Agent skill

Statute Analysis

by borghei in borghei/Claude-Skills

Statute and regulation interpretation framework. An agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills.

MITAuto-check passedLegal & Compliance

Install Statute Analysis

skills CLI
$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill statute-analysis -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills statute-analysis --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/legal/statute-analysis .claude/skills/statute-analysis && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
statute-analysis
GitHub stars
881
Token cost
~4.5k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,883 words
Files
5 (incl. scripts, references)
Skills in repo
349
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Statute and regulation interpretation framework. An agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills.

  • Works in 6 steps: Verify currency and status -- Is this… → Understand the regulatory ecosystem --… → Browse the full structure -- Read the… → …
  • Reading statutes
  • SKILL.md covers Table of Contents, Legal Hierarchy, Clarify First and Preliminary Steps, plus 14 more sections
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder; calls python

What it does

Statute Analysis is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Statute and regulation interpretation framework. Use when reading statutes, classifying requirements, analyzing operative keywords, applying canons of construction, or mapping compliance obligations from legislative text.

Its SKILL.md is about 4.5k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 6 other files, including scripts and reference files (for example `references/canons_of_construction.md`, `references/statutory_structure.md` and `scripts/requirement_classifier.py`).

It sits in Legal & Compliance, covering Legal research. The repository describes itself as: 385 AI skills, 77 expert agents, and 900 stdlib Python tools for every team: engineering, PM, marketing, C-level, compliance, business ops, research, and a LinkedIn toolkit… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Reading statutes
  • Classifying requirements
  • Analyzing operative keywords
  • Applying canons of construction

Example prompts

  • “/statute-analysis”

Requirements

  • Python 3

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Verify currency and status -- Is this the current, in-force version? Check for amendments, repeals, or sunset clauses. Use official…
  2. Understand the regulatory ecosystem -- What regulations, rules, and guidance implement this statute? Map the full hierarchy.
  3. Browse the full structure -- Read the table of contents, definitions section, scope provisions, and transitional articles before diving…
  4. Identify the definitions section -- Almost all statutes define key terms. These definitions override ordinary meaning.
  5. Check effective dates -- Different provisions may have different effective dates. Map the compliance timeline.
  6. Identify your role -- Statutes impose different obligations depending on the reader's role (e.g., "provider" vs "deployer" in the EU AI…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 4a698e8. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 2 files in scripts/ (Python), which the agent can run.

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • python

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Statute Analysis loads about 4.5k tokens when it runs, and up to ~13k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 60 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,883 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~60
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.5k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~13k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from borghei/Claude-Skills at commit 4a698e8, republished under its MIT licence (© borghei). 1,883 words, ~4,541 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/statute-analysis/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 4 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
statute-analysis
description
Statute and regulation interpretation framework. Use when reading statutes, classifying requirements, analyzing operative keywords, applying canons of construction, or mapping compliance obligations from legislative text.
license
MIT + Commons Clause
metadata.version
1.0.0
metadata.author
The Glass Room
metadata.category
legal
metadata.domain
statutory-interpretation
metadata.updated
2026-04-10
metadata.tags
statute, regulation, compliance, interpretation, legal-analysis

⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL — This skill is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All responsibility for usage rests with the user. Consult qualified legal professionals before acting on any output.

Statute Analysis

Production-ready framework for reading, interpreting, and applying statutes, regulations, and rules. Covers the full lifecycle from identifying the legal hierarchy through extracting actionable requirements and mapping implementation obligations.


Table of Contents


Understanding the source hierarchy is the foundation of statutory analysis.

SourceCreated ByAuthorityExample
ConstitutionSovereign/peopleSupremeU.S. Constitution, EU Treaties
StatuteLegislaturePrimary legislationGDPR, Clean Air Act, AI Act
RegulationExecutive agencyDelegated authorityFDA 21 CFR, FTC rules
RuleAgency or courtProcedural/interpretiveFederal Rules of Civil Procedure
GuidanceAgencyNon-binding, persuasiveFDA guidance documents, CNIL guides
Case lawCourtsBinding within jurisdictionSupreme Court precedent

Key principle: Higher sources override lower sources. Regulations cannot exceed statutory authority. Guidance cannot create new obligations not grounded in statute.


