Agent skill

Plannotator Release Preparation

by backnotprop in backnotprop/plannotator

Drafts Plannotator release notes with full contributor credit, bumps versions in dependency order, builds, and starts the tag-driven release pipeline, in four reviewed phases.

Apache-2.0Auto-check passedDevelopment

Install Plannotator Release Preparation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add backnotprop/plannotator --skill release-plannotator -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install backnotprop/plannotator release-plannotator --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/backnotprop/plannotator.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.agents/skills/release .claude/skills/release-plannotator && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
release-plannotator
GitHub stars
9.2k
Token cost
~4.6k tokens
SKILL.md length
2,055 words
Files
4 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
13
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Apache-2.0

At a glance

Drafts Plannotator release notes with full contributor credit, bumps versions in dependency order, builds, and starts the tag-driven release pipeline, in four reviewed phases.

  • Works in 4 steps: Draft Release Notes → Version Bump → Build → …
  • Preparing release notes that credit every contributor, not just PR authors
  • SKILL.md covers Phase 1: Draft Release Notes, Phase 2: Version Bump, Phase 3: Build and Phase 4: Commit, Tag, and…, plus 1 more section
  • Calls gh, bun and git; reaches docs.plannotator.ai and x.com

What it does

Phase one, drafting release notes, is described as the most important phase and where most of the work happens: the skill finds the latest tag, asks you to confirm a patch, minor or major bump if unclear, and gathers every commit and merged PR since that tag with git log and gh pr view. It then researches every person who contributed, not only PR authors, including issue reporters, commenters who added useful context, and discussion creators, by walking linked issues for each PR.

Three bundled reference release notes, covering a large release with new contributors, a large community release with many external authors, and a small patch release driven by issue reports, set the tone and structure to match depending on the new release's contributor profile. The draft is written to RELEASE_NOTES_v<VERSION>.md in the repo root and presented for review before the remaining phases, which bump versions across package files, build in dependency order, and kick off the tag-driven pipeline.

When your agent uses it

  • Preparing release notes that credit every contributor, not just PR authors
  • Bumping versions across multiple packages before a release
  • Deciding how much narrative detail a release's notes should have

Example prompts

  • “Let's ship v0.14.0 — draft the release notes first.”
  • “What's changed since the last release, and who should get credit?”
  • “Prep a release and bump all the package versions in order.”

Requirements

  • The gh CLI
  • Git tags from previous releases

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Draft Release Notes
  2. Version Bump
  3. Build
  4. Commit, Tag, and Release

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 1d9fe3f. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • gh
    • bun
    • git
    • npm
    • jq

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    Hosts in commands or code, which the agent is likely to contact:

    • docs.plannotator.ai
    • x.com
    • slsa.dev
    • cyclonedx.org

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Plannotator Release Preparation loads about 4.6k tokens when it runs, and up to ~14k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 127 tokens; SKILL.md has 2,055 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~127
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.6k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~14k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from backnotprop/plannotator at commit 1d9fe3f, republished under its Apache-2.0 licence (© backnotprop). 2,055 words, ~4,561 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/release-plannotator/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 3 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
release-plannotator
description
Prepare and execute a Plannotator release — draft release notes with full contributor credit, bump versions across all package files, build in dependency order, and kick off the tag-driven release pipeline. Use this skill whenever the user mentions preparing a release, bumping versions, writing release notes, tagging a release, or publishing. Also trigger when the user says things like "let's ship", "prep a release", "what's changed since last release", or "time to cut a new version".

Plannotator Release

The process has four phases. Phase 1 (release notes) is where most of the work happens — present the draft for review before proceeding to later phases.

Phase 1: Draft Release Notes

This is the most important phase. The release notes are the public face of each version and the primary way the community sees their contributions recognized.

Step 1: Determine scope
  1. Find the latest release tag: git tag --sort=-v:refname | head -1
  2. Determine the new version number. Ask the user if unclear (patch, minor, or major).
  3. Gather all changes since the last tag:
    • git log --oneline <last-tag>..HEAD for commit history
    • git log --merges --oneline <last-tag>..HEAD for merged PRs
  4. For each PR, use gh pr view <number> --json title,author,body,closedIssues,labels to get details.
Step 2: Research contributors

This is critical. Every person who participated in the release gets credit — not just PR authors.

