Agent skill

Prediction Market Strategy

by agiprolabs in agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills

Venue- and market-type-agnostic strategy, sizing, and backtesting layer for binary prediction markets (Kalshi, Polymarket, ForecastEx).

MITAuto-check passedBusiness, Finance & HR

Install Prediction Market Strategy

skills CLI
$ npx skills add agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills --skill prediction-market-strategy -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills prediction-market-strategy --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/prediction-market-strategy .claude/skills/prediction-market-strategy && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
prediction-market-strategy
GitHub stars
410
Token cost
~3.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,672 words
Files
6 (incl. scripts, references)
Skills in repo
68
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Venue- and market-type-agnostic strategy, sizing, and backtesting layer for binary prediction markets (Kalshi, Polymarket, ForecastEx).

  • Works in 4 steps: Markets aggregate information. By… → Brier score is not edge. A 0.07 OOS… → The actual edge is behavioral. The… → …
  • Tasks that involve Trading and backtesting
  • SKILL.md covers Core Thesis, Strategy Catalog, Fee-Aware Sizing & Edge Gates and Backtesting Methodology, plus 3 more sections
  • Runs Python scripts from its folder

What it does

Prediction Market Strategy is an agent skill from agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills. Venue- and market-type-agnostic strategy, sizing, and backtesting layer for binary prediction markets (Kalshi, Polymarket, ForecastEx). Covers the durable edge thesis, fee-aware selection, fractional-Kelly sizing, and leak-free validation methodology.

Its SKILL.md is about 3.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 7 other files, including scripts and reference files (for example `references/backtesting-methodology.md`, `references/evidence-and-literature.md` and `references/sizing-and-edge-gates.md`).

It sits in Business, Finance & HR, covering Trading and backtesting and Essays and academic help. It works with Kalshi and Polymarket. The repository describes itself as: 68 trading, DeFi, and quantitative finance Agent Skills. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, and 30+ other tools. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Trading and backtesting
  • Tasks that involve Essays and academic help

Example prompts

  • “/prediction-market-strategy”

Requirements

  • Python 3

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Markets aggregate information. By decision time, the market price already reflects NWS model output, recent actuals, and whatever edge the…
  2. Brier score is not edge. A 0.07 OOS Brier score (better than climatology) is consistent with zero net edge if the market is priced at 0.07…
  3. The actual edge is behavioral. The longshot overpricing is not informational — it's behavioral (retail overconfidence in cheap contracts)…
  4. Forecast-driven YES entries work only at the margin. When your calibrated model says a bracket is materially underpriced (> θ net edge…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 981e1d7. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Ships 1 file in scripts/ (Python), which the agent can run.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Prediction Market Strategy loads about 3.4k tokens when it runs, and up to ~8.7k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 70 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,672 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~70
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~3.4k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~8.7k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); the scripts in this folder are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills at commit 981e1d7, republished under its MIT licence (© agiprolabs). 1,672 words, ~3,401 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/prediction-market-strategy/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 5 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
prediction-market-strategy
description
Venue- and market-type-agnostic strategy, sizing, and backtesting layer for binary prediction markets (Kalshi, Polymarket, ForecastEx). Covers the durable edge thesis, fee-aware selection, fractional-Kelly sizing, and leak-free validation methodology.

Prediction Market Strategy

Binary prediction markets price contracts as probabilities. This skill covers the strategy, sizing, and validation layer that applies across all venues and market types. API mechanics live in kalshi-api / polymarket-api; contract semantics and settlement live in kalshi-weather-markets / kalshi-crypto-index-markets. This is the strategy/sizing/validation layer that applies across all of them.

Core Thesis

Price = implied probability. A contract priced at $0.18 claims an 18% chance of resolving YES. Brackets in a series sum to just above $1.00 — the overround is the house margin (roughly 5–8% for weather markets on Kalshi).

Takers systematically lose; makers systematically win. Across 300k+ Kalshi contracts, the average pre-fee return is ≈ −20%, concentrated in takers (market-order users) and in longshot buyers. Makers (resting limit orders) earn positive returns. On Polymarket (588M+ trades), the top ~1% of accounts capture ~76.5% of profit, predominantly by resting limit orders. This is the foundational result.

Favorite–longshot bias is the durable mechanism. Cheap longshots are systematically overpriced: a $0.05 contract historically wins ~2%; sub-$0.10 contracts lose ~60% of stake to buyers. Favorites are fairly- to slightly-underpriced. The repeatable expression is selling the overpriced longshot tail, maker-side — resting NO bids on brackets priced ~$0.05–$0.20, diversified across many events to survive the rare hit. This is structural/behavioral, not a forecasting edge.

Forecast skill ≠ trading edge. A good weather or event forecast is largely redundant with the market price at decision time. Markets aggregate information efficiently enough that even a measurably better model produces near-zero net edge after fees unless it finds systematic mispricings (which are behavioral, not informational). The exception is official-label ML in lightly-traded markets — but that is bounded by fill-rate and capacity, not forecast accuracy.


Strategy Catalog

Strategies evaluated on Kalshi/Polymarket weather and event markets. "Real" means it survived correct settlement + fees in testing; others are flagged so you don't re-chase them.