Clarify First

Before the analysis, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:

  • The exact statute/regulation and its in-force version — analyzing a superseded or repealed version yields wrong obligations; verify currency before extracting anything
  • Your role under it — provider vs deployer, controller vs processor — determines which obligations actually bind you and which to extract
  • Jurisdiction(s) in scope — needed to flag cross-jurisdictional conflicts and preemption; definitions differ across regimes and must not be cross-pollinated

Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the analysis.

Preliminary Steps

Before interpreting any statutory provision, complete these checks:

  1. Verify currency and status -- Is this the current, in-force version? Check for amendments, repeals, or sunset clauses. Use official sources (government gazettes, EUR-Lex, congress.gov).
  2. Understand the regulatory ecosystem -- What regulations, rules, and guidance implement this statute? Map the full hierarchy.
  3. Browse the full structure -- Read the table of contents, definitions section, scope provisions, and transitional articles before diving into specific sections.
  4. Identify the definitions section -- Almost all statutes define key terms. These definitions override ordinary meaning.
  5. Check effective dates -- Different provisions may have different effective dates. Map the compliance timeline.
  6. Identify your role -- Statutes impose different obligations depending on the reader's role (e.g., "provider" vs "deployer" in the EU AI Act, "controller" vs "processor" in GDPR).

Tools

Statute Keyword Analyzer

Scans statute text for operative keywords and classifies obligations, permissions, conditions, and exemptions.

bash
# Analyze a statute file
python scripts/statute_keyword_analyzer.py --input statute.txt

# Analyze with JSON output
python scripts/statute_keyword_analyzer.py --input regulation.txt --json

# Analyze inline text
python scripts/statute_keyword_analyzer.py --text "The controller shall implement appropriate technical measures..."

# Save analysis report
python scripts/statute_keyword_analyzer.py --input statute.txt --output analysis.json
Requirement Classifier

Classifies statutory requirements by type, implementation team, enforcement mechanism, and penalty.

bash
# Classify requirements from a JSON list
python scripts/requirement_classifier.py --input requirements.json

# Classify with JSON output
python scripts/requirement_classifier.py --input requirements.json --json

# Classify inline requirement
python scripts/requirement_classifier.py --text "Controllers must provide data subjects with a privacy notice at the point of collection"

# Generate implementation matrix
python scripts/requirement_classifier.py --input requirements.json --output matrix.json

Core Interpretation Techniques

Definitions Analysis

Statutory definitions control meaning. Pay attention to the verb used:

VerbTypeMeaningExample
"means"ExhaustiveThe definition is complete; no other meaning applies"'Personal data' means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person"
"includes"IllustrativeThe definition provides examples but is not limited to them"'Processing' includes collection, recording, organization, structuring..."
"does not include"ExclusionExplicitly carves out items from scope"'Consumer' does not include a natural person acting in a commercial or employment context"
"refers to"PointerIncorporates an external definition"'Harmonised standard' refers to a European standard as defined in Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012"
Operative Keywords
KeywordClassificationLegal Effect
shallMandatoryCreates an obligation; must be done
mustMandatorySame as "shall" in modern drafting
mayPermissiveCreates permission; optional
may notProhibitiveCreates a prohibition
andConjunctiveAll listed items required
orDisjunctiveAny listed item sufficient
unlessExceptionNegates the rule when condition is met
exceptExceptionCarves out specific items from the rule
subject toConditionalRule applies but another provision modifies it
notwithstandingOverrideThis provision prevails over conflicting provisions
provided thatConditionAdds a requirement that must be satisfied
if...thenConditionalTrigger condition and consequence
uponTemporal triggerAction required when event occurs
Conjunctive vs Disjunctive Analysis

This distinction determines whether ALL conditions must be met or ANY single condition suffices.

PatternReadingPractical Impact
"A, B, and C"All three requiredMust satisfy every element
"A, B, or C"Any one sufficientSatisfy any single element
"A, B, and/or C"AmbiguousFlag for clarification; analyze context
"both A and B"Explicitly conjunctiveMust satisfy both
"either A or B"Explicitly disjunctiveSatisfy one
Serial comma ambiguityContext-dependentApply whole-act rule for consistency

Canons of Construction

See references/canons_of_construction.md for the complete 12-canon reference.

