Agent skill

Fin Lit Review

by csmar432 in csmar432/finai-research

经济金融领域的系统性文献综述。整合 Semantic Scholar + ArXiv + OpenAlex + NBER 构建引文网络,识别研究缺口,生成结构化文献地图。

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Fin Lit Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add csmar432/finai-research --skill fin-lit-review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install csmar432/finai-research fin-lit-review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/csmar432/finai-research.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.agents/skills/fin-lit-review .claude/skills/fin-lit-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
fin-lit-review
GitHub stars
109
Token cost
~1.2k tokens
SKILL.md length
175 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
15
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

经济金融领域的系统性文献综述。整合 Semantic Scholar + ArXiv + OpenAlex + NBER 构建引文网络,识别研究缺口,生成结构化文献地图。

  • Works in 7 steps: PICO 解析 → 多源并行检索 → PRISMA 筛选 → …
  • Tasks that involve Academic paper search
  • SKILL.md covers 核心功能, 工作流程, MCP 工具快速参考 and 与其他技能的关系, plus 1 more section
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Fin Lit Review is an agent skill from csmar432/finai-research. 经济金融领域的系统性文献综述。整合 Semantic Scholar + ArXiv + OpenAlex + NBER 构建引文网络,识别研究缺口,生成结构化文献地图。

Its SKILL.md is about 1.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Academic paper search. It works with arXiv, Semantic Scholar, Model Context Protocol and Prisma. The repository describes itself as: Evidence-first AI workflow for economic and financial research: literature → identification → data → econometrics → verifiable LaTeX. 43 data sources, 58 method modules, 18 AI… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Academic paper search

Example prompts

  • “/fin-lit-review”

Requirements

  • Python 3

Workflow steps

7 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. PICO 解析
  2. 多源并行检索
  3. PRISMA 筛选
  4. 引文网络构建
  5. 质量评级
  6. 研究缺口识别
  7. 生成输出文件

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 47eebb7. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are python, markdown and json).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Fin Lit Review loads about 1.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 25 tokens; SKILL.md has 175 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~25
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from csmar432/finai-research at commit 47eebb7, republished under its MIT licence (© csmar432). 175 words, ~1,214 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/fin-lit-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
fin-lit-review
description
经济金融领域的系统性文献综述。整合 Semantic Scholar + ArXiv + OpenAlex + NBER 构建引文网络,识别研究缺口,生成结构化文献地图。
argument-hint
研究主题或PICO关键词

经济金融系统性文献综述

整合多源学术数据库,构建引文网络,识别研究缺口。

核心功能

  • 多源并行检索:OpenAlex / ArXiv / NBER / 百度学术
  • PRISMA 筛选流程:Inclusion/Exclusion 标准透明
  • 引文网络构建:NetworkX 有向图,可视化知识结构
  • 研究缺口识别:LLM 分析 + 人工标注
  • 结构化输出:LIT_REVIEW.md / LIT_SUMMARY.md / CITATION_GRAPH.json

工作流程

Step 1: PICO 解析

将研究问题拆解为 PICO 四要素:

P (Population): 研究对象 — 企业/投资者/银行/政府
I (Intervention): 处理变量 — 政策/工具/事件
C (Comparator): 对照组 — 处理前/未受政策影响
O (Outcome): 结果变量 — 创新/绩效/风险/效率

示例输入:"碳排放权交易对企业绿色创新的影响" → PICO: P=制造业企业, I=碳排放权交易试点, C=非试点企业, O=绿色专利/研发投入

Step 2: 多源并行检索

使用以下 MCP 工具并行搜索:

OpenAlex(优先,推荐 50 篇)
python
server: user-openalex
tool: get_openalex_works
params: {
    "query": "carbon trading OR carbon emission trading green innovation",
    "per_page": 50,
    "sort": "citation_count"
}
ArXiv(预印本,最新方法)
python
server: user-arxiv
tool: semantic_search
params: {
    "query": "carbon trading innovation policy effect DID",
    "max_results": 30
}
NBER(工作论文,高质量)
python
server: user-nber-wp
tool: get_nber_papers
params: {
    "category": "corporate finance OR environmental economics",
    "year_from": 2021
}
中文文献(百度学术 + CNKI)
python
server: user-brave-search
tool: brave_web_search
params: {
    "query": "碳排放权交易 绿色创新 DID 双重差分 经济研究"
}
研报补充(东方财富)
python
server: user-eastmoney-reports
tool: get_stock_news
params: {
    "ts_code": "000001.SZ",
    "limit": 20
}
# 用于补充行业背景,不作为核心文献
Step 3: PRISMA 筛选

对检索到的所有文献应用筛选标准:

Inclusion Criteria:
✓ 实证研究(排除纯理论/综述)
✓ 经济金融领域(或跨学科应用)
✓ 英文/中文全文可获取
✓ 2000年后发表

Exclusion Criteria:
✗ 纯工程/技术类研究(非金融视角)
✗ 无DOI/无法溯源
✗ 样本量<100 或 方法严重缺陷
✗ 与研究问题无关

Checkpoint:筛选完成后,向用户展示筛选数量统计:

markdown
## PRISMA 筛选结果

- 检索总数: [N]
- 去重后: [N]
- 标题/摘要筛选排除: [N]
- 全文筛选排除: [N]
- 最终纳入: [N]

