Agent skill

Metric Spec

by ai-analyst-lab in ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst

Define any metric completely with a standardized template: calculation, denominator, time window, filters, interpretation.

MITAuto-check passedProduct & Project Management

Install Metric Spec

skills CLI
$ npx skills add ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst --skill metric-spec -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst metric-spec --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/.claude/skills/metric-spec .claude/skills/metric-spec && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
metric-spec
GitHub stars
304
Token cost
~4.9k tokens
SKILL.md length
808 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
43
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Define any metric completely with a standardized template: calculation, denominator, time window, filters, interpretation.

  • Works in 5 steps: Definition must be unambiguous — two… → Always specify the denominator —… → Always specify the time window — "DAU"… → …
  • Define this metric
  • SKILL.md covers Purpose, When to Use, Instructions and Examples, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Metric Spec is an agent skill from ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst. Define any metric completely with a standardized template: calculation, denominator, time window, filters, interpretation. Trigger on "define this metric", "how should we measure X?", "what's the right way to calculate Y?", "document our metrics", "create a metric definition", "different teams are measuring this differently", or when a metric is used in analysis without a clear specification.

Its SKILL.md is about 4.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Product & Project Management, covering Product metrics. The repository describes itself as: AI Product Analyst — Claude Code-powered data analysis toolkit. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Define this metric
  • How should we measure X?
  • Whats the right way to calculate Y?
  • Document our metrics

Example prompts

  • “define this metric”
  • “how should we measure X?”
  • “s the right way to calculate Y?”
  • “/metric-spec”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Definition must be unambiguous — two different analysts reading the spec should write the same SQL
  2. Always specify the denominator — "conversion rate" is meaningless without knowing what's in the denominator (visitors? sessions? users?)
  3. Always specify the time window — "DAU" measured daily is different from "DAU" measured as a 7-day average
  4. Always specify exclusions — which users/events are filtered out? (test accounts, internal users, bots)
  5. Guardrails should be based on historical data — not gut feel. State the basis: "Based on 6-month average of 3.8% ± 0.4%"

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 52c0744. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are markdown, sql and yaml).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Metric Spec loads about 4.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 102 tokens; SKILL.md has 808 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~102
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~4.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst at commit 52c0744, republished under its MIT licence (© ai-analyst-lab). 808 words, ~4,891 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/metric-spec/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
metric-spec
description
Define any metric completely with a standardized template: calculation, denominator, time window, filters, interpretation. Trigger on "define this metric", "how should we measure X?", "what's the right way to calculate Y?", "document our metrics", "create a metric definition", "different teams are measuring this differently", or when a metric is used in analysis without a clear specification.

Skill: Metric Spec

Purpose

Define any metric clearly and completely using a standardized template so there is no ambiguity about what is being measured, how it's calculated, or how to interpret it.

When to Use

Apply this skill when defining a new metric, when a metric is referenced without a clear definition, or when different people are using the same metric name to mean different things. Every metric used in an analysis should have a spec.

Instructions

Metric Spec Template
markdown
## Metric: [Name]

### Definition
**Plain English:** [One sentence a non-technical person can understand]
**Formula:** [Exact calculation]
**Owner:** [team or person accountable for this metric]
**Granularity:** [the grain it is reported at: per user / per order / daily / weekly ...]

### Components
| Component | Definition | Source |
|-----------|-----------|--------|
| **Numerator** | [What's being counted/summed in the top] | [Table.column] |
| **Denominator** | [What's being counted in the bottom (if ratio)] | [Table.column] |
| **Unit of analysis** | [What does one row represent?] | [e.g., per user, per session, per order] |

### Segmentation Dimensions
| Dimension | Values | Why |
|-----------|--------|-----|
| [e.g., Device type] | [mobile, desktop, tablet] | [Different UX → different conversion] |
| [e.g., Acquisition channel] | [organic, paid, referral] | [Different intent → different behavior] |
| [e.g., Geography] | [US, EU, APAC] | [Different markets → different baselines] |

### Data Source
- **Primary table:** [schema.table_name]
- **Key columns:** [list]
- **Refresh cadence:** [real-time / hourly / daily / weekly]
- **Latency:** [how delayed is the data?]
- **Reference query:** [SQL query that computes this metric — the canonical implementation]