Quick Reference
CanonCore RuleWhen to Apply
General-Terms CanonGeneral terms get general meaningDefault interpretation
Expressio UniusExpressing one thing excludes othersSpecific lists without catchall
Whole-Act RuleInterpret provisions consistentlyApparent conflicts between sections
Consistent UsageSame term = same meaning throughoutTerm appears multiple times
Meaningful VariationDifferent terms = different meaningsSimilar but distinct terms used
Surplusage CanonEvery word has meaning; no redundancyTempted to treat words as surplus
Noscitur a SociisWords known by their associatesAmbiguous term in a list
Ejusdem GenerisGeneral follows specific = limited"...and other similar" patterns
Against IneffectivenessPrefer reading that gives effectTwo possible readings
Avoiding AbsurdityReject absurd outcomesLiteral reading produces nonsensical result
Remedial StatutesConstrue liberallyConsumer protection, safety statutes
Rule of LenityAmbiguity favors the regulated partyCriminal or penalty provisions

Interpretation Sources

When statutory text is ambiguous, consult sources in this order:

PrioritySourceWeightWhere to Find
1Statutory text itselfControllingOfficial gazette, codified law
2Definitions sectionControllingUsually first articles/sections
3Legislative purpose (recitals, preamble)StrongPreamble, "Whereas" clauses
4Canons of constructionStrongLegal treatises, case law
5Case law interpreting the provisionStrong-to-moderateCourt databases
6Agency regulations implementing statuteModerateAgency websites, CFR
7Agency guidance and FAQsPersuasive onlyAgency websites
8Legislative historyWeak (varies by jurisdiction)Congressional record, Hansard
9Academic commentaryPersuasive onlyLegal journals

Requirement Classification

Every statutory requirement maps to an implementation category:

TypeDescriptionTypical OwnerExample
DisclosureInformation must be provided to someoneLegal / CompliancePrivacy notice requirements
OperationalProcess or procedure must existOperations / ComplianceRecord-keeping obligations
TechnicalSystem capability or safeguard requiredEngineeringEncryption, access controls
UI/DesignUser interface must include specific elementsProduct / DesignConsent mechanisms, opt-out buttons
OrganizationalGovernance structure or role requiredManagement / HRAppointing a DPO, board oversight
DocumentationWritten records must be maintainedLegal / ComplianceImpact assessments, audit trails
ReportingInformation must be submitted to authorityLegal / ComplianceBreach notification, annual reports

Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis

When requirements from multiple jurisdictions apply:

  1. Map applicable jurisdictions -- Where are your users, your entity, and your data?
  2. Identify overlapping requirements -- Many frameworks share common obligations.
  3. Find the highest common denominator -- Design for the strictest requirement that satisfies all jurisdictions.
  4. Flag conflicts -- Where requirements genuinely conflict, document the conflict and seek legal advice.
  5. Check preemption -- Federal law may preempt state law; EU regulations may preempt member state law.

Show full SKILL.md (720 more words)Show less

Enforcement Analysis

For each statutory requirement, assess enforcement risk:

FactorAssessment Questions
Enforcement authorityWhich agency enforces? How active are they?
Penalty typesCivil fines, criminal penalties, administrative sanctions?
Penalty severityFixed amounts, percentage of turnover, per-violation?
Cure periodsIs there a right to cure before penalties apply?
Private right of actionCan individuals sue for violations?
Enforcement historyHas this provision been actively enforced?
Regulatory guidanceHas the agency clarified enforcement priorities?

