Agent skill

Nda Review

Deep clause-by-clause NDA review from Recipient or Discloser perspective.

Install Nda Review

skills CLI

$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill nda-review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills nda-review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/legal/nda-review .claude/skills/nda-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Paste into Claude Code

Install the "nda-review" agent skill from https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/legal/nda-review into .claude/skills/nda-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "nda-review", then confirm the skill loads.

Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

$skill-installer

$skill-installer install https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/legal/nda-review

Type this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill nda-review -a codex

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills nda-review --agent codex

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/legal/nda-review .agents/skills/nda-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.

Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/

Paste into Codex

Install the "nda-review" agent skill from https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/legal/nda-review into .agents/skills/nda-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "nda-review", then confirm the skill loads.

Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill nda-review -a cursor

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills nda-review --agent cursor

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/legal/nda-review .cursor/skills/nda-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.

Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/

Paste into Cursor

Install the "nda-review" agent skill from https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/legal/nda-review into .cursor/skills/nda-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "nda-review", then confirm the skill loads.

Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

gemini skills install

$ gemini skills install https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git --path legal/nda-review

--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill nda-review -a gemini-cli

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills nda-review --agent gemini-cli

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/legal/nda-review .gemini/skills/nda-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.

Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/

Paste into Gemini CLI

Install the "nda-review" agent skill from https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/legal/nda-review into .gemini/skills/nda-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "nda-review", then confirm the skill loads.

Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills nda-review

Installs for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

skills CLI

$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill nda-review -a github-copilot

Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/legal/nda-review .github/skills/nda-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.

GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/

Paste into GitHub Copilot

Install the "nda-review" agent skill from https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/legal/nda-review into .github/skills/nda-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "nda-review", then confirm the skill loads.

GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

skills CLI

$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill nda-review -a opencode

OpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.

GitHub CLI

$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills nda-review --agent opencode

Project scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.

Manual copy

$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/legal/nda-review .opencode/skills/nda-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.

OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/

Paste into OpenCode

Install the "nda-review" agent skill from https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/legal/nda-review into .opencode/skills/nda-review/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "nda-review", then confirm the skill loads.

OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.

Facts

Skill name: nda-review
GitHub stars: 891
Token cost: ~4.6k tokens
SKILL.md length: 1,835 words
Files: 4 (incl. scripts, references)
Skills in repo: 354
Repo updated: Oct 7, 2026
First seen: Oct 7, 2026
Licence: MIT

At a glance

Deep clause-by-clause NDA review from Recipient or Discloser perspective.

Works in 8 steps: Triage first -- Run nda-triage skill for… → Deep review -- Run… → Review issue log -- Address HIGH-risk… → …
Reviewing NDAs for negotiation
SKILL.md covers Table of Contents, Clarify First, Tools and Reference Guides, plus 11 more sections
Runs Python scripts from its folder; calls python

What it does

Nda Review is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Deep clause-by-clause NDA review from Recipient or Discloser perspective. Produces issue log with redlines, fallbacks, rationales, owners, deadlines. Use when reviewing NDAs for negotiation or approval.

Its SKILL.md is about 4.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 5 other files, including scripts and reference files (for example `references/nda_clause_reference.md`, `references/nda_review_templates.md` and `scripts/nda_clause_reviewer.py`).

It sits in Legal & Compliance, covering Contract review. The repository describes itself as: 385 AI skills, 77 expert agents, and 900 stdlib Python tools for every team: engineering, PM, marketing, C-level, compliance, business ops, research, and a LinkedIn toolkit… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

Reviewing NDAs for negotiation
Tasks that involve Contract review

Example prompts

“/nda-review”

Requirements

Python 3

Workflow steps

8 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

Triage first -- Run nda-triage skill for quick GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification
Deep review -- Run nda_clause_reviewer.py with appropriate --perspective
Review issue log -- Address HIGH-risk items first, then MEDIUM, then LOW
Prepare redlines -- Use preferred positions; prepare fallbacks
Assign owners -- Legal owns clause language; business owns commercial terms
Set deadlines -- Pre-signing items before next meeting; post-signing items within 30-90 days
Negotiate -- Present redlines; use fallbacks as needed
Final review -- Verify all issues resolved before execution