For each PR and linked issue, collect:

  • PR authors — the person who wrote the code
  • Issue reporters — who filed the bug or feature request
  • Issue commenters — who participated in the discussion with useful context
  • Discussion creators — who started relevant GitHub Discussions
  • Feature requestors — check the linked "closes #N" issues and their authors

Use the GitHub API via gh:

bash
# Get issue details including author
gh issue view <number> --json author,title,body

# Get issue comments to find participants
gh api repos/backnotprop/plannotator/issues/<number>/comments --jq '.[].user.login'

# Get PR review comments
gh api repos/backnotprop/plannotator/pulls/<number>/comments --jq '.[].user.login'
Step 3: Write the release notes

Read the reference release notes in references/ for the canonical template structure. These are real release notes from previous versions — match their tone, structure, and level of detail.

  • release-notes-v0.13.0.md — large release, 14 PRs, 3 first-time contributors, "New Contributors" + narrative "Contributors" section
  • release-notes-v0.12.0.md — large community release, 14 PRs, 10 external, detailed narrative "Contributors" section
  • release-notes-v0.13.1.md — small patch release, 2 PRs, no external authors, "Community" section focused on issue reporters

Pay attention to how each reference handles contributor crediting differently. Pick the pattern that fits the release's contributor profile — a release with many external PRs warrants a narrative "Contributors" section; a patch driven by issue reports uses a lighter "Community" section.

Write the file to the repo root as RELEASE_NOTES_v<VERSION>.md.

Structure
  1. X/Twitter follow link — first line, always the same:

    Follow [@plannotator](https://x.com/plannotator) on X for updates
  2. "Missed recent releases?" collapsible table — copy from the previous release's notes, then:

    • Add the previous release (the one you're succeeding) as the newest row
    • Keep roughly 10-12 rows; drop the oldest if needed
    • Each row: version link + comma-separated feature highlights (short phrases)
  3. "What's New in vX.Y.Z" — the heart of the notes

    • Open with 1-3 sentences summarizing the release theme and scope. Mention how many PRs, how many from external contributors, any first-timers.
    • Each major feature/fix gets its own ### subsection with:
      • A descriptive heading (not the PR title verbatim — rephrase for clarity)
      • 1-4 paragraphs explaining what changed and why it matters. Be specific and concrete. Describe the problem that existed before, what the change does, and how users experience it.
      • Credit line at the bottom: PR link, linked issues with closing [#N], and contributor attribution
    • Minor changes go under ### Additional Changes as bold-titled bullets
  4. Install / Update — standard block, read from the previous release notes and reuse verbatim

  5. "What's Changed" — bullet list of every PR in the release:

    - feat: descriptive PR title by @author in [#N](url)
  6. "New Contributors" — if any first-time contributors:

    - @username made their first contribution in [#N](url)
  7. "Contributors" or "Community" — narrative section recognizing everyone who participated:

    • PR authors get a sentence about what they built
    • Issue reporters and commenters get listed with what they reported/discussed
    • Group community issue reporters in a bullet list at the end
  8. Full Changelog link:

    **Full Changelog**: https://github.com/backnotprop/plannotator/compare/<prev-tag>...<new-tag>
Writing guidelines
  • Narrative over noise. Write in clear, readable prose. Not marketing-speak, not changelog-dump. Explain what changed and why someone should care, in plain language.
  • Bullets where they help. Use bullet lists for enumerating discrete items (additional changes, contributor lists). Use paragraphs for explaining features.
  • No cliches or buzzwords. Don't say "exciting", "game-changing", "seamless", "powerful". Just describe what happened.
  • No punchlines. Don't end sections with a clever quip or a summary zinger. Let the feature speak for itself.
  • Speak through practical benefit. Describe what changed and what it means for the user in concrete, reliable terms. Not aspirational, not hype — just what it does.
  • Don't overuse em dashes. One or two per release is fine. If you notice them stacking up, restructure the sentence instead.
  • Grammatical structure matters. Vary sentence structure. Active voice. Concrete subjects and verbs.
  • Contributor tags. Use @username — bare at-mentions, not markdown links like [@user](url). GitHub renders bare @mentions with avatar icons in release notes. This is important for community recognition.
  • Every contributor counts. Everyone who filed an issue, left a comment that shaped a decision, or participated in a discussion gets mentioned. This project's community is its lifeblood.
Step 4: Present for review

Write the draft to RELEASE_NOTES_v<VERSION>.md in the repo root and tell the user it's ready for review. Do not git add or commit this file — release notes are kept untracked by design. Wait for their feedback before proceeding to Phase 2.