### Guardrails
| Condition | Value | Action |
|-----------|-------|--------|
| **Healthy** | [e.g., >3.5%] | No action needed |
| **Watch** | [e.g., 2.5-3.5%] | Monitor weekly, investigate if persists >2 weeks |
| **Investigate** | [e.g., <2.5%] | Root cause analysis within 48 hours |
| **Alert** | [e.g., <1.5%] | Escalate to leadership, immediate investigation |

**Typical range:** [the band the metric normally lives in, with its basis: "3.4-4.2% over the last 6 months"]

### Known Limitations
- [Limitation 1: e.g., "Does not include guest checkouts — only registered users"]
- [Limitation 2: e.g., "Affected by bot traffic; filter using is_bot flag"]
- [Limitation 3: e.g., "Denominator changes when new markets launch — compare like-for-like"]

### Related Metrics
- [Upstream: what drives this metric?]
- [Downstream: what does this metric drive?]
- [Alternative: other ways to measure the same concept]

### Driver Decomposition (Optional)
If this is a key business metric, decompose it into its drivers to enable faster diagnosis when the metric changes.

**Decomposition type:** [Multiplicative / Additive]

| Driver | Formula | Relationship | Data Source |
|--------|---------|-------------|-------------|
| [driver 1] | [formula] | [× / +] | [table.column] |
| [driver 2] | [formula] | [× / +] | [table.column] |
| [driver 3] | [formula] | [× / +] | [table.column] |

**Diagnostic rule:** If [parent metric] drops, check these drivers in order:
1. [driver 1] — [why this is the most likely cause / highest leverage]
2. [driver 2] — [what changes in this driver would look like]
3. [driver 3] — [least common but possible]

**Verification:** [parent metric] = [driver 1] × [driver 2] × [driver 3] (for multiplicative)
or [parent metric] = [driver 1] + [driver 2] + [driver 3] (for additive)
Writing Rules
  1. Definition must be unambiguous — two different analysts reading the spec should write the same SQL
  2. Always specify the denominator — "conversion rate" is meaningless without knowing what's in the denominator (visitors? sessions? users?)
  3. Always specify the time window — "DAU" measured daily is different from "DAU" measured as a 7-day average
  4. Always specify exclusions — which users/events are filtered out? (test accounts, internal users, bots)
  5. Guardrails should be based on historical data — not gut feel. State the basis: "Based on 6-month average of 3.8% ± 0.4%"
Workflow: Write Spec → Register to Knowledge System

After writing the spec, register it to the knowledge system so it is discoverable and reusable (steps below).

Registration Steps (execute these immediately after completing the metric spec):

  1. Read active dataset ID: Read .knowledge/active.yaml to get the active dataset name

  2. Check metrics directory: Verify .knowledge/datasets/{active}/metrics/ directory exists. If not, create it.

  3. Generate metric ID: Convert metric name to ID format: lowercase, hyphens, no spaces

    • Example: "Checkout Conversion Rate" → checkout-conversion-rate
  4. Check for existing entry: Read .knowledge/datasets/{active}/metrics/index.yaml. If the metric ID exists, you're updating. If not, you're creating new.

  5. Write metric YAML: Create .knowledge/datasets/{active}/metrics/{id}.yaml with exactly the fields the metrics skill displays:

    • name: The metric's display name
    • owner: Copy from the Owner field (null if not stated)
    • definition.plain_english: Copy from Plain English field
    • definition.formula: Copy from Formula field
    • definition.unit: Infer from formula (%, count, currency, ratio)
    • definition.direction: Infer from guardrails (higher_is_better / lower_is_better)
    • definition.granularity: Copy from the Granularity field (fall back to Unit of analysis)
    • source.tables: List primary table(s) from Data Source section
    • source.sql: Copy reference query if provided
    • dimensions: Array of dimension column names from Segmentation Dimensions
    • guardrails: Map guardrail conditions to values (the field is named guardrails, not thresholds)
    • typical_range: Copy from the Typical range line (null if unknown)
    • validation_status: draft on first registration; set to validated once the reference query has been run against the data and its result checked
    • last_validated: the date the reference query was last verified against the data (null until then)
    • limitations: Array of strings from Known Limitations
  6. Update index: Update .knowledge/datasets/{active}/metrics/index.yaml with an entry:

    yaml
    - id: checkout-conversion-rate
      name: Checkout Conversion Rate
      category: conversion  # infer: conversion, engagement, revenue, retention, etc.
      direction: higher_is_better
      validation_status: draft
      created: YYYY-MM-DD
      updated: YYYY-MM-DD

    (direction and validation_status are in the index because the metrics skill's list view displays them.)

