Executive Mentor
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Adversarial thinking partner for founders and executives. An agent skill from alirezarezvani/claude-skills.
Adversarial thinking partner that stress-tests plans, prepares board meetings, and surfaces blind spots.
$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill executive-mentor -a claude-codeProject install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.
$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills executive-mentor --agent claude-codeProject scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/c-level-advisor/executive-mentor .claude/skills/executive-mentor && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.
Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/
Install the "executive-mentor" agent skill from https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/c-level-advisor/executive-mentor into .claude/skills/executive-mentor/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "executive-mentor", then confirm the skill loads.Claude Code copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$skill-installer install https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/c-level-advisor/executive-mentorType this inside Codex. $skill-installer <name> installs a curated skill from openai/skills. The installer writes to $CODEX_HOME/skills (default ~/.codex/skills). Restart Codex if the skill does not show up.
$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill executive-mentor -a codexProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.codex/skills/.
$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills executive-mentor --agent codexProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .agents/skills && cp -r skills-src/c-level-advisor/executive-mentor .agents/skills/executive-mentor && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.agents/skills/ instead of .agents/skills for a personal install.
Codex skills documentation · loads skills from .agents/skills/
Install the "executive-mentor" agent skill from https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/c-level-advisor/executive-mentor into .agents/skills/executive-mentor/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "executive-mentor", then confirm the skill loads.Codex copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill executive-mentor -a cursorProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.cursor/skills/.
$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills executive-mentor --agent cursorProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .cursor/skills && cp -r skills-src/c-level-advisor/executive-mentor .cursor/skills/executive-mentor && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.cursor/skills/ instead of .cursor/skills for a personal install.
Cursor skills documentation · loads skills from .cursor/skills/, .agents/skills/, .claude/skills/, .codex/skills/
Install the "executive-mentor" agent skill from https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/c-level-advisor/executive-mentor into .cursor/skills/executive-mentor/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "executive-mentor", then confirm the skill loads.Cursor copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gemini skills install https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git --path c-level-advisor/executive-mentor--scope user (default) or --scope workspace; --path is the subfolder of the repo that holds the skill; --consent skips the security confirmation prompt.
$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill executive-mentor -a gemini-cliProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.gemini/skills/.
$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills executive-mentor --agent gemini-cliProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .gemini/skills && cp -r skills-src/c-level-advisor/executive-mentor .gemini/skills/executive-mentor && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.gemini/skills/ instead of .gemini/skills for a personal install, then run /skills reload.
Gemini CLI skills documentation · loads skills from .gemini/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "executive-mentor" agent skill from https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/c-level-advisor/executive-mentor into .gemini/skills/executive-mentor/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "executive-mentor", then confirm the skill loads.Gemini CLI copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills executive-mentorInstalls for Copilot at project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Preview a skill first with gh skill preview. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).
$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill executive-mentor -a github-copilotProject install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.copilot/skills/.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .github/skills && cp -r skills-src/c-level-advisor/executive-mentor .github/skills/executive-mentor && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.copilot/skills/ instead of .github/skills for a personal install. Commit .github/skills so cloud agent and code review can use it.
GitHub Copilot skills documentation · loads skills from .github/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "executive-mentor" agent skill from https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/c-level-advisor/executive-mentor into .github/skills/executive-mentor/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "executive-mentor", then confirm the skill loads.GitHub Copilot copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill executive-mentor -a opencodeOpenCode documents no install command of its own. Project install goes to .agents/skills/; add -g for ~/.config/opencode/skills/.
$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills executive-mentor --agent opencodeProject scope by default (.agents/skills/); add --scope user for a personal install.
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .opencode/skills && cp -r skills-src/c-level-advisor/executive-mentor .opencode/skills/executive-mentor && rm -rf skills-srcUse ~/.config/opencode/skills/ instead of .opencode/skills for a personal install.
OpenCode skills documentation · loads skills from .opencode/skills/, .claude/skills/, .agents/skills/
Install the "executive-mentor" agent skill from https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/c-level-advisor/executive-mentor into .opencode/skills/executive-mentor/ in this project. Copy the whole folder (SKILL.md and every file beside it), keep the folder name "executive-mentor", then confirm the skill loads.OpenCode copies the folder itself, the same result as the manual copy. Check what it changed before you commit it.
executive-mentorAdversarial thinking partner that stress-tests plans, prepares board meetings, and surfaces blind spots.