Phase 2: Version Bump

Bump the version string in these 7 files (and only these — other package.json files use stub versions):

FileField
package.json (root)"version"
apps/opencode-plugin/package.json"version"
apps/pi-extension/package.json"version"
apps/hook/.claude-plugin/plugin.json"version"
apps/copilot/plugin.json"version"
openpackage.yml (root)version:
packages/server/package.json"version"

Read each file, confirm the current version matches expectations, then update all 7 atomically.

Do not bump the VS Code extension (apps/vscode-extension/package.json) — it has independent versioning.


Phase 3: Build

Run builds in dependency order:

bash
bun run build:review    # 1. Code review editor (standalone Vite build)
bun run build:hook      # 2. Plan review + hook server (copies review's built HTML into hook dist)
bun run build:opencode  # 3. OpenCode plugin (copies built HTML from hook + review)
bun run build:pi        # 4. Pi extension (chains review → hook → pi internally, safe to run after 1-2)

build:pi chains review and hook internally, so after steps 1-2 it only runs the pi-specific build.

Verify all builds succeed before proceeding.

Pi Parity Gate

After builds pass, audit the Pi extension to ensure all server-side imports resolve in the published package. This catches missing files before they reach npm.

  1. Check imports vs files array. Trace all local imports (starting with ./ or ../) from index.ts, server.ts, tool-scope.ts, and every file in server/. Verify each target is covered by a pattern in the files array of apps/pi-extension/package.json.

  2. Check vendor.sh covers all shared/ai imports. Every ../generated/*.js import in the server files must have a corresponding entry in vendor.sh's copy loops. If a new shared module or AI module was added to packages/shared/ or packages/ai/ and is imported by Pi's server code, it must be added to vendor.sh.

  3. Dry-run the pack. Run cd apps/pi-extension && bun pm pack --dry-run and verify the output includes every file the server imports. Look specifically for any newly added files since the last release.

  4. Quick smoke test. Confirm generated/ contains all expected files after build, especially any new ones (e.g., a new shared module added in this release cycle).

If anything is missing, fix it before proceeding to Phase 4. Common fixes:

  • Add the file to vendor.sh's copy loop
  • Add the file or directory to the files array in package.json
  • Add an import path fix (Pi uses ../generated/ not @plannotator/shared or @plannotator/ai)

Show full SKILL.md (1,030 more words)Show less

Phase 4: Commit, Tag, and Release

  1. Commit the version bump:

    chore: bump version to X.Y.Z

    Stage only the 7 version-bumped files. Do not stage the release notes file (it's untracked by design).

  2. Create and push the tag:

    bash
    git tag vX.Y.Z
    git push origin main
    git push origin vX.Y.Z

    The v* tag push triggers the release pipeline (.github/workflows/release.yml).

  3. The pipeline handles everything else:

    • Runs tests
    • Cross-compiles binaries for 6 platforms (macOS ARM64/x64, Linux x64/ARM64, Windows x64/ARM64)
    • Compiles paste service binaries (same 6 platforms)
    • Packs the two npm packages in a credential-free job
    • Downloads pinned, checksum-verified Syft and Grype binaries; generates and schema-validates the release-wide CycloneDX SBOM after all shipped subjects exist
    • Forces the repository-owned, suppression-free Grype configuration, retries the official database update up to three times, requires a valid/active schema-v6 database no more than 120 hours old with no pending update, and preserves the machine-readable scan/database/policy evidence as a workflow artifact
    • Rejects every scanner-side ignored match, then blocks before any attestation or publication on CISA KEV or fixable Critical findings classified as shipped/runtime or unknown-applicability. High, development-only, and no-fix Critical findings are report-only but remain in the evidence
    • Generates SLSA build provenance attestations for all 12 binaries via actions/attest-build-provenance (signed through Sigstore, recorded in Rekor)
    • Uses the separate official actions/attest SBOM path to bind the CycloneDX predicate to all 12 binaries and both npm tarballs through the same GitHub OIDC/Sigstore service. This is an inventory attestation, not a replacement for SLSA or npm provenance
    • Creates the GitHub Release with all binaries, SHA256 sidecars, the versioned CycloneDX SBOM, and its SHA256 sidecar attached
    • Publishes @plannotator/opencode and @plannotator/pi-extension to npm with provenance

