New: 98,000+ skills indexed from GitHub repos with 100+ stars · every skill safety-checkedBrowse top skillsTop skills
Esc to closeBrowse all skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills
Submit a skillBrowse skills

Official agent skill

Dsar Response

by anthropics in anthropics/claude-for-legal

Walk through a Data Subject Access Request (or deletion, portability, correction request) and draft the response — verify identity, locate data system-by-system, assess exemptions, draft the…

OfficialApache-2.0Auto-check passedLegal & Compliance

Install Dsar Response

skills CLI
$ npx skills add anthropics/claude-for-legal --skill dsar-response -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install anthropics/claude-for-legal dsar-response --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/anthropics/claude-for-legal.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/privacy-legal/skills/dsar-response .claude/skills/dsar-response && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
dsar-response
GitHub stars
9.6k
Used in
1 other repo
Token cost
~5.1k tokens
SKILL.md length
2,177 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
147
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Apache-2.0

At a glance

Walk through a Data Subject Access Request (or deletion, portability, correction request) and draft the response — verify identity, locate data system-by-system, assess exemptions, draft the…

  • Works in 6 steps: Classify the request → Verify identity → Locate the data → …
  • A DSAR comes in
  • SKILL.md covers Matter context, Purpose, Jurisdiction assumption and Load the process, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Dsar Response is an agent skill from anthropics/claude-for-legal, published by the product's own GitHub organization. Walk through a Data Subject Access Request (or deletion, portability, correction request) and draft the response — verify identity, locate data system-by-system, assess exemptions, draft the acknowledgment and substantive response letters. Use when a DSAR comes in, the user pastes an access/deletion/portability/correction request, or says "DSAR came in", "access request", "right to be forgotten", or "someone wants their data".

Its SKILL.md is about 5.1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Legal & Compliance, covering Privacy and GDPR. The repository describes itself as: A suite of plugins for legal workflows. The licence is Apache-2.0.

When your agent uses it

  • A DSAR comes in
  • The user pastes an access/deletion/portability/correction request
  • Says DSAR came in
  • Right to be forgotten

Example prompts

  • “DSAR came in”
  • “access request”
  • “right to be forgotten”
  • “/dsar-response”

Workflow steps

6 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Classify the request
  2. Verify identity
  3. Locate the data
  4. Exemption analysis
  5. Draft the response — TWO LETTERS
  6. Log it

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 4a6c651. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are markdown).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Dsar Response loads about 5.1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 111 tokens; SKILL.md has 2,177 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~111
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~5.1k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from anthropics/claude-for-legal at commit 4a6c651, republished under its Apache-2.0 licence (© anthropics). 2,177 words, ~5,062 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/dsar-response/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
dsar-response
description
Walk through a Data Subject Access Request (or deletion, portability, correction request) and draft the response — verify identity, locate data system-by-system, assess exemptions, draft the acknowledgment and substantive response letters. Use when a DSAR comes in, the user pastes an access/deletion/portability/correction request, or says "DSAR came in", "access request", "right to be forgotten", or "someone wants their data".
argument-hint
[paste the request, or describe it]

/dsar-response

  1. Load ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/privacy-legal/CLAUDE.md → DSAR process (systems list, verification method, SLA).
  2. Run the workflow below.
  3. Classify request type. Check escalation triggers — if any fire, route before proceeding.
  4. Walk through: verify identity → walk systems list → exemption analysis → draft.
  5. Output response draft. Do NOT send — human reviews and sends.
  6. Log the DSAR per house process.

Before pasting the request: the request will contain the data subject's PII. Confirm your session and output storage meet your data-handling requirements. Redact anything you don't need (ID attachments, unrelated email threads). Do not store the subject's name in filenames.

/privacy-legal:dsar-response
[paste the request email]

DSAR Response Drafting

Matter context

Matter context. Check ## Matter workspaces in the practice-level CLAUDE.md. If Enabled is ✗ (the default for in-house users), skip the rest of this paragraph — skills use practice-level context and the matter machinery is invisible. If enabled and there is no active matter, ask: "Which matter is this for? Run /privacy-legal:matter-workspace switch <slug> or say practice-level." Load the active matter's matter.md for matter-specific context and overrides. Write outputs to the matter folder at ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/privacy-legal/matters/<matter-slug>/. Never read another matter's files unless Cross-matter context is on.

