Humanizer
Azure-Samples/interview-coach-agent-framework
Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. An agent skill from Azure-Samples/interview-coach-agent-framework.
A skill your agent uses when a user asks what AI-writing flags mean, whether detector output proves AI authorship, or wants a careful interpretation of possible false positives, especially for…
Install False Positive Reviewer
$ npx skills add conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing --skill false-positive-reviewer -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing false-positive-reviewer --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/false-positive-reviewer .claude/skills/false-positive-reviewer && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "false-positive-reviewer" agent skill from https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing/tree/main/skills/false-positive-reviewer into .claude/skills/false-positive-reviewer/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "false-positive-reviewer", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing/tree/main/skills/false-positive-reviewerType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing --skill false-positive-reviewer -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing false-positive-reviewer --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/false-positive-reviewer .agents/skills/false-positive-reviewer && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "false-positive-reviewer" agent skill from https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing/tree/main/skills/false-positive-reviewer into .agents/skills/false-positive-reviewer/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "false-positive-reviewer", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing --skill false-positive-reviewer -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing false-positive-reviewer --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/false-positive-reviewer .cursor/skills/false-positive-reviewer && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "false-positive-reviewer" agent skill from https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing/tree/main/skills/false-positive-reviewer into .cursor/skills/false-positive-reviewer/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "false-positive-reviewer", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing.git --path skills/false-positive-reviewer--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing --skill false-positive-reviewer -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing false-positive-reviewer --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/false-positive-reviewer .gemini/skills/false-positive-reviewer && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "false-positive-reviewer" agent skill from https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing/tree/main/skills/false-positive-reviewer into .gemini/skills/false-positive-reviewer/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "false-positive-reviewer", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing false-positive-reviewerInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing --skill false-positive-reviewer -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/false-positive-reviewer .github/skills/false-positive-reviewer && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "false-positive-reviewer" agent skill from https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing/tree/main/skills/false-positive-reviewer into .github/skills/false-positive-reviewer/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "false-positive-reviewer", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing --skill false-positive-reviewer -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing false-positive-reviewer --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/false-positive-reviewer .opencode/skills/false-positive-reviewer && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "false-positive-reviewer" agent skill from https://github.com/conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing/tree/main/skills/false-positive-reviewer into .opencode/skills/false-positive-reviewer/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "false-positive-reviewer", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
Facts
- Skill name
false-positive-reviewer- GitHub stars
- 4.9k
- Token cost
- ~1.1k tokens
- SKILL.md length
- 523 words
- Files
- 2
- Skills in repo
- 7
- Repo updated
- First seen
- Licence
- MIT
At a glance
A skill your agent uses when a user asks what AI-writing flags mean, whether detector output proves AI authorship, or wants a careful interpretation of possible false positives, especially for…
- Works in 6 steps: Identify which observations are… → Explain the strongest signals and… → Consider genre, second-language writing,… → …
- A user asks what AI-writing flags mean
- SKILL.md covers Authority, Connection contract, AI-engineering evidence lens and Workflow, plus 2 more sections
- Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md
What it does
False Positive Reviewer is an agent skill from conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing. Use when a user asks what AI-writing flags mean, whether detector output proves AI authorship, or wants a careful interpretation of possible false positives, especially for academic, hiring, publication, disciplinary, or other consequential decisions.
Its SKILL.md is about 1.1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 2 other files (for example `agents/openai.yaml`).
It sits in Writing & Content, covering Humanizing AI text. The repository describes itself as: Skill that audits and rewrites content to remove AI writing patterns. Use it with your favorite agents including Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, and Hermes. The licence is MIT.
When your agent uses it
- A user asks what AI-writing flags mean
- Whether detector output proves AI authorship
- Wants a careful interpretation of possible false positives
- Especially for academic
Example prompts
- “/false-positive-reviewer”
Workflow steps
6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.
- Identify which observations are deterministic detector hits, model-only editorial observations, or contextual facts supplied by the user.
- Explain the strongest signals and plausible human reasons they can appear.
- Consider genre, second-language writing, technical register, deadline pressure, editing tools, typography software, and the writer's known…
- If an adequate audit is missing and the user wants one, return control to the router with a fresh-signal request. Do not call the detector…
- For consequential decisions, do not turn a score or pattern list into a definitive claim of AI use, cheating, fraud, dishonesty, or…
- Suggest evidence that is more probative for the legitimate decision, such as source history, drafts, revision logs, direct discussion with…
What it can do on your machine
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 5a5cf6a. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Context cost
False Positive Reviewer loads about 1.1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 69 tokens; SKILL.md has 523 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
Safety
Auto-check passed
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.
