Official agent skill

Firehose Operation Review

by aws in aws/tools-for-devops-agent

Comprehensive Amazon Data Firehose (formerly Kinesis Data Firehose) review aligned with the AWS Well-Architected Framework and Firehose best practices.

OfficialApache-2.0Auto-check passedDevOps & Cloud

Install Firehose Operation Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add aws/tools-for-devops-agent --skill firehose-operation-review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install aws/tools-for-devops-agent firehose-operation-review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aws/tools-for-devops-agent.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/firehose-operation-review .claude/skills/firehose-operation-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
firehose-operation-review
GitHub stars
103
Token cost
~6k tokens
SKILL.md length
2,949 words
Files
372 (incl. references, assets)
Skills in repo
31
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Apache-2.0

At a glance

Comprehensive Amazon Data Firehose (formerly Kinesis Data Firehose) review aligned with the AWS Well-Architected Framework and Firehose best practices.

  • Works in 6 steps: Identify Target Scope → Discover Firehose Resources → Collect CloudWatch Metrics (namespace… → …
  • A user asks to review
  • SKILL.md covers When to Use, Review Checklist, Step 1: Identify Target Scope and Step 2: Discover Firehose…, plus 8 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Firehose Operation Review is an agent skill from aws/tools-for-devops-agent, published by the product's own GitHub organization. Comprehensive Amazon Data Firehose (formerly Kinesis Data Firehose) review aligned with the AWS Well-Architected Framework and Firehose best practices. Use this skill when a user asks to review, audit, or assess Amazon Data Firehose delivery streams for best-practices compliance, security posture, reliability, delivery health, performance, cost optimization, service quotas, operational excellence, or sustainability. Triggers on requests like "Firehose review", "Kinesis Firehose best practices audit", "review my…

Its SKILL.md is about 6k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 379 other files, including reference files and assets (for example `.skilleval.yaml`, `CHANGELOG.md` and `README.md`).

It sits in DevOps & Cloud, covering Cloud architecture. It works with Amazon Web Services. The repository describes itself as: Open-source tools for AWS DevOps Agent - extend DevOps Agent with ready-to-use skills, custom agents, and other tools, for incident response, root cause analysis, and operational…. The licence is Apache-2.0.

When your agent uses it

  • A user asks to review
  • Assess Amazon Data Firehose delivery streams for best-practices compliance
  • Security posture
  • Delivery health

Example prompts

  • “Firehose review”
  • “Kinesis Firehose best practices audit”
  • “review my delivery streams”
  • “/firehose-operation-review”

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Identify Target Scope
  2. Discover Firehose Resources
  3. Collect CloudWatch Metrics (namespace AWS/Firehose)
  4. Analyze Against Best Practices
  5. Generate Report
  6. Track Findings Over Time (recurring reviews)

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit ddda70b. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    Links to these hosts (documentation or services it may open):

    • docs.aws.amazon.com
    • aws.amazon.com

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Firehose Operation Review loads about 6k tokens when it runs, and up to ~14k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 177 tokens; SKILL.md has 2,949 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~177
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~6k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~14k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from aws/tools-for-devops-agent at commit ddda70b, republished under its Apache-2.0 licence (© aws). 2,949 words, ~6,040 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/firehose-operation-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 371 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
firehose-operation-review
description
Comprehensive Amazon Data Firehose (formerly Kinesis Data Firehose) review aligned with the AWS Well-Architected Framework and Firehose best practices. Use this skill when a user asks to review, audit, or assess Amazon Data Firehose delivery streams for best-practices compliance, security posture, reliability, delivery health, performance, cost optimization, service quotas, operational excellence, or sustainability. Triggers on requests like "Firehose review", "Kinesis Firehose best practices audit", "review my delivery streams", "Firehose health check", "why is my Firehose lagging", "Firehose delivery failures", "Firehose cost optimization review", or "ORR for Firehose".
metadata.author
stharolz
metadata.version
1.4.1
metadata.aws-devops-agent-skills.agent-t
Chat tasks, Evaluation
metadata.aws-devops-agent-skills.aws-ser
Amazon Data Firehose
metadata.aws-devops-agent-skills.technic
Analytics, Streaming Data

Amazon Data Firehose Operational Review

Conduct a comprehensive operational review of Amazon Data Firehose (formerly Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose) delivery streams aligned with the AWS Well-Architected Framework and Amazon Data Firehose best practices.

