Agent skill

Sales Engineer

by borghei in borghei/Claude-Skills

Analyzes RFP responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature matrices, and plans proof-of-concept engagements for pre-sales engineering

MITAuto-check passedSales & Support

Install Sales Engineer

skills CLI
$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill sales-engineer -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills sales-engineer --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/business-growth/sales-engineer .claude/skills/sales-engineer && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
sales-engineer
GitHub stars
881
Token cost
~4.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,797 words
Files
12 (incl. scripts, references, assets)
Skills in repo
349
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Analyzes RFP responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature matrices, and plans proof-of-concept engagements for pre-sales engineering

  • Works in 11 steps: Discovery & Research → Solution Design → Demo Preparation & Delivery → …
  • Tasks that involve Proposals and quotes
  • SKILL.md covers Overview, Clarify First, 5-Phase Workflow and Python Automation Tools, plus 9 more sections
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder; calls python

What it does

Sales Engineer is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Analyzes RFP responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature matrices, and plans proof-of-concept engagements for pre-sales engineering

Its SKILL.md is about 4.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 14 other files, including scripts, reference files and assets (for example `assets/demo_script_template.md`, `assets/expected_output.json` and `assets/poc_scorecard_template.md`).

It sits in Sales & Support, covering Proposals and quotes, Prototyping and Test coverage. The repository describes itself as: 385 AI skills, 77 expert agents, and 900 stdlib Python tools for every team: engineering, PM, marketing, C-level, compliance, business ops, research, and a LinkedIn toolkit… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Proposals and quotes
  • Tasks that involve Prototyping
  • Tasks that involve Test coverage

Example prompts

  • “Use the sales-engineer skill to analyz RFP responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature matrices, and plans proof-of-concept engagements…”
  • “/sales-engineer”

Requirements

  • Python 3

Workflow steps

11 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Discovery & Research
  2. Solution Design
  3. Demo Preparation & Delivery
  4. POC & Evaluation
  5. Proposal & Closing
  6. RFP Response Analyzer
  7. Competitive Matrix Builder
  8. POC Planner
  9. rfp_response_analyzer.py
  10. competitive_matrix_builder.py
  11. poc_planner.py

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 4a698e8. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 3 files in scripts/ (Python), which the agent can run.

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • python

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Sales Engineer loads about 4.3k tokens when it runs, and up to ~11k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 40 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,797 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~40
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.3k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~11k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from borghei/Claude-Skills at commit 4a698e8, republished under its MIT licence (© borghei). 1,797 words, ~4,300 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/sales-engineer/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 11 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
sales-engineer
description
Analyzes RFP responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature matrices, and plans proof-of-concept engagements for pre-sales engineering
license
MIT + Commons Clause
metadata.version
1.0.0
metadata.author
borghei
metadata.category
business-growth
metadata.domain
sales-engineering
metadata.updated
2026-03-31
metadata.tags
sales-engineering, demos, poc, technical-sales, solutions

Sales Engineer Skill

A production-ready skill package for pre-sales engineering that bridges technical expertise and sales execution. Provides automated analysis for RFP/RFI responses, competitive positioning, and proof-of-concept planning.

Overview

Role: Sales Engineer / Solutions Architect Domain: Pre-Sales Engineering, Solution Design, Technical Demos, Proof of Concepts Business Type: SaaS / Pre-Sales Engineering

What This Skill Does
  • RFP/RFI Response Analysis - Score requirement coverage, identify gaps, generate bid/no-bid recommendations
  • Competitive Technical Positioning - Build feature comparison matrices, identify differentiators and vulnerabilities
  • POC Planning - Generate timelines, resource plans, success criteria, and evaluation scorecards
  • Demo Preparation - Structure demo scripts with talking points and objection handling
  • Technical Proposal Creation - Framework for solution architecture and implementation planning
  • Win/Loss Analysis - Data-driven competitive assessment for deal strategy
Key Metrics
MetricDescriptionTarget
Win RateDeals won / total opportunities>30%
Sales Cycle LengthAverage days from discovery to close<90 days
POC Conversion RatePOCs resulting in closed deals>60%
Customer Engagement ScoreStakeholder participation in evaluation>75%
RFP Coverage ScoreRequirements fully addressed>80%

Clarify First

Before producing the deliverable, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:

  • Which deliverable — RFP/RFI coverage analysis, competitive matrix, or POC plan (selects the tool and phase)
  • Customer requirements + priorities — the must/should/nice-to-have list (drives weighted coverage and the bid/no-bid call)
  • Competitor(s) in the deal — needed for the feature matrix, differentiators, and battlecard
  • POC scope + success criteria — when planning a POC, the use cases and measurable go/no-go bar (prevents an unbounded POC)

Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the deliverable.