是否继续生成文献综述?
 [1] 继续
 [2] 调整筛选标准
 [3] 补充更多文献
Step 4: 引文网络构建

使用 scripts/citation_graph.py 构建知识图谱:

python
from scripts.citation_graph import CitationGraphBuilder

builder = CitationGraphBuilder()
graph = builder.build(papers)  # papers: list of dict with title/doi/cite_count

# 提取高影响力文献
influential = builder.get_influential_papers(top_n=20)

# 提取引文聚类(研究主题簇)
clusters = builder.get_citation_clusters()

# 导出 JSON
graph_json = builder.to_json()

输出结构:

json
{
  "nodes": [
    {"id": "doi", "title": "...", "year": 2023, "journal": "JFE", "cite_count": 150}
  ],
  "edges": [
    {"source": "doi1", "target": "doi2", "weight": 5}
  ],
  "clusters": [
    {"cluster_id": 1, "theme": "碳交易政策评估", "papers": ["doi1", "doi2"]}
  ]
}
Step 5: 质量评级

对纳入文献按期刊层级评级:

等级期刊示例权重
Top 5JF / JPE / Econometrica5
Top 10JFE / RFS / JME / 金融研究4
Top 30JAE / JDE / 经济研究 / 管理世界3
普通其他SSCI/CSSCI2
Working PaperNBER / arXiv1
Step 6: 研究缺口识别

使用 LLM 分析引文网络,识别:

  1. 理论缺口:现有理论无法解释的现象
  2. 方法缺口:现有方法的局限性
  3. 样本缺口:研究样本的局限(地区/行业/时间)
  4. 机制缺口:中介/调节机制未被充分探讨
  5. 情境缺口:特定情境(新兴市场、数字经济等)研究不足

LLM 分析提示词:

你是一个经济金融领域专家。基于以下文献列表和引文网络,
识别出3-5个最主要的研究缺口,并说明:
1. 每个缺口的现状(现有研究做了什么)
2. 为什么是缺口(未解决什么问题)
3. 对该研究方向的启示
Step 7: 生成输出文件
output/fin-literature/LIT_REVIEW.md
markdown
# 系统性文献综述: [研究主题]

> 综述日期: [日期]
> 检索来源: OpenAlex + ArXiv + NBER + 百度学术
> 纳入文献: [N] 篇

## 1. 研究概述
[研究问题定义 + PICO]

## 2. 理论框架
[理论基础:X理论、Y理论...]

## 3. 主要实证文献

### 3.1 [主题分组1]
| 文献 | 期刊 | 方法 | 样本 | 核心发现 |
|------|------|------|------|----------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

### 3.2 [主题分组2]
...

## 4. 研究方法趋势
[按方法分类的文献分布]

## 5. 引文网络分析
[高影响力文献 + 聚类结构]

## 6. 研究缺口
1. [缺口1]
2. [缺口2]
3. [缺口3]

## 7. 未来研究方向
[基于缺口的建议]

## 参考文献
[BibTeX 格式]
output/fin-literature/LIT_SUMMARY.md

三页executive summary,供快速阅读:

markdown
# 文献综述摘要: [研究主题]

## 一句话结论
[研究领域现状的一句话概括]

## 核心发现(Top 5)
1. [发现1]
2. [发现2]
...

## 主要研究方法
[DID / IV / RDD / PSM 分布]

## 最大研究缺口
[最值得切入的研究空白]

## 对本研究的启示
[基于综述的3个具体建议]
output/fin-literature/CITATION_GRAPH.json

引文网络完整数据(用于后续可视化)。

MCP 工具快速参考

数据源工具参数
OpenAlexget_openalex_worksquery, per_page=50, sort=citation_count
ArXivsemantic_searchquery, max_results=30
NBERget_nber_paperscategory, year_from
中文检索brave_web_searchquery
论文全文get_context7_by_arxivarxiv_id
中文文献search_chinese_papersquery, per_page
CSSCIsearch_cssci_papersquery

与其他技能的关系

  • 上游:无(独立使用或配合用户描述)
  • 下游:
    • fin-generate-idea → 基于研究缺口生成想法
    • fin-novelty-check → 验证想法新颖性
    • fin-paper-writing → 基于综述撰写引言

注意事项

  1. 中文文献优先百度学术/知网:英文数据库对中文政策研究覆盖不足
  2. NBER 是高质量补充:工作论文往往代表最新方法
  3. 研报仅作背景补充:研报不作为学术文献纳入
  4. PRISMA 流程透明:Checkpoint 展示筛选数量,用户可调整
  5. 引文网络需要DOI:优先使用有DOI的文献构建网络

© csmar432, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in .agents/skills/fin-lit-review of csmar432/finai-research.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 47eebb7

Compare with similar skills

Fin Lit Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Fin Lit Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Fin Lit Review this skillcsmar432/finai-research109—~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Paper Searchopenags/paper-search-mcp2.8k—~1.2kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Nature Academic Searchwp-a/nature-academic-search304—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Paper Searchopenags/paper-search-mcp2.8k—~794Automated safety check: NotesMIT
Nature Academic Searchjing1312/nature-figure-skill171—~1.3kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Paper Searchdr-dumpling/paper-search-cli135—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Paper Search

    openags/paper-search-mcp

    Search, download, and read academic papers from 20+ sources (arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, CrossRef, etc).