This skill uses the Firehose, CloudWatch, and Service Quotas APIs only — all data is collected through native AWS control-plane APIs and CloudWatch metrics. It performs no data-plane record puts and reads no delivered record content.

When to Use

Activate this skill when the user asks to:

  • Review, audit, or assess Amazon Data Firehose delivery streams
  • Check Firehose best-practices compliance
  • Evaluate Firehose security, reliability, delivery health, performance, cost, or quotas
  • Perform a Firehose operational readiness review (ORR)
  • Investigate delivery lag (data freshness), delivery failures, throttling, or cost drivers

Review Checklist

Work through these steps in order — each depends on the outputs of the ones before it. Track progress against this checklist and do not skip a step unless its scope makes it inapplicable (e.g. a single-stream review skips the account rollup).

  • Step 1: Identify target scope (accounts, regions, streams, pillars, window)
  • Step 2: Discover Firehose resources and capture per-stream config
  • Step 3: Collect CloudWatch metrics (load the thresholds reference first)
  • Step 4: Analyze against best practices (load the checklist reference first)
  • Step 5: Generate the report (load the report template)
  • Step 6: Track findings over time (recurring reviews)

Step 1: Identify Target Scope

Ask the user which accounts and regions to review, and whether to focus on a specific delivery stream. Accept:

  • Specific account IDs and regions
  • A specific delivery stream name (or "all streams")
  • "all regions" for a given account
  • A specific pillar or set of checks (e.g. "just reliability and cost"). Map free-text pillar names to this canonical set (accept the listed aliases, case-insensitive): security; reliability (aliases: resiliency, availability, durability); performance (perf); service-quotas (quotas, limits); cost (cost-optimization, cost optimization, finops); operational-excellence (ops, opex, operations); sustainability (green, efficiency). If a requested term matches none of these, ask the user to pick from the canonical list rather than guessing; if the run is unattended, default to all pillars.

If no scope is given, default to all configured account regions, all delivery streams, and all pillars. Default the analysis window to the last 7 days unless the user specifies a range (historical windows older than ~2 weeks may have reduced CloudWatch resolution).

Unattended / scheduled runs. If the skill is invoked without an interactive user turn — e.g. as a scheduled custom agent or an automated evaluation task — do not wait for scope input. Proceed immediately with the full default scope: all configured accounts and regions, all delivery streams, all seven pillars, and a 7-day window. Only pause to ask for scope when there is an interactive user to answer.

Step 2: Discover Firehose Resources

Account scoping. This skill operates within the accounts the DevOps Agent Space is configured to access — it does not assume roles or enumerate an Organization itself. "All accounts" means the accounts already associated with the Agent Space as cloud sources; the agent invokes the read APIs below in each in-scope account/region using the Space's configured access. If a requested account is not associated with the Space, report it as "not accessible from this Agent Space" rather than attempting to assume into it. Iterate account × region across the resolved scope.

Per account/region, list the delivery streams and describe each one:

firehose.ListDeliveryStreams                   # enumerate streams in the region
firehose.DescribeDeliveryStream                 # full config for each stream
firehose.ListTagsForDeliveryStream              # tags (cost allocation, ownership)

If ListDeliveryStreams returns no streams for a region, record "No Firehose delivery streams in this region — skipping analysis" and move on. Do not generate empty findings tables for regions with no streams.

From DescribeDeliveryStream, capture per stream:

