Agent skill

Company Os

by borghei in borghei/Claude-Skills

Meta-framework for how a company runs -- the connective tissue between C-suite roles (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR-native).

MITAuto-check passedBusiness, Finance & HR

Install Company Os

skills CLI
$ npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill company-os -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install borghei/Claude-Skills company-os --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/c-level-advisor/company-os .claude/skills/company-os && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
company-os
GitHub stars
891
Token cost
~4.7k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,871 words
Files
4 (incl. scripts)
Skills in repo
354
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Meta-framework for how a company runs -- the connective tissue between C-suite roles (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR-native).

  • Setting up company operations
  • SKILL.md covers Keywords, Clarify First, Operating System Selection and The Six Core Components, plus 10 more sections
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder; calls python
  • Selecting a management framework

What it does

Company Os is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Meta-framework for how a company runs -- the connective tissue between C-suite roles (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR-native). Use when setting up company operations, selecting a management framework, designing meeting rhythms, or implementing OKRs.

Its SKILL.md is about 4.7k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 4 other files, including scripts (for example `scripts/meeting_pulse_designer.py`, `scripts/rocks_tracker.py` and `scripts/scorecard_builder.py`).

It sits in Business, Finance & HR, covering OKRs and executive reporting. The repository describes itself as: 385 AI skills, 77 expert agents, and 900 stdlib Python tools for every team: engineering, PM, marketing, C-level, compliance, business ops, research, and a LinkedIn toolkit… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Setting up company operations
  • Selecting a management framework
  • Designing meeting rhythms
  • Implementing OKRs

Example prompts

  • “/company-os”

Requirements

  • Python 3

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 4a698e8. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 3 files in scripts/ (Python), which the agent can run.

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • python

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Company Os loads about 4.7k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 62 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,871 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~62
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.7k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from borghei/Claude-Skills at commit 4a698e8, republished under its MIT licence (© borghei). 1,871 words, ~4,693 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/company-os/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 3 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
company-os
description
Meta-framework for how a company runs -- the connective tissue between C-suite roles (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR-native). Use when setting up company operations, selecting a management framework, designing meeting rhythms, or implementing OKRs.
license
MIT + Commons Clause
metadata.version
2.0.0
metadata.author
borghei
metadata.category
c-level
metadata.domain
company-operations
metadata.updated
2026-03-09
metadata.frameworks
os-comparison, accountability-chart, scorecard-design, meeting-pulse, ids-resolution, rocks-framework, communication-cadence
metadata.triggers
operating system, company OS, EOS, Scaling Up, Rockefeller Habits, OKR, OKRs, L10 meeting, rocks, scorecard, accountability chart, issues list, IDS, meeting…

Company Operating System

The operating system is the collection of tools, rhythms, and agreements that determine how the company functions. Every company has one -- most just do not know what it is. Making it explicit makes it improvable.

Keywords

operating system, EOS, Entrepreneurial Operating System, Scaling Up, Rockefeller Habits, OKR, Holacracy, L10 meeting, rocks, scorecard, accountability chart, issues list, IDS, meeting pulse, quarterly planning, weekly scorecard, management framework, company rhythm, traction, annual planning, communication cadence


Clarify First

Before generating, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:

  • Company size and stage — the framework recommendation (EOS / Scaling Up / OKR-native / Holacracy) and implementation timeline are driven primarily by headcount
  • What is actually broken (no scorecard, misaligned priorities, recurring unresolved issues, meeting overload) — determines which of the six components to build first
  • Founder operating style (operational vs. visionary) and whether the company is engineering-led or sales-led — tips the framework choice within a given size band
  • What rhythms and metrics already exist — so the new OS replaces meetings rather than stacking on top and causing meeting fatigue

Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.