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 4a698e8. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

Tool permissions
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Runs code
Ships 1 file in scripts/ (Python), which the agent can run.
Shell commands in SKILL.md call:
- python
From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
Network
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Credentials
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Nda Review loads about 4.6k tokens when it runs, and up to ~12k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 53 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,835 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it: ~53
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches: ~4.6k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them: ~12k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from borghei/Claude-Skills at commit 4a698e8, republished under its MIT licence (© borghei). 1,835 words, ~4,619 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/nda-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 3 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.

name: nda-review
description: Deep clause-by-clause NDA review from Recipient or Discloser perspective. Produces issue log with redlines, fallbacks, rationales, owners, deadlines. Use when reviewing NDAs for negotiation or approval.
license: MIT + Commons Clause
metadata.version: 1.0.0
metadata.author: The Glass Room
metadata.category: legal
metadata.domain: nda-analysis
metadata.updated: 2026-04-10
metadata.tags: nda, review, clause-analysis, redline, negotiation

⚠️ EXPERIMENTAL — This skill is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It does NOT constitute legal advice. All responsibility for usage rests with the user. Consult qualified legal professionals before acting on any output.

NDA Review

Deep clause-by-clause NDA review tool that analyzes agreements from Recipient or Discloser perspective. Produces structured issue logs with preferred redlines, fallback positions, rationale, owners, and deadlines.

Tools
- NDA Clause Reviewer
Reference Guides
Workflows
- Full NDA Review
- Perspective-Based Review
Immediate Red Flags
Review Checklists
Variation Callouts
Risk Rating Guide
Common Pitfalls
Troubleshooting
Success Criteria
Scope & Limitations
Anti-Patterns
Tool Reference

Clarify First

Before reviewing the NDA, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:

Your perspective: Recipient or Discloser — flips every risk rating and the direction of each redline (the core --perspective input)
Deal context — M&A, employment, VC/fundraising, or standard commercial — triggers the variation callouts (standstill, invention assignment, portfolio conflicts)
What you cannot accept — non-compete, IP grant, perpetual term — sets which of the 7 immediate red flags force escalation vs negotiation

Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the issue log.

Tools

NDA Clause Reviewer

Performs deep analysis of NDA text, extracting and classifying each clause against best practices. Detects overbroad definitions, missing carveouts, problematic residuals, IP grants, indemnification, and audit rights.

bash

# Review from recipient perspective (default)
python scripts/nda_clause_reviewer.py nda_draft.txt

# Review from discloser perspective
python scripts/nda_clause_reviewer.py nda_draft.txt --perspective discloser

# JSON output for integration
python scripts/nda_clause_reviewer.py nda_draft.txt --json

# Save issue log
python scripts/nda_clause_reviewer.py nda_draft.txt --output issues.json --json

What it produces:

Clause-by-clause issue log with H/M/L risk ratings
Preferred redline for each issue
Fallback position if preferred is rejected
Rationale for each recommendation
Owner assignment (legal, business, executive)
Deadline category (pre-signing, 30-day, 90-day)

Reference Guides

NDA Clause Reference

references/nda_clause_reference.md

Five deep reference modules:

Duration & Scope (term, survival, scope limitations)
Key Clauses (definition, purpose, permitted use, marking)
Party Obligations (standard of care, use restriction, disclosure limits)
Remedies & Liability (injunctive relief, damages, indemnification)
Standard Exceptions (public knowledge, prior possession, independent development, third-party receipt, legal compulsion)

NDA Review Templates

references/nda_review_templates.md

Output templates and worked examples:

Executive Summary format
Clause-by-clause Issue Log table format
Ownership and timing defaults by topic category
Worked examples for social media endorsement and group licensing scenarios

Workflows

Full NDA Review

Triage first -- Run nda-triage skill for quick GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification
Deep review -- Run nda_clause_reviewer.py with appropriate --perspective
Review issue log -- Address HIGH-risk items first, then MEDIUM, then LOW
Prepare redlines -- Use preferred positions; prepare fallbacks
Assign owners -- Legal owns clause language; business owns commercial terms
Set deadlines -- Pre-signing items before next meeting; post-signing items within 30-90 days
Negotiate -- Present redlines; use fallbacks as needed
Final review -- Verify all issues resolved before execution

Perspective-Based Review

Perspective	Focus Areas	Key Concerns
Recipient	Scope of obligations, carveouts, residuals, return/destruction	Protecting freedom to operate; avoiding contamination claims
Discloser	Definition breadth, remedies, duration, permitted disclosures	Maximizing protection; ensuring adequate enforcement

Immediate Red Flags

Stop review and escalate if any of these 7 red flags are present.