  • Stream type / source: DirectPut, KinesisStreamAsSource (with the source Kinesis stream ARN), or MSK as source. This determines which ingestion metrics and quotas apply.
  • Destination: S3 / Extended S3, Redshift, OpenSearch Service, OpenSearch Serverless, Splunk, HTTP endpoint, Snowflake, or Apache Iceberg tables. A stream has exactly one active destination.
  • Buffering hints: SizeInMBs and IntervalInSeconds for the destination.
  • Compression: CompressionFormat (UNCOMPRESSED, GZIP, Snappy, Zip, HADOOP_SNAPPY).
  • Encryption at rest: server-side encryption (DeliveryStreamEncryptionConfiguration) — AWS_OWNED_CMK vs CUSTOMER_MANAGED_CMK — and destination S3 EncryptionConfiguration (KMS key).
  • Error/backup config: S3BackupMode (FailedDataOnly / AllData / Disabled), the backup S3 bucket, and destination RetryOptions.DurationInSeconds.
  • Data transformation: ProcessingConfiguration — whether a Lambda transform is enabled and its ARN (do NOT read the Lambda's code or invoke it).
  • Format conversion: DataFormatConversionConfiguration (Parquet/ORC) for S3 destinations.
  • Dynamic partitioning: enabled/disabled and the partitioning config.
  • CloudWatch error logging: CloudWatchLoggingOptions.Enabled.
  • VPC configuration: VpcConfiguration for OpenSearch/Redshift destinations.
  • Cross-account / PrivateLink destinations: for OpenSearch, Redshift, and HTTP-endpoint destinations, note whether the destination ARN/endpoint is in a different account or reached through a VPC/PrivateLink endpoint versus the public internet — this feeds the Security and Reliability checks.
  • Timestamps and status: CreateTimestamp, LastUpdateTimestamp, and DeliveryStreamStatus.

Guard on stream status. Only run the full metric-and-pillar analysis on streams in ACTIVE status. For a stream in CREATING, CREATING_FAILED, or DELETING state, record its status and skip the CloudWatch/pillar analysis — these streams have partial or no metrics, and analyzing them produces misleading "0 IncomingRecords" findings. For CREATING_FAILED, surface the failure itself as a HIGH reliability finding.

Step 3: Collect CloudWatch Metrics (namespace AWS/Firehose)

Before querying metrics, and whenever classifying a metric value as Normal, Warning, or Critical in this step or Step 4, load the authoritative thresholds reference — references/metrics-thresholds.md — with:

read_skill_resource(skill_id="firehose-operation-review", path="references/metrics-thresholds.md")

Use the thresholds from that file when classifying metric values as Normal, Warning, or Critical throughout this step and Step 4.

If this read_skill_resource call fails (e.g. resource not found), do not silently proceed on the model's own judgment. State it explicitly at the top of the report — "⚠️ thresholds reference (references/metrics-thresholds.md) could not be loaded; metric classifications use general Firehose guidance and may be less precise" — and continue with best-effort general guidance. Surfacing the gap keeps reviews consistent and auditable.

All Firehose metrics use the dimension DeliveryStreamName. Pull metric data with cloudwatch.GetMetricData over the selected window (default 7 days). Firehose publishes metrics at 1-minute granularity, and GetMetricData allows up to 500 metric-data queries per call — batch requests and paginate when a region has many streams.

Select which metrics to pull from the stream's source and destination (Step 2), then use the thresholds reference as the authoritative catalog. metrics-thresholds.md lists every metric — by group (ingestion, source-specific for Kinesis/MSK, per-destination delivery, backup-to-S3, and feature metrics for transform / format conversion / dynamic partitioning / SSE / CloudWatch-Logs decompression) — with its statistic and its Normal/Warning/Critical bands. Pull only the groups that apply:

  • Always: the ingestion metrics (volume, ThrottledRecords, the *PerSecondLimit metrics).
  • By source: the Kinesis-source or MSK-source metric group.
  • By destination: the DeliveryTo<Dest>.* group for the stream's one active destination (<Dest> ∈ S3, Redshift, AmazonOpenSearchService, AmazonOpenSearchServerless, Splunk, HttpEndpoint, Snowflake), plus BackupToS3.* when backup is enabled.
  • By enabled feature: the transform, format-conversion, dynamic-partitioning, SSE, or decompression group — only when Step 2 showed that feature is on.

Do not hand-copy metric names from memory; take them and their bands from the loaded reference so the classification is consistent across runs.

Alarm coverage. To evaluate the alarm-coverage checks (the Service Quotas and Operational Excellence items in the best-practices checklist), call cloudwatch.DescribeAlarms and match alarms whose MetricName is ThrottledRecords or DeliveryTo<Dest>.DataFreshness with a Dimensions entry of DeliveryStreamName = the stream under review. A stream with no such alarm is a coverage gap.