Executive Mentor is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Adversarial thinking partner that stress-tests plans, prepares board meetings, and surfaces blind spots. Use when you need plan validation, board prep, hard-decision frameworks, or pre/post-mortem failure analysis.
Its SKILL.md is about 4.6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 4 other files, including scripts (for example `scripts/coaching_plan_generator.py`, `scripts/goal_tracker.py` and `scripts/leadership_assessment.py`).
It sits in DevOps & Cloud, covering Runbooks and postmortems, Load testing and Root cause analysis. The repository describes itself as: 385 AI skills, 77 expert agents, and 900 stdlib Python tools for every team: engineering, PM, marketing, C-level, compliance, business ops, research, and a LinkedIn toolkit… The licence is MIT.
Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 4a698e8. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.
Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.
From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.
Ships 3 files in scripts/ (Python), which the agent can run.
Shell commands in SKILL.md call:
pythonFrom the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.
No URLs in SKILL.md.
From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.
Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.
From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.
Executive Mentor loads about 4.6k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 58 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,617 words of instructions outside code blocks.
Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.
The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.
Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.
The full file from borghei/Claude-Skills at commit 4a698e8, republished under its MIT licence (© borghei). 1,617 words, ~4,626 tokens.
.claude/skills/executive-mentor/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 3 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.Not another advisor. An adversarial thinking partner. Finds the holes before your competitors, board, or customers do. Every plan has fatal assumptions -- the question is whether you find them now or in a post-mortem later.
executive mentor, pre-mortem, board prep, hard decisions, stress test, postmortem, plan challenge, devil's advocate, founder coaching, adversarial thinking, crisis, pivot, layoffs, co-founder conflict, blind spots, decision quality, assumption testing, scenario planning
Other C-suite skills build plans. Executive Mentor breaks them.
| Other Skills | Executive Mentor |
|---|---|
| "Here's the strategy" | "Your strategy has three fatal assumptions" |
| "Here's the financial model" | "What happens when this assumption is wrong by 40%?" |
| "Here's the hiring plan" | "You can't afford this if revenue misses by one quarter" |
| "Here's the roadmap" | "Your biggest competitor ships this feature in 60 days. Then what?" |
Step 1: STATE THE PLAN
Describe the plan as if it succeeded perfectly.
Step 2: ASSUME FAILURE
"It's 12 months from now. This plan failed completely. Why?"
Step 3: IDENTIFY FAILURE MODES
List every way the plan could fail. Minimum 5 failure modes.
Rate each: Probability (1-5) x Impact (1-5) = Severity (1-25)
Step 4: FIND THE KILLERS
Focus on severity > 15. These are the ones that will actually kill you.
Step 5: BUILD HEDGES
For each killer: What's the earliest warning signal?
What's the cheapest hedge that reduces severity by 50%?
Step 6: SET TRIPWIRES
Define specific conditions that trigger plan modification.
"If [metric] drops below [threshold] by [date], we [action]."| Failure Mode | Probability (1-5) | Impact (1-5) | Severity | Earliest Warning | Hedge | Tripwire |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Key hire doesn't work out | 3 | 4 | 12 | 60-day performance review | Start backup pipeline now | If not performing at 60 days, activate backup |
| Market shifts faster than expected | 2 | 5 | 10 | Competitor announces similar product | Build modular architecture, pivot-ready | If competitor launches in 90 days, convene board |
| Revenue misses by > 20% | 3 | 5 | 15 | Pipeline coverage drops below 2x | Cut discretionary spend plan ready | If Q1 misses by > 15%, execute cost reduction |
T-48 hours: INFORMATION GATHERING
- Pull all metrics the board tracks
- Identify every number that missed target
- List every hard question they could ask
- Review previous board meeting action items
T-24 hours: NARRATIVE CONSTRUCTION
- Build the story: where we said we'd be, where we are, why, what next
- Prepare the bad news delivery (Framework: State, Own, Understand, Fix)
- Practice the three hardest questions out loud
- Prepare specific asks (not "any help appreciated")
T-2 hours: FINAL PREP
- Review deck one more time
- Ensure every metric has a target and status
- Confirm every variance has a one-sentence explanation
- Know your three key messages cold
During: EXECUTION
- Lead with the most important thing (slide 3, not slide 30)
- Deliver bad news early, with ownership and a plan
- End with specific, actionable asksPrepare answers for these regardless of your agenda:
| Question | What They Really Want to Know |
|---|---|
| "Walk me through the miss" | Can you diagnose problems honestly? |
| "What's the path to profitability?" | Do you have unit economics discipline? |
| "Who's your biggest competitive threat?" | Are you aware and strategic, or dismissive? |
| "What keeps you up at night?" | Are you honest about risks, or selling? |
| "If you had to cut 30% of the team, who stays?" | Do you know who's critical? |
| "Why should we put more money in?" | Is the risk/reward still compelling? |
| "What would you do differently?" | Can you learn and adapt? |
| "Show me the cohort data" | Is retention real or is growth masking churn? |
| "What's your biggest hiring mistake?" | Are you self-aware and decisive? |
| "When will you need more capital?" | Do you understand your cash position? |
| Board Member Type | Behavior | How to Handle |
|---|---|---|
| The Operator | Digs into execution details | Have the numbers ready, respect their experience |
| The Financier | Everything is an IRR calculation | Lead with unit economics and capital efficiency |
| The Strategist | Wants to see the big picture | Connect tactics to strategy, show the vision |
| The Skeptic | Questions everything, plays devil's advocate | Welcome the challenge, don't get defensive |
| The Passive | Agrees with everything, adds little | Assign specific topics, ask direct questions |
For decisions with no good options -- only less bad ones.