#	Red Flag	Why It Matters	Escalation
1	Non-compete clause	Restricts business operations; requires separate consideration and analysis	Senior counsel immediately
2	IP assignment or license grant	Transfers rights beyond confidentiality scope	Senior counsel immediately
3	Non-solicitation of employees or customers	Employment law implications; may be unenforceable	Senior counsel within 24 hours
4	Missing 3+ standard carveouts	Fundamentally deficient NDA	Counsel review before any response
5	Liquidated damages or penalty clause	Transforms NDA into penalty contract	Senior counsel within 24 hours
6	Perpetual obligations with no termination	Indefinite legal burden with no exit	Counsel review within 48 hours
7	Exclusivity provision	Limits engagement with other parties	Business leadership + counsel

Review Checklists

Recipient Checklist (8 Topics)

#	Topic	Key Questions	Risk if Missing
1	Definition Scope	Is confidential info bounded? Is there a marking requirement?	Overbroad definition traps all shared information
2	Standard Carveouts	Are all 5 carveouts present and properly drafted?	Missing carveouts restrict legitimate business activities
3	Permitted Use	Is use restricted to stated purpose? Can we share with advisors?	Overly restrictive use limits may impede evaluation
4	Residuals	Is there a residuals clause? Is it narrow or broad?	Broad residuals clause benefits; narrow or absent protects discloser
5	Return/Destruction	Return or destroy option? Retention exception for backups?	No retention exception is impractical for electronic data
6	Term & Survival	Reasonable term? Reasonable survival period? Termination right?	Perpetual obligations are burdensome
7	Remedies	Injunctive relief only? Or liquidated damages/indemnification?	Excessive remedies shift risk disproportionately
8	Problematic Provisions	Non-compete? Non-solicitation? IP assignment? Audit rights?	These provisions have no place in a standard NDA

Discloser Checklist (5 Topics)

#	Topic	Key Questions	Risk if Missing
1	Definition Breadth	Does definition cover all information we will share? All forms?	Gaps in definition leave information unprotected
2	Obligation Strength	Standard of care adequate? Written agreements from recipients?	Weak obligations increase risk of unauthorized disclosure
3	Remedies	Injunctive relief available? Is it meaningful in this jurisdiction?	Without adequate remedies, NDA is unenforceable in practice
4	Duration	Is the term long enough? Does survival cover our exposure window?	Short terms may expire before information loses value
5	Recipient Limits	Who can receive? Is need-to-know enforced? Downstream binding?	Unrestricted sharing exposes information to unauthorized parties

Variation Callouts

Different NDA contexts require different review emphasis.

M&A Context

Additional Concern	Reason	Recommended Position
Standstill provision	Prevents hostile acquisition moves during due diligence	Accept if mutual and time-limited (12-18 months)
Non-solicitation of employees	Standard in M&A NDAs	Accept if limited to key employees for 12 months
Broader definition	M&A requires extensive information sharing	Accept broader definition with strong carveouts
Longer survival	Sensitive strategic information shared	3-5 year survival is appropriate
Residuals clause sensitivity	Competitive intelligence at stake	Resist residuals clause or narrow significantly

Employment Context

Additional Concern	Reason	Recommended Position
Invention assignment	Employer IP ownership	Separate from NDA; use invention assignment agreement
Post-employment obligations	Obligations after employment ends	Limit survival to 2 years; ensure enforceability
Scope of work product	What the employee creates	Define in employment agreement, not NDA
Non-compete enforceability	Varies by jurisdiction	Review local law before including; may be void