5-Phase Workflow

Phase 1: Discovery & Research

Objective: Understand customer requirements, technical environment, and business drivers.

Activities:

  1. Conduct technical discovery calls with stakeholders
  2. Map customer's current architecture and pain points
  3. Identify integration requirements and constraints
  4. Document security and compliance requirements
  5. Assess competitive landscape for this opportunity

Tools: Use rfp_response_analyzer.py to score initial requirement alignment.

Output: Technical discovery document, requirement map, initial coverage assessment.

Phase 2: Solution Design

Objective: Design a solution architecture that addresses customer requirements.

Activities:

  1. Map product capabilities to customer requirements
  2. Design integration architecture
  3. Identify customization needs and development effort
  4. Build competitive differentiation strategy
  5. Create solution architecture diagrams

Tools: Use competitive_matrix_builder.py to identify differentiators and vulnerabilities.

Output: Solution architecture, competitive positioning, technical differentiation strategy.

Phase 3: Demo Preparation & Delivery

Objective: Deliver compelling technical demonstrations tailored to stakeholder priorities.

Activities:

  1. Build demo environment matching customer's use case
  2. Create demo script with talking points per stakeholder role
  3. Prepare objection handling responses
  4. Rehearse failure scenarios and recovery paths
  5. Collect feedback and adjust approach

Templates: Use demo_script_template.md for structured demo preparation.

Output: Customized demo, stakeholder-specific talking points, feedback capture.

Phase 4: POC & Evaluation

Objective: Execute a structured proof-of-concept that validates the solution.

Activities:

  1. Define POC scope, success criteria, and timeline
  2. Allocate resources and set up environment
  3. Execute phased testing (core, advanced, edge cases)
  4. Track progress against success criteria
  5. Generate evaluation scorecard

Tools: Use poc_planner.py to generate the complete POC plan.

Templates: Use poc_scorecard_template.md for evaluation tracking.

Output: POC plan, evaluation scorecard, go/no-go recommendation.

Phase 5: Proposal & Closing

Objective: Deliver a technical proposal that supports the commercial close.

Activities:

  1. Compile POC results and success metrics
  2. Create technical proposal with implementation plan
  3. Address outstanding objections with evidence
  4. Support pricing and packaging discussions
  5. Conduct win/loss analysis post-decision

Templates: Use technical_proposal_template.md for the proposal document.

Output: Technical proposal, implementation timeline, risk mitigation plan.

Python Automation Tools

1. RFP Response Analyzer

Script: scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py

Purpose: Parse RFP/RFI requirements, score coverage, identify gaps, and generate bid/no-bid recommendations.

Coverage Categories:

  • Full (100%) - Requirement fully met by current product
  • Partial (50%) - Requirement partially met, workaround or configuration needed
  • Planned (25%) - On product roadmap, not yet available
  • Gap (0%) - Not supported, no current plan

Priority Weighting:

  • Must-Have: 3x weight
  • Should-Have: 2x weight
  • Nice-to-Have: 1x weight

Bid/No-Bid Logic:

  • Bid: Coverage score >70% AND must-have gaps <=3
  • Conditional Bid: Coverage score 50-70% OR must-have gaps 2-3
  • No-Bid: Coverage score <50% OR must-have gaps >3

Usage:

bash
# Human-readable output
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json

# JSON output
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json

# Help
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py --help

Input Format: See assets/sample_rfp_data.json for the complete schema.

2. Competitive Matrix Builder

Script: scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py

Purpose: Generate feature comparison matrices, calculate competitive scores, identify differentiators and vulnerabilities.

Feature Scoring:

  • Full (3) - Complete feature support
  • Partial (2) - Partial or limited feature support
  • Limited (1) - Minimal or basic feature support
  • None (0) - Feature not available

Usage:

bash
# Human-readable output
python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json

# JSON output
python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json --format json

Output Includes:

  • Feature comparison matrix with scores
  • Weighted competitive scores per product
  • Differentiators (features where our product leads)
  • Vulnerabilities (features where competitors lead)
  • Win themes based on differentiators
3. POC Planner

Script: scripts/poc_planner.py

Purpose: Generate structured POC plans with timeline, resource allocation, success criteria, and evaluation scorecards.