    SBOM scope: the public document is a release-wide Syft inventory of the monorepo's locked build inputs and dependencies. It is deliberately not described as exact binary runtime contents. Coverage testing found that Bun standalone executables hide bundled JavaScript dependency metadata from Syft. The OpenCode tarball is similarly opaque; the Pi tarball exposes only a partial view through nested package-lock files. The scope and limitations are also embedded in the CycloneDX metadata.

    Exceptions: there is no active production exception file. If a future release baseline needs one, do not add a loose ignore. Add a repository-reviewed OpenVEX document and explicitly wire it through PLANNOTATOR_RELEASE_VEX; each statement must match one exact package URL and vulnerability ID and carry not_affected status, an OpenVEX justification, impact statement, HTTPS evidence, owner, created date, and expiration date. The policy tests reject expired, malformed, broad, and nonmatching records.

    Note on immutable releases: The repo has GitHub Immutable Releases enabled, so once the v* tag is pushed and the release is created, the tag→commit and tag→asset bindings are permanent. You cannot delete and re-create a tag to "fix" a bad release — you must ship a new version. Release notes remain editable (see step 5), but everything else is locked.

  4. Monitor the pipeline: Watch the release workflow run until it completes:

    bash
    gh run list --workflow=release.yml --limit=1
    gh run view <run-id> --log

    Verify:

    • All jobs pass, including release-security, attest, release, and npm-publish
    • release-security-evidence records the Syft/Grype versions, active database schema/build/checksum/update status, all Grype matches, and an ACCEPT policy decision
    • The GitHub Release was created with all binary artifacts, SHA256 sidecars, the versioned plannotator-X.Y.Z-release-sbom.cdx.json, and its .sha256 sidecar
    • npm packages published successfully (check with npm view @plannotator/opencode version and npm view @plannotator/pi-extension version)

    A pull request proves generation, schema/sentinel validation, database policy, Grype evaluation, least-privilege job wiring, and all report artifacts. GitHub OIDC issuance, publication to the artifact-attestation service, and final release-asset publication only run for a real eligible v* tag. For the first release after this control lands, complete this bounded tag-only verification before calling the rollout complete:

    Before tagging that first release, update the canonical Mintlify page at https://docs.plannotator.ai/open-source/start/installation#pin-or-verify-a-release with the SBOM scope/limitations, Grype policy, download/checksum commands, and both predicate-verification commands from the README. The legacy Astro files under apps/marketing/src/content/docs/ are redirect-only/deprecated copies and are not the public documentation source. Confirm the live Mintlify page contains the material; do not let its publication lag the shipped control.

    bash
    tag=vX.Y.Z
    version="${tag#v}"
    gh release download "$tag" --pattern 'plannotator-linux-x64*' --pattern "plannotator-${version}-release-sbom.cdx.json*" --dir /tmp/plannotator-release-verify
    (cd /tmp/plannotator-release-verify && sha256sum --check plannotator-linux-x64.sha256)
    (cd /tmp/plannotator-release-verify && sha256sum --check "plannotator-${version}-release-sbom.cdx.json.sha256")
    
    gh attestation verify /tmp/plannotator-release-verify/plannotator-linux-x64 \
      --repo backnotprop/plannotator \
      --source-ref "refs/tags/$tag" \
      --signer-workflow backnotprop/plannotator/.github/workflows/release.yml \
      --predicate-type https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
    
    gh attestation verify /tmp/plannotator-release-verify/plannotator-linux-x64 \
      --repo backnotprop/plannotator \
      --source-ref "refs/tags/$tag" \
      --signer-workflow backnotprop/plannotator/.github/workflows/release.yml \
      --predicate-type https://cyclonedx.org/bom

