Agent skill

Cross National

by Aperivue in Aperivue/medsci-skills

A skill your agent uses when comparing an exposure-outcome association across countries with parallel national surveys (KNHANES, NHANES, CHNS).

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Cross National

skills CLI
$ npx skills add Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill cross-national -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install Aperivue/medsci-skills cross-national --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/cross-national .claude/skills/cross-national && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
cross-national
GitHub stars
333
Token cost
~2.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,060 words
Files
4 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
54
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

A skill your agent uses when comparing an exposure-outcome association across countries with parallel national surveys (KNHANES, NHANES, CHNS).

  • Works in 5 steps: Study Definition → Data Preparation → Parallel Analysis → …
  • Comparing an exposure-outcome association across countries with parallel national surveys (KNHANES
  • SKILL.md covers Inputs, Reference Files, Workflow and Critical Rules
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Cross National is an agent skill from Aperivue/medsci-skills. Use when comparing an exposure-outcome association across countries with parallel national surveys (KNHANES, NHANES, CHNS). Harmonizes variables, runs parallel weighted analyses and builds comparison tables for 2-country (KR+US) or 3-country (KR+US+CN) designs.

Its SKILL.md is about 2.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 4 other files, including reference files (for example `references/additional_variables.md`, `references/chns_coding.md` and `skill.yml`).

It sits in Research & Science. The repository describes itself as: Agent Skills for medical research — literature search, reporting-guideline & citation checks, statistics, publication figures, submission. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor &… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Comparing an exposure-outcome association across countries with parallel national surveys (KNHANES

Example prompts

  • “/cross-national”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Study Definition
  2. Data Preparation
  3. Parallel Analysis
  4. Cross-National Comparison Table
  5. Output Files

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 3b14ae2. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Cross National loads about 2.4k tokens when it runs, and up to ~4.3k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 69 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,060 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~69
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.4k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~4.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from Aperivue/medsci-skills at commit 3b14ae2, republished under its MIT licence (© Aperivue). 1,060 words, ~2,376 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/cross-national/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 3 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
cross-national
description
Use when comparing an exposure-outcome association across countries with parallel national surveys (KNHANES, NHANES, CHNS). Harmonizes variables, runs parallel weighted analyses and builds comparison tables for 2-country (KR+US) or 3-country (KR+US+CN) designs.
model
opus
metadata.triggers
cross-national, 한미 비교, Korea US comparison, KNHANES NHANES, 양국 비교, binational, cross-country, 비교연구, 3국 비교, CHNS, 한미중

Cross-National Comparison Study Skill

Inputs

  1. Research question: exposure → outcome association to compare across countries
  2. Korean data path: KNHANES CSV file
  3. US data path: NHANES CSV directory (multiple tables to merge)
  4. Harmonization table (optional): CSV mapping variables across surveys
    • Default: /replicate-study's references/harmonization_knhanes_nhanes.csv

Reference Files

  • /write-paper's references/paper_types/cross_national.md — writing template
  • /analyze-stats's references/analysis_guides/survey_weighted.md — survey-weighted analysis guide
  • references/chns_coding.md — CHNS files, merge keys, coding and warnings; read it when the design includes China (3-country design)
  • references/additional_variables.md — asthma, sleep, physical activity, diet, treatment and non-HDL-cholesterol coding, plus composite-score (LE8) warnings; read it when the study uses any of them

Workflow

Phase 1: Study Definition
  1. Confirm research question: Exposure → Outcome
  2. Define variable coding for both countries:
    • Exposure: PHQ-9, BMI category, smoking, etc.
    • Outcome: diabetes, hypertension, mortality, etc.
    • Covariates: age, sex, education, income, smoking, alcohol, obesity, CVD
  3. Check harmonization table for variable availability
  4. Output: study protocol summary for user approval
Phase 2: Data Preparation

Never guess a variable name, dataset column name, or variable coding. If a mapping is uncertain, output [VERIFY: variable_name] and ask the user to confirm it against the data dictionary.

