Agent skill

Observability Instrumentation

by BlackBeltTechnology in BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard

Make runtime behavior visible and diagnosable. An agent skill from BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard.

MITAuto-check passedDevOps & Cloud

Install Observability Instrumentation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard --skill observability-instrumentation -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard observability-instrumentation --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/packages/eng-disciplines/.pi/skills/observability-instrumentation .claude/skills/observability-instrumentation && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
observability-instrumentation
GitHub stars
315
Token cost
~2.8k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,255 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
70
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Make runtime behavior visible and diagnosable. An agent skill from BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard.

  • Works in 7 steps: Define "working" before instrumenting → Pick the right signal for each question → Structured logging → …
  • Like add logging/metrics/tracing
  • SKILL.md covers Overview, When to Use, Process and Common Rationalizations, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Observability Instrumentation is an agent skill from BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard. Make runtime behavior visible and diagnosable. Use on triggers like "add logging/metrics/tracing", "instrument this", "add alerting", "we can't tell what happened in prod", or when a feature needs evidence it works at runtime. Fills an instrumentation gap not covered by the project's existing skills. Not a ship or release workflow.

Its SKILL.md is about 2.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in DevOps & Cloud, covering Observability. The repository describes itself as: Real-time web dashboard for pi coding-agent sessions. Multi-session view, live chat mirroring, integrated terminal, diff viewer, pi-flows execution, and mobile-first remote… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Like add logging/metrics/tracing
  • Instrument this
  • We cant tell what happened in prod
  • A feature needs evidence it works at runtime

Example prompts

  • “add logging/metrics/tracing”
  • “instrument this”
  • “add alerting”
  • “/observability-instrumentation”

Workflow steps

7 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Define "working" before instrumenting
  2. Pick the right signal for each question
  3. Structured logging
  4. Metrics
  5. Distributed tracing
  6. Alerting
  7. Verify the telemetry itself

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 7a2d171. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are typescript).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Observability Instrumentation loads about 2.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 91 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,255 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~91
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.8k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard at commit 7a2d171, republished under its MIT licence (© BlackBeltTechnology). 1,255 words, ~2,757 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/observability-instrumentation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
observability-instrumentation
description
Make runtime behavior visible and diagnosable. Use on triggers like "add logging/metrics/tracing", "instrument this", "add alerting", "we can't tell what happened in prod", or when a feature needs evidence it works at runtime. Fills an instrumentation gap not covered by the project's existing skills. Not a ship or release workflow.

Observability and Instrumentation

Overview

Code you can't observe is code you can't operate. Observability is the ability to answer "what is the system doing and why?" from the outside, using the telemetry the code emits. Instrumentation is not a post-launch add-on — it's written alongside the feature, the same way tests are. If a feature ships without telemetry, the first user-reported bug becomes archaeology instead of a query.

When to Use

  • Building any feature that will run in production
  • Adding a new service, endpoint, background job, or external integration
  • A production incident took too long to diagnose ("we couldn't tell what happened")
  • Setting up or reviewing alerting rules
  • Reviewing a PR that adds I/O, retries, queues, or cross-service calls

NOT for:

  • Diagnosing a failure happening right now — use the debugging-and-error-recovery skill (observability is what makes that skill fast next time)
  • Profiling and optimizing measured slowness — use the performance-optimization skill
  • Launch-day monitoring checklists and rollback triggers — see the shipping-and-launch skill; this skill covers the instrumentation that feeds them

Process

1. Define "working" before instrumenting

Telemetry without a question is noise. Before adding any instrumentation, write down 2–4 questions an on-call engineer will ask about this feature:

FEATURE: checkout payment retry
QUESTIONS ON-CALL WILL ASK:
1. What fraction of payments succeed on first attempt vs after retry?
2. When a payment fails permanently, why? (provider error? timeout? validation?)
3. Is the payment provider slower than usual?
→ Every signal below must help answer one of these.

If you can't name the questions, you're not ready to instrument — you'll log everything and learn nothing.