Step 1: REVERSIBILITY TEST
[Is this decision reversible within 90 days?]
|
+-- YES --> Make it faster. Speed > perfection for reversible decisions.
+-- NO --> Proceed through full framework.
Step 2: 10/10/10 ANALYSIS
- How will you feel about this in 10 minutes?
- How will you feel in 10 months?
- How will you feel in 10 years?
Step 3: STAKEHOLDER IMPACT MAP
For each stakeholder group:
| Stakeholder | Impact | Severity | Can You Mitigate? |
| Team | [desc] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No/Partially] |
| Customers | [desc] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No/Partially] |
| Investors | [desc] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No/Partially] |
| Partners | [desc] | [H/M/L] | [Yes/No/Partially] |
Step 4: OPTION MATRIX
| Option | Upside | Downside | Reversibility | Speed | Regret Risk |
| A | | | | | |
| B | | | | | |
| C (do nothing) | | | | | |
Step 5: DECIDE AND COMMUNICATE
- Make the call
- Communicate to affected stakeholders within 24 hours
- Own the decision fully -- no "I was advised to"| Decision | Key Consideration | Common Mistake |
|---|---|---|
| Layoffs | Cut deep enough once; don't do rolling layoffs | Cutting too shallow, needing a second round |
| Firing a co-founder | Delay costs more than the pain of acting | Waiting until the relationship is destroyed |
| Killing a product | Sunk cost is irrelevant; opportunity cost is everything | Keeping it alive because "we've invested so much" |
| Pivoting | Pivot from data, not desperation | Pivoting without understanding why current thing failed |
| Turning down funding | Wrong money at the wrong terms is worse than no money | Taking bad terms because "we need the runway" |
| Saying no to a big customer | One customer's needs vs. product vision | Building custom features that derail the roadmap |
Step 1: IDENTIFY THE ASSUMPTION
State it explicitly: "We assume [X]"
Step 2: FIND COUNTER-EVIDENCE
What data or scenarios would make this assumption false?
- Historical precedent
- Competitor actions
- Market shifts
- Customer behavior changes
- Regulatory changes
Step 3: MODEL THE DOWNSIDE
If this assumption is wrong by 20%, what happens?
By 40%? By 60%?
At what point does the plan break?
Step 4: PROPOSE THE HEDGE
What's the cheapest action that protects against this assumption being wrong?
Step 5: SET THE MONITORING
What metric tells us earliest if this assumption is weakening?| Assumption | Challenge | Hedge |
|---|---|---|
| "Revenue will grow 2x YoY" | What if it grows 1.3x? | Plan expenses for 1.5x, invest for 2x |
| "$5B TAM" | Is that serviceable? What's your SAM? | Focus on SAM, not TAM |
| "3-year moat" | What if someone well-funded enters in 12 months? | Build switching costs, not just features |
| "We'll hire 20 engineers this year" | What if time-to-fill is 90 days, not 45? | Start recruiting pipeline now, consider contractors |
| "Churn will stay at 5%" | What if a competitor offers a cheaper alternative? | Invest in stickiness, not just acquisition |
POST-MORTEM: [Event Name]
Date of Event: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Date of Review: [YYYY-MM-DD]
Facilitator: [Name]
Participants: [Names]
TIMELINE
[Chronological sequence of events, facts only]
IMPACT
- Customer impact: [description, magnitude]
- Revenue impact: [$ amount]
- Team impact: [description]
- Reputation impact: [description]
5 WHYS ANALYSIS
1. Why did [event] happen?
Because [cause 1].