Default Phase Breakdown:

  • Week 1: Setup - Environment provisioning, data migration, configuration
  • Weeks 2-3: Core Testing - Primary use cases, integration testing
  • Week 4: Advanced Testing - Edge cases, performance, security
  • Week 5: Evaluation - Scorecard completion, stakeholder review, go/no-go

Usage:

bash
# Human-readable output
python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json

# JSON output
python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json --format json

Output Includes:

  • POC plan with phased timeline
  • Resource allocation (SE, engineering, customer)
  • Success criteria with measurable metrics
  • Evaluation scorecard (functionality, performance, integration, usability, support)
  • Risk register with mitigation strategies
  • Go/No-Go recommendation framework

Reference Knowledge Bases

ReferenceDescription
references/rfp-response-guide.mdRFP/RFI response best practices, compliance matrix, bid/no-bid framework
references/competitive-positioning-framework.mdCompetitive analysis methodology, battlecard creation, objection handling
references/poc-best-practices.mdPOC planning methodology, success criteria, evaluation frameworks

Asset Templates

TemplatePurpose
assets/technical_proposal_template.mdTechnical proposal with executive summary, solution architecture, implementation plan
assets/demo_script_template.mdDemo script with agenda, talking points, objection handling
assets/poc_scorecard_template.mdPOC evaluation scorecard with weighted scoring
assets/sample_rfp_data.jsonSample RFP data for testing the analyzer
assets/expected_output.jsonExpected output from rfp_response_analyzer.py

Communication Style

  • Technical yet accessible - Translate complex concepts for business stakeholders
  • Confident and consultative - Position as trusted advisor, not vendor
  • Evidence-based - Back every claim with data, demos, or case studies
  • Stakeholder-aware - Tailor depth and focus to audience (CTO vs. end user vs. procurement)

Integration Points

  • Marketing Skills - Leverage competitive intelligence and messaging frameworks from ../../marketing/
  • Product Team - Coordinate on roadmap items flagged as "Planned" in RFP analysis from ../../product-team/
  • C-Level Advisory - Escalate strategic deals requiring executive engagement from ../../c-level-advisor/
  • Customer Success - Hand off POC results and success criteria to CSM from ../customer-success-manager/

Tool Reference

1. rfp_response_analyzer.py

Parses RFP/RFI requirements and scores coverage using Full/Partial/Planned/Gap categories. Generates weighted coverage scores, gap analysis, effort estimation, and bid/no-bid recommendations.

bash
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py rfp_data.json
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py rfp_data.json --format json
FlagTypeDescription
rfp_data.jsonpositionalPath to JSON file with RFP requirements and coverage data
--formatoptionalOutput format: text (default) or json

Bid/No-Bid Logic:

  • Bid: Coverage score >70% AND must-have gaps <=3
  • Conditional Bid: Coverage score 50-70% OR must-have gaps 2-3
  • No-Bid: Coverage score <50% OR must-have gaps >3
Show full SKILL.md (705 more words)Show less
2. competitive_matrix_builder.py

Generates feature comparison matrices, calculates weighted competitive scores, identifies differentiators and vulnerabilities, and produces win themes.

bash
python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json
python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json --format json
FlagTypeDescription
competitive_data.jsonpositionalPath to JSON file with feature comparison data
--formatoptionalOutput format: text (default) or json

Scoring: Full (3), Partial (2), Limited (1), None (0)

3. poc_planner.py

Generates structured POC plans with phased timelines, resource allocation, success criteria, evaluation scorecards, risk registers, and go/no-go frameworks.

bash
python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json
python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json --format json
FlagTypeDescription
poc_data.jsonpositionalPath to JSON file with POC scope and requirements
--formatoptionalOutput format: text (default) or json

Default Phase Breakdown: Week 1 Setup, Weeks 2-3 Core Testing, Week 4 Advanced Testing, Week 5 Evaluation