DescribeAlarms permission handling (per-region, partial results). DescribeAlarms is Region-scoped and permissions can differ across Regions in a multi-region scan, so evaluate it per Region, independently — a denial in one Region must not suppress alarm-coverage results in Regions where the call succeeds. On AccessDenied for a Region: (1) do not fail the whole review; (2) mark only that Region's alarm coverage as "not verified — cloudwatch:DescribeAlarms denied in <region>"; (3) still report alarm coverage normally for Regions where the call succeeded; and (4) list the affected Regions in the report so the reader knows which results are partial. Never infer a coverage gap from a permission denial.

Step 4: Analyze Against Best Practices

Before evaluating findings, load the best-practices checklist — references/best-practices-checklist.md — with:

read_skill_resource(skill_id="firehose-operation-review", path="references/best-practices-checklist.md")

If this read_skill_resource call fails, state it explicitly at the top of the report — "⚠️ best-practices checklist (references/best-practices-checklist.md) could not be loaded; findings are based on the pillar guidance in this SKILL.md only" — and continue using the per-pillar guidance in Step 4 below rather than silently skipping checks.

Use the checklist as the canonical list of items to evaluate for each pillar. Mark each item as ✅ Pass, ⚠️ Warning, ❌ Fail, or ➖ Not Applicable, and generate a finding for every Fail or Warning.

Evaluate all collected data across the pillars below and assign a severity to every finding: CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW, or INFO. The pillars are: Security, Reliability, Performance, Service Quotas, Cost Optimization, Operational Excellence, Sustainability — the seven Well-Architected-aligned pillars for Firehose.

The overall review is a best-practices assessment: every finding maps to an item in best-practices-checklist.md. "Best Practices" is therefore the framing for the whole review, not a separate pillar — do not create a "Best Practices" pillar section.

Each checklist item carries a base severity (and any escalation conditions); the Severity Definitions table (near the end of this file) is the single source of truth for what each level means and its remediation SLA. If an SLA changes, update that table only.

Pillar checks: Security, Reliability, Performance, Service Quotas, Operational Excellence, Sustainability

For these six pillars, work the loaded references/best-practices-checklist.md item by item — it is the canonical list of checks, and it carries each check's base severity, escalation conditions, and the judgment rules that must be applied verbatim (e.g. the customer-managed-KMS data-classification escalation, the "state the fact, don't judge it" rule for Resource: "*" IAM grants, the Redshift-COPY vs Firehose root-causing, Iceberg landing reconciliation, and the "report CloudWatch error logging once under Operational Excellence" cross-reference). Classify every metric value against the bands in references/metrics-thresholds.md. Do not re-derive checks or severities from memory — apply the reference so two runs of the same stream agree.

Two procedural rules that span the pillars:

  • Service Quotas: read every quota value from servicequotas.GetServiceQuota and the *PerSecondLimit CloudWatch metrics — never hardcode the Region-dependent defaults — then apply the Warning/Critical bands from the Service Quota Utilization table.
  • Sustainability overlaps Cost Optimization: cross-reference the Cost items rather than duplicating rationale, and raise a finding one severity level only when the waste is "large" per references/metrics-thresholds.md.
Show full SKILL.md (1,276 more words)Show less
Cost Optimization — impact-estimation procedure

Ref: Amazon Data Firehose pricing

The Cost checklist items (compression, columnar conversion, buffering, dynamic-partitioning efficiency, idle streams) live in references/best-practices-checklist.md. This section is the procedure for the "Est. Impact" column those findings reference — it stays in the body because it is analysis logic, not a lookup table.

Estimating the "Est. Impact" column (rough, directional). These are back-of-envelope figures for prioritization, not billing forecasts — always confirm against the current Firehose pricing page and the destination's own storage/scan pricing.

Where the unit rates come from (in priority order):

  1. Ask the user for their negotiated / EDP rate if cost precision matters and there is an interactive user. Never block on this — if there is no interactive user (scheduled/automated run per Step 1) or the user does not respond, do not wait; fall straight through to (2).
  2. Default: current public on-demand list prices (S3 Standard $/GB-month, S3 PUT $/1,000 requests, and the relevant Athena/scan rate) for the stream's Region, applied as constants and explicitly labeled "rough estimate at public on-demand list rates, <region>, as of <date the skill was run>." This is the default path, not a last resort — always produce a labeled figure rather than omitting cost.
  3. pricing.GetProducts (AWS Price List API) can supply these programmatically, but it is not in the default AIDevOpsAgentAccessPolicy. If the permission is present, use it. On AccessDenied (or if the permission is absent), degrade to option (2) — a clearly-labeled list-price estimate — rather than silently omitting the cost figure. Never drop a cost estimate solely because pricing.GetProducts was denied.