Operating System Selection

Decision Tree
START: "Which operating system?"
  |
  v
[Company size?]
  |
  +-- 10-50 people
  |     |
  |     v
  |   [Is the founder operational or visionary?]
  |     |
  |     +-- Operational --> EOS / Traction (structured, simple)
  |     +-- Visionary --> Scaling Up (ambitious, strategy-heavy)
  |
  +-- 50-200 people
  |     |
  |     v
  |   [Engineering-led or sales-led?]
  |     |
  |     +-- Engineering-led --> OKR-native (hypothesis-driven)
  |     +-- Sales-led --> Scaling Up or EOS (execution-focused)
  |
  +-- 200+ people
  |     |
  |     v
  |   [High autonomy or high alignment needed?]
  |     |
  |     +-- High autonomy --> Holacracy (only if patient)
  |     +-- High alignment --> Custom hybrid (best of EOS + OKR)
  |
  +-- Not sure --> Start with EOS. It is the simplest to implement.
Framework Comparison Matrix
FeatureEOSScaling UpOKR-NativeHolacracy
ComplexityLowMediumMediumHigh
Implementation time30-90 days90-180 days60-120 days6-12 months
Best company size10-25050-50020-50050-300
Goal frameworkRocks (binary)OKRs + PrioritiesOKRs (graded)Roles + accountabilities
Meeting cadenceWeekly L10Daily huddle + weeklyWeekly + quarterlyGovernance + tactical
Issue resolutionIDSKeep/Kill/CombineRetrospectiveGovernance process
AccountabilityAccountability chartFunction accountabilityOKR ownershipRole-based
ScorecardWeekly numbersWeekly KPIsQuarterly KRsMetrics per role
StrengthsSimple, fast to implementRigorous, strategy-heavyFlexible, tech-friendlyDistributed authority
WeaknessesCan feel rigidComplex, requires disciplineCan drift without structureSteep learning curve

The Six Core Components

Every effective operating system has these six, regardless of framework:

Component 1: Accountability Chart

Not an org chart. An accountability chart answers: "Who owns this outcome?"

Design Principles
PrincipleImplementation
Single ownershipOne person owns each function. Multiple may work in it.
Explicit gapsFunctions nobody owns are identified and assigned.
No overlapIf two people think they own it, neither does. Resolve immediately.
Stage-appropriateOne person can own multiple seats early. Be explicit about it.
Quarterly reviewOwnership shifts as company grows. Review every quarter.
Accountability Chart Template
CEO
  |
  +-- Revenue (CRO/VP Sales)
  |     +-- Inbound pipeline
  |     +-- Outbound pipeline
  |     +-- Customer success
  |
  +-- Product & Engineering (CTO/CPO)
  |     +-- Product roadmap
  |     +-- Engineering delivery
  |     +-- Technical operations
  |
  +-- Operations (COO)
  |     +-- Finance & legal
  |     +-- People operations
  |     +-- Business operations
  |
  +-- Marketing (CMO/VP Marketing)
        +-- Demand generation
        +-- Brand & content
        +-- Product marketing
Workshop Protocol (2 hours)
Step 1: List all functions the company performs (30 min)
Step 2: Assign ONE owner per function (30 min)
Step 3: Identify gaps (functions nobody owns) (15 min)
Step 4: Identify overlaps (2+ people claiming ownership) (15 min)
Step 5: Resolve gaps and overlaps (20 min)
Step 6: Publish and communicate (10 min)
Component 2: Scorecard

Weekly metrics that tell you if the company is on track. Not monthly. Not quarterly. Weekly.

Scorecard Rules
RuleRationale
5-15 metrics maximumMore than 15 = nothing gets attention
Each metric has an ownerOwnership drives accountability
Each metric has a weekly targetNot a range -- a specific number
Red/Yellow/Green statusNot paragraphs -- traffic lights
Only Red metrics get discussionGreen = no discussion needed in meeting
Example Scorecard
MetricOwnerTargetWeekStatus
New MRRCRO$50K$43K[R]
Logo churnCS Lead< 1%0.8%[G]
Active usersCPO2,0002,150[G]
DeploymentsCTO3/week3[G]
Critical bugs openCTO02[R]
RunwayCFO> 18mo16mo[Y]
Offer acceptanceCHRO> 85%90%[G]
Component 3: Meeting Pulse
Full Meeting Rhythm
MeetingFrequencyDurationWhoPurpose
Daily standupDaily15 minEach teamBlockers only
L10 / Leadership syncWeekly90 minLeadership teamScorecard + issues
Department reviewMonthly60 minDept + leadershipDeep dive on dept metrics
Quarterly planningQuarterly1-2 daysLeadershipSet rocks, review strategy
Annual planningAnnual2-3 daysLeadership1-year + 3-year vision
L10 Meeting Agenda (Weekly Leadership)
SegmentDurationActivity
Good news5 minPersonal + business wins
Scorecard review5 minFlag red items only
Rock review5 minOn/off track for each rock
Customer/employee headlines5 minNotable events
Issues list (IDS)60 minIdentify, Discuss, Solve
To-dos review5 minLast week's commitments: done or not?
Conclude5 minRate meeting 1-10, what would make it 10 next time
Component 4: Issue Resolution (IDS)

Maximum 15 minutes per issue. This is the core problem-solving loop.