Reference Guides

GuidePathDescription
Canons of Constructionreferences/canons_of_construction.md12 canons with definitions, examples, and misapplication warnings
Statutory Structurereferences/statutory_structure.mdHow statutes are organized, effective dates, preemption, enforcement

Workflows

Workflow 1: First Reading of a New Statute
  1. Browse the full table of contents and structure.
  2. Read the definitions section and scope provisions.
  3. Check effective dates and transitional provisions.
  4. Identify your role under the statute.
  5. Run scripts/statute_keyword_analyzer.py on the full text.
  6. Review the obligation/permission/exception map.
  7. Identify provisions that apply to your role.
  8. Validation: Definitions cataloged, role identified, key obligations listed.
Workflow 2: Requirement Extraction and Classification
  1. Extract all provisions containing "shall," "must," or mandatory language.
  2. For each requirement, identify: who (subject), what (action), when (trigger/deadline), how (standard).
  3. Run scripts/requirement_classifier.py on the extracted requirements.
  4. Review the implementation matrix.
  5. Assign each requirement to an implementation team.
  6. Prioritize by enforcement risk and deadline.
  7. Validation: Every mandatory provision classified, assigned, and prioritized.
Workflow 3: Cross-Reference Resolution
  1. Identify all cross-references in the target provision ("subject to Article X," "as defined in Section Y").
  2. Read each referenced provision in full.
  3. Determine whether the cross-reference modifies, limits, or supplements the target provision.
  4. Check for circular references or chains (A references B which references C).
  5. Document the complete picture -- the target provision as modified by all cross-references.
  6. Validation: All cross-references resolved; no orphan references.

Troubleshooting

ProblemLikely CauseResolution
Term not defined in statuteLegislature used ordinary meaningApply general-terms canon; check case law for judicial definitions
"And/or" ambiguityDrafting imprecisionCheck legislative history; apply whole-act rule; flag for legal review
Conflicting provisionsLater provision may override earlierCheck for "notwithstanding" clauses; apply later-in-time rule
Undefined thresholdDelegated to regulationCheck implementing regulations and agency guidance
Provision seems to have no effectMay be transitional or placeholderCheck effective dates and amendment history
Cross-reference to repealed sectionStatute not updated after amendmentCheck saving clauses; apply presumption against ineffectiveness

Success Criteria

CriterionTarget
All defined terms cataloged100% of definitions section mapped
Obligations extractedEvery "shall/must" provision identified
Requirements classifiedEach requirement has type, owner, enforcement, and priority
Cross-references resolvedNo unresolved references remain
Enforcement risk assessedEvery material obligation has enforcement analysis
Implementation matrix completeRequirements mapped to teams with timelines

Scope & Limitations

In scope: Reading and interpreting statutory text, extracting requirements, classifying obligations, applying canons of construction, mapping enforcement risk.

Out of scope: Providing legal advice, predicting court outcomes, drafting legislation, interpreting case law holdings, constitutional analysis.

Disclaimer: This skill provides a structured methodology for statutory analysis. It does not constitute legal advice. Always consult qualified legal counsel for binding interpretations.


Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It FailsBetter Approach
Reading a section in isolationStatutes are interconnected; isolated reading misses cross-references, definitions, and scope limitationsAlways read definitions, scope, and cross-referenced provisions before interpreting
Treating guidance as lawAgency guidance is non-binding and can change; building compliance solely on guidance creates riskUse guidance to inform interpretation but anchor compliance to statutory text
Ignoring "what the statute doesn't say"Silence can mean permission, delegation, or an oversight; assuming the statute covers everything leads to compliance gapsAffirmatively check: does the statute address this scenario? If not, analyze why and what fills the gap
Applying one jurisdiction's interpretation to another"Personal data" in GDPR is not identical to "personal information" in CCPA; cross-pollinating definitions creates errorsAnalyze each statute independently using its own definitions and interpretive framework
Skipping the definitions sectionStatutory definitions override ordinary meaning; missing them leads to fundamental misreadingsAlways read the definitions section first, before any substantive analysis

Tool Reference

ToolInputOutputUse Case
statute_keyword_analyzer.pyStatute text file or inline textObligation/permission/exception mapFirst pass analysis of any legislative text
requirement_classifier.pyList of requirements (text or JSON)Implementation matrix with types, teams, enforcementConverting statutory obligations to actionable implementation tasks

© borghei, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 4 other files (scripts, references) in legal/statute-analysis of borghei/Claude-Skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/canons_of_construction.md
  • references/statutory_structure.md
  • scripts/requirement_classifier.py
  • scripts/statute_keyword_analyzer.py

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 4a698e8

Compare with similar skills

Statute Analysis next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Statute Analysis compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Statute Analysis this skillborghei/Claude-Skills881—~4.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Tw Legal RAGaa0101181514/tw-legal-rag327—~580Automated safety check: PassCustom licence
Design Award SearchSeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills712—~3kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
China Lawyer AnalystCSlawyer1985/china-lawyer-analyst194—~3.3kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Billing And Litigation BudgetTHUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chinese868—~5kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Hard Predict Futuredavepoon/buildwithclaude3.6k1 repos~4.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Tw Legal RAG

    aa0101181514/tw-legal-rag

    Retrieve real Taiwan court judgments with verifiable citations before answering any question about Taiwan law or case law.