Never emit a dollar figure without stating which rate source (1/2/3) was used.

  • Extrapolate monthly ingested volume from the window: GB/month ≈ (Sum of IncomingBytes over window / window days) × 30 / 1e9.
  • Compression / columnar conversion savings land mostly downstream (S3 storage + Athena/Spectrum scan cost), not on the Firehose bill: downstream monthly saving ≈ stored_GB × storage_$/GB × (1 − compression_ratio), where storage_$/GB is the rate from the source chosen above, plus query-scan savings proportional to the same ratio. The ~0.3–0.5-of-original ratio for GZIP on JSON is a static default assumption, not measured — where possible refine it from the stream's own observed data (e.g. compare IncomingBytes against DeliveryToS3.Bytes, or a sample) and state whether the ratio used is the default or observed. Always label the resulting figure an estimate.
  • Small-object / buffering impact is driven by S3 PUT request cost: monthly PUT cost ≈ (DeliveryToS3.ObjectCount rate × 30 days) × S3_PUT_$ (S3 PUT rate from the chosen source). Larger buffers cut object count roughly linearly.
  • Firehose format-conversion and dynamic-partitioning features carry their own per-GB charges — net them against the downstream savings before calling an opportunity worthwhile.
  • Firehose base ingestion cost is deliberately excluded from these estimates. Firehose bills per GB ingested (plus format-conversion/partitioning surcharges), but the optimizations above — compression, columnar conversion, buffer sizing — change downstream storage/scan cost, not the volume ingested into Firehose, so they don't reduce the base ingestion charge. State this in the report so a reader doesn't assume the ingestion line item is part of the savings. (The only lever that reduces base ingestion cost is ingesting less data — e.g. filtering/decommissioning idle streams, covered separately.) Keep every figure clearly marked as an estimate with its assumptions and rate source stated.

Step 5: Generate Report

Generate a shareable Markdown report artifact for the review. Before writing the report, load the report template — assets/report-template.md — and follow its section order and tables exactly:

read_skill_resource(skill_id="firehose-operation-review", path="assets/report-template.md")

The template covers the artifact naming convention, header, executive summary, the "Change Since Last Review" diff (Step 6), the account-level rollup, per-pillar findings tables, configuration and metrics summaries, quota utilization, the combined cost/sustainability opportunities table, the priority matrix, next steps, and the reference-links appendix. Populate every applicable section and omit the ones the template marks as scope-dependent (e.g. skip the account rollup for a single-stream review).

If this read_skill_resource call fails, note it at the top of the report — "⚠️ report template (assets/report-template.md) could not be loaded; report structure follows the skill's general guidance" — and still produce the standard sections (header, executive summary, findings by pillar, configuration, metrics, quotas, cost, priority matrix, next steps).

Re-run behavior: Before creating a new report artifact, check for an existing report for the same stream/account and region. If one exists, refresh it with the latest data instead of creating a duplicate.

Step 6: Track Findings Over Time (recurring reviews)

When this skill runs on a schedule (or is re-run manually), a stateless snapshot loses the most useful operational signal: what changed since last time. If a prior report artifact exists for the same stream/account + region (from the re-run check above), diff this run's findings against it and lead the new report with a Change Since Last Review section:

  • New — findings present now but not in the prior report (regressions or newly surfaced issues). Highlight these first; a new CRITICAL/HIGH is the top signal.
  • Resolved — findings in the prior report absent now (fixed or no longer applicable). Acknowledge them so the reader sees progress.
  • Persistent — findings in both, with any severity change noted (e.g. MEDIUM → HIGH as utilization climbs). Persistent CRITICAL/HIGH items that recur across runs warrant escalation, not just re-listing.

Match findings across runs by a stable key (stream name + pillar + check identity), not by exact wording, so a re-phrased finding isn't miscounted as new+resolved. If no prior report exists, note "baseline review — no prior run to compare" and skip the diff. Keep the diff advisory: never suppress a current finding just because it also appeared last time.