2. Pick the right signal for each question
SignalAnswersCost profileExample
Structured log"What happened in this specific case?"Per-event; grows with trafficpayment_failed with provider error code
Metric"How often / how fast, in aggregate?"Fixed per series; cheap to queryp99 latency of provider calls
Trace"Where did time go across services?"Per-request; usually sampledOne slow checkout, broken down by hop

Rule of thumb: metrics tell you that something is wrong, traces tell you where, logs tell you why.

3. Structured logging

Log events, not prose. Every log line is a JSON object with a stable event name and machine-readable fields:

typescript
// BAD: string interpolation — unqueryable, inconsistent
logger.info(`Payment ${id} failed for user ${userId} after ${n} retries`);

// GOOD: stable event name + structured fields
logger.warn({
  event: 'payment_failed',
  paymentId: id,
  provider: 'stripe',
  errorCode: err.code,
  attempt: n,
}, 'payment failed');

Log levels — use them consistently:

LevelMeaningOn-call action
errorInvariant broken; someone may need to actInvestigate
warnDegraded but handled (retry succeeded, fallback used)Watch for trends
infoSignificant business event (order placed, job finished)None
debugDiagnostic detailOff in production by default

Correlation IDs are mandatory. Generate (or accept) a request ID at the system boundary and attach it to every log line, span, and outbound call. Without it, you cannot reconstruct a single request from interleaved logs:

typescript
// Express: child logger per request, ID propagated downstream
app.use((req, res, next) => {
  req.id = req.headers['x-request-id'] ?? crypto.randomUUID();
  req.log = logger.child({ requestId: req.id });
  res.setHeader('x-request-id', req.id);
  next();
});

Never log secrets, tokens, passwords, or full PII. This is a hard rule from the security-and-hardening skill — telemetry pipelines are a classic data-leak path. Allowlist fields; don't log whole request bodies.

4. Metrics

For request-driven services, instrument RED on every endpoint and every external dependency: Rate (requests/sec), Errors (failure rate), Duration (latency histogram, not average). For resources (queues, pools, hosts), use USE: Utilization, Saturation, Errors.

As with tracing, the vendor-neutral path is the OpenTelemetry metrics API (same SDK and context as step 5). The example below uses Prometheus' prom-client — one common backend choice, not the only one; the RED/USE and cardinality rules are identical either way.

typescript
import { Histogram } from 'prom-client';

const httpDuration = new Histogram({
  name: 'http_request_duration_seconds',
  help: 'HTTP request duration',
  labelNames: ['method', 'route', 'status_class'],  // '2xx', not '200'
  buckets: [0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5],
});

Cardinality is the failure mode. Every unique label combination is a separate time series. Labels must come from small, fixed sets (route template, status class, provider name). Never use user IDs, raw URLs, error messages, or other unbounded values as labels — that belongs in logs and traces.

OK as label:    route="/api/tasks/:id"   status_class="5xx"   provider="stripe"
NEVER a label:  user_id, email, request_id, full URL, error message text

Track averages never, percentiles always: an average hides the 1% of users having a terrible time. Use histograms and read p50/p95/p99.

5. Distributed tracing

Use OpenTelemetry — it's the vendor-neutral standard, and auto-instrumentation covers HTTP, gRPC, and common DB clients with near-zero code:

typescript
// tracing.ts — must be imported before anything else
import { NodeSDK } from '@opentelemetry/sdk-node';
import { getNodeAutoInstrumentations } from '@opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node';

const sdk = new NodeSDK({
  serviceName: 'checkout-service',
  instrumentations: [getNodeAutoInstrumentations()],
});
sdk.start();

Add manual spans only around meaningful internal units of work (e.g., applyDiscounts, chargeProvider) and attach the attributes on-call will filter by. Propagate context across every async boundary — HTTP headers, queue message metadata — or the trace dies at the gap. Sample head-based at a low rate by default; keep 100% of errors if your backend supports tail sampling.

6. Alerting

Alert on symptoms users feel, not on causes:

SYMPTOM (page-worthy):           CAUSE (dashboard, not a page):
error rate > 1% for 5 min        CPU at 85%
p99 latency > 2s                 one pod restarted
queue age > 10 min               disk at 70%

Cause-based alerts fire when nothing is wrong and miss failures you didn't predict. Symptom-based alerts fire exactly when users are hurt, regardless of the cause.