    327 GitHub stars~580 tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Design Award Search

    SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills

    Find and verify award-winning designs in the same or adjacent functional category through eight explicit relevance dimensions: problem and user, core function, sensing technology, intervention…

    712 GitHub stars~3k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • China Lawyer Analyst

    CSlawyer1985/china-lawyer-analyst

    通过中国法律视角分析事件,运用成文法解释、指导案例参照、请求权基础分析等方法, 理解权利义务、评估责任风险、识别法律依据并推荐合规策略。

    194 GitHub stars~3.3k tokensUpdated 8 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Billing And Litigation Budget

    THUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chinese

    A skill your agent uses when the user needs to track or manage attorney hours, expert fees, and investigation costs; control litigation spend; or prepare timesheets or expense statements for clients.

    868 GitHub stars~5k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Hard Predict Future

    davepoon/buildwithclaude

    Activate this agent for any future-oriented question that requires deep quantitative analysis, historical precedents, and structured scenario planning.

    3.6k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.2k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
  • Legal Issue Research

    Golden2002/legal-research-skill

    中国法律全领域系统性检索专家. An agent skill from Golden2002/legal-research-skill.

    155 GitHub stars~6.8k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

More from borghei/Claude-Skills

All 349 skills in this repo
  • Agents In The Team

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Run delivery when AI coding and ops agents take tickets. An agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills.

    881 GitHub stars~4.2k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Content Disclosure

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Check AI-generated marketing content and reviews for required disclosures under the EU AI Act, FTC rules and platform AI-label policies.

    881 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Prototyping

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Idea to AI-generated prototype to customer validation to engineering handoff.

    881 GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Analytics Engineer

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Analytics engineering across data modeling, dbt, transformation, and semantic layers.

    881 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Ansoff Matrix

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Ansoff Matrix — 4-quadrant framework for growth options: market penetration, market/product development, and diversification.

    881 GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Brainstorm Okrs

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    OKR brainstorming and validation using the Radical Focus framework — outcome objectives, measurable key results, counter-metrics.

    881 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Statute Analysis

What does Statute Analysis do?

Statute and regulation interpretation framework. An agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Statute Analysis is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Statute and regulation interpretation framework.

When should I use Statute Analysis?

Statute Analysis fits situations like: reading statutes; classifying requirements; analyzing operative keywords; applying canons of construction.

How do I install Statute Analysis in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill statute-analysis -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (legal/statute-analysis in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .claude/skills/statute-analysis in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Statute Analysis in Codex?

Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill statute-analysis -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (legal/statute-analysis in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .agents/skills/statute-analysis in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Statute Analysis in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill statute-analysis -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/statute-analysis, .gemini/skills/statute-analysis, .github/skills/statute-analysis and .opencode/skills/statute-analysis in your project.

What does Statute Analysis need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Statute Analysis needs Python for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (python). Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Statute Analysis access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Statute Analysis safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Statute Analysis use?

Statute Analysis is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Statute Analysis use?

About 4.5k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 18k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 8.2k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Statute Analysis?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Statute Analysis: Tw Legal RAG (aa0101181514/tw-legal-rag, 327 stars), Design Award Search (SeanJ1ang/design-judge-skills, 712 stars), China Lawyer Analyst (CSlawyer1985/china-lawyer-analyst, 194 stars) and Billing And Litigation Budget (THUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chinese, 868 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Statute Analysis?

borghei (a GitHub user) maintains it in borghei/Claude-Skills, which has 881 GitHub stars. The repository holds 349 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 7, 2026.

Source: borghei/Claude-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.