Purpose

A DSAR has a deadline (set by the applicable regime), a process (verify, locate, assess exemptions, respond), and a bunch of places it can go wrong. This skill walks through each step and drafts the response.

Jurisdiction assumption

This analysis assumes the jurisdictional scope specified in your configuration. Privacy rules, response deadlines, and lawful bases vary materially by jurisdiction (GDPR vs. state consumer privacy laws vs. sectoral). If the data subject, processing activity, or controller is in a different jurisdiction than configured, this analysis may not apply as written.

Load the process

Read ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/privacy-legal/CLAUDE.md → ## DSAR process. That section has:

  • The systems list (every place user data lives)
  • Identity verification method
  • Response SLA
  • Who handles routine vs. who gets escalated

If the systems list is empty or stale, flag it — can't do a complete DSAR without knowing where to look.

Workflow

Step 1: Classify the request

Identify which right the data subject is invoking. Common categories:

  • Access — copy of their data + information about processing
  • Deletion / erasure — remove their data (subject to exemptions)
  • Portability — their data in machine-readable format
  • Correction / rectification — fix inaccurate data
  • Objection — stop a particular processing (often marketing)
  • Restriction — pause processing pending a dispute
  • Opt-out of sale/share / automated decision-making — regime-specific rights

Research the applicable rule before proceeding. For each invoked right, identify the jurisdiction(s) whose law applies (GDPR, UK GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, other US state privacy laws, sectoral regimes). Cite the controlling statute or regulation with pinpoint references — the specific article/section, the scope of the right, any carve-outs. Note effective dates; data subject rights are amended frequently (new state laws each legislative session). Flag uncertainty and escalate for attorney verification rather than stating a rule you haven't confirmed.

No silent supplement. If a research query to the configured legal research tool returns few or no results for the jurisdiction's rights, exemptions, or deadlines, report what was found and stop. Do NOT fill the gap from web search or model knowledge without asking. Say: "The search returned [N] results from [tool]. Coverage appears thin for [regime / right]. Options: (1) broaden the search query, (2) try a different research tool, (3) search the web — results will be tagged [web search — verify] and should be checked against a primary source before relying, or (4) flag as unverified and stop. Which would you like?" A lawyer decides whether to accept lower-confidence sources.

Source attribution tiering. Tag every citation with its source. For model-knowledge citations, use one of three tiers rather than a single blanket "verify" tag:

  • [settled] — stable, well-known statutory and regulatory references unlikely to have changed (e.g., GDPR Art. 33, CCPA § 1798.100, FTC Act § 5, 45-day CCPA response window under § 1798.130(a)(2) as a concept). Still verify before filing, but lower priority.
  • [verify] — model-knowledge citations that are real but should be verified: specific implementing regulations, agency guidance, case holdings, thresholds, effective dates, post-2023 amendments.
  • [verify-pinpoint] — pinpoint citations (specific subsection letters, volume/page numbers, paragraph numbers, regulatory subpart references) carry the highest fabrication risk and should ALWAYS be verified against a primary source.

Tool-retrieved citations keep their source tag ([Westlaw], [issuing authority site], or the MCP tool name); web-search citations remain [web search — verify]; user-supplied citations remain [user provided]. The tiering surfaces the real verification work — a reader who verifies everything verifies nothing. Never strip or collapse the tags.

Some requests are combinations — "delete my account and send me my data first" is deletion + portability. Handle as two linked requests.

Step 2: Verify identity

Per the method in ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/privacy-legal/CLAUDE.md. Common approaches:

  • Logged-in verification: Request came from within an authenticated session → identity confirmed
  • Email match: Request came from an email on file → usually sufficient for low-risk requests
  • Additional verification: For high-value accounts or deletion requests → challenge question, phone verification, ID document

Calibrate to risk. Over-verifying turns the DSAR process into a barrier (bad look with regulators). Under-verifying risks handing someone else's data to a fraudster.