2. Why did [cause 1] happen?
Because [cause 2].
3. Why did [cause 2] happen?
Because [cause 3].
4. Why did [cause 3] happen?
Because [cause 4].
5. Why did [cause 4] happen?
Because [root cause].
ROOT CAUSE: [One sentence]
CONTRIBUTING FACTORS (not root cause, but made it worse):
- [Factor 1]
- [Factor 2]
WHAT WENT WELL (always include this):
- [Thing 1]
- [Thing 2]
CHANGES REQUIRED
| Change | Owner | Deadline | Verification Method |
|--------|-------|----------|-------------------|
| [Change 1] | [Name] | [Date] | [How we verify it's done] |
| [Change 2] | [Name] | [Date] | [How we verify it's done] |
FOLLOW-UP REVIEW: [Date to check all changes are implemented]| Anti-Pattern | Why It Fails | Better Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Blame assignment | People hide information next time | Blameless: focus on system, not individuals |
| "We'll be more careful" | Not actionable | Specific process or system change |
| Too many action items | Nothing gets done | Maximum 5 changes, prioritized |
| No follow-up | Changes never implemented | Mandatory follow-up date, tracked |
| Whitewashing | Same failure repeats | Honest root cause, uncomfortable truths |
| Situation | Mentor Does | Invokes |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue plan looks optimistic | Challenges the assumptions | CFO: "Model the bear case" |
| Hiring plan has no budget check | Questions feasibility | CFO: "Can we afford this?" |
| Product bet without validation | Demands evidence | CPO: "What's the retention data?" |
| Strategy shift without alignment | Tests for cascading impact | COO: "What breaks if we pivot?" |
| Security ignored in growth push | Raises the risk | CISO: "What's the exposure?" |
| Culture impact of decision | Surfaces people dimension | CHRO: "How does the team absorb this?" |
| Request | Deliverable |
|---|---|
| "Challenge this plan" | Pre-mortem with ranked failure modes, hedges, and tripwires |
| "Prep me for the board" | 10 hardest questions with prepared answers and narrative |
| "Help me make this hard call" | Decision matrix with options, trade-offs, and communication plan |
| "Stress test this assumption" | Counter-evidence, downside modeling, hedge recommendation |
| "Run a post-mortem" | Blameless analysis with root cause, contributing factors, and changes |
| "Find my blind spots" | Pattern analysis of past decisions and recurring themes |
| Problem | Likely Cause | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Stress test produces no actionable insights | Assumptions too vague or too few failure modes identified | Require minimum 5 specific, quantified failure modes per plan; use GROW model (Goal, Reality, Options, Will) to sharpen each |
| Board prep feels superficial | Skipping the hard questions or not rehearsing answers | Run the 10 Hardest Board Questions drill with a trusted peer; record and review responses |
| Post-mortem devolves into blame | Facilitator not enforcing blameless culture | Restate ground rules at start; focus language on systems not people; consider external facilitator |
| Pre-mortem participants only list obvious risks | Group conformity bias suppressing creative thinking | Use silent brainstorming first (written, anonymous), then share; apply inversion technique ("How would we guarantee failure?") |
| Hard call framework produces analysis paralysis | Too many options or unclear decision criteria | Limit to 3 options maximum; apply the reversibility test first to eliminate low-stakes decisions from full framework |
| Founder avoids engaging with mentor challenges | Ego protection or fear of appearing weak | Start with evidence file review (past wins); normalize the process by referencing Co-Active coaching principle: the leader is naturally creative and resourceful |
| Tripwires set but never monitored | No ownership or tracking cadence assigned | Assign a specific person to each tripwire; add to weekly leadership meeting agenda |
| Skill | Integration | Data Flow |
|---|---|---|
ceo-advisor | Strategic decisions feed into stress testing | CEO strategy → Mentor challenges assumptions |
founder-coach | Personal development gaps surface during mentoring | Mentor blind spots → Coach development plan |
board-deck-builder | Board prep protocol feeds directly into deck construction | Mentor hard questions → Deck narrative answers |
strategic-alignment | Strategy cascade validation after stress testing | Mentor-validated plan → Alignment cascade |
scenario-war-room | Pre-mortem failure modes feed into scenario modeling | Mentor failure modes → War room scenarios |
org-health-diagnostic | Health scores reveal areas needing executive attention | Health red flags → Mentor focus areas |
cfo-advisor | Financial assumptions require CFO validation | Mentor financial challenges → CFO bear case model |
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
|---|---|---|
scripts/leadership_assessment.py | Score leadership competencies across 8 dimensions using the GROW model framework | python scripts/leadership_assessment.py --name "Jane Doe" --role CEO --json |
scripts/coaching_plan_generator.py | Generate a structured 90-day coaching plan based on assessment gaps | python scripts/coaching_plan_generator.py --gaps delegation,communication --stage "series-a" --json |
scripts/goal_tracker.py | Track executive development goals with progress and accountability | python scripts/goal_tracker.py add --goal "Delegate all operational decisions" --deadline 2026-06-01 --json |
© borghei, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file
SKILL.md and 3 other files (scripts) in c-level-advisor/executive-mentor of borghei/Claude-Skills.