VC / Fundraising Context

Additional Concern	Reason	Recommended Position
Investor portfolio conflicts	VC may have portfolio companies in same space	Include portfolio company exclusion or conflict provision
Residuals clause	VCs see many similar pitches	Resist; protect trade secrets and specific data
Term limitations	VCs want short obligations	2-3 year term acceptable; ensure adequate survival
Definition scope	Founders want maximum protection	Balance with investor need for portfolio flexibility

Risk Rating Guide

Rating	Criteria	Action	Timeline
HIGH (H)	Could result in material legal or financial exposure; deal-breaker potential	Must resolve before signing	Pre-signing
MEDIUM (M)	Creates meaningful risk but manageable; strong preference to resolve	Should resolve; accept with documented risk if necessary	Within 30 days
LOW (L)	Minor preference; improves agreement but not material	Nice to resolve; concede if needed for higher-priority wins	Within 90 days

Show full SKILL.md (708 more words)Show less

Risk Rating by Issue Type

Issue Type	Typical Rating	Escalation
Missing carveout (any)	M-H	Counsel
Overbroad definition	M	Counsel
Non-compete/non-solicitation	H	Senior counsel
IP assignment	H	Senior counsel
Residuals clause (broad)	M	Counsel
Perpetual obligations	M-H	Counsel
No return/destruction	M	Counsel
Liquidated damages	H	Senior counsel
Missing governing law	L-M	Counsel
One-sided obligations	M	Counsel

Common Pitfalls

Pitfall	Impact	Fix
Reviewing without knowing your perspective	Recipient and discloser have opposing interests on many clauses	Always set `--perspective` flag; review with clear role in mind
Treating the NDA as "just a formality"	Missing problematic provisions that create real obligations	Run full clause review on every NDA, regardless of perceived importance
Negotiating clause-by-clause in document order	Wastes time on early low-priority clauses; may not reach critical issues	Prioritize by risk rating; address H items first
Accepting "standard" NDAs without review	Every organization's "standard" is different; one party's standard favors that party	No NDA is truly standard; always review
Ignoring context (M&A, employment, VC)	Standard NDA review misses context-specific risks	Use variation callouts for specialized contexts
Not preparing fallback positions	Stuck when counterparty rejects preferred redline	Prepare preferred + fallback for every H and M item
Signing before resolving H-rated issues	Creates material legal exposure	Require all H items resolved or executive sign-off

Troubleshooting

Problem	Cause	Solution
All issues rated LOW	NDA is genuinely well-drafted, or text extraction lost key sections	Manually verify critical sections (definition, carveouts, remedies) are in the input file
Perspective flag has no effect	Tool adjusts weighting, not detection; same issues found either way	Perspective changes risk ratings and recommendations, not issue detection
Too many issues generated	NDA is non-standard or poorly drafted	Focus on H-rated issues first; use the issue log as a negotiation roadmap
Script misses embedded provisions	Non-compete or IP clause hidden in definitions or general provisions	Search full document for "compete", "assign", "license", "solicit" manually
Output format does not match template	Tool outputs structured data, not final deliverable	Use `references/nda_review_templates.md` to format the output for stakeholders

Success Criteria

Complete clause-by-clause review in under 15 minutes: Automated analysis replaces 1-2 hours of manual review.
Zero missed HIGH-risk issues: Every non-compete, IP assignment, and missing carveout is identified.
Actionable redlines for every H and M issue: Each issue has preferred position, fallback, and rationale.
Clear ownership assignment: Every issue has a designated owner (legal, business, executive).
Perspective-appropriate recommendations: Recipient and discloser reviews produce different risk weightings.
Context-aware review: M&A, employment, and VC variations are flagged when relevant.

Scope & Limitations

Covers:

Deep clause-by-clause NDA analysis with pattern matching and risk classification
Perspective-based review (Recipient vs. Discloser)
Issue log generation with redlines, fallbacks, rationale, owners, and deadlines
Detection of 7 immediate red flags for triage
Context variation awareness (M&A, Employment, VC)

Does NOT cover:

Legal advice -- this tool supports review, it does not replace qualified legal counsel
Rapid triage -- use nda-triage for quick GREEN/YELLOW/RED screening
Contract types beyond NDAs -- use contract-review for general commercial agreements
Jurisdiction-specific enforceability analysis -- requires local counsel assessment
Non-English NDAs -- pattern matching is English-language only