If identity can't be verified:

markdown
We were unable to verify that this request came from the individual whose data
is at issue. To proceed, please [verification step]. We cannot provide personal
data in response to a request we cannot verify.

This pauses the clock (arguably) but don't sit on it — respond to say you need verification within a few days, not on day 29.

Step 3: Locate the data

Walk the systems list from ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/privacy-legal/CLAUDE.md. For each system:

SystemQueried?Data found?What
Production database
Analytics (e.g., Mixpanel, Amplitude)
Support tickets (e.g., Zendesk)
CRM (e.g., Salesforce, HubSpot)
Email marketing (e.g., Marketo)
Logs
Backups(note: usually exempt from deletion — see below)
Third-party processors(they may need to be notified for deletion)

For a B2B processor: the "data subject" is usually your customer's end user. Check whether this is actually your customer's DSAR to handle, not yours. Many processor DPAs say "forward DSARs to the controller."

Step 4: Exemption analysis

Not everything gets produced or deleted. Research the applicable rule before proceeding. For each item, identify every exemption that plausibly applies under the regime in scope (e.g., third-party privacy, privilege, trade secret, security, legal obligation to retain, establishment/defense of legal claims, transactional necessity, backup rotation accommodations, freedom of expression). Cite the controlling statute, regulation, or case with a pinpoint cite. Exemption scope varies by jurisdiction and regime — verify currency and flag uncertainty.

Don't narrow the list on a subjective call. The skill proposes exemptions where a good-faith basis exists and flags the uncertain ones; the attorney narrows the list before the response goes out. Dropping an exemption that later turns out to apply is costly — once material is disclosed, the exemption is functionally gone. Over-asserting a plausible exemption is correctable by the attorney in review. Prefer the recoverable error.

Every proposed exemption carries an explicit note: "proposed — requires attorney review before asserting. Regulators scrutinize blanket exemption claims, so the attorney narrows this list; the skill does not."

Common recurring questions to work through:

  • Does the record contain data about other people that needs to be redacted before production?
  • Is there a specific legal retention obligation that blocks deletion? Cite it.
  • Is there an active litigation hold covering this individual's data?
  • Are there backup rotation or technical-feasibility accommodations that need to be documented (not used as a general excuse)?

Document every exemption claimed. If a regulator asks why you didn't delete something, "we had a legal obligation" needs a citation.

Show full SKILL.md (981 more words)Show less
Step 5: Draft the response — TWO LETTERS

Research-connector pre-flight. Before emitting either letter or the internal exemption analysis, check whether a legal research connector is reachable for this session — Westlaw, an EUR-Lex / regulator-site connector, or any firm-configured research MCP. Collect this into the reviewer note per CLAUDE.md ## Outputs — the reviewer note sits on the INTERNAL exemption-analysis and cover memo, NOT on the outward-facing DSAR letters to the data subject. If no connector returns results in Step 1 (right classification), Step 4 (exemption analysis), or the Deadline management research step (or none is configured at run time), record it in the Sources: line of the internal reviewer note — e.g., not connected — cites from training knowledge; claimed exemptions, response deadlines, and extension mechanisms are especially fabrication-prone, verify before asserting any exemption to a data subject or regulator. Per-citation [model knowledge — verify] tags remain inline. Do not emit a standalone banner above the output.

Most regimes expect (or require) a prompt acknowledgment separate from the substantive response. Produce both; do not collapse them into one letter that waits until the 45-day deadline to go out.

  • Step 5a — Acknowledgment letter. Sent within days of receipt (target: same-day to 3–5 days, always well inside the regime's statutory window). Confirms receipt, states what the controller understands the request to be, states the response clock and the target date, asks for any identity-verification material still outstanding. Does NOT contain the substantive disclosure. A prompt acknowledgment is the first regulator-visible signal that the DSAR process is working; it also reduces the risk of a duplicate request or an early complaint.
  • Step 5b — Substantive response letter. The actual disclosure, deletion confirmation, or portability export. Goes out by the statutory deadline (or the internal SLA if tighter). Only after identity verification is complete and the Step 3 / Step 4 data location + exemption analysis is done.