Rules for every alert you create:

  1. It must be actionable. If the response is "ignore it, it self-heals", delete the alert.
  2. It links to a runbook — even three lines: what it means, first query to run, escalation path.
  3. It has a threshold and duration justified by the SLO or by historical data, not by a guess.
  4. Use two severities only: page (user-facing, act now) and ticket (degradation, act this week). A third tier becomes noise that trains people to ignore everything.
Show full SKILL.md (485 more words)Show less
7. Verify the telemetry itself

Instrumentation is code; it can be wrong. Before calling the work done, trigger the paths and look at the actual output:

  • Force an error in staging → find it in the logs by requestId, confirm fields are structured (not [object Object])
  • Send test traffic → confirm metric series appear with the expected labels and sane values
  • Follow one request across services in the tracing UI → no broken spans
  • Fire each new alert once (lower the threshold temporarily) → confirm it reaches the right channel and the runbook link works

Common Rationalizations

RationalizationReality
"I'll add logging after it works""After" becomes "after the first incident", which is the most expensive moment to discover you're blind. Instrument as you build.
"More logs = more observability"Unstructured noise makes incidents slower, not faster. Three queryable events beat three hundred prose lines.
"console.log is fine for now"Unstructured output can't be filtered, correlated, or alerted on. The structured logger costs five extra minutes once.
"We can just look at the dashboards when something breaks"Dashboards built without defined questions show you everything except the answer. Start from on-call questions.
"Alert on everything important, we'll tune later"A noisy pager trains people to ignore it. The tuning never happens; the missed real page does.
"User ID as a metric label makes debugging easier"It also makes your metrics backend fall over. High-cardinality lookups belong in logs and traces.
"Tracing is overkill for our two services"Two services already means cross-service latency questions logs can't answer. Auto-instrumentation makes the cost trivial.

Red Flags

  • A feature PR with retries, queues, or external calls and zero new telemetry
  • Log lines built by string interpolation instead of structured fields
  • No correlation/request ID — each log line is an orphan
  • Metrics labeled with user IDs, raw URLs, or error message text (cardinality bomb)
  • Latency tracked as an average with no percentiles
  • Alerts that fire daily and get acknowledged without action
  • Alerts on causes (CPU, memory) paging humans while user-facing error rate is unmonitored
  • Secrets, tokens, or full request bodies appearing in logs
  • "It works on my machine" as the only evidence a production feature is healthy

Verification

After instrumenting a feature, confirm:

  • The on-call questions for this feature are written down, and each signal maps to one
  • All log output is structured (JSON), with stable event names and a correlation ID on every line
  • No secrets, tokens, or unredacted PII in any log line (spot-check actual output)
  • RED metrics exist for every new endpoint and every external dependency, with bounded label sets
  • Latency is a histogram; p95/p99 are queryable
  • A single request can be followed end-to-end in the tracing UI without broken spans
  • Every new alert is symptom-based, has a runbook link, and was test-fired once
  • An induced failure in staging was located via telemetry alone, without reading the source

For the at-a-glance version of this list, including the pre-launch instrumentation gate, see references/observability-checklist.md.

© BlackBeltTechnology, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in packages/eng-disciplines/.pi/skills/observability-instrumentation of BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 7a2d171

Compare with similar skills

Observability Instrumentation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Observability Instrumentation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Observability Instrumentation this skillBlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard315—~2.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Vercel Optimize Auditvercel-labs/agent-skills32k8 repos~4.3kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Kubeshark Installerkubeshark/kubeshark12k—~3.6kAutomated safety check: NotesApache-2.0
Kubeshark KFL2 Filter Referencekubeshark/kubeshark12k—~3.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
KubeSphere ServiceMesh Managerkubesphere/kubesphere17k—~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Kubernetes Network Root Cause Analysiskubeshark/kubeshark12k—~5.3kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • Vercel Optimize Audit

    vercel-labs/agent-skills

    Official

    Runs a metrics-first audit of a deployed Vercel project, gating investigations on real signals to produce ranked, citation-backed cost and performance recommendations.