SKILL.md
The full file from conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing at commit 5a5cf6a, republished under its MIT licence (© conorbronsdon). 523 words, ~1,091 tokens.
Download SKILL.mdSave it as
.claude/skills/false-positive-reviewer/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 1 other file; get the full folder from GitHub.- name
- false-positive-reviewer
- description
- Use when a user asks what AI-writing flags mean, whether detector output proves AI authorship, or wants a careful interpretation of possible false positives, especially for academic, hiring, publication, disciplinary, or other consequential decisions.
- version
- 3.37.0
- license
- MIT
False-Positive Reviewer
Interpret AI-writing signals without turning them into an unsupported authorship verdict.
Authority
Use the evidence caveats and pattern guidance in ../avoid-ai-writing/SKILL.md. The original Skill explicitly treats flags as writing-quality signals, not proof of who or what wrote the text.
For cross-Skill work, follow ../avoid-ai-writing-router/references/handoff-contract.md and ../avoid-ai-writing-router/references/skill-graph.json.
Connection contract
Incoming
Accept interpretation work from:
avoid-ai-writing-routerviaROUTEwhen the user directly asks for an authorship or consequential interpretation.ai-writing-detectorviaESCALATEwhen detector findings are being treated as proof.- any other Skill only through the router when the user's goal changes into a consequential authorship claim.
Preserve the distinction between:
- deterministic detector evidence,
- model-only editorial observations,
- contextual facts supplied by the user,
- evidence not yet available.
Produce
Update the handoff envelope only with interpretation-relevant state:
- keep
consequential_authorship_claim: truewhen applicable, - identify what the existing evidence can and cannot establish,
- list additional evidence that would materially reduce uncertainty,
- set a router-return reason if the user requests fresh signal collection or changes intent.
Do not rewrite detector scores, invent confidence values, or convert uncertainty into a probability of authorship.
Terminal behavior
This Skill has no direct outgoing Skill edge.
If fresh signal collection is genuinely needed, return control to avoid-ai-writing-router with fresh_signal_collection_needed. The router may run ai-writing-detector and then route the updated evidence back for interpretation if the user's request still requires it.
If the user separately asks to rewrite or edit the text, return control to the router with the new intent. Do not jump directly into rewrite or mutation from this Skill.
This keeps interpretation terminal in the Skill graph and prevents reviewer-detector cycles.
AI-engineering evidence lens
Apply the agency-ai-engineer lens encoded in ../avoid-ai-writing-router/references/agency-role-lenses.md:
- treat detector output as noisy evidence rather than ground truth,
- account for context mode, genre, second-language writing, technical register, editing software, and baseline writing style,
- separate model behavior from human attribution,
- avoid false precision,
- prefer process evidence when the decision has consequences.
Show full SKILL.md (206 more words)Show less
Workflow
- Identify which observations are deterministic detector hits, model-only editorial observations, or contextual facts supplied by the user.
- Explain the strongest signals and plausible human reasons they can appear.
- Consider genre, second-language writing, technical register, deadline pressure, editing tools, typography software, and the writer's known baseline when those facts are available.
- If an adequate audit is missing and the user wants one, return control to the router with a fresh-signal request. Do not call the detector directly.
- For consequential decisions, do not turn a score or pattern list into a definitive claim of AI use, cheating, fraud, dishonesty, or suitability.
- Suggest evidence that is more probative for the legitimate decision, such as source history, drafts, revision logs, direct discussion with the writer, or task-specific process evidence.
Stop conditions
Stop when the interpretation question is answered. If more signal collection or a different action is requested, return control to the router rather than opening a direct Skill loop.
Output
Distinguish what the text actually shows, what it may suggest, what it cannot establish, which evidence came from executed tooling versus model-only review, what additional evidence would reduce uncertainty, and whether control should return to the router for a newly requested stage.
© conorbronsdon, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
Files
SKILL.md and 1 other file in skills/false-positive-reviewer of conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing.