Before proceeding to send either letter to the data subject: Read ## Who's using this in ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/privacy-legal/CLAUDE.md. If the Role is Non-lawyer:

Sending a DSAR response has legal consequences — the content, the exemptions claimed, and the omissions are all reviewable by a regulator, and misstatements become enforcement exposure. Have you reviewed this with an attorney? If yes, proceed. If no, here's a brief to bring to them:

[Generate a 1-page summary: data subject, right invoked, applicable regime(s), what was located across the systems list, what is being withheld and under which exemption, identity verification posture, response deadline, and the three things to ask the attorney before the letter goes out.]

If you need to find a licensed attorney, solicitor, barrister, or other authorised legal professional in your jurisdiction: your professional regulator's referral service is the fastest starting point (state bar in the US, SRA/Bar Standards Board in England & Wales, Law Society in Scotland/NI/Ireland/Canada/Australia, or your jurisdiction's equivalent).

Do not proceed past this gate without an explicit yes.

Note: Both DSAR letters are externally-facing deliverables sent to the data subject. Do not include the work-product header from ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/privacy-legal/CLAUDE.md ## Outputs on either letter. Internal notes, logs, and exemption analyses that accompany the letters are attorney work product — keep those separate and prepend the work-product header per ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/privacy-legal/CLAUDE.md ## Outputs (which differs by user role — see ## Who's using this).

Before sending either letter: This is a draft for attorney review, not a response to send. Sending commits the controller to a position, may waive exemptions, and may start a regulator's clock. A licensed attorney reviews, edits, and approves before either letter goes to the data subject. Do not send unreviewed.

Step 5a — Acknowledgment letter template
markdown
Subject: We received your privacy request — [Company] — [date]

Dear [Name],

We received your [access / deletion / portability / correction] request on [date received].

**Your request, as we understand it:** [one-sentence restatement — e.g., "a copy of all personal data we hold associated with your account, along with the categories of third parties with whom we share it, and deletion of your account after we provide the copy."]

**What happens next:**
- Our target date for the substantive response is [date — no later than the regime's statutory deadline; use internal SLA if tighter]. [If identity verification is outstanding: "We need [specific verification step] before we can proceed — see below."]
- If we need more time because the request is complex or we receive other requests from you at the same time, we will tell you before the initial deadline and explain why. [If the regime allows an extension, cite the controlling provision.]
- No fee applies to this request. [Or: the fee applies only if the regime permits it and the request is manifestly unfounded or excessive — cite the provision.]

[If identity verification is outstanding:]
**To verify your identity,** please [specific verification step — e.g., reply to this email from the address on file with the last 4 digits of the payment method we have on file]. This does not pause our deadline; we continue to work in parallel.

If you have questions, contact [privacy contact].

[Sender]

Clock-start rule. The response clock starts on receipt of the request, not on completion of identity verification — unless the applicable regime says otherwise. Do not tacitly toll the clock on verification. If a regime has a different trigger, cite it; do not assume.

Step 5b — Substantive response letter templates

Access request response:

markdown
Subject: Your Data Access Request — [Company] — [date]

We received your request on [date] for a copy of the personal data we hold about you.

**What we found:**

We hold the following categories of personal data associated with [identifier]:

| Category | Source | Purpose | Retained until |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Account info: name, email] | You, at signup | Account management | Account deletion |
| [Usage data] | Our service | Analytics, product improvement | [period] |
| [Support correspondence] | You | Customer support | [period] |

**Your data is attached** in [format]. [Secure delivery note — password-protected
archive, secure link with expiry, etc.]

**Third parties:** We share data with the following processors: [list or link to
subprocessor page].

**Your other rights:** You may also request [deletion / correction / portability].
To do so, [method].

**Data we did not include:**
- [Category] — [exemption and reason, e.g., "internal security logs — disclosure
  would compromise security measures"]
- [Data about other individuals has been redacted from support correspondence]

If you have questions about this response, contact [privacy contact].