IDENTIFY: What is the actual issue? (One sentence, root cause, not symptom)
  |
DISCUSS: Relevant facts + perspectives. Time-boxed.
  |       When discussion starts repeating, STOP.
  |
SOLVE: One owner. One action. One due date. Written down.
IDS Anti-Patterns
Anti-PatternWhy It FailsFix
"Let's take this offline"Things taken offline rarely get resolvedSolve it now or put it on next week's list
Discussing without decidingGreat discussion, no action item = wastedEvery discussion must end with a decision
Revisiting decided issuesUndermines the systemOnce solved, off the list. Reopen only with new data.
Issue on list 3+ meetingsEither not real or too scary to addressForce it: address this week or remove it
Multiple issues conflatedImpossible to solve a bundled problemOne issue per entry. Separate if needed.
Component 5: Rocks (90-Day Priorities)
Rock Rules
RuleRationale
3-7 per person maximumMore than 7 = none get done
3-7 company-level rocksShared leadership priorities
Binary status: done or not doneNo "60% complete"
Set at quarterly planningReviewed weekly (on/off track)
Not a to-do listRocks take 90 days of sustained work
Good vs. Bad Rocks
Bad RockWhyGood Rock
"Improve sales process"Not measurable or specific"Implement CRM with pipeline stages and reporting by Mar 31"
"Hire more engineers"No target, no deadline"Hire 3 senior engineers with offers accepted by Apr 15"
"Reduce churn"No target"Reduce monthly logo churn from 3% to 1.5% by end of Q2"
"Get better at communication"Not observable"Ship weekly company update every Friday for 12 weeks"
Component 6: Communication Cadence
AudienceWhatWhenFormat
All employeesCompany updateMonthlyWritten + Q&A
All employeesQuarterly results + prioritiesQuarterlyAll-hands meeting
Leadership teamScorecardWeeklyDashboard
BoardCompany performanceMonthly or quarterlyBoard memo/deck
InvestorsKey metrics + narrativeMonthly or quarterlyInvestor update
CustomersProduct updatesPer releaseRelease notes

Default rule: If deciding whether to share internally, share it. Under-communication always costs more than over-communication.


Implementation Roadmap

30-Day Quick Start
WeekActivityTime Investment
1Build accountability chart2-hour workshop
2Define 5-10 weekly scorecard metrics1-hour alignment session
3Start weekly L10 meeting90 min/week (ongoing)
4Set first round of 90-day rocksHalf-day planning session

These four alone improve coordination more than most companies achieve in a year.

90-Day Full Implementation
MonthFocusDeliverables
1FoundationAccountability chart, scorecard, L10 meetings
2DepthRocks defined, issues list active, daily standups
3CadenceFull meeting rhythm, communication cadence, first quarterly review

Common Failure Modes

FailureSymptomFix
Partial implementation"We do OKRs but skip check-ins"Half an OS is worse than none. Commit to the full system.
Meeting fatigueAdded rhythm on top of existing meetingsReplace meetings, do not add them
Metric overload30 KPIs because "they all matter"Start with 5. Add only when cadence is established.
Rock inflation12 rocks per personHard limit: 7 per person, 7 for the company.
Leader non-complianceLeadership skips L10 or ignores IDSThe OS mirrors leadership respect. Leaders go first.
No quarterly reviewAnnual goals checked at year-endQuarterly is the minimum review cycle.
Scorecard without targetsTracking numbers without thresholdsEvery metric needs a target to be actionable.

Show full SKILL.md (699 more words)Show less

Red Flags

  • Five team leads give different answers when asked "What are the top 3 company priorities?" -- alignment failure
  • Same issue on the issues list for 4+ weeks -- avoidance or structural problem
  • No weekly scorecard exists -- flying blind
  • Rocks set but never reviewed weekly -- goals without accountability
  • Accountability chart has not been updated in 6+ months -- reality has drifted
  • Meetings consistently end without decisions -- meeting design problem
  • Communication is all top-down, never bottom-up -- feedback loop broken

Integration with C-Suite

RoleOS Dependency
CEO (ceo-advisor)Sets vision that feeds 1-year plan and rocks
COO (coo-advisor)Owns meeting pulse and issue resolution cadence
CFO (cfo-advisor)Owns financial metrics in the scorecard
CTO (cto-advisor)Owns engineering rocks and tech scorecard metrics
CHRO (chro-advisor)Owns people metrics (attrition, hiring velocity)
Culture Architect (culture-architect)Culture rituals integrate into meeting pulse
Strategic Alignment (strategic-alignment)Validates team rocks cascade from company rocks
Change Management (change-management)New OS rollout follows ADKAR model

