Agent skill

Tau Tool Verification

by dpc in dpc/tau

A skill your agent uses when asked to verify Tau harness tools or tool output behavior, especially read, edit, shell/shellcommand, line-oriented output, truncation, metadata headers, UTF-8 handling…

MPL-2.0Auto-check passed

Install Tau Tool Verification

skills CLI
$ npx skills add dpc/tau --skill tau-tool-verification -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install dpc/tau tau-tool-verification --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dpc/tau.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.agents/skills/tau-tool-verification .claude/skills/tau-tool-verification && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
tau-tool-verification
GitHub stars
104
Token cost
~4.8k tokens
SKILL.md length
2,425 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
15
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MPL-2.0

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when asked to verify Tau harness tools or tool output behavior, especially read, edit, shell/shellcommand, line-oriented output, truncation, metadata headers, UTF-8 handling…

  • Asked to verify Tau harness tools
  • SKILL.md covers Goal and Guidelines
  • Calls python3; needs FULL_KEY
  • Tool output behavior

What it does

Tau Tool Verification is an agent skill from dpc/tau. Use this skill when asked to verify Tau harness tools or tool output behavior, especially read, edit, shell/shellcommand, line-oriented output, truncation, metadata headers, UTF-8 handling, diffs, timeouts, or skill/tool conformance.

Its SKILL.md is about 4.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Tau Coding Agent - like Pi, but twice as much. The licence is MPL-2.0.

When your agent uses it

  • Asked to verify Tau harness tools
  • Tool output behavior
  • Especially read
  • Shell/shellcommand

Example prompts

  • “/tau-tool-verification”

Requirements

  • A credential in FULL_KEY

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit d2e1955. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • python3

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names these keys or tokens, usually read from environment variables:

    • FULL_KEY

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Tau Tool Verification loads about 4.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 64 tokens; SKILL.md has 2,425 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~64
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.8k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from dpc/tau at commit d2e1955, republished under its MPL-2.0 licence (© dpc). 2,425 words, ~4,752 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/tau-tool-verification/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
tau-tool-verification
description
Use this skill when asked to verify Tau harness tools or tool output behavior, especially read, edit, shell/shell_command, line-oriented output, truncation, metadata headers, UTF-8 handling, diffs, timeouts, or skill/tool conformance.
advertise
true

Tau Tool Verification

Use when asked to verify Tau tool behavior or Tau tool-verification skills.

Tau exposes different tool sets depending on configuration, provider/model capabilities, and extension setup. Common sets include:

  • ext-shell's read, export, import, edit, and shell tools, plus related tools such as dir_lock, and std-utils' artifact-backed read_image; read_image appears only on explicitly image-capable provider routes;
  • provider/native tools such as apply_patch and shell_command.

If not explicitly stated, start from the tools that are actually exposed in the current session. For older/full ext-shell sessions, the default core set is read, edit, and shell. For ordinary models, edit uses the exact-text internal replace implementation; its provider definition, model calls, and canonical results remain edit, while ext-shell started/result lifecycle events use replace. The shell:tool-style:edit selector instead exposes the legacy line-coordinate implementation as edit; ChatGPT/Codex uses apply_patch. For provider/native sessions, map the same checks to shell_command and apply_patch where possible, and explicitly report any tool-specific checks that cannot be run because the corresponding tool is not available.

When export and import are exposed, verify a small original round trip: export a local regular file, confirm its artifact and size output headers, import the returned <tau-artifact:FULL_KEY> reference, confirm the import's path and size output headers, compare the imported local file byte-for-byte, and confirm its private non-executable permissions. Carry returned filename and mime_type hints to import and verify a sanitized useful filename/suffix; also verify key-only import stays generic (hints are not stored by digest). Explicit export MIME is a declaration, not verified media. Check a PNG clipboard artifact inserts its reference with mime_type: image/png, never an invented filename. For an image original, pass the complete artifact reference directly to read_image; import is needed only for filesystem tools. Do not inspect harness State paths or treat the digest as provenance or safety.

Goal

Your goal is to verify if basic Tau harness tools still work as expected, and conform to our standards and guidelines.

Guidelines

Persistent workdir and project discovery

When workdir is exposed, distinguish the top-level persistent setter from shell_command.workdir, which applies only to one invocation. In disposable project directories, verify that a successful persistent setter makes the new project AGENTS/skill catalog available before a dependent turn; a getter and call-local override must not change discovery. A same-path setter must rescan edited or deleted project files. Do not run dependent calls as sibling tools.