Severity Definitions

SeverityDefinitionSLA
CRITICALImmediate risk to availability, security, or data integrity (e.g. delivery stalled, KMS key failures)Fix within 24–48 hours
HIGHSignificant gap that could lead to data loss or incidentsFix within 1 week
MEDIUMNotable improvement opportunityPlan within 30 days
LOWMinor optimization or hardeningAddress when convenient
INFOObservation, no action requiredN/A

Region-Restricted Checks

Some checks depend on Region:

  • Iceberg-table throughput cap: lower and Region-dependent — call servicequotas.GetServiceQuota and cite the returned value. Do not state a reference number; the limit varies by Region and changes over time, and AppendOnly=True streams auto-scale. See the Iceberg note in references/metrics-thresholds.md.
  • Direct PUT throughput defaults vary by Region — read the actual limit from the *PerSecondLimit CloudWatch metrics rather than assuming a fixed value.

Known API Quirks

  • DeliveryTo<Dest>.Success is a ratio (successful puts / total puts), not a count. Small dips below 1.0 do not mean data loss — Firehose retries and, when backup is configured, falls back to S3. Sustained low values with no backup are the concern.
  • DataFreshness is emitted per destination; for warehouse destinations (Redshift) the S3 staging freshness appears as DeliveryToS3.DataFreshness.
  • ThrottledRecords counts records dropped at ingestion — throttled data is excluded from IncomingRecords/IncomingBytes, so compute throttle rate as ThrottledRecords / (IncomingRecords + ThrottledRecords).
  • Metrics are aggregated over 1-minute intervals; sub-second bursts may not appear.
  • cloudwatch.GetMetricData caps at 500 metric-data queries per call — batch and paginate for accounts with many streams.

Data Source Boundaries

This skill collects data exclusively through native AWS APIs (firehose, cloudwatch, servicequotas). It does not:

  • Put, read, or transform any records (no data-plane calls).
  • Read delivered object content, transform Lambda code, or destination data.
  • Depend on any non-AWS tooling or internal scripts — the skill is self-contained on the DevOps Agent's primary cloud-source IAM role.

Runtime inputs vs. eval fixtures. At review time the skill reads only live AWS APIs and its own references/ and assets/ files. evals/files/firehose-context.json is an evaluation fixture used solely by the skill-evaluation harness — it is not a runtime input and is not read during an actual review (interactive, scheduled, or automated). If it is absent or unreadable, real reviews are unaffected; only eval runs that reference it would skip those fixture-backed cases. There is therefore no unattended-run fallback needed for this file.

© aws, Apache-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 371 other files (references, assets) in skills/firehose-operation-review of aws/tools-for-devops-agent.

  • SKILL.md
  • .skilleval.yaml
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • README.md
  • assets/report-template.md
  • evals/benchmark.json
  • evals/best-practices/v11/benchmark.json
  • evals/best-practices/v11/iteration-1/best-practices-tests-results.json
  • evals/best-practices/v11/iteration-2/best-practices-tests-results.json
  • evals/best-practices/v11/iteration-3/best-practices-tests-results.json
  • evals/eval_queries.json
  • evals/evals.json
  • evals/files/firehose-context.json
  • … and 359 more

Open the folder on GitHubat commit ddda70b

Compare with similar skills

Firehose Operation Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Firehose Operation Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Firehose Operation Review this skillaws/tools-for-devops-agent103—~6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Cloud Cost Optimizationwshobson/agents40k14 repos~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Thesvgglincker/thesvg2.8k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
AWS Cloud Advisortech-leads-club/agent-skills7k—~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassCC-BY-4.0
Dangling DNS Finderanirudhbiyani/findmytakeover180—~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassGPL-3.0
AWS Architecture Diagramvidanov/aws-architecture-diagram-skill159—~4.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Cuts cloud spend across AWS, Azure, GCP and OCI with cost tagging, rightsizing, commitment and spot pricing models, and architecture changes.

    40k GitHub starsUsed in 14 repos~1.7k tokens
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Thesvg

    glincker/thesvg

    Fetch brand SVG logos and cloud architecture icons (AWS, Azure, GCP) from theSVG.

    2.8k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • AWS Cloud Advisor

    tech-leads-club/agent-skills

    Answers AWS architecture, security and service-selection questions by searching AWS documentation through MCP tools first, then adapting advice to your stack and team.