Output Artifacts

RequestDeliverable
"Set up our operating system"Framework recommendation + 30-day implementation plan
"Design our meeting cadence"Full meeting rhythm with agendas and owners
"Build our scorecard"5-15 metrics with owners, targets, and thresholds
"Help with quarterly planning"Planning session agenda + rock-setting framework
"Fix our accountability"Accountability chart workshop + gap/overlap analysis
"We keep discussing the same issues"IDS training + issues list audit

Tool Reference

scorecard_builder.py

Builds and tracks weekly company scorecards with RAG status, trend analysis, and IDS-ready issue lists for L10 meetings.

bash
# Run with demo data
python scripts/scorecard_builder.py

# From JSON with metrics and rocks
python scripts/scorecard_builder.py --input scorecard.json

# JSON output
python scripts/scorecard_builder.py --json
rocks_tracker.py

Tracks 90-day company and individual rocks with binary status, blocker identification, and owner accountability.

bash
# Run with demo data
python scripts/rocks_tracker.py

# Specify quarter
python scripts/rocks_tracker.py --quarter Q2

# From JSON
python scripts/rocks_tracker.py --input rocks.json

# JSON output
python scripts/rocks_tracker.py --json
meeting_pulse_designer.py

Designs company meeting rhythms, validates meeting load, identifies redundancies and gaps, and generates L10 agenda templates.

bash
# Run with demo meetings
python scripts/meeting_pulse_designer.py

# Specify team size
python scripts/meeting_pulse_designer.py --team-size 50

# From JSON with current meetings
python scripts/meeting_pulse_designer.py --input meetings.json

# JSON output
python scripts/meeting_pulse_designer.py --json

Troubleshooting

ProblemLikely CauseFix
Five team leads give different answers about top 3 prioritiesAlignment failure -- rocks not cascaded or not reviewed weeklyRe-run quarterly planning; review rocks weekly in L10; publish company priorities visibly
Same issue on the issues list for 4+ weeksAvoidance or structural problem too scary to addressForce it: address this week or permanently remove; escalate if needed
Scorecard has 30+ KPIsMetric overload -- nothing gets attentionCut to 5-10 metrics. Only the ones that tell you if the company is on track.
Rocks set but never reviewedGoals without accountability; L10 meeting not happeningWeekly L10 is non-negotiable; 5 minutes on rocks review every week
Leadership team skips L10 or ignores IDSLeader non-compliance destroys the OSCEO must enforce: leaders go first. If CEO skips, the OS dies.
Meetings added on top of existing meetingsMeeting fatigue from accumulationReplace meetings, don't add them. Audit meeting inventory; eliminate redundancies

Success Criteria

  • Weekly L10 meeting happens every week with 90%+ leadership attendance (no exceptions for 12+ consecutive weeks)
  • Scorecard reviewed weekly with red metrics discussed using IDS format (zero red metrics ignored)
  • 70%+ of quarterly rocks completed as binary done/not-done by end of quarter
  • Issues list: average issue resolved within 2 meetings (no issue lingers 4+ weeks)
  • All team leads can articulate top 3 company priorities identically (tested quarterly)
  • Meeting hours per person per week below 10 hours (measured via meeting_pulse_designer.py)
  • Accountability chart reviewed and updated quarterly with zero unowned functions

Scope & Limitations

In Scope: Operating system selection (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR, Holacracy), accountability charts, weekly scorecards, meeting pulse design, IDS issue resolution, 90-day rocks, communication cadence, implementation roadmap.

Out of Scope: OKR software configuration, project management tool setup, Agile/Scrum methodology, sprint planning, product backlog management, HR policy development.

Limitations: Scorecard builder calculates RAG from provided data but cannot source live metrics from business systems. Rocks tracker uses manual status updates -- it cannot automatically detect completion. Meeting pulse designer provides recommendations based on team size and meeting inventory but cannot account for company-specific cultural norms. Framework comparison is directional -- actual implementation success depends on leadership commitment.