Anti-Patterns

Anti-Pattern	Why It Fails	Better Approach
Running deep review without triage first	Wastes time on detailed analysis of NDAs that should be rejected outright (RED triage)	Always run `nda-triage` first; only proceed to deep review for YELLOW or GREEN-with-complexity
Using Recipient perspective for both sides	Recipient perspective minimizes obligations and maximizes carveouts, which is wrong if you are the discloser	Always set the correct `--perspective` flag based on your role
Accepting all LOW-rated issues without review	Some LOW issues are low-risk individually but create cumulative exposure when combined	Review the full issue log for interaction effects; multiple LOW issues in the same area may compound to MEDIUM
Skipping the variation callouts for specialized contexts	Standard NDA review misses M&A standstill provisions, employment invention assignment, VC portfolio conflicts	Check the variation callouts section for your specific deal context

Tool Reference

nda_clause_reviewer.py

Purpose: Performs deep clause-by-clause NDA analysis. Detects overbroad definitions, missing carveouts, problematic provisions, and generates an issue log with redlines, fallbacks, rationale, owners, and deadlines.

Usage:

bash

python scripts/nda_clause_reviewer.py <nda_file> [--perspective PERSPECTIVE] [--json] [--output FILE]

Flags:

Flag	Short	Default	Description
`nda_file`	(positional)		Path to NDA text file (.txt or .md)
`--perspective`	`-p`	`recipient`	Review perspective: `recipient` or `discloser`
`--json`		off	Output in JSON format
`--output`	`-o`	(stdout)	Write output to file

Example Output (JSON):

json

{
  "file": "vendor_nda.txt",
  "perspective": "recipient",
  "issues": [
    {
      "id": 1,
      "clause": "Definition of Confidential Information",
      "issue": "Overbroad definition with no marking requirement",
      "risk": "H",
      "preferred_redline": "Narrow to information marked Confidential or confirmed in writing within 10 days",
      "fallback": "Add marking requirement for written; 10-day confirmation for oral",
      "rationale": "Overbroad definition traps all shared information as confidential",
      "owner": "legal",
      "deadline": "pre-signing"
    }
  ],
  "summary": {
    "total_issues": 5,
    "high": 2,
    "medium": 2,
    "low": 1
  }
}

Example Output (Text):

NDA CLAUSE REVIEW — ISSUE LOG
==============================
File: vendor_nda.txt
Perspective: Recipient
Issues Found: 5 (H:2 M:2 L:1)

 #  Risk  Clause                           Issue
 1  H     Definition of Confidential Info  Overbroad definition; no marking requirement
        Preferred: Narrow to marked information with 10-day oral confirmation
        Fallback:  Add marking requirement for written; 10-day confirmation for oral
        Rationale: Overbroad definition traps all shared information
        Owner: legal | Deadline: pre-signing

 2  H     Standard Carveouts               Missing independent development carveout
        Preferred: Add standard independent development exception
        Fallback:  Add with documentary evidence requirement
        Rationale: Missing carveout blocks internal R&D
        Owner: legal | Deadline: pre-signing

Files

SKILL.md and 3 other files (scripts, references) in legal/nda-review of borghei/Claude-Skills.

SKILL.md
references/nda_clause_reference.md
references/nda_review_templates.md
scripts/nda_clause_reviewer.py

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 4a698e8

Compare with similar skills

Nda Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Nda Review compared with similar skills
Skill	Stars	Used in	Tokens	Auto-check	Licence	Repo updated
Nda Review this skillborghei/Claude-Skills	891	—	~4.6k	Automated safety check: Pass	MIT	3 days ago
Contract Reviewevolsb/claude-legal-skill	464	1 repos	~3.6k	Automated safety check: Pass	MIT	2 mo ago
Commercial Legal Plapiotrowski-afk/commercial-legal-pl	176	1 repos	~4.1k	Automated safety check: Pass	Apache-2.0	yesterday
Hand Drawnthreerocks/hand-drawn-styles	2.2k	—	~398	Automated safety check: Pass	MIT	2 days ago
Tabular Document Reviewanthropics/claude-for-legal	9.6k	3 repos	~4.3k	Automated safety check: Pass	Apache-2.0	11 days ago
Tw Formal WritingImbad0202/tw-formal-writing	179	—	~1k	Automated safety check: Pass	MIT	16 days ago