  7. Add a compile: block when the metric is a single aggregate (recommended). If the metric is one measure over one table with named dimensions and filters (not a join, a window function, or multi-metric arithmetic), add a compile: block so the metric compiler can compute it deterministically (Tier A). This is what turns a defined metric from "the model writes SQL from the definition" into "the same number every run." Shape:

    yaml
    compile:
      measure: "AVG(Volume)"          # aggregate expression over columns of `table`
      table: sp500_daily
      time_column: Date               # optional; enables date filters
      grain: day                      # documentation of what one input row represents
      grain_key: [Date]               # columns that uniquely identify a row; the fan-out guard
                                      # halts if the table has more rows than distinct grain keys
      dimensions:                     # public name -> column/expression; whitelisted group-bys
        year: "extract(year from Date)"
      filters:                        # public name -> WHERE fragment with :params (bound, not interpolated)
        year: "extract(year from Date) = :year"
      denominator: "SUM(SUM(Volume)) OVER ()"   # set only for a ratio
      value_bounds: [0, 1]            # valid range for a ratio; the guard halts outside it (default [0,1])
      requires_columns: [Volume, Date]

    Set the index entry's compilable: true. If the metric needs a join, a window over rows, or more than one measure, do NOT add a compile: block; it stays on the generate-and-validate path, which is correct. Full spec and guards: helpers/data/metric_compiler.py.

Show full SKILL.md (250 more words)Show less

Why this matters: Registering metrics to the knowledge system enables:

  • Future analyses can reference the canonical definition
  • Other analysts can discover what metrics already exist
  • The system can warn when metrics are being redefined differently
  • Metric lineage and usage can be tracked

Examples

Example 1: Conversion Rate
markdown
## Metric: Checkout Conversion Rate

### Definition
**Plain English:** The percentage of users who visit the checkout page and complete a purchase.
**Formula:** (Users who completed purchase) / (Users who viewed checkout page) × 100

### Components
| Component | Definition | Source |
|-----------|-----------|--------|
| **Numerator** | Distinct users with a `purchase_completed` event within 24h of checkout view | events.event_type = 'purchase_completed' |
| **Denominator** | Distinct users with a `checkout_viewed` event | events.event_type = 'checkout_viewed' |
| **Unit of analysis** | Per user per day (deduplicated — a user counts once even with multiple checkout views) |

### Segmentation Dimensions
| Dimension | Values | Why |
|-----------|--------|-----|
| Device type | mobile, desktop, tablet | Mobile checkout has different UX friction |
| Payment method | credit card, PayPal, Apple Pay | Different failure rates by method |
| New vs returning | first purchase, repeat | Different conversion baselines |

### Data Source
- **Primary table:** analytics.events
- **Key columns:** user_id, event_type, event_timestamp, device_type, properties.payment_method
- **Refresh cadence:** Hourly
- **Latency:** ~2 hours from event to availability

### Guardrails
| Condition | Value | Action |
|-----------|-------|--------|
| **Healthy** | >3.5% | No action |
| **Watch** | 2.5-3.5% | Monitor; check if specific segment is dragging |
| **Investigate** | <2.5% | Root cause within 48h; check payment processor, page load times |
| **Alert** | <1.5% | Immediate escalation; likely a bug or outage |

### Known Limitations
- Does not include guest checkouts (only logged-in users)
- 24h attribution window means some slow purchasers are excluded
- Bot filtering depends on `is_bot` flag accuracy (~95% reliable)
Example 2: Revenue Metric
markdown
## Metric: Monthly Recurring Revenue (MRR)

### Definition
**Plain English:** The total monthly revenue from all active subscriptions, normalized to a monthly rate.
**Formula:** SUM(active_subscriptions × monthly_equivalent_price) as of the last day of the month