Integration Points

SkillIntegration
ceo-advisorCEO sets vision that feeds 1-year plan and rocks
coo-advisorOwns meeting pulse and issue resolution cadence
cfo-advisorFinancial metrics in the weekly scorecard
cto-advisorEngineering rocks and tech scorecard metrics
chro-advisorPeople metrics (attrition, hiring velocity) in scorecard
culture-architectCulture rituals integrate into meeting pulse
strategic-alignmentValidates team rocks cascade from company rocks
change-managementNew OS rollout follows ADKAR model for adoption
chief-of-staffOrchestrates quarterly planning sessions and L10 follow-up

© borghei, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 3 other files (scripts) in c-level-advisor/company-os of borghei/Claude-Skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • scripts/meeting_pulse_designer.py
  • scripts/rocks_tracker.py
  • scripts/scorecard_builder.py

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 4a698e8

Compare with similar skills

Company Os next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Company Os compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Company Os this skillborghei/Claude-Skills891—~4.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Pine BacktesterTradersPost/pinescript-agents1701 repos~3.9kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Analytics Strategyrampstackco/claude-skills945—~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Onboarding Plannerbpinheiroms/dotfiles108—~5.4kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Replit Decksanqiufong/slides-from-anything1321 repos~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Building Streamlit Dashboardsiusztinpaul/designing-real-world-ai-agents-workshop512—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Pine Backtester

    TradersPost/pinescript-agents

    Implements comprehensive backtesting and performance metrics.

    170 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.9k tokens
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Analytics Strategy

    rampstackco/claude-skills

    Design measurement frameworks including event taxonomy, KPI hierarchy, dashboard architecture, attribution models, and analytics implementation strategy.

    945 GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Onboarding Planner

    bpinheiroms/dotfiles

    Plan high-conversion mobile app onboarding flows from scratch.

    108 GitHub stars~5.4k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Replit Deck

    sanqiufong/slides-from-anything

    Single-file horizontal-swipe HTML deck in the style of Replit Slides's landing-page template gallery.

    132 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.9k tokens
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Building Streamlit Dashboards

    iusztinpaul/designing-real-world-ai-agents-workshop

    Building dashboards in Streamlit. An agent skill from iusztinpaul/designing-real-world-ai-agents-workshop.

    512 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Massing Bim

    ibuilder/massing

    Drive a Massing BIM/AEC project from an AI agent over MCP — read a project's status, records, CDE, KPI and model-quality checks; run standards-compliance, schedule-risk, embodied-carbon, permit-…

    122 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed

More from borghei/Claude-Skills

All 354 skills in this repo
  • Agent Harness

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Test and evaluation harness for AI agents — scenario suites, deterministic replay, regression diffing, cost and latency budgets.

    891 GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Agents In The Team

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Run delivery when AI coding and ops agents take tickets. An agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills.

    891 GitHub stars~4.2k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Content Disclosure

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Check AI-generated marketing content and reviews for required disclosures under the EU AI Act, FTC rules and platform AI-label policies.

    891 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Prototyping

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Idea to AI-generated prototype to customer validation to engineering handoff.

    891 GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Analytics Engineer

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Analytics engineering across data modeling, dbt, transformation, and semantic layers.

    891 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Ansoff Matrix

    borghei/Claude-Skills

    Ansoff Matrix — 4-quadrant framework for growth options: market penetration, market/product development, and diversification.

    891 GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Company Os

What does Company Os do?

Meta-framework for how a company runs -- the connective tissue between C-suite roles (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR-native). Company Os is an agent skill from borghei/Claude-Skills. Meta-framework for how a company runs -- the connective tissue between C-suite roles (EOS, Scaling Up, OKR-native).

When should I use Company Os?

Company Os fits situations like: setting up company operations; selecting a management framework; designing meeting rhythms; implementing OKRs.

How do I install Company Os in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill company-os -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (c-level-advisor/company-os in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .claude/skills/company-os in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Company Os in Codex?

Run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill company-os -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (c-level-advisor/company-os in borghei/Claude-Skills) into .agents/skills/company-os in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Company Os in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add borghei/Claude-Skills --skill company-os -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/company-os, .gemini/skills/company-os, .github/skills/company-os and .opencode/skills/company-os in your project.

What does Company Os need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Company Os needs Python for the scripts in its folder and the command-line tools its instructions call (python). Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Company Os access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Company Os safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Company Os use?

Company Os is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Company Os use?

About 4.7k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 19k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Company Os?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Company Os: Pine Backtester (TradersPost/pinescript-agents, 170 stars), Analytics Strategy (rampstackco/claude-skills, 945 stars), Onboarding Planner (bpinheiroms/dotfiles, 108 stars) and Replit Deck (sanqiufong/slides-from-anything, 132 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Company Os?

borghei (a GitHub user) maintains it in borghei/Claude-Skills, which has 891 GitHub stars. The repository holds 354 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 7, 2026.

Source: borghei/Claude-Skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.