Verify unavailable-project failure reports the actual committed cwd and degraded discovery rather than claiming rollback or retaining stale project instructions. User and unrelated shell/agent contributions must remain intact. For automated background/cancellation probes, discovery readiness must outlive the setter and selected-agent :skill expansion must wait for the installed replacement. Restore the original workdir with a separate setter when the probe finishes.

Tool result output structure

All tools should return a normalized HTTP-protocol-like structure:

header-1: value-1
header-2: value-2
...
header-n: value-n

multi-line-payload

The canonical form is zero or more headers followed by an optional body. When headers and a body are both present, one empty line separates them. A compact body-only scalar response is valid and must not gain a leading empty line or redundant status header.

multi-line-payload can be arbitrary, but line-oriented output typically uses <prefix>(optional-per-line-flags) <line-content> structure. If that's the case the tool description should mention it.

Tool outputs with non-trivial fields encoded into line-oriented payloads should include a format header describing field order and names. For example, an email listing can use:

text
format: uid date from flags access attachments subject...

6212 2016-04-23T17:32:52Z builds@travis-ci.org seen,redacted preview 0 Hi there, from us

The ... suffix on the last field in the format is used to indicate it is a multi-word field that extends to the end of the line.

Tool implementation must take care ensuring newlines and special characters are stripped from field values, and empty values use some placeholders (e.g. -) to avoid breaking the meaning of each line.

Many headers are optional, and skipped for their default most natural values for token efficiency. Keep tool output compact: include only non-default, non-redundant values that help the agent decide what to do next. Do not emit aliases or duplicate fields that carry the same information.

Every completed shell process result is an exception: it carries an explicit termination_reason, including exit with status: 0, so downstream consumers never infer normal termination from an exit status alone.

Do not include headers that are straight copies of tool invocation arguments. The calling agent already knows the arguments it sent, so echoing them wastes context and makes the meaningful result harder to scan. Only report a requested path, query, command, or similar argument when the tool has transformed it into new information, such as a canonicalized path that differs from the input.

Harness-owned background-wait interruption is a successful control result, not an ordinary completion. It uses closed tau_internal: true, wait_outcome: interrupted, wait_reason: activating_input, and wait_mode: exact or any_background headers. It does not echo a target ID or consume the target result.

Layered escaping policy

Tools must semantically escape untrusted metadata fields before composing model-visible text. This includes paths, filenames, identifiers, owner names, queries, commands when shown as metadata, and any other field whose bytes come from the workspace, filesystem, user config, or an extension peer. Escaping is local to the tool because the tool knows which substrings are metadata and which substrings are user/file payload that should remain literal.

Line-oriented outputs must never let metadata inject extra records, headers, or status lines. Escape at least \\, newlines, carriage returns, tabs, and other control characters in metadata fields; use explicit flags such as escaped or invalid-utf8 when that helps the caller understand that displayed text is not byte-exact. Do not over-escape file contents or command output just because they are untrusted; those payloads have separate line-prefix, truncation, and UTF-8 handling rules.

Central provider-visible rendering should still apply a last-resort safety invariant when structured tool responses are rendered into model input, but that is defense-in-depth. It is not a substitute for tool-local semantic escaping, because a central renderer cannot reliably know whether an arbitrary string is a path, a header value, a status label, or content.

Terminal/UI sanitization is a separate layer. UI code must protect terminal state and layout from control sequences, but UI escaping does not make provider/model-visible text safe, and provider-visible escaping does not replace terminal sanitization.

Common patterns

read range operations use inclusive start_line and end_line fields. edit range operations use half-open start_line and end_line_exclusive fields. Newlines are assumed to be \n, but other styles are supported and displayed as crlf (\r\n), cr (\r) or no_nl (missing trailing newline). This applies to both read line-number prefixes and shell stdout/stderr prefixes.

Lines containing invalid UTF-8 bytes should show Unicode replacement characters and an invalid-utf8 flag, so useful surrounding content remains visible while the agent knows the bytes were not exact. Lines which are too long show a truncated flag and have content skipped.

Total outputs that are too long are truncated; truncated: true, total_lines: {lines} and total_bytes: {bytes} headers are added. These total headers are omitted when output is not truncated, except read may report total_lines: 0 and total_bytes: 0 for an empty file. For shell output, total_bytes and saved artifacts count the complete rendered UTF-8 shell form, including out / err prefixes, line-ending and UTF-8 markers, and inserted record separators. They are not raw stdout/stderr byte counts.