KNHANES (single CSV):

  1. Load CSV and keep every row — the age ≥20 (or per-protocol) restriction is applied to the design in step 3

  2. Derive variables using KNHANES coding:

    VariableRaw VarCoding
    SmokingBS3_11,2=Current; 3=Former; 8=Never
    AlcoholBD1_112-6=Frequent (current drinker); 1=Occasional (past-year abstainer); 8=Never
    ObesityHE_obe1-3=Normal; 4-6=Obesity (BMI≥25, Asian cutoff)
    DepressionBP_PHQ_1~9Sum ≥10 = depression
    DiabetesHE_glu, HE_HbA1c, DE1_dgFPG≥126 or HbA1c≥6.5 or DE1_dg=1
    CVDDI4_dg, DI5_dg, DI6_dgAny = 1 → CVD yes
    Educationedu1-3=Non-college; 4=College
    IncomeincmQuartile (1=lowest … 4=highest): 1-3=Bottom 75%; 4=Top quartile
  3. Set survey design on the full file, then restrict to the analytic domain: des <- svydesign(id=~psu, strata=~kstrata, weights=~wt_itvex, nest=TRUE, data=df); des_ad <- subset(des, age >= 20). Never filter rows before svydesign() — dropping them changes the standard errors (see survey_weighted.md, subpopulation analysis)

NHANES (multiple CSVs):

  1. Load and merge tables by SEQN (DEMO_J, DPQ_J, GHB_J, GLU_J, BMX_J, SMQ_J, ALQ_J, DIQ_J, MCQ_J, BPQ_J, BPXO_J)

  2. Derive variables using NHANES coding. CRITICAL: NHANES data downloaded via R nhanesA package uses TEXT LABELS, not numeric codes.

    VariableRaw VarCoding (text labels)
    SexRIAGENDR"Male" / "Female" (NOT 1/2)
    SmokingSMQ020 + SMQ040100 cigs (SMQ020 "Yes" / "No") + now smoke (SMQ040 "Every day" / "Some days" / "Not at all")
    AlcoholALQ121 + ALQ111Frequent (current drinker): any ALQ121 frequency except "Never in the last year"; Occasional (past-year abstainer): "Never in the last year"; Never (lifetime non-drinker): ALQ111 == "No" (ALQ121 will be NA)
    ObesityBMXBMI (BMX_J, kg/m²)≥30 (WHO cutoff, NOT Asian)
    PHQ-9DPQ010~DPQ090"Not at all"→0, "Several days"→1, "More than half the days"→2, "Nearly every day"→3; sum ≥10 = depression
    DiabetesLBXGLU (GLU_J, fasting subsample, mg/dL), LBXGH (GHB_J, %), DIQ010LBXGLU≥126 | LBXGH≥6.5 | DIQ010=="Yes" (DIQ010: "Yes" / "No" / "Borderline"). CRITICAL: fasting glucose is GLU_J LBXGLU, not BIOPRO_J LBXSGL — CDC says the serum LBXSGL should not be used to determine undiagnosed diabetes; an analysis that uses LBXGLU needs the fasting-subsample weight (step 3). LBXGLU is NA for non-fasters, and in R NA | TRUE is TRUE but NA | FALSE is NA, so this composite goes missing only for non-fasters who would be non-diabetic; dropping those NAs under WTMEC2YR inflates prevalence. Either analyse the FPG composite only in the fasting domain with the fasting weight, or use the non-fasting variant LBXGH>=6.5 | DIQ010=="Yes" on WTMEC2YR, and say which in variable_mapping.csv
    CVDMCQ160B/C/D/EMCQ160B=="Yes" (CHF) | MCQ160C=="Yes" (CHD) | MCQ160D=="Yes" (angina) | MCQ160E=="Yes" (MI); labels "Yes" / "No" / "Don't know"
    HTNBPXOSY2+3, BPXODI2+3, BPQ020mean(BPXOSY2, BPXOSY3)≥140 | mean(BPXODI2, BPXODI3)≥90 | BPQ020=="Yes" (BPXOSY3 is the 3rd reading, not an average; the mean of the 2nd and 3rd matches KNHANES)
    EducationDMDEDUC25 text levels
  3. Set survey design on the full file, then subset() the design object to the analytic domain (e.g. RIDAGEYR >= 20): svydesign(id=~SDMVPSU, strata=~SDMVSTRA, weights=~WTMEC2YR, nest=TRUE). The weight follows the files: the single-cycle _J tables above take WTMEC2YR; WTMECPRP goes only with the pre-pandemic P_ files (P_DEMO, P_BMX, ...). A variable from the fasting subsample (GLU_J LBXGLU, TRIGLY_J LBXTR/LBDLDL) takes the fasting weight instead: WTSAF2YR (_J) or WTSAFPRP (P_); a variable that combines a fasting-subsample component with full-sample ones (diabetes above) is defined only in that fasting domain, so it cannot enter a WTMEC2YR model. Pooling cycles follows the NCHS rules: divide each cycle's weight by the number of cycles pooled (1999–2002 has its own 4-year weights), and to combine 2015–2016 with 2017–March 2020 use 2/5.2 × WTMEC2YR and 3.2/5.2 × WTMECPRP.