Open the folder on GitHubat commit 4a698e8
Executive Mentor next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.
| Skill | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Repo updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Executive Mentor this skillborghei/Claude-Skills | 881 | — | ~4.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Executive Mentoralirezarezvani/claude-skills | 28k | 1 repos | ~1.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Post Mortemthananon/9arm-skills | 3.2k | — | ~3.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | None | |
| Post-Incident DebriefVeryGoodOpenSource/vgv-wingspan | 109 | — | ~1.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Postmortemalirezarezvani/claude-skills | 28k | 2 repos | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | |
| Postmortemdralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework | 125 | — | ~708 | Automated safety check: Pass | None |
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Adversarial thinking partner for founders and executives. An agent skill from alirezarezvani/claude-skills.
thananon/9arm-skills
Write the canonical engineering record of a fixed bug — root cause, mechanism, fix, validation, and how it slipped through.
VeryGoodOpenSource/vgv-wingspan
Produces a blameless post-incident debrief with timeline, root cause and follow-up actions after an outage, failed release or significant bug, while details are fresh.
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
/em:postmortem — Honest analysis of what went wrong. An agent skill from alirezarezvani/claude-skills.
dralgorhythm/claude-agentic-framework
Runs this framework's blameless postmortem workflow — reconstruct the incident timeline from evidence, drive five-whys to a mechanism-level root cause, and produce owner-and-due-date action items…
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Facilitate structured post-incident reviews to identify root causes, document what worked and failed, and produce actionable recommendations to improve future incident response.
borghei/Claude-Skills
Run delivery when AI coding and ops agents take tickets. An agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills.
borghei/Claude-Skills
Check AI-generated marketing content and reviews for required disclosures under the EU AI Act, FTC rules and platform AI-label policies.
borghei/Claude-Skills
Idea to AI-generated prototype to customer validation to engineering handoff.
borghei/Claude-Skills
Analytics engineering across data modeling, dbt, transformation, and semantic layers.
borghei/Claude-Skills
Ansoff Matrix — 4-quadrant framework for growth options: market penetration, market/product development, and diversification.
borghei/Claude-Skills
OKR brainstorming and validation using the Radical Focus framework — outcome objectives, measurable key results, counter-metrics.
Adversarial thinking partner that stress-tests plans, prepares board meetings, and surfaces blind spots. Executive Mentor is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Adversarial thinking partner that stress-tests plans, prepares board meetings, and surfaces blind spots.
Executive Mentor fits situations like: you need plan validation; hard-decision frameworks; pre/post-mortem failure analysis.
Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill executive-mentor -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (c-level-advisor/executive-mentor in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .claude/skills/executive-mentor in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.
Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill executive-mentor -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (c-level-advisor/executive-mentor in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .agents/skills/executive-mentor in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.
Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill executive-mentor -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/executive-mentor, .gemini/skills/executive-mentor, .github/skills/executive-mentor and .opencode/skills/executive-mentor in your project.
Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Executive Mentor needs Python for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (python). Our summary lists: Python 3.
SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.
Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.
Executive Mentor is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.
About 4.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 19k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.
Skills that share tags, products or a category with Executive Mentor: Executive Mentor (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars), Post Mortem (thananon/9arm-skills, 3.2k stars), Post-Incident Debrief (VeryGoodOpenSource/vgv-wingspan, 109 stars) and Postmortem (alirezarezvani/claude-skills, 28k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.
borghei (a GitHub user) maintains it in borghei/Claude-Skills, which has 881 GitHub stars. The repository holds 349 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 7, 2026.
Source: borghei/Claude-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.