Troubleshooting

ProblemLikely CauseResolution
RFP coverage score below 50% triggering No-BidProduct gaps in must-have requirements or incorrect coverage assessmentReview gap items -- distinguish true gaps from items addressable via configuration, integration, or roadmap commitment; reassess before declining
Competitive matrix shows vulnerabilities in 3+ categoriesProduct gaps relative to a specific competitor, or scoring does not reflect actual competitive dynamicsValidate scoring with field SEs who have competed against this vendor; focus battlecard on differentiators where you lead, not where you trail
POC-to-close conversion below 60%POC scope too broad, success criteria not aligned with buyer priorities, or wrong stakeholders involvedNarrow POC to 3-5 use cases tied to buyer's stated pain; get written agreement on success criteria before starting; ensure executive sponsor participates in evaluation
Win rate below 30%Technical win but commercial loss, late involvement in deal, or poor discovery leading to misaligned demosEngage earlier in sales cycle; improve discovery quality using MEDDIC framework; align demo storyline to buyer's language not product features
Demo-to-POC conversion below 40%Demo did not address buyer's specific use case or was too genericCustomize every demo to buyer's stated requirements; use their data or industry-specific scenarios; include Q&A and next-step proposal at end
RFP response time exceeds 2 weeksManual response process without templates or pre-built content libraryBuild a response library indexed by requirement category; use rfp_response_analyzer.py to prioritize effort on must-have items
Stakeholder engagement score below 75%Key decision-makers not involved in technical evaluationMap stakeholder roles early; ensure executive briefing alongside technical deep-dives; send personalized follow-up to each stakeholder

Success Criteria

  • Win rate exceeds 30% across all competitive opportunities
  • Sales cycle length stays below 90 days from discovery to close
  • POC-to-close conversion rate exceeds 60%
  • RFP coverage score averages above 80% for opportunities pursued (bid decisions working correctly)
  • Competitive matrix identifies minimum 3 clear differentiators per competitor
  • Customer engagement score exceeds 75% (measured by stakeholder participation in evaluation milestones)
  • Average RFP response time drops below 5 business days with structured response library

Scope & Limitations

In scope: RFP/RFI response analysis and scoring, competitive feature matrix construction, proof-of-concept planning and evaluation, demo preparation frameworks, technical proposal structure, win/loss analysis methodology, and stakeholder engagement tracking across the 5-phase pre-sales workflow (Discovery, Solution Design, Demo, POC, Proposal).

Out of scope: Sales strategy and territory planning (account executive function), pricing and commercial terms negotiation (use pricing-strategy), post-sale implementation and customer success (use customer-success-manager), marketing content and competitive messaging (use marketing skills), and product roadmap decisions based on RFP gaps (use product-team). Tools analyze static data exports -- no integrations with CRM systems (Salesforce, HubSpot) or RFP platforms (Loopio, Arphie).

Limitations: Bid/no-bid thresholds are configurable but defaults assume B2B SaaS with 30%+ win-rate targets. Competitive matrix scoring is only as accurate as the input data -- validate scores with field experience against specific competitors. POC timelines assume standard 5-week engagement; highly regulated industries (healthcare, government) may require 2-3x longer. AI-assisted RFP tools (emerging in 2025-2026) can reduce response time 60-80% but are not integrated here.


Integration Points

  • revenue-operations -- Pipeline deals requiring technical validation flow through SE workflow; SE win/loss data feeds pipeline analysis
  • customer-success-manager -- POC results and success criteria hand off to CSM for post-close adoption tracking
  • pricing-strategy -- Competitive pricing data from matrix builder informs pricing positioning decisions
  • product-team -- RFP gaps flagged as "Planned" or "Gap" feed into product roadmap prioritization
  • c-level-advisor -- Strategic deals requiring executive engagement escalate through C-level advisory workflow
  • marketing -- Competitive intelligence from marketing feeds into battlecard creation and positioning

Last Updated: March 2026 Status: Production-ready Tools: 3 Python automation scripts References: 3 knowledge base documents Templates: 5 asset files

© borghei, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 11 other files (scripts, references, assets) in business-growth/sales-engineer of borghei/Claude-Skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • assets/demo_script_template.md
  • assets/expected_output.json
  • assets/poc_scorecard_template.md
  • assets/sample_rfp_data.json
  • assets/technical_proposal_template.md
  • references/competitive-positioning-framework.md
  • references/poc-best-practices.md
  • references/rfp-response-guide.md
  • scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py
  • scripts/poc_planner.py
  • scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 4a698e8

Compare with similar skills

Sales Engineer next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Sales Engineer compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Sales Engineer this skillborghei/Claude-Skills881—~4.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Panel Review Rationalisationlawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills836—~11kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Doc Coauthoringaws-samples/sample-strands-agent-with-agentcore19540 repos~3.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Audit Onboarding Proposalhoangnb24/repository-harness1.2k—~4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
No Negative EchoLB623/no-negative-echo897—~965Automated safety check: PassMIT
GEO Service Proposal Generatorzubair-trabzada/geo-seo-claude11k—~3kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Panel Review Rationalisation

    lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills

    Panel health assessment, firm exit management, coverage gap analysis, and panel refresh brief for in-house legal ops teams.