    Also extract the attested CycloneDX predicate with gh attestation verify --format json --jq '.[0].verificationResult.statement.predicate', canonicalize both it and the downloaded release SBOM with jq -S, and cmp them. Verify one npm tarball subject the same way if you download the exact published tarball. Record any tag-only discrepancy as a release blocker and ship a new version rather than mutating an immutable release.

    If anything fails, investigate the logs and report to the user before retrying.

  5. Replace the release notes: Once the release is live and verified, replace the auto-generated notes body with the drafted release notes:

    bash
    gh release edit vX.Y.Z --notes-file RELEASE_NOTES_v<VERSION>.md

Checklist

Before tagging, verify:

  • All 7 version files bumped consistently
  • Release notes drafted and reviewed
  • bun run build:review succeeded
  • bun run build:hook succeeded
  • bun run build:opencode succeeded
  • bun run build:pi succeeded (or pi-specific build step)
  • Version bump committed
  • Pi parity gate passed (imports, vendor.sh, dry-run pack)
  • No stale build artifacts (clean builds, no cache issues — run bun install first if dependencies changed)
  • The PR-safe release-security job generated a schema-valid, sentinel-complete SBOM and accepted the Grype policy with a fresh database
  • No scanner binary, database, generated SBOM/report, credential, or DO_NOT_COMMIT content is staged
  • For the first SBOM-enabled release, the canonical Mintlify install/verification page contains the README's SBOM scope, policy, checksum, SLSA, and CycloneDX commands (do not edit the deprecated Astro docs instead)

After tagging, verify:

  • Release workflow completed with release-security, attest, release, and npm-publish green
  • GitHub Release created with all binaries, sidecars, SBOM, and SBOM sidecar
  • One native binary passes both the explicit SLSA and CycloneDX predicate checks pinned to the tag and signer workflow
  • Downloaded SBOM checksum passes and canonical JSON matches the attested predicate
  • release-security-evidence shows a fresh/active database and an accepted policy decision
  • npm packages published at correct version
  • npm trusted-publishing provenance remains visible for both packages
  • Release notes replaced via gh release edit

© backnotprop, Apache-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 3 other files (references) in .agents/skills/release of backnotprop/plannotator.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/release-notes-v0.12.0.md
  • references/release-notes-v0.13.0.md
  • references/release-notes-v0.13.1.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 1d9fe3f

Compare with similar skills

Plannotator Release Preparation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Plannotator Release Preparation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Plannotator Release Preparation this skillbacknotprop/plannotator9.2k—~4.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Verdaccio Pull Request Workflowverdaccio/verdaccio18k—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Ansible Pull Request Reviewansible/ansible71k—~570Automated safety check: PassGPL-3.0
Plane Release Notes Generatormakeplane/plane60k—~2.5kAutomated safety check: PassAGPL-3.0
Pair GitHub PRNVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router1.6k—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Handsontable Changelog Entryhandsontable/handsontable22k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Takes a change through a verdaccio pull request: branch, local checks, changeset, title and body, labels, CI and review rounds, and ports to other release lines.

    18k GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Reviews an Ansible pull request by number, following the steps in the project's CLAUDE.md, with early checks for changelog fragments and tests.

    71k GitHub stars~570 tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Builds categorized release notes for a Plane release pull request from its commits and writes them into the PR description, for both the plane-cloud and plane-ee repos.

    60k GitHub stars~2.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Pair GitHub PR

    NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router

    Official

    Fills GitHub pull request descriptions with the required PAIR pair-release-intent:v1 block so the release-intent check passes.

    1.6k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Handsontable Changelog Entry

    handsontable/handsontable

    Decides whether a code change needs a changelog entry and creates the JSON file in .changelogs with the right type, framework and user-facing title.

    22k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated today
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed
  • Automates a version release with changesets: analyzes code changes, writes a bilingual CHANGELOG, bumps the version and commits through a release branch and pull request.

