     │ Quarterly   │ Themes only,  │
│                 │ themes         │             │ no dates      │
└─────────────────┴────────────────┴─────────────┴───────────────┘
Handling Roadmap Requests and Pressure
When a stakeholder asks for a specific feature:

1. Acknowledge: "I understand this is important for [their goal]"
2. Connect to outcomes: "How does this relate to [business outcome]?"
3. Contextualize: "Here's where it fits relative to current priorities"
4. Offer trade-offs: "We can do this if we deprioritize [X]. What do you think?"
5. Document: Record the request and the decision in the roadmap backlog

When leadership demands a fixed date:
1. Provide a range with confidence levels, not a single date
2. List assumptions and risks that could affect the timeline
3. Identify what would need to be true for the earliest date
4. Offer scope flexibility: "We can hit [date] if scope is limited to [subset]"

Roadmap Creation Workshop

Workshop Structure (Half-Day)
Pre-work (before workshop):
- Collect input from stakeholders (surveys, interviews)
- Gather data: usage metrics, customer feedback, competitive analysis
- Prepare current state assessment

Workshop Agenda:
1. (30 min) Vision and Strategy Recap
   - Where are we going? Why?
   - What does success look like in 12 months?

2. (45 min) Opportunity Brainstorming
   - What could we build/improve?
   - Organize by theme
   - Include customer requests, tech debt, innovation bets

3. (45 min) Prioritization Exercise
   - Apply RICE or weighted scoring
   - Discuss trade-offs openly
   - Identify the "must dos" vs "nice to haves"

4. (30 min) Dependency and Risk Review
   - Map dependencies between initiatives
   - Identify critical risks
   - Flag external dependencies

5. (30 min) Sequencing and Allocation
   - Place items into Now-Next-Later
   - Allocate team capacity across themes
   - Identify what is explicitly NOT on the roadmap

6. (15 min) Communication Plan
   - Who needs to see this?
   - What format for each audience?
   - When is the next review?

Roadmap Anti-Patterns

Patterns to Avoid
  1. The Feature Factory Roadmap: Just a list of features with dates. No outcomes, no strategy.
  2. The Promise Roadmap: Every item has a committed date. No flexibility.
  3. The Kitchen Sink Roadmap: Everything is on it. Nothing is prioritized.
  4. The Stale Roadmap: Last updated 6 months ago. No one looks at it.
  5. The Secret Roadmap: Only product knows about it. No alignment.
  6. The Single-Track Roadmap: Only customer features. No platform, no tech debt, no innovation.
  7. The Democratic Roadmap: Everyone gets one feature. No strategic focus.
  8. The Copy-Cat Roadmap: Built by looking at competitor feature lists instead of user needs.
Show full SKILL.md (317 more words)Show less
Healthy Roadmap Indicators
  • Updated at least monthly
  • Clearly connects to business strategy/OKRs
  • Includes explicit trade-offs (what you are NOT doing)
  • Has different detail levels for different time horizons
  • Stakeholders know where to find it and reference it
  • Includes both customer-facing and platform investments

Roadmap Templates

One-Page Roadmap Template
PRODUCT ROADMAP | [Product Name] | Updated: [Date]

VISION: [One sentence describing where you're headed]

STRATEGIC THEMES:
1. [Theme A] - [Brief description and target metric]
2. [Theme B] - [Brief description and target metric]
3. [Theme C] - [Brief description and target metric]

NOW (Committed, In Progress):
• [Initiative] - Target: [Metric improvement] - Status: [On track/At risk]
• [Initiative] - Target: [Metric improvement] - Status: [On track/At risk]

NEXT (Planned, Scoped):
• [Initiative] - Expected outcome: [Metric improvement]
• [Initiative] - Expected outcome: [Metric improvement]

LATER (Under Consideration):
• [Initiative] - Hypothesis: [What we think will happen]
• [Initiative] - Hypothesis: [What we think will happen]

NOT DOING (Explicitly Deprioritized):
• [Item] - Reason: [Why not now]