CHNS (3-country design): read references/chns_coding.md before preparing China data.

Show full SKILL.md (323 more words)Show less
Phase 3: Parallel Analysis

For EACH country independently:

  1. Table 1: Baseline characteristics by exposure (weighted counts + percentages)
  2. Main analysis: Sequential logistic regression models
    • Model 1 (unadjusted)
    • Model 2 (age + sex)
    • Model 3 (fully adjusted: + education, income, smoking, alcohol, obesity, CVD)
  3. Subgroup analyses: By sex, age group, education, income, alcohol, smoking, CVD, obesity. Whether the association differs between subgroups is tested with an exposure × subgroup interaction term fitted on the full design (svyglm on the whole sample), not by comparing the subgroups' P values.
  4. Dose-response (if applicable): RCS with 3 knots
Phase 4: Cross-National Comparison Table

Generate a side-by-side comparison:

AnalysisKorea wOR (95% CI)US wOR (95% CI)Ratio of wORs (95% CI); P
Overall (fully adjusted).........
Male.........
Female.........
............

Compare the countries with the ratio of their odds ratios, not with whether the directions agree: two estimates in the same direction can differ, and opposite directions can be compatible. With log odds ratios b₁, b₂ and their design-based standard errors SE₁, SE₂ from the two independent surveys, the ratio is exp(b₁ − b₂) with 95% CI exp(b₁ − b₂ ± 1.96·√(SE₁² + SE₂²)) and z = (b₁ − b₂)/√(SE₁² + SE₂²) (Altman & Bland, BMJ 2003;326:219).

Every number comes from executed code output (analysis_korea.R, analysis_us.R) — never an invented p-value, effect size, confidence interval, or sample size.

Phase 5: Output Files
{working_dir}/
├── cross_national_report.md    — Study summary + comparison tables
├── variable_mapping.csv        — Variable mapping with match status
├── analysis_korea.R            — KNHANES analysis (self-contained)
├── analysis_us.R               — NHANES analysis (self-contained)
├── results/
│   ├── table1_korea.csv
│   ├── table1_us.csv
│   ├── main_results_comparison.csv
│   └── subgroup_comparison.csv
└── manuscript_draft/           — Optional: Methods + Results draft
    ├── methods_draft.md
    └── results_draft.md

Take every citation in the report or draft from /search-lit (confirmed DOI/PMID); mark any other [UNVERIFIED - NEEDS MANUAL CHECK], and never generate references from memory.

Critical Rules

  1. NEVER pool data across countries. Each country analyzed with its own survey design.
  2. Country-specific BMI cutoffs: Korea ≥25 (Asian), US ≥30 (WHO).
  3. Country-specific income: KNHANES quartile, NHANES PIR → harmonize to binary.
  4. Weighted analysis mandatory: Both KNHANES and NHANES are complex surveys. CHNS has no survey weights — analyse it unweighted (see references/chns_coding.md).
  5. Document all harmonization decisions: What matches, what needed recoding, what differs.
  6. Same analytic approach: Identical model specifications for both countries for fair comparison.