    7k GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Dangling DNS Finder

    anirudhbiyani/findmytakeover

    Detect dangling DNS records and subdomain-takeover risks across a multi-cloud environment by running the bundled findmytakeover tool.

    180 GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • AWS Architecture Diagram

    vidanov/aws-architecture-diagram-skill

    Generate AWS architecture diagrams in draw.io format. An agent skill from vidanov/aws-architecture-diagram-skill.

    159 GitHub stars~4.9k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Configure secure, high-performance connectivity between on-premises infrastructure and cloud platforms using VPN and dedicated connections.

    40k GitHub starsUsed in 11 repos~1.5k tokens
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed

More from aws/tools-for-devops-agent

All 31 skills in this repo
  • Aiml GPU Training Cluster Investigation

    aws/tools-for-devops-agent

    Official

    A skill your agent uses for GPU training or inference clusters on SageMaker HyperPod (Slurm or EKS), ParallelCluster, or self-managed EC2/EKS GPU instances.

    103 GitHub stars~5.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • AWS Health Events

    aws/tools-for-devops-agent

    Official

    ALWAYS use this skill in the beginning of any incident investigation, root cause analysis, or operational troubleshooting.

    103 GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Database Migration Service Expertise

    aws/tools-for-devops-agent

    Official

    AWS Database Migration Service (DMS) operational review and troubleshooting skill.

    103 GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Ecs Operation Review

    aws/tools-for-devops-agent

    Official

    Performs a comprehensive Amazon ECS operations review across the 6 review pillars (Resiliency & HA, Observability, Security, Operations, Performance, Additional Analysis) using read-only AWS APIs…

    103 GitHub stars~4.8k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Rds Operation Review

    aws/tools-for-devops-agent

    Official

    Comprehensive Amazon RDS and Aurora operational review aligned with the AWS Well-Architected Framework and RDS/Aurora best practices.

    103 GitHub stars~4.8k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed
  • Sagemaker AI Ops Review

    aws/tools-for-devops-agent

    Official

    Amazon SageMaker AI Operational Review. An agent skill from aws/tools-for-devops-agent.

    103 GitHub stars~3.9k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Firehose Operation Review

What does Firehose Operation Review do?

Comprehensive Amazon Data Firehose (formerly Kinesis Data Firehose) review aligned with the AWS Well-Architected Framework and Firehose best practices. Firehose Operation Review is an agent skill from aws/tools-for-devops-agent, published by the product's own GitHub organization. Comprehensive Amazon Data Firehose (formerly Kinesis Data Firehose) review aligned with the AWS Well-Architected Framework and Firehose best practices.

When should I use Firehose Operation Review?

Firehose Operation Review fits situations like: A user asks to review; assess Amazon Data Firehose delivery streams for best-practices compliance; security posture; delivery health.

How do I install Firehose Operation Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add aws/tools-for-devops-agent --skill firehose-operation-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/firehose-operation-review in aws/tools-for-devops-agent) into .claude/skills/firehose-operation-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Firehose Operation Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add aws/tools-for-devops-agent --skill firehose-operation-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/firehose-operation-review in aws/tools-for-devops-agent) into .agents/skills/firehose-operation-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Firehose Operation Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add aws/tools-for-devops-agent --skill firehose-operation-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/firehose-operation-review, .gemini/skills/firehose-operation-review, .github/skills/firehose-operation-review and .opencode/skills/firehose-operation-review in your project.

What does Firehose Operation Review need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Firehose Operation Review is instructions for the agent only.

Does Firehose Operation Review access the network?

SKILL.md names 2 domains. As links in the text: docs.aws.amazon.com and aws.amazon.com. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Firehose Operation Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Firehose Operation Review use?

Firehose Operation Review is published under the Apache-2.0 licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Firehose Operation Review use?

About 6k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 24k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 7.9k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Firehose Operation Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Firehose Operation Review: Cloud Cost Optimization (wshobson/agents, 40k stars), Thesvg (glincker/thesvg, 2.8k stars), AWS Cloud Advisor (tech-leads-club/agent-skills, 7k stars) and Dangling DNS Finder (anirudhbiyani/findmytakeover, 180 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Firehose Operation Review?

aws (a GitHub organization, an official publisher) maintains it in aws/tools-for-devops-agent, which has 103 GitHub stars. The repository holds 31 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 9, 2026.

Source: aws/tools-for-devops-agent on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.