When output is truncated due to line number limit, first and last 1000 lines should be shown with ... line separating them, instead of usual line prefix. If a single line would exceed the native byte budget for ext-shell read, search/list/edit recovery, or user shell output (10 KiB), or model shell / shell_command native output body (15 KiB), show only the native prefix plus (truncated) rather than partial content. Small model-shell result metadata and provider rendering are outside the 15 KiB body budget.

Native-budget-truncated ext-shell output, including read, grep, find, ls, edit recovery, model shell, and user shell surfaces, must preserve native rendering and include complete total_lines and total_bytes, a compact warning to prefer narrower commands or filters, and normally an exact temporary artifact path. Artifacts up to the 16 MiB saved cap use full_output_path. Output beyond the saved cap must instead use saved_output_path, saved_output_truncated: true, and saved_output_bytes; it must never call that partial artifact full output. Verify the exact file is readable while its random parent directory is private and not listable. Verify privacy/filesystem failures instead emit saved_output_unavailable: true, then verify ordinary cleanup only after both 32 later relevant calls and roughly 15 minutes, plus independent graceful shutdown and safe crash cleanup. Caller-requested result limits and grep'"'"'s per-line shortening retain their native limit metadata and do not by themselves imply a saved artifact. For find, verify the exact notice-only overflow boundary: 101 matches with a limit of 100 and 101-byte rendered names select 10,199 native bytes. The final body must stay within 10 KiB, preserve each visible pathname as a whole record or an explicit truncation marker, include both result-limit and visible-limit notices, report exact native totals, and save exactly the selected 100-record native rendering (not the sentinel or notices). Also verify the neighboring no-sentinel, already-over-budget, and multibyte-path cases.

For complete terminal-frame budgeting, verify an oversized read_image result fails as typed content without base64/text fallback. For an oversized edit/apply_patch structured diff, verify only the optional UI diff becomes an explicit truncation marker while success or partial failure and changed-file evidence remain truthful. Verify apply_patch headers name the first changed path instead of repeating the tool name, append ,… when other distinct paths changed, and show the NF file count before aggregate +N/-M diff totals.

grep searches in-process without requiring rg; cancellation during traversal, buffered reads, and callbacks is cooperative and does not interrupt a blocked filesystem operation or executing matcher. Normal status is 0 for matches (including limit-reached results), 1 for no matches. grep renders matches heading-grouped: each file's path appears once as a heading line, followed by LINE:CONTENT for match lines and LINE-CONTENT for context lines. Over-long path headings are truncated to the same GREP_MAX_LINE_LENGTH (500 chars) as match body lines, with an ellipsis and the "Some lines truncated to 500 chars" notice, so every rendered line stays within the 500-char budget.

Show full SKILL.md (771 more words)Show less
Tool descriptions

Tool description should be short but informative. They should mention the line prefix meaning, if used in the tool. They should mention line and byte limits.

Focused verification skills

Load the focused skill for every tool group in scope. The index contains shared output rules; the focused skills contain the detailed tool-specific plans.

  • tau-tool-verification-file-shell — read, both edit implementations (including the internal exact-text replace lifecycle name), apply_patch, shell, and shell_command, including ranges, UTF-8, truncation, diffs, timeouts, mutation safety, and shell lock coverage.
  • tau-tool-verification-background-cancel — background tool completion, wait, cancel, and the required background/active-wait agent_start interruption probes, including consumption races, prompt suppression, delegate interruption, isolation, and event-log checks.
  • tau-tool-verification-directory-locks — dir_lock conflict behavior, automatic lock scopes, lock wait metadata, cancellation, force unlock, and lifecycle cleanup. When an automatic mutation mixes covered and uncovered targets for the same owner, its diagnostic must distinguish the uncovered requested canonical directory from the manual directory already held.
  • tau-tool-verification-agent-coordination — message, agent_start, and agent_watch, including routing, validation, queued and active-wait interruption, notification formatting, and deduplication. Always pair it with tau-tool-verification-background-cancel when verifying agent_start.
  • tau-tool-verification-status — status transitions, validation, Working acknowledgement persistence, and activation steering around routine tool rounds and watched-agent events.

If a request spans groups, load all applicable focused skills. Apply the shared guidelines in this index to every group, and explicitly report unavailable or version-specific tools rather than silently skipping their checks.

Verification procedure

Create a scratch directory in /tmp for your experiments and always avoid dangerous or disruptive actions during testing.

Model-visible parallel-call probe

Test parallel tool calling through the actual provider and harness, rather than inferring support from a capability flag. In one assistant message, emit four sibling calls to the available shell tool (shell or shell_command). Do not use a batching/parallel-wrapper tool, and do not launch any of the four calls from a later assistant turn: either would bypass the provider behavior this probe is intended to test.