KEY RISKS:
• [Risk 1]: Mitigation: [Action]
• [Risk 2]: Mitigation: [Action]

NEXT REVIEW: [Date]

Quick Decision Guide

When asked about roadmaps:

  • "Help me create a roadmap" → Start with Now-Next-Later, connect to outcomes
  • "How to prioritize?" → Use RICE for data-driven, weighted scoring for collaborative
  • "When will feature X ship?" → Provide ranges with confidence, not exact dates
  • "Roadmap is too full" → Apply ruthless prioritization, make explicit trade-offs
  • "Stakeholders keep adding requests" → Implement intake process with trade-off conversations
  • "How to communicate the roadmap?" → Use the stakeholder communication matrix

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Designing or implementing roadmap planner solutions
  • Reviewing or improving existing roadmap planner approaches
  • Making architectural or implementation decisions about roadmap planner
  • Learning roadmap planner patterns and best practices
  • Troubleshooting roadmap planner-related issues

Do NOT use this skill when:

  • The question is about a fundamentally different technology domain
  • A more specific sibling skill covers the exact topic needed
  • The user needs a complete hands-on tutorial rather than expert guidance

Output Format

markdown
# Roadmap Planner Analysis

## Context Assessment
[Situation summary and constraints]

## Recommended Approach
[Primary recommendation with rationale]

## Implementation Steps
1. [Step with specific details]
2. [Step with specific details]
3. [Step with specific details]

## Trade-offs and Considerations
- [Key trade-off 1]
- [Key trade-off 2]

## Next Steps
- [Immediate action item]
- [Follow-up action item]

Example

Input: "Help me implement roadmap planner for a medium-scale production application"

Output: A structured analysis covering current state assessment, recommended roadmap planner approach with specific patterns, implementation roadmap with milestones, and risk mitigation strategies tailored to the application scale and constraints.

Edge Cases

  • Legacy system integration: When roadmap planner must coexist with legacy approaches, provide a gradual migration path rather than a complete rewrite
  • Scale mismatch: When the solution complexity exceeds the project scale, recommend a simpler approach and note when to revisit
  • Team skill gaps: When the team lacks experience with the recommended approach, include learning resources and simpler alternatives
  • Conflicting requirements: When constraints conflict (e.g., performance vs. maintainability), explicitly state the trade-off and recommend based on stated priorities

© FerroxLabs, Apache-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in src/process/resources/skills-library/bodies/skills/business-strategy/roadmap-planner of FerroxLabs/wayland.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 4c030c7

Compare with similar skills

Roadmap Planner next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Roadmap Planner compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Roadmap Planner this skillFerroxLabs/wayland608—~4.9kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Product Strategistalirezarezvani/claude-skills28k2 repos~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Strategic Roadmap Planningdeanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills7.2k2 repos~4.7kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Walking Skeleton Roadmap Scopingprime-radiant-inc/iterative-development181—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
AI Product Strategy InterviewerPrepLabsAI/InterviewMentor112—~4.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Product PlannerBuildGreatProducts/builder-os227—~4.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Product Strategist

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    OKR cascade toolkit for product leaders: generates aligned company-to-team OKRs from five strategy types and scores how well they line up.

    28k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~1.8k tokens
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Strategic Roadmap Planning

    deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills

    Sequences prioritization, epic definition, and stakeholder alignment into a release plan that ladders up to business outcomes.

    7.2k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~4.7k tokens
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Walking Skeleton Roadmap Scoping

    prime-radiant-inc/iterative-development

    Turns extracted requirements into a roadmap by choosing a walking skeleton iteration with its first journey scenario and ordering the remaining work into follow-on iterations.

    181 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • AI Product Strategy Interviewer

    PrepLabsAI/InterviewMentor

    A VP of Product interviewer that simulates a product strategy interview focused on AI-native products.