### Components
| Component | Definition | Source |
|-----------|-----------|--------|
| **Numerator** | Sum of monthly-equivalent price for all subscriptions with status='active' on the measurement date | subscriptions.price / (billing_interval_months) |
| **Denominator** | N/A (absolute metric, not a ratio) | — |
| **Unit of analysis** | Per month, measured on last calendar day |

### Segmentation Dimensions
| Dimension | Values | Why |
|-----------|--------|-----|
| Plan tier | free, starter, pro, enterprise | Different ARPU and churn dynamics |
| Billing interval | monthly, annual | Annual has lower churn but deferred revenue |
| Cohort month | signup month | Tracks retention and expansion by cohort |

### Guardrails
| Condition | Value | Action |
|-----------|-------|--------|
| **Healthy** | MoM growth >3% | On track for annual targets |
| **Watch** | MoM growth 0-3% | Dig into new vs expansion vs churn components |
| **Investigate** | MoM growth <0% | Net churn exceeding new business — root cause urgently |

### Known Limitations
- Annual subscriptions are divided by 12 for monthly equivalent; actual cash flow differs
- Does not include one-time fees, implementation fees, or overages
- Enterprise custom pricing may lag in system — verify against finance for board reporting
Example 3: Engagement Metric
markdown
## Metric: DAU/MAU Ratio (Stickiness)

### Definition
**Plain English:** The percentage of monthly users who use the product on any given day. Higher = more habitual usage.
**Formula:** (Average daily active users in the month) / (Monthly active users) × 100

### Components
| Component | Definition | Source |
|-----------|-----------|--------|
| **Numerator** | Average of daily distinct users with ≥1 meaningful action, averaged across all days in the month | AVG(daily_active_users) where action ∈ meaningful_actions |
| **Denominator** | Distinct users with ≥1 meaningful action in the entire month | COUNT(DISTINCT user_id) for the month |
| **Unit of analysis** | Per month |

### Segmentation Dimensions
| Dimension | Values | Why |
|-----------|--------|-----|
| User tenure | <30d, 30-90d, 90-365d, >365d | New users have different patterns |
| Plan tier | free, paid | Paid users should be stickier |
| Platform | web, iOS, Android | Mobile tends to be stickier |

### Guardrails
| Condition | Value | Action |
|-----------|-------|--------|
| **Healthy** | >25% | Strong daily habit (comparable to social apps) |
| **Watch** | 15-25% | Typical for B2B SaaS; look for improvement opportunities |
| **Investigate** | <15% | Weak daily habit; investigate activation and feature adoption |

### Known Limitations
- "Meaningful action" definition matters enormously — login alone should NOT count
- Weekday/weekend patterns affect daily averages; consider business-day-only variant for B2B
- Bots and automated API calls must be excluded or this metric is inflated
Example 4: Metric with Driver Decomposition
markdown
## Metric: Revenue

### Definition
**Plain English:** Total revenue from completed orders in a period.
**Formula:** COUNT(orders) × AVG(order_value)

### Components
| Component | Definition | Source |
|-----------|-----------|--------|
| **Numerator** | Sum of total_amount for orders with status='completed' | orders.total_amount WHERE status='completed' |
| **Denominator** | N/A (absolute metric) | — |
| **Unit of analysis** | Per month |

### Driver Decomposition
**Decomposition type:** Multiplicative

Revenue = Active Users × Orders per User × Average Order Value

| Driver | Formula | Relationship | Data Source |
|--------|---------|-------------|-------------|
| Active Users | COUNT(DISTINCT user_id) with ≥1 order in period | × | orders.user_id |
| Orders per User | COUNT(orders) / COUNT(DISTINCT user_id) | × | orders |
| Average Order Value | SUM(total_amount) / COUNT(orders) | × | orders.total_amount |

**Diagnostic rule:** If Revenue drops, check these drivers in order:
1. Active Users — did fewer users place orders? (acquisition or retention problem)
2. Orders per User — did users buy less frequently? (engagement or value problem)
3. Average Order Value — did users spend less per order? (pricing, mix shift, or promo problem)

**Verification:** Revenue = Active Users × Orders per User × AOV

Anti-Patterns

  1. Never define a metric without specifying the denominator — "conversion rate" is meaningless without context
  2. Never use a metric name that means different things to different teams — if marketing's "conversion" ≠ product's "conversion," create two separate specs
  3. Never set guardrails without historical data — arbitrary thresholds lead to false alarms or missed problems
  4. Never skip the "known limitations" section — every metric has caveats, and hiding them doesn't make them go away
  5. Never use a ratio without understanding what moves the numerator vs. denominator independently — a "improving" conversion rate could mean you lost low-intent traffic, not that you improved the product

Reference Queries for Common Metrics

Use these canonical SQL patterns when computing standard metrics. Replace {schema} with the active dataset schema (e.g., your_dataset).