Deletion request response:

markdown
Subject: Your Deletion Request — [Company] — [date]

We received your request on [date] to delete the personal data we hold about you.

**What we deleted:**

| Category | System | Deleted on |
|---|---|---|
| [Account and profile] | Production | [date] |
| [Analytics events] | [Amplitude/etc.] | [date] |
| [etc.] | | |

**What we retained and why:**

| Category | Reason | Retained until |
|---|---|---|
| [Transaction records] | Legal obligation (tax record retention, [cite law]) | [date] |
| [Backup snapshots] | Will be deleted on next rotation | [date] |

**Third-party processors:** We have instructed [list] to delete your data from
their systems.

Your account is now closed. If you have questions, contact [privacy contact].
Step 6: Log it

DSARs get audited. Record:

  • Date received
  • Date identity verified
  • Date responded
  • What was produced/deleted
  • Exemptions claimed and basis
  • Who handled it

If your team uses a DSAR tracking tool, create the record there. If not, a log file works.

Escalation triggers

Per ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/privacy-legal/CLAUDE.md → Escalation table, escalate when:

  • Requester is (or might be) a plaintiff, opposing counsel, or journalist
  • Request scope is unusual ("all data including internal communications about me")
  • There's a litigation hold on this individual's data (deletion request + lit hold = conflict, lawyer decides)
  • Requester is disputing a previous DSAR response
  • Any regulator is cc'd or mentioned

Deadline management

Two-letter rule. Every DSAR produces an acknowledgment letter (prompt — target same-day to 3–5 days after receipt) AND a substantive response letter (by the statutory deadline). Most regimes either require or expect a prompt acknowledgment separate from the substantive response; a single combined letter sent on day 45 is a process failure even if it is substantively correct.

Research the currently operative response deadline for the specific right invoked and the applicable jurisdictions. Check whether an extension mechanism exists, how much extra time it buys, and what notice the data subject must receive to invoke it. Identify when the clock starts (receipt vs. verification vs. some other trigger — default rule is receipt; verify per regime). Cite the controlling statute or regulation with pinpoint references. Note effective dates — data protection response timelines are amended frequently and new state laws introduce their own clocks.

If ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/privacy-legal/CLAUDE.md → ## DSAR process records an internal SLA that is tighter than the legal deadline, use the internal SLA and note the legal backstop.

If you're going to need an extension, send the "we need more time" notice well before the first deadline. Day-of extensions look bad.

What this skill does not do

  • It doesn't query systems directly. It walks you through the checklist; a human (or a connected tool) does the actual queries.
  • It doesn't make exemption calls on close cases. It flags them for a lawyer.
  • It doesn't send the response. Draft, review, human sends.

© anthropics, Apache-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in privacy-legal/skills/dsar-response of anthropics/claude-for-legal.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 4a6c651

Used in 1 other repository

We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in anthropics/claude-for-legal, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Dsar Response next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Dsar Response compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Dsar Response this skillanthropics/claude-for-legal9.6k1 repos~5.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
C15tc15t/c15t1.9k1 repos~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
HIPAA Safe Harbor Coverage Auditmaziyarpanahi/openmed5.5k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Korean Privacy Termskimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms586—~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Gdpr ComplianceSushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance9431 repos~3.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hipaa ComplianceSushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance9431 repos~2.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • C15t

    c15t/c15t

    Work with c15t consent management docs, APIs, and integrations for Next.js, React, and JavaScript.

    1.9k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.6k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

  • HIPAA Safe Harbor Coverage Audit

    maziyarpanahi/openmed

    Checks OpenMed de-identified clinical text against the 18 HIPAA Safe Harbor identifier categories and reports gaps and residual re-identification risk.

    5.5k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated today
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

  • Korean Privacy Terms

    kimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms

    처리방침·이용약관 자동 생성 스킬 패키지 (v4.0). An agent skill from kimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms.