Use these four commands as the respective call arguments:

sh
python3 -c 'import time; ident="parallel-1"; start=time.time_ns(); time.sleep(3); end=time.time_ns(); print(f"id={ident} start_ns={start} end_ns={end} elapsed_ms={(end-start)/1_000_000:.3f}")'
python3 -c 'import time; ident="parallel-2"; start=time.time_ns(); time.sleep(3); end=time.time_ns(); print(f"id={ident} start_ns={start} end_ns={end} elapsed_ms={(end-start)/1_000_000:.3f}")'
python3 -c 'import time; ident="parallel-3"; start=time.time_ns(); time.sleep(3); end=time.time_ns(); print(f"id={ident} start_ns={start} end_ns={end} elapsed_ms={(end-start)/1_000_000:.3f}")'
python3 -c 'import time; ident="parallel-4"; start=time.time_ns(); time.sleep(3); end=time.time_ns(); print(f"id={ident} start_ns={start} end_ns={end} elapsed_ms={(end-start)/1_000_000:.3f}")'

Before the probe, resolve the required interpreter in the effective execution environment. Do this before changing persistent workdir, or use a verified absolute executable path. If it is unavailable, report the probe unavailable rather than treating command-not-found as a concurrency failure.

Confirm from the canonical provider.response_finished aggregate or an exact provider capture that all four call IDs occurred in one provider terminal. Visual adjacency in the UI or one apparent assistant message is insufficient: calls emitted by separate provider responses do not test sibling scheduling.

Interpret the model-visible results by call identity, not by result-delivery order. For each interval use [start_ns, end_ns], and compute the overall makespan as max(end_ns) - min(start_ns). Normal process startup and scheduler jitter mean starts and ends need not be exactly equal.

  • PASS: all four results are present, each elapsed time is approximately three seconds, the intervals have a common overlap (max(start_ns) < min(end_ns)), and the makespan is normally about three to five seconds (use six seconds as a conservative upper bound).
  • FAIL — serialized execution: all four calls were emitted together, but their approximately three-second intervals are sequential/non-overlapping and the makespan is approximately twelve seconds (ten seconds or more is a useful lower bound).
  • FAIL — provider emission: the provider/model does not emit all four sibling calls in the one assistant message. Do not issue missing calls in later turns and misreport that as a parallel test.
  • INCONCLUSIVE: report partial overlap, unexpected per-call duration, missing/malformed output, or a makespan between the pass and serialized bounds, then repeat the one-turn probe before assigning the failure to a layer.

When all four calls were visibly emitted in one assistant message but their recorded execution intervals serialize, provider emission succeeded and the evidence points to harness/extension scheduling. If the provider never emits the four sibling calls, execution-layer concurrency was not tested. Report the classification, four identity-tagged intervals and elapsed times, makespan, overlap observation, and which layer the available evidence implicates.

For every tool thoroughly consider all corner cases, including ones which are not covered in this document.

Negative probes intentionally produce tool failures, so do not run enough of them consecutively to trip Tau's loop guard and then report the pivot as a tool defect. Three identical failures or four consecutive distinct failures can trigger the guard; one successful terminal resets the streak. Isolate negative groups in short-lived delegates or insert a harmless successful tool call between groups. A pivot below threshold, after a successful reset, or with incorrect argument-sensitive grouping remains a discrepancy.

Report back:

  • discrepancies between this document and actual usage,
  • things that are wrong, confusing, inconsistent or unclear in both this document and actual tool output
  • ideas for improvements both in the tool behavior and this document

© dpc, MPL-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in .agents/skills/tau-tool-verification of dpc/tau.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit d2e1955

Compare with similar skills

Tau Tool Verification next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Tau Tool Verification compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Tau Tool Verification this skilldpc/tau104—~4.8kAutomated safety check: PassMPL-2.0
Basic Memory Setup for Taubasicmachines-co/basic-memory4.1k—~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassAGPL-3.0
First Order Model Fittingbenchflow-ai/skillsbench1.8k—~652Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Celltype Specificity ProfilerClawBio/ClawBio1.2k—~4.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Tau Releasedpc/tau104—~4.2kAutomated safety check: PassMPL-2.0
Tau Papercut Triagedpc/tau104—~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassMPL-2.0

Similar skills

  • Basic Memory Setup for Tau

    basicmachines-co/basic-memory

    Walks a user through installing and configuring the Basic Memory extension for Tau: inspect first, ask one decision at a time, choose where memory goes and verify the connection.