    32k GitHub starsUsed in 8 repos~4.3k tokens
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Kubeshark Installer

    kubeshark/kubeshark

    Installs and configures Kubeshark on a Kubernetes cluster, choosing between the quick CLI path and a Helm install with custom values.

    12k GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated today
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check: notes
  • Syntax reference for KFL2, the CEL-based display filter language used to search Kubernetes network traffic captured by Kubeshark, loaded before any filter is written.

    12k GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated today
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • KubeSphere ServiceMesh Manager

    kubesphere/kubesphere

    Installs, checks and troubleshoots the KubeSphere ServiceMesh extension (Istio, Kiali, Jaeger), including grayscale release, sidecar injection, topology and tracing issues.

    17k GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Investigates past Kubernetes incidents from Kubeshark traffic snapshots: takes captures, dissects API calls, extracts PCAPs and compares traffic over time.

    12k GitHub stars~5.3k tokensUpdated today
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Caveman Gateway Setup

    JuliusBrussee/caveman

    Routes every LLM call in a repository through the Caveman Cloud gateway in record mode, so requests and costs are measured without changing behavior.

    111k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.6k tokens
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check: warnings

More from BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard

All 70 skills in this repo
  • Browser

    BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard

    Browser automation via the agent-browser CLI. An agent skill from BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard.

    315 GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • CI Troubleshoot

    BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard

    Diagnose failed GitHub Actions runs for pi-agent-dashboard: the 11-file workflow taxonomy, affected-test selection, the release pipeline, known failure modes, and how to read gh run logs and…

    315 GitHub stars~3.5k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Debug Dashboard

    BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard

    Diagnose problems in the running pi-agent-dashboard system: server.log, /api/health, bridge WebSocket connectivity, vitest triage, known-issue FAQ entries.

    315 GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Implement

    BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard

    Disciplined implementation in pi-agent-dashboard: the rebuild matrix (extension→reload, server→restart, client→build+restart, openspec-apply→full rebuild) plus the project's code discipline rules.

    315 GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Pi Dashboard

    BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard

    Monitor and control the pi-dashboard server. An agent skill from BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard.

    315 GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Session To Guideline

    BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard

    Turn a pi session into a Markdown "how-we-did-it" collaboration guideline: reads the session's JSONL transcript and synthesizes a reusable playbook of which prompts worked, what had to be steered…

    315 GitHub stars~3.2k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Observability Instrumentation

What does Observability Instrumentation do?

Make runtime behavior visible and diagnosable. An agent skill from BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard. Observability Instrumentation is an agent skill from BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard. Make runtime behavior visible and diagnosable.

When should I use Observability Instrumentation?

Observability Instrumentation fits situations like: like add logging/metrics/tracing; instrument this; we cant tell what happened in prod; A feature needs evidence it works at runtime.

How do I install Observability Instrumentation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard --skill observability-instrumentation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (packages/eng-disciplines/.pi/skills/observability-instrumentation in BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard) into .claude/skills/observability-instrumentation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Observability Instrumentation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard --skill observability-instrumentation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (packages/eng-disciplines/.pi/skills/observability-instrumentation in BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard) into .agents/skills/observability-instrumentation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Observability Instrumentation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard --skill observability-instrumentation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/observability-instrumentation, .gemini/skills/observability-instrumentation, .github/skills/observability-instrumentation and .opencode/skills/observability-instrumentation in your project.

What does Observability Instrumentation need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Observability Instrumentation is instructions for the agent only.

Does Observability Instrumentation access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Observability Instrumentation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Observability Instrumentation use?

Observability Instrumentation is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Observability Instrumentation use?

About 2.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 11k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Observability Instrumentation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Observability Instrumentation: Vercel Optimize Audit (vercel-labs/agent-skills, 32k stars), Kubeshark Installer (kubeshark/kubeshark, 12k stars), Kubeshark KFL2 Filter Reference (kubeshark/kubeshark, 12k stars) and KubeSphere ServiceMesh Manager (kubesphere/kubesphere, 17k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Observability Instrumentation?

BlackBeltTechnology (a GitHub organization) maintains it in BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard, which has 315 GitHub stars. The repository holds 70 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 10, 2026.

Source: BlackBeltTechnology/pi-agent-dashboard on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.