Conversion Rate (Event-Based)
sql
-- Conversion rate: % of users who performed action B after action A
SELECT
    COUNT(DISTINCT CASE WHEN b.user_id IS NOT NULL THEN a.user_id END) * 1.0
    / NULLIF(COUNT(DISTINCT a.user_id), 0) AS conversion_rate
FROM {schema}.events a
LEFT JOIN {schema}.events b
    ON a.user_id = b.user_id
    AND b.event_type = '{{TARGET_EVENT}}'
    AND b.timestamp >= a.timestamp
    AND b.timestamp <= a.timestamp + INTERVAL '{{WINDOW}}'
WHERE a.event_type = '{{SOURCE_EVENT}}'
    AND a.timestamp BETWEEN '{{START_DATE}}' AND '{{END_DATE}}';
Revenue (Order-Based)
sql
-- Total revenue and order count for a period
SELECT
    COUNT(DISTINCT order_id) AS total_orders,
    SUM(total_amount) AS total_revenue,
    AVG(total_amount) AS avg_order_value,
    COUNT(DISTINCT user_id) AS purchasing_users
FROM {schema}.orders
WHERE status = 'completed'
    AND order_date BETWEEN '{{START_DATE}}' AND '{{END_DATE}}';
Active Users (DAU / WAU / MAU)
sql
-- Daily/Weekly/Monthly active users
SELECT
    DATE_TRUNC('{{GRANULARITY}}', timestamp) AS period,
    COUNT(DISTINCT user_id) AS active_users
FROM {schema}.events
WHERE event_type IN ({{QUALIFYING_EVENTS}})
    AND timestamp BETWEEN '{{START_DATE}}' AND '{{END_DATE}}'
GROUP BY 1
ORDER BY 1;
Retention Rate (Cohort-Based)
sql
-- Cohort retention: % of users active in period N after signup
WITH cohorts AS (
    SELECT
        user_id,
        DATE_TRUNC('{{GRANULARITY}}', signup_date) AS cohort
    FROM {schema}.users
),
activity AS (
    SELECT DISTINCT
        user_id,
        DATE_TRUNC('{{GRANULARITY}}', timestamp) AS active_period
    FROM {schema}.events
)
SELECT
    c.cohort,
    DATE_DIFF('{{GRANULARITY}}', c.cohort, a.active_period) AS period_number,
    COUNT(DISTINCT a.user_id) * 1.0
    / NULLIF(COUNT(DISTINCT c.user_id), 0) AS retention_rate
FROM cohorts c
LEFT JOIN activity a ON c.user_id = a.user_id
GROUP BY 1, 2
ORDER BY 1, 2;
NPS (Net Promoter Score)
sql
-- Net Promoter Score: % promoters - % detractors
SELECT
    COUNT(CASE WHEN score >= 9 THEN 1 END) * 100.0 / NULLIF(COUNT(*), 0)
    - COUNT(CASE WHEN score <= 6 THEN 1 END) * 100.0 / NULLIF(COUNT(*), 0) AS nps,
    COUNT(CASE WHEN score >= 9 THEN 1 END) AS promoters,
    COUNT(CASE WHEN score BETWEEN 7 AND 8 THEN 1 END) AS passives,
    COUNT(CASE WHEN score <= 6 THEN 1 END) AS detractors,
    COUNT(*) AS total_responses
FROM {schema}.nps_responses
WHERE submitted_at BETWEEN '{{START_DATE}}' AND '{{END_DATE}}';

Usage notes:

  • Always replace {schema} with the active dataset's schema prefix
  • Replace {{VARIABLE}} placeholders with actual values for the analysis
  • These are starting patterns — adapt WHERE clauses and JOINs for your specific data model
  • Always validate output with the Data Quality Check skill before drawing conclusions

© ai-analyst-lab, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in .claude/skills/metric-spec of ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 52c0744

Compare with similar skills

Metric Spec next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Metric Spec compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Metric Spec this skillai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst304—~4.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Swarmaglitch-rabin/swarma173—~4.4kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Prdjuanandresgs/claude-ctrl193—~2.9kAutomated safety check: PassNone
AI Product Strategy InterviewerPrepLabsAI/InterviewMentor112—~4.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Investigate MetricPostHog/posthog40k—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Weekly Creative Reportreal-simple-labs/parker-brain102—~4.7kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Swarma

    glitch-rabin/swarma

    Agent teams that run growth experiments and build their own playbook.