    2.8k GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 9 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Nature Academic Search

    wp-a/nature-academic-search

    A skill your agent uses when users ask to 找文献、做文献检索、查论文、查临床试验、核验引用、去重文献、设计 PubMed/MeSH 检索式、追踪上下游引文、解析 DOI/PMID/PMCID/arXiv/OpenAlex/Semantic Scholar/NCT ID, 或导出 RIS、BibTeX、NBIB、ENW;also use for…

    304 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 9 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Paper Search

    openags/paper-search-mcp

    Search, download, and read academic papers through the paper-search MCP tools (mcppaper-search), covering arXiv, PubMed, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, Crossref, OpenAlex and 15+ other sources.

    2.8k GitHub stars~794 tokensUpdated 9 days ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Nature Academic Search

    jing1312/nature-figure-skill

    Multi-source literature search, citation verification, MeSH search strategy, citation file management (.nbib/.ris/.bib conversion), and reference management (BibTeX, related articles, ID conversion)…

    171 GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Paper Search

    dr-dumpling/paper-search-cli

    学术文献检索与论文获取调度器,基于 paper-search CLI,而不是 MCP server. An agent skill from dr-dumpling/paper-search-cli.

    135 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Papers Skill

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Skill for academic research workflows: search Semantic Scholar (200M+ papers), inspect citations, download arXiv PDFs, and extract PDF text.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from csmar432/finai-research

All 15 skills in this repo
  • Fin Arch Diagram

    csmar432/finai-research

    生成研究/项目架构图、流程图、层次图(swimlane / processflow / hierarchytree)。适合 PPT 汇报、技术文档、综述插图。输出风格接近 draw.io,可选 graphviz(高质量)/ matplotlib(零依赖)双后端。

    109 GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fin Brief Generator

    csmar432/finai-research

    根据用户输入或已有研究输出(文献综述/想法报告/新颖性报告),自动生成或更新FINBRIEF.md,减少用户填写负担. An agent skill from csmar432/finai-research.

    109 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fin Data Acquisition

    csmar432/finai-research

    根据REFINEDDESIGN.md中的变量定义,自动获取所需数据并生成可执行的回归分析脚本(Python/Stata)。

    109 GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fin Experiment Design

    csmar432/finai-research

    经济金融实证方法设计。根据研究想法和REFINEDDESIGN.md,生成完整的实证研究设计方案,覆盖识别策略选择、样本构建、变量定义、稳健性检验清单和内生性处理方案。

    109 GitHub stars~4.2k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fin Generate Idea

    csmar432/finai-research

    针对经济金融研究方向的创意生成与评估。生成8-12个可发表的研究idea,过滤后在数据可行的情况下进行小规模实证验证,输出排序后的研究想法报告。

    109 GitHub stars~2.5k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fin Idea Discovery

    csmar432/finai-research

    经济金融研究的完整想法发现流程。从研究方向出发,经过文献综述、想法生成、新颖性验证、实证方法设计和数据获取,输出经过数据实证验证的可执行研究方案。

    109 GitHub stars~2.7k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Fin Lit Review

What does Fin Lit Review do?

经济金融领域的系统性文献综述。整合 Semantic Scholar + ArXiv + OpenAlex + NBER 构建引文网络,识别研究缺口,生成结构化文献地图。. Fin Lit Review is an agent skill from csmar432/finai-research.

When should I use Fin Lit Review?

Fin Lit Review fits situations like: tasks that involve Academic paper search.

How do I install Fin Lit Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add csmar432/finai-research --skill fin-lit-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.agents/skills/fin-lit-review in csmar432/finai-research) into .claude/skills/fin-lit-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Fin Lit Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add csmar432/finai-research --skill fin-lit-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.agents/skills/fin-lit-review in csmar432/finai-research) into .agents/skills/fin-lit-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Fin Lit Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add csmar432/finai-research --skill fin-lit-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/fin-lit-review, .gemini/skills/fin-lit-review, .github/skills/fin-lit-review and .opencode/skills/fin-lit-review in your project.

What does Fin Lit Review need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Fin Lit Review is instructions for the agent only. Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Fin Lit Review access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Fin Lit Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Fin Lit Review use?

Fin Lit Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Fin Lit Review use?

About 1.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Fin Lit Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Fin Lit Review: Paper Search (openags/paper-search-mcp, 2.8k stars), Nature Academic Search (wp-a/nature-academic-search, 304 stars), Paper Search (openags/paper-search-mcp, 2.8k stars) and Nature Academic Search (jing1312/nature-figure-skill, 171 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Fin Lit Review?

csmar432 (a GitHub user) maintains it in csmar432/finai-research, which has 109 GitHub stars. The repository holds 15 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 6, 2026.

Source: csmar432/finai-research on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.