Similar skills

Contract Review
evolsb/claude-legal-skill
Review legal contracts, NDAs, employment agreements, SaaS terms, and M&A documents.
464 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.6k tokens
Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
Commercial Legal Pl
apiotrowski-afk/commercial-legal-pl
Skill do analizy i tworzenia umów według polskiego prawa, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem umów B2B, IP i IT (body leasing, NDA, wdrożenia, SaaS, przeniesienie praw autorskich, ugody).
176 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.1k tokens
Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
Hand Drawn
threerocks/hand-drawn-styles
A skill your agent uses when users ask for a hand-drawn or illustrated image prompt, name one of the repository's 20 numbered styles or the 3.1 stable variant, or mention triggers such as…
2.2k GitHub stars~398 tokensUpdated 2 days ago
Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
Tabular Document Review
anthropics/claude-for-legal
Official
Builds a review grid with one row per document and one column per data point, each cell cited to a verbatim quote, built for M&A diligence and other batch reviews.
9.6k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~4.3k tokens
Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
Tw Formal Writing
Imbad0202/tw-formal-writing
台灣正式文件撰寫助手 — 涵蓋政府公文、政府機關其他文件、法律文件、人民對政府文書四類中文正式文件的撰寫（不含學術論文、商業文書、私人書信等，見下方排除清單）。
179 GitHub stars~1k tokensUpdated 16 days ago
Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed
Contract Review Pro
CSlawyer1985/contract-review-pro
专业合同审核 Skill：7步工作流（含立场声明、框架审阅、类型路由）、5类通用门禁+16个专项门禁、终稿三件套+HTML可视化报告、8维度风险评分、修订5分类路由。完全自包含，零外部依赖。
277 GitHub stars~2.3k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

Questions about Nda Review

What does Nda Review do?

Deep clause-by-clause NDA review from Recipient or Discloser perspective. Nda Review is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Deep clause-by-clause NDA review from Recipient or Discloser perspective.

When should I use Nda Review?

Nda Review fits situations like: reviewing NDAs for negotiation; tasks that involve Contract review.

How do I install Nda Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill nda-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (legal/nda-review in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .claude/skills/nda-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Nda Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill nda-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (legal/nda-review in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .agents/skills/nda-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Nda Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill nda-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/nda-review, .gemini/skills/nda-review, .github/skills/nda-review and .opencode/skills/nda-review in your project.

What does Nda Review need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Nda Review needs Python for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (python). Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Nda Review access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Nda Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Nda Review use?

Nda Review is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Nda Review use?

About 4.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 18k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 7.5k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Nda Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Nda Review: Contract Review (evolsb/claude-legal-skill, 464 stars), Commercial Legal Pl (apiotrowski-afk/commercial-legal-pl, 176 stars), Hand Drawn (threerocks/hand-drawn-styles, 2.2k stars) and Tabular Document Review (anthropics/claude-for-legal, 9.6k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Nda Review?

borghei (a GitHub user) maintains it in borghei/Claude-Skills, which has 891 GitHub stars. The repository holds 354 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 7, 2026.

Source: borghei/Claude-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.

Install Nda Review

Facts

At a glance

What it does

When your agent uses it

Example prompts

Requirements

Workflow steps

What it can do on your machine

Tool permissions

Runs code

Network

Credentials

Context cost

Safety

SKILL.md

NDA Review

Table of Contents

Clarify First

Tools

NDA Clause Reviewer

Reference Guides

NDA Clause Reference

NDA Review Templates

Workflows

Full NDA Review

Perspective-Based Review

Immediate Red Flags

Review Checklists

Recipient Checklist (8 Topics)

Discloser Checklist (5 Topics)

Variation Callouts

M&A Context

Employment Context

VC / Fundraising Context

Risk Rating Guide

Risk Rating by Issue Type

Common Pitfalls

Troubleshooting

Success Criteria

Scope & Limitations

Anti-Patterns

Tool Reference

nda_clause_reviewer.py

Files

Compare with similar skills

Similar skills

More from borghei/Claude-Skills

Related

Questions about Nda Review