    173 GitHub stars~4.4k tokensUpdated 6 mo ago
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check: notes
  • Prd

    juanandresgs/claude-ctrl

    Write structured feature specifications with problem statements, user journeys, use cases, functional requirements, and success metrics.

    193 GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • AI Product Strategy Interviewer

    PrepLabsAI/InterviewMentor

    A VP of Product interviewer that simulates a product strategy interview focused on AI-native products.

    112 GitHub stars~4.5k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Investigate Metric

    PostHog/posthog

    Official

    Diagnose why a product metric changed (dropped, spiked, or plateaued) by orchestrating breakdowns, actors, paths, lifecycle, retention, and annotations queries.

    40k GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated today
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Weekly Creative Report

    real-simple-labs/parker-brain

    Build the brand's weekly creative report, a polished, shareable page an agency can send straight to the brand's CMO and team.

    102 GitHub stars~4.7k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed
  • North Star

    andreaskelm/pm-brain

    Define, sharpen, or audit a North Star metric and its input metrics tree, and decide which product metrics actually matter (leading vs.

    234 GitHub stars~2.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Product & Project ManagementAuto-check passed

More from ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst

All 43 skills in this repo
  • Always Compare

    ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst

    Never present a metric or number in isolation; anchor every number to a comparison (prior period, benchmark, or another segment) or state that none is available.

    304 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Archaeology

    ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst

    Retrieve proven SQL patterns, table cheatsheets, and join patterns from .knowledge/query-archaeology/ so past work gets reused.

    304 GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Archive Analysis

    ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst

    Save completed analyses to the knowledge system's analysis archive for future reference.

    304 GitHub stars~2.7k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Auth Preflight

    ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst

    Verify Google Workspace MCP authentication at the start of any session that needs Google APIs (Docs, Slides, Drive).

    304 GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Causal

    ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst

    Causal inference toolkit for when experiments are not possible: estimate treatment effects from observational data with assumption checks and mandatory caveats.

    304 GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Chart To Drive

    ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst

    Standardized workflow for uploading local chart PNGs to Google Drive and making them available for insertion into Google Docs and Slides.

    304 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Metric Spec

What does Metric Spec do?

Define any metric completely with a standardized template: calculation, denominator, time window, filters, interpretation. Metric Spec is an agent skill from ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst. Define any metric completely with a standardized template: calculation, denominator, time window, filters, interpretation.

When should I use Metric Spec?

Metric Spec fits situations like: define this metric; how should we measure X?; whats the right way to calculate Y?; document our metrics.

How do I install Metric Spec in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst --skill metric-spec -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (.claude/skills/metric-spec in ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst) into .claude/skills/metric-spec in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Metric Spec in Codex?

Run `npx skills add ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst --skill metric-spec -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (.claude/skills/metric-spec in ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst) into .agents/skills/metric-spec in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Metric Spec in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst --skill metric-spec -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/metric-spec, .gemini/skills/metric-spec, .github/skills/metric-spec and .opencode/skills/metric-spec in your project.

What does Metric Spec need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Metric Spec is instructions for the agent only.

Does Metric Spec access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Metric Spec safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Metric Spec use?

Metric Spec is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Metric Spec use?

About 4.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 20k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Metric Spec?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Metric Spec: Swarma (glitch-rabin/swarma, 173 stars), Prd (juanandresgs/claude-ctrl, 193 stars), AI Product Strategy Interviewer (PrepLabsAI/InterviewMentor, 112 stars) and Investigate Metric (PostHog/posthog, 40k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Metric Spec?

ai-analyst-lab (a GitHub organization) maintains it in ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst, which has 304 GitHub stars. The repository holds 43 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 30, 2026.

Source: ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.