    586 GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

  • Gdpr Compliance

    Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance

    Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing…

    943 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.9k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

  • Hipaa Compliance

    Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance

    Expert HIPAA compliance assistant for healthcare and software contexts.

    943 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.3k tokens
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check passed

  • Pii Contract Analyze

    gregmos/PII-Shield

    Universal legal document processor with PII anonymization. An agent skill from gregmos/PII-Shield.

    149 GitHub stars~8.9k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    Legal & ComplianceAuto-check: notes

More from anthropics/claude-for-legal

All 147 skills in this repo

  • Legal Clinic Client Intake

    anthropics/claude-for-legal

    Official

    Structures a legal clinic client intake interview and produces a case summary with cross-area issue spotting, conflict flags and triage classification.

    9.6k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~3.2k tokens
    Auto-check passed

  • Supervisor Review Queue

    anthropics/claude-for-legal

    Official

    Holds student work in a queue for a legal clinic professor to approve, edit-then-approve or return before anything reaches clients or courts.

    9.6k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~1.1k tokens
    Auto-check passed

  • Tabular Document Review

    anthropics/claude-for-legal

    Official

    Builds a review grid with one row per document and one column per data point, each cell cited to a verbatim quote, built for M&A diligence and other batch reviews.

    9.6k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~4.3k tokens
    Auto-check passed

  • Product Launch Legal Review

    anthropics/claude-for-legal

    Official

    Runs a category-by-category legal review of a product launch from a PRD or tracker ticket, calibrated to your team's framework, and writes a review memo in house format.

    9.6k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~5k tokens
    Auto-check passed

  • Legal Skills Registry Browser

    anthropics/claude-for-legal

    Official

    Searches watched registries for community legal skills, shows matches with descriptions and offers the full SKILL.md before anything is installed.

    9.6k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~620 tokens
    Auto-check passed

  • Contract Renewal Tracker

    anthropics/claude-for-legal

    Official

    Shows which contracts renew soon and when notice must be sent by, working from a maintained renewal register, and warns about missed cancellation windows.

    9.6k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~3.1k tokens
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Dsar Response

What does Dsar Response do?

Walk through a Data Subject Access Request (or deletion, portability, correction request) and draft the response — verify identity, locate data system-by-system, assess exemptions, draft the…. Dsar Response is an agent skill from anthropics/claude-for-legal, published by the product's own GitHub organization. Walk through a Data Subject Access Request (or deletion, portability, correction request) and draft the response — verify identity, locate data system-by-system, assess exemptions, draft the acknowledgment and substantive response letters.

When should I use Dsar Response?

Dsar Response fits situations like: A DSAR comes in; the user pastes an access/deletion/portability/correction request; says DSAR came in; right to be forgotten.

How do I install Dsar Response in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add anthropics/claude-for-legal --skill dsar-response -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (privacy-legal/skills/dsar-response in anthropics/claude-for-legal) into .claude/skills/dsar-response in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Dsar Response in Codex?

Run `npx skills add anthropics/claude-for-legal --skill dsar-response -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (privacy-legal/skills/dsar-response in anthropics/claude-for-legal) into .agents/skills/dsar-response in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Dsar Response in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add anthropics/claude-for-legal --skill dsar-response -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/dsar-response, .gemini/skills/dsar-response, .github/skills/dsar-response and .opencode/skills/dsar-response in your project.

What does Dsar Response need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Dsar Response is instructions for the agent only.

Does Dsar Response access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Dsar Response safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Dsar Response use?

Dsar Response is published under the Apache-2.0 licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Dsar Response use?

About 5.1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 20k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Dsar Response?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Dsar Response: C15t (c15t/c15t, 1.9k stars), HIPAA Safe Harbor Coverage Audit (maziyarpanahi/openmed, 5.5k stars), Korean Privacy Terms (kimlawtech/korean-privacy-terms, 586 stars) and Gdpr Compliance (Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance, 943 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Dsar Response?

anthropics (a GitHub organization, an official publisher) maintains it in anthropics/claude-for-legal, which has 9,629 GitHub stars. The repository holds 147 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 29, 2026.

Source: anthropics/claude-for-legal on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.