    112 GitHub stars~4.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Product Planner

    BuildGreatProducts/builder-os

    Vision intake conversation followed by generation of three product documents — docs/product-vision.md (strategy and brand), docs/prd.md (technical spec for coding agents), and…

    227 GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Rewrites a feature-list roadmap into outcome statements that name the customer segment, the result they get and the business impact, grouped into themes.

    103 GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed

More from FerroxLabs/wayland

All 1,194 skills in this repo
  • Star Office Helper

    FerroxLabs/wayland

    Install, start, connect, and troubleshoot visualization companion projects for Aion/OpenClaw, with Star-Office-UI as the default recommendation.

    608 GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check: notes
  • Openclaw Setup

    FerroxLabs/wayland

    OpenClaw usage expert: Helps you install, deploy, configure, and use OpenClaw personal AI assistant.

    608 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Tvcontrol Setup

    FerroxLabs/wayland

    Set up TVControl end to end: install the connector, start TradingView Desktop with its control port open, load a watchlist export, add the indicators they use, and leave a working chart.

    608 GitHub stars~5.7k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Ab Testing Specialist

    FerroxLabs/wayland

    End-to-end guide for designing, running, and analyzing A/B tests including experiment design, statistical significance, sample size calculation, common pitfalls, and advanced testing patterns.

    608 GitHub stars~3.7k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Academic Writer

    FerroxLabs/wayland

    Complete academic writing guide covering thesis and dissertation structure, journal article format using IMRaD, literature review methodology, citation management, the peer review process, and…

    608 GitHub stars~4.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Accessibility Auditor

    FerroxLabs/wayland

    Web accessibility expertise covering WCAG 2.2 conformance, audit methodology, ARIA patterns, keyboard navigation, screen reader testing, focus management, form accessibility, and automated vs manual…

    608 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Roadmap Planner

What does Roadmap Planner do?

Product roadmap creation expert covering Now-Next-Later format, outcome-based roadmaps, theme-based roadmaps, dependency mapping, stakeholder alignment, review cadence, metric-driven prioritization…. Roadmap Planner is an agent skill from FerroxLabs/wayland. Product roadmap creation expert covering Now-Next-Later format, outcome-based roadmaps, theme-based roadmaps, dependency mapping, stakeholder alignment, review cadence, metric-driven prioritization, and roadmap communication.

When should I use Roadmap Planner?

Roadmap Planner fits situations like: the user asks about roadmap planner; roadmap planner best practices; needs guidance on roadmap planner implementation; the user needs a different specialized skill.

How do I install Roadmap Planner in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add FerroxLabs/wayland --skill roadmap-planner -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (src/process/resources/skills-library/bodies/skills/business-strategy/roadmap-planner in FerroxLabs/wayland) into .claude/skills/roadmap-planner in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Roadmap Planner in Codex?

Run `npx skills add FerroxLabs/wayland --skill roadmap-planner -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (src/process/resources/skills-library/bodies/skills/business-strategy/roadmap-planner in FerroxLabs/wayland) into .agents/skills/roadmap-planner in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Roadmap Planner in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add FerroxLabs/wayland --skill roadmap-planner -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/roadmap-planner, .gemini/skills/roadmap-planner, .github/skills/roadmap-planner and .opencode/skills/roadmap-planner in your project.

What does Roadmap Planner need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Roadmap Planner is instructions for the agent only.

Does Roadmap Planner access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Roadmap Planner safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Roadmap Planner use?

Roadmap Planner is published under the Apache-2.0 licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Roadmap Planner use?

About 4.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 19k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Roadmap Planner?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Roadmap Planner: Product Strategist (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars), Strategic Roadmap Planning (deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills, 7.2k stars), Walking Skeleton Roadmap Scoping (prime-radiant-inc/iterative-development, 181 stars) and AI Product Strategy Interviewer (PrepLabsAI/InterviewMentor, 112 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Roadmap Planner?

FerroxLabs (a GitHub user) maintains it in FerroxLabs/wayland, which has 608 GitHub stars. The repository holds 1,194 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 6, 2026.

Source: FerroxLabs/wayland on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.