- SKILL.md
- agents/openai.yaml
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 5a5cf6a
Compare with similar skills
False Positive Reviewer next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| False Positive Reviewer this skillconorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing | 4.9k | — | ~1.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| HumanizerAzure-Samples/interview-coach-agent-framework | 173 | 38 repos | ~5.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| User-Facing Text Cleanupguillaumemeyer/watermarks-remover | 24k | — | ~3.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Install Anti Sloptrycompai/crm | 11k | 1 repos | ~881 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Stop SlopXe/site | 732 | 8 repos | ~423 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Chinese Text Humanizerop7418/Humanizer-zh | 19k | — | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT |
Similar skills
- Official
User-Facing Text Cleanup
guillaumemeyer/watermarks-remover
Audits prose for invisible Unicode characters and rewrites it while keeping facts, citations, code and required disclosures unchanged and the writer's voice intact.
Install Anti Slop
trycompai/crm
Install and configure the anti-slop Oxlint plugin in a local TypeScript or JavaScript repository.
Stop Slop
Xe/site
Remove AI writing patterns from prose. An agent skill from Xe/site.
Chinese Text Humanizer
op7418/Humanizer-zh
Edits Chinese articles, comments and documents to remove filler, repetition and template phrasing while keeping the facts, the level of certainty and the author's voice.
Natural Japanese Business Writing
coji/natural-japanese
Writes and edits Japanese business documents so they read clearly and naturally, removes AI-sounding phrasing and can score how AI-like a text reads.
More from conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing
Avoid AI Writing
conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing
Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms").
AI Writing Detector
conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing
A skill your agent uses when the user asks to detect, scan, audit, score, or flag AI-writing patterns without rewriting the text, including requests for a deterministic local detector result when…
Preservation Verifier
conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing
A skill your agent uses when the user provides an original and rewritten version, asks whether a rewrite preserved protected content, or wants a deterministic check for code, frontmatter, quotes…
Avoid AI Writing Router
conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing
A skill your agent uses when a request combines AI-writing audit, rewrite, file editing, voice preservation, false-positive interpretation, verification, or when the user invokes Avoid AI Writing…
File Edit In Place
conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing
A skill your agent uses when the user names a local file and explicitly asks to clean, rewrite, humanize, or remove AI-writing patterns in that file itself, with minimal targeted edits and post-edit…
Voice Preserving Rewriter
conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing
A skill your agent uses when the user asks to rewrite, humanize, clean up, or remove AI-isms from text while preserving the writer's voice, facts, intent, structure, register, and protected material.
Related
Categories
Questions about False Positive Reviewer
What does False Positive Reviewer do?
A skill your agent uses when a user asks what AI-writing flags mean, whether detector output proves AI authorship, or wants a careful interpretation of possible false positives, especially for…. False Positive Reviewer is an agent skill from conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing. Use when a user asks what AI-writing flags mean, whether detector output proves AI authorship, or wants a careful interpretation of possible false positives, especially for academic, hiring, publication, disciplinary, or other consequential decisions.
When should I use False Positive Reviewer?
False Positive Reviewer fits situations like: A user asks what AI-writing flags mean; whether detector output proves AI authorship; wants a careful interpretation of possible false positives; especially for academic.
How do I install False Positive Reviewer in Claude Code?
Run `npx skills add conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing --skill false-positive-reviewer -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/false-positive-reviewer in conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing) into .claude/skills/false-positive-reviewer in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
How do I install False Positive Reviewer in Codex?
Run `npx skills add conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing --skill false-positive-reviewer -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/false-positive-reviewer in conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing) into .agents/skills/false-positive-reviewer in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Can I use False Positive Reviewer in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing --skill false-positive-reviewer -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/false-positive-reviewer, .gemini/skills/false-positive-reviewer, .github/skills/false-positive-reviewer and .opencode/skills/false-positive-reviewer in your project.
What does False Positive Reviewer need to run?
SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: False Positive Reviewer is instructions for the agent only.
Does False Positive Reviewer access the network?
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Is False Positive Reviewer safe to install?
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.
What licence does False Positive Reviewer use?
False Positive Reviewer is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
How many tokens does False Positive Reviewer use?
About 1.1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 4.4k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
What are the alternatives to False Positive Reviewer?
Skills that share tags, products or a category with False Positive Reviewer: Humanizer (Azure-Samples/interview-coach-agent-framework, 173 stars), User-Facing Text Cleanup (guillaumemeyer/watermarks-remover, 24k stars), Install Anti Slop (trycompai/crm, 11k stars) and Stop Slop (Xe/site, 732 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
Who maintains False Positive Reviewer?
conorbronsdon (a GitHub user) maintains it in conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing, which has 4,938 GitHub stars. The repository holds 7 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 8, 2026.
Source: conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.