    836 GitHub stars~11k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Sales & SupportAuto-check passed
  • Doc Coauthoring

    aws-samples/sample-strands-agent-with-agentcore

    Official

    Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation.

    195 GitHub starsUsed in 40 repos~3.2k tokens
    Sales & SupportAuto-check passed
  • Audit Onboarding Proposal

    hoangnb24/repository-harness

    Use only when the user explicitly invokes $audit-onboarding-proposal.

    1.2k GitHub stars~4k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Sales & SupportAuto-check passed
  • No Negative Echo

    LB623/no-negative-echo

    Prevent 此地无银三百两式 residue: finalize artifacts without echoing rejected session-only alternatives into labels, metadata, commits, PRs, or handoffs.

    897 GitHub stars~965 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Sales & SupportAuto-check passed
  • GEO Service Proposal Generator

    zubair-trabzada/geo-seo-claude

    Builds a client-ready AI-search-optimization proposal from an existing GEO audit, with pricing tiers, an ROI estimate and a markdown document ready to send.

    11k GitHub stars~3k tokensUpdated today
    Sales & SupportAuto-check: notes
  • Architectural Proposals

    FritzAndFriends/SharpSite

    How to write comprehensive architectural proposals that drive alignment before code is written

    145 GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~1.6k tokens
    Sales & SupportAuto-check passed

More from borghei/Claude-Skills

All 349 skills in this repo
  • Agents In The Team

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Run delivery when AI coding and ops agents take tickets. An agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills.

    881 GitHub stars~4.2k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Content Disclosure

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Check AI-generated marketing content and reviews for required disclosures under the EU AI Act, FTC rules and platform AI-label policies.

    881 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Prototyping

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Idea to AI-generated prototype to customer validation to engineering handoff.

    881 GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Analytics Engineer

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Analytics engineering across data modeling, dbt, transformation, and semantic layers.

    881 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Ansoff Matrix

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Ansoff Matrix — 4-quadrant framework for growth options: market penetration, market/product development, and diversification.

    881 GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Brainstorm Okrs

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    OKR brainstorming and validation using the Radical Focus framework — outcome objectives, measurable key results, counter-metrics.

    881 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Sales Engineer

What does Sales Engineer do?

Analyzes RFP responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature matrices, and plans proof-of-concept engagements for pre-sales engineering. Sales Engineer is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills.

When should I use Sales Engineer?

Sales Engineer fits situations like: tasks that involve Proposals and quotes; tasks that involve Prototyping; tasks that involve Test coverage.

How do I install Sales Engineer in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill sales-engineer -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (business-growth/sales-engineer in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .claude/skills/sales-engineer in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Sales Engineer in Codex?

Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill sales-engineer -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (business-growth/sales-engineer in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .agents/skills/sales-engineer in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Sales Engineer in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill sales-engineer -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/sales-engineer, .gemini/skills/sales-engineer, .github/skills/sales-engineer and .opencode/skills/sales-engineer in your project.

What does Sales Engineer need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Sales Engineer needs Python for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (python). Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Sales Engineer access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Sales Engineer safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Sales Engineer use?

Sales Engineer is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Sales Engineer use?

About 4.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 17k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 7k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Sales Engineer?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Sales Engineer: Panel Review Rationalisation (lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills, 836 stars), Doc Coauthoring (aws-samples/sample-strands-agent-with-agentcore, 195 stars), Audit Onboarding Proposal (hoangnb24/repository-harness, 1.2k stars) and No Negative Echo (LB623/no-negative-echo, 897 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Sales Engineer?

borghei (a GitHub user) maintains it in borghei/Claude-Skills, which has 881 GitHub stars. The repository holds 349 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 7, 2026.

Source: borghei/Claude-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.