    6.1k GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    DevelopmentAuto-check passed

More from backnotprop/plannotator

All 13 skills in this repo
  • Plannotator Visual Explainer

    backnotprop/plannotator

    Builds self-contained HTML explainers for plans, pull requests and technical concepts in Plannotator's theme, then opens them in its annotation view.

    9.2k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Plannotator Planning Analysis

    backnotprop/plannotator

    Mines a Plannotator archive of denied plans for feedback patterns and prompt improvements, then writes an HTML dashboard report, with a Claude Code fallback.

    9.2k GitHub stars~6.7k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Renovate Actions PR Review

    backnotprop/plannotator

    Reviews Renovate pull requests that bump GitHub Actions by checking pinned SHAs against upstream tags, scanning changelogs and confirming workflows stay compatible.

    9.2k GitHub stars~640 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Plannotator Goal Setup

    backnotprop/plannotator

    Guides the agent from a vague objective to a written goal package under goals/, using a confirmed restatement, a browser interview, a fact sheet and a codebase pass.

    9.2k GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Dependency Update Audit

    backnotprop/plannotator

    Audits outdated npm and Bun packages for supply chain integrity before bumping them, deferring risky ones and logging every decision.

    9.2k GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Plannotator Reference

    backnotprop/plannotator

    Reference for picking the right Plannotator tool or command for plan review, code review, annotating files and URLs, archived plan decisions and Guided Reviews.

    9.2k GitHub stars~5.7k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check: warnings

Works with

Categories

Questions about Plannotator Release Preparation

What does Plannotator Release Preparation do?

Drafts Plannotator release notes with full contributor credit, bumps versions in dependency order, builds, and starts the tag-driven release pipeline, in four reviewed phases. Phase one, drafting release notes, is described as the most important phase and where most of the work happens: the skill finds the latest tag, asks you to confirm a patch, minor or major bump if unclear, and gathers every commit and merged PR since that tag with git log and gh pr view. It then researches every person who contributed, not only PR authors, including issue reporters, commenters who added useful context, and discussion creators, by walking linked issues for each PR.

When should I use Plannotator Release Preparation?

Plannotator Release Preparation fits situations like: preparing release notes that credit every contributor, not just PR authors; bumping versions across multiple packages before a release; deciding how much narrative detail a release's notes should have.

How do I install Plannotator Release Preparation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add backnotprop/plannotator --skill release-plannotator -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.agents/skills/release in backnotprop/plannotator) into .claude/skills/release-plannotator in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Plannotator Release Preparation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add backnotprop/plannotator --skill release-plannotator -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.agents/skills/release in backnotprop/plannotator) into .agents/skills/release-plannotator in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Plannotator Release Preparation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add backnotprop/plannotator --skill release-plannotator -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/release-plannotator, .gemini/skills/release-plannotator, .github/skills/release-plannotator and .opencode/skills/release-plannotator in your project.

What does Plannotator Release Preparation need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Plannotator Release Preparation needs the command-line tools its instructions call (gh, bun, git, npm and jq). Our summary lists: The gh CLI; Git tags from previous releases.

Does Plannotator Release Preparation access the network?

SKILL.md names 4 domains. In commands or code: docs.plannotator.ai, x.com, slsa.dev and cyclonedx.org; the agent is likely to contact these when it follows the instructions. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Plannotator Release Preparation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Plannotator Release Preparation use?

Plannotator Release Preparation is published under the Apache-2.0 licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Plannotator Release Preparation use?

About 4.6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 18k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 9.5k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Plannotator Release Preparation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Plannotator Release Preparation: Verdaccio Pull Request Workflow (verdaccio/verdaccio, 18k stars), Ansible Pull Request Review (ansible/ansible, 71k stars), Plane Release Notes Generator (makeplane/plane, 60k stars) and Pair GitHub PR (NVIDIA/Personal-AI-Router, 1.6k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Plannotator Release Preparation?

backnotprop (a GitHub user) maintains it in backnotprop/plannotator, which has 9,185 GitHub stars. The repository holds 13 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 6, 2026.

Source: backnotprop/plannotator on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.