© Aperivue, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 3 other files (references) in skills/cross-national of Aperivue/medsci-skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/additional_variables.md
  • references/chns_coding.md
  • skill.yml

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 3b14ae2

Compare with similar skills

Cross National next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Cross National compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Cross National this skillAperivue/medsci-skills333—~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hypothesis Generationspacering-net/codeg3.9k14 repos~3.6kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
GitHub Deep Researchbytedance/deer-flow84k4 repos~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills47k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Content Research Writerweapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss1.9k25 repos~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Last30daysmvanhorn/last30days-skill64k—~7.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Hypothesis Generation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. An agent skill from spacering-net/codeg.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 14 repos~3.6k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • GitHub Deep Research

    bytedance/deer-flow

    Researches a GitHub repository over four rounds using the GitHub API and web search, then writes a structured markdown report with timeline, metrics and Mermaid diagrams.

    84k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~1.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Nature Paper Card

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Content Research Writer

    weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss

    Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section.

    1.9k GitHub starsUsed in 25 repos~3.5k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Last30days

    mvanhorn/last30days-skill

    Research what people actually say about any topic in the last 30 days.

    64k GitHub stars~7.9k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Peer Review

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 17 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

More from Aperivue/medsci-skills

All 54 skills in this repo
  • Obsidian Paper Vault

    Aperivue/medsci-skills

    A skill your agent uses when turning a folder of research PDFs into Obsidian notes, even if Obsidian is not named.

    333 GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Clean Data

    Aperivue/medsci-skills

    A skill your agent uses when a clinical CSV/Excel dataset needs profiling and cleaning before analysis (missing values, outliers, duplicates, type mismatches).

    333 GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Design Study

    Aperivue/medsci-skills

    A skill your agent uses when checking a radiology or medical AI study design before drafting or submission.

    333 GitHub stars~3.9k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fill Icmje Coi

    Aperivue/medsci-skills

    A skill your agent uses when each author needs an ICMJE Conflict of Interest disclosure form (coidisclosure.docx) for submission.

    333 GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Fill Protocol

    Aperivue/medsci-skills

    A skill your agent uses when an institutional Word form (.doc/.docx IRB protocol, ethics application, grant template) must be filled without breaking its styles, tables, fonts or page layout.

    333 GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Find Cohort Gap

    Aperivue/medsci-skills

    A skill your agent uses when looking for research topics a longitudinal cohort database can answer (NHIS, UK Biobank, an institutional EMR or registry).

    333 GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Cross National

What does Cross National do?

A skill your agent uses when comparing an exposure-outcome association across countries with parallel national surveys (KNHANES, NHANES, CHNS). Cross National is an agent skill from Aperivue/medsci-skills. Use when comparing an exposure-outcome association across countries with parallel national surveys (KNHANES, NHANES, CHNS).

When should I use Cross National?

Cross National fits situations like: comparing an exposure-outcome association across countries with parallel national surveys (KNHANES.

How do I install Cross National in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill cross-national -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/cross-national in Aperivue/medsci-skills) into .claude/skills/cross-national in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Cross National in Codex?

Run `npx skills add Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill cross-national -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/cross-national in Aperivue/medsci-skills) into .agents/skills/cross-national in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Cross National in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill cross-national -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/cross-national, .gemini/skills/cross-national, .github/skills/cross-national and .opencode/skills/cross-national in your project.

What does Cross National need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Cross National is instructions for the agent only.

Does Cross National access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Cross National safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Cross National use?

Cross National is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Cross National use?

About 2.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 9.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 1.9k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Cross National?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Cross National: Hypothesis Generation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), GitHub Deep Research (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars), Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars) and Content Research Writer (weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss, 1.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Cross National?

Aperivue (a GitHub organization) maintains it in Aperivue/medsci-skills, which has 333 GitHub stars. The repository holds 54 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 5, 2026.

Source: Aperivue/medsci-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.