Build or audit a literature review: evidence map, gaps, synthesis plan.

Custom licenceAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Literature Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill literature-review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills literature-review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/54-scdenney-open-science-skills/skills/literature-review .claude/skills/literature-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
literature-review
GitHub stars
4.6k
Token cost
~1.5k tokens
SKILL.md length
657 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
383
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Custom licence

At a glance

Build or audit a literature review: evidence map, gaps, synthesis plan.

  • Works in 7 steps: Classify the review task → Define the question and boundaries → Build the source base → …
  • Tasks that involve Literature review
  • SKILL.md covers Heritage and scope, Instructions, Output and Quality checks
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Literature Review is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills. Build or audit a literature review: evidence map, gaps, synthesis plan.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science, covering Literature review. The repository describes itself as: 🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI…

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Literature review

Example prompts

  • “/literature-review”

Workflow steps

7 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Classify the review task
  2. Define the question and boundaries
  3. Build the source base
  4. Extract evidence, not summaries
  5. Cluster the literature
  6. Test the claimed gap
  7. Compose with sibling skills

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 9fa87d8. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Literature Review loads about 1.5k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 22 tokens; SKILL.md has 657 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~22
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.5k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

Its licence (Custom licence) doesn't allow us to republish the file, so here is its outline and opening line. It has 657 words (~1,501 tokens).

“This is an original Open Science Skills workflow for experimental and computational social science. It remixes high-level ideas from Cheng-I Wu's Academic Research Skills for Claude Code (CC BY-NC 4.0), especially evidence mapping, source verification, and mode separation between narrative…”

— opening of SKILL.md by brycewang-stanford, Custom licence
name
literature-review
argument-hint
[topic, draft literature review, paper list, Zotero export, or claimed contribution]

Read the full SKILL.md on GitHub

Files

Just SKILL.md in skills/54-scdenney-open-science-skills/skills/literature-review of brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 9fa87d8

Compare with similar skills

Literature Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Literature Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Literature Review this skillbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4.6k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills47k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Systematic Review ScreenerImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~8.4kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Literature Reviewneflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent12620 repos~5.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Preprint Search on bioRxivLigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper73912 repos~3.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Academic Paper Writing PipelineImbad0202/academic-research-skills51k—~16kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Nature Paper Card

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Systematic Review Screener

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Screens records for systematic, scoping and rapid reviews against fixed eligibility rules, using two blinded AI reviewers and a third adjudicator, with traceable PRISMA counts.

    51k GitHub stars~8.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Literature Review

    neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent

    Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).

    126 GitHub starsUsed in 20 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Preprint Search on bioRxiv

    LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper

    Searches bioRxiv life sciences preprints by keyword, author, date range or category with a Python script, returning JSON metadata and optional PDF downloads.

    739 GitHub starsUsed in 12 repos~3.7k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Writing Pipeline

    Imbad0202/academic-research-skills

    Runs a 12-agent pipeline that plans, drafts, cites, reviews and formats academic papers, with modes for revision, rebuttals, abstracts and citation checks.

    51k GitHub stars~16k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Deep Research Workflow

    TokenRhythm/opensquilla

    Runs multi-round research in three stages with a persisted state file, evidence tracking and a long-form report with per-claim citations.

    7.1k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed

More from brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

All 383 skills in this repo
  • Aer Consistency

    brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when auditing a finished or near-finished AER, AER:Insights, or AEJ manuscript for internal consistency: headline numbers across abstract, introduction, results, and tables…

    4.6k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.6k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Latex Paper En

    brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

    English LaTeX academic paper assistant for existing .tex projects.

    4.6k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.2k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Bayesian Workflow

    brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

    Opinionated Bayesian modeling workflow with PyMC and ArviZ. An agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills.

    4.6k GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Daily Paper Generator

    brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when the user asks to "generate daily paper", "search arXiv for EEG papers", "find EEG decoding papers", "review brain-computer interface papers", or wants to create paper…

    4.6k GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Five Questions

    brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

    Deeply analyze any empirical economics PDF using the five-question framework (五问框架): research question, identification strategy, core estimand, robustness logic, and scholarly contribution.

    4.6k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check: notes
  • Kaggle Research

    brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills

    A skill your agent uses when a research task needs reproducible Kaggle discovery, metadata inspection, bounded public-data downloads, competition or kernel discovery, model discovery, or an…

    4.6k GitHub stars~868 tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Literature Review

What does Literature Review do?

Build or audit a literature review: evidence map, gaps, synthesis plan. Literature Review is an agent skill from brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills. Build or audit a literature review: evidence map, gaps, synthesis plan.

When should I use Literature Review?

Literature Review fits situations like: tasks that involve Literature review.

How do I install Literature Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill literature-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/54-scdenney-open-science-skills/skills/literature-review in brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills) into .claude/skills/literature-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Literature Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill literature-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/54-scdenney-open-science-skills/skills/literature-review in brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills) into .agents/skills/literature-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Literature Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill literature-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/literature-review, .gemini/skills/literature-review, .github/skills/literature-review and .opencode/skills/literature-review in your project.

What does Literature Review need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Literature Review is instructions for the agent only.

Does Literature Review access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Literature Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Literature Review use?

Literature Review has a licence file (the repository's licence) that doesn't match a standard licence. Read it on GitHub before reusing the skill.

How many tokens does Literature Review use?

About 1.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 6k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Literature Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Literature Review: Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars), Systematic Review Screener (Imbad0202/academic-research-skills, 51k stars), Literature Review (neflibata-feng/MyArxiv-Agent, 126 stars) and Preprint Search on bioRxiv (LigphiDonk/Oh-my--paper, 739 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Literature Review?

brycewang-stanford (a GitHub user) maintains it in brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills, which has 4,556 GitHub stars. The repository holds 383 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 5, 2026.

Source: brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.