    4.1k GitHub stars~3.7k tokensUpdated today
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check passed
  • First Order Model Fitting

    benchflow-ai/skillsbench

    Fit first-order dynamic models to experimental step response data and extract K (gain) and tau (time constant) parameters.

    1.8k GitHub stars~652 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Given a gene and a single-cell atlas, compute how cell-type-specific its expression is — the tau specificity index, Sarle's expression bimodality coefficient, and the cell types that drive the…

    1.2k GitHub stars~4.3k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • A skill your agent uses when preparing or carrying out an explicitly authorized Tau application release; not for SDK-only releases.

    104 GitHub stars~4.2k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • A skill your agent uses when asked to "triage papercuts", review clanker-reported problems, or analyze and clear tau dev papercut reports.

    104 GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • A skill your agent uses when tracing or auditing Tau agent execution, including provider and cache cost, tool/background/wait latency, outer turns, compaction, delegated workflows, or performance…

    104 GitHub stars~658 tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • A skill your agent uses when selfci, Nix CI, coverage, cargo-crap, CRAP-score, crapAbsolute, or crapReport checks fail in Tau, or before changing the cargo-crap gates, thresholds, or flagged complex…

    104 GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • A skill your agent uses when verifying Tau file and command tools: read, edit, replace, applypatch, shell, or shellcommand, including ranges, UTF-8, truncation, diffs, timeouts, mutation safety, and…

    104 GitHub stars~4k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • A skill your agent uses when changing or reviewing Tau's static site under site/ and needing visual verification of layout, spacing, colors, alignment, desktop rendering, mobile rendering, or…

    104 GitHub stars~308 tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • A skill your agent uses when verifying Tau agentstart, message, or agentwatch coordination, including routing, validation, interruption, notification formatting, watch lifecycle, and deduplication.

    104 GitHub stars~6.3k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • A skill your agent uses when verifying Tau background tool execution, wait, cancel, or agentstart interruption, including result consumption, completion prompt suppression, races, delegate…

    104 GitHub stars~5.8k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Generate routine trailing-two-week provider/model latency and output-throughput CSV and SVG charts from content-free durable agent traces.

    104 GitHub stars~2.5k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Tau Tool Verification

What does Tau Tool Verification do?

A skill your agent uses when asked to verify Tau harness tools or tool output behavior, especially read, edit, shell/shellcommand, line-oriented output, truncation, metadata headers, UTF-8 handling…. Tau Tool Verification is an agent skill from dpc/tau. Use this skill when asked to verify Tau harness tools or tool output behavior, especially read, edit, shell/shellcommand, line-oriented output, truncation, metadata headers, UTF-8 handling, diffs, timeouts, or skill/tool conformance.

When should I use Tau Tool Verification?

Tau Tool Verification fits situations like: asked to verify Tau harness tools; tool output behavior; especially read; shell/shellcommand.

How do I install Tau Tool Verification in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add dpc/tau --skill tau-tool-verification -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.agents/skills/tau-tool-verification in dpc/tau) into .claude/skills/tau-tool-verification in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Tau Tool Verification in Codex?

Run `npx skills add dpc/tau --skill tau-tool-verification -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.agents/skills/tau-tool-verification in dpc/tau) into .agents/skills/tau-tool-verification in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Tau Tool Verification in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add dpc/tau --skill tau-tool-verification -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/tau-tool-verification, .gemini/skills/tau-tool-verification, .github/skills/tau-tool-verification and .opencode/skills/tau-tool-verification in your project.

What does Tau Tool Verification need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Tau Tool Verification needs the command-line tools its instructions call (python3) and credentials named FULL_KEY. Our summary lists: A credential in FULL_KEY.

Does Tau Tool Verification access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Tau Tool Verification safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Tau Tool Verification use?

Tau Tool Verification is published under the MPL-2.0 licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Tau Tool Verification use?

About 4.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 19k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Tau Tool Verification?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Tau Tool Verification: Basic Memory Setup for Tau (basicmachines-co/basic-memory, 4.1k stars), First Order Model Fitting (benchflow-ai/skillsbench, 1.8k stars), Celltype Specificity Profiler (ClawBio/ClawBio, 1.2k stars) and Tau Release (dpc/tau, 104 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Tau Tool Verification?

dpc (a GitHub user) maintains it in dpc/tau, which has 104 GitHub stars. The repository holds 15 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 5, 2026.

Source: dpc/tau on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.