StrategyVerdictMechanismKey Catch
Favorite–longshot fade, maker-side✅ DurableRest maker NO bids on ~$0.05–$0.20 brackets; behavioral tail overpricingRare longshot hit; measure fill-rate forward
Bracket YES-only (forecast-driven)✅ Works, fee-sensitiveBuy YES when calibrated model says bracket is materially underpricedRequires net_edge > θ gate; not raw win-rate
Market-making / liquidity provision⚠️ Structurally favored, infra-heavyTwo-sided quotes, capture spread + maker rebatesInventory risk, adverse selection, queue priority
Overround / dutching arbitrage⚠️ Real in theory, marginal in practiceSum-to->$1.00 across brackets; buy the underpriced residualLegs must fill simultaneously; Kalshi fills are sequential
Cross-venue arb (Kalshi ↔ Polymarket)❌ Blocked for mostSimultaneous position in equivalent contracts on two venuesTransfer time/cost destroys edge; geo-lock
Latency / news front-running (crypto/index hourlies)❌ HFT gameReact to public feeds before market repricesSub-100ms requirement; co-location; not retail
Near-certainty intraday repricing⚠️ Information/latency edgeMarkets slow to reprice near-certain contracts; capture the residualRequires real-time feed + automation
Copy-the-sharps❌ Survivorship illusionMirror apparent winning accountsNo reliable signal on public data; past winners regress

Bottom line: Two strategies survive correct accounting — the behavioral tail fade (maker-side) and the forecast-driven YES entry past the θ gate. Everything else is either HFT-scale, infrastructure-heavy, or dissolves under correct settlement + fees.


Fee-Aware Sizing & Edge Gates

All selection is on fee-adjusted net edge. Raw win-rate, return on notional, and % correct are not selection metrics.

Net Edge Formula
python
net_edge = p_model - ask - kalshi_fee(ask)
# Kalshi taker fee: ceil(0.07 * price * (1 - price) * 100) / 100 per contract
# Polymarket fee: 0 (no explicit taker fee; spread is the cost)

Select a trade only when net_edge > θ.

Expected-Edge Gate (θ)
Account sizeθ (Kalshi)Rationale
< $2,00015%Small account; fee drag is proportionally higher
≥ $2,00020%Standard gate covering fee + execution uncertainty
Polymarket~5%No explicit taker fee; spread and gas are the cost
Limit Price Posting

When placing maker orders, post your bid θ below model fair value:

limit_price_cents = floor((p_model - θ) × 100)

This ensures you only fill when the market moves in your favor by at least θ.

Fractional-Kelly Sizing
python
f_star = edge / (1 - entry_price)          # full Kelly fraction
stake = min(kelly_frac * f_star * bankroll, max_bet_fraction * bankroll)
contracts = stake / entry_price
# Defaults: kelly_frac=0.25 (quarter-Kelly), max_bet_fraction=0.015

The 1.5% bankroll cap is the binding constraint for most trades. Quarter-Kelly is aggressive enough to compound but mild enough to survive a bad run of correlated hits.

Exposure Caps (observed defaults)
CapValue
Per-contract bankroll limit1.5% of account
Single-city / single-event5% of account
Total open exposure20–25% of account
Max slippage as fraction of edge50%
Slippage Is Part of Selection

Walk the real NO/YES ladder to your full size to compute the depth-weighted entry price. If the walk pushes net_edge below θ — or slippage exceeds 50% of the edge — skip the trade. Phantom penny levels (≤2¢ asks that don't persist across snapshots and lack trade-print corroboration) must be excluded from the ladder before walking it.

Maker vs. Taker

Resting a limit order (maker) captures the spread instead of paying it, avoids (or reduces) the taker fee, and is the execution mode used by profitable accounts. The maker edge compounds the structural longshot fade. Market orders (taker) should be used only when the fill probability of a limit order is unacceptably low relative to the opportunity.

All sizing functions are in scripts/sizing.py. Run directly for a worked example.


Backtesting Methodology

Cardinal Rule: Settle on the Venue's Own Result

Never re-derive settlement from a third-party source. Use the venue's result field (Kalshi: result: "yes"/"no"; Polymarket: settlement transaction). Any derived truth that merely correlates with the venue's resolution can flip ~10% of outcomes and manufacture double-digit fake edges.

Method Checklist
  • Use venue result for settlement — never self-computed truth
  • Use close_time (or settlement date from the ticker), not date-of-crawl
  • Decision features cut at the city/event's own local decision time — no UTC mismatch
  • Entry prices from a decision-time snapshot, not near-close prices (which have already converged)
  • Walk the real ladder to your size; cap by top-of-book depth; deduplicate fills
  • Fee-deducted PnL only — never notional
  • Temporal holdout or expanding-window walk-forward only — no shuffled CV
  • Forward paper-trading before live capital: log model p, decision-time ask, and outcome; compare to the backtest Brier/accuracy
Show full SKILL.md (745 more words)Show less
Phantom-Edge Hall of Fame

Each of these produced a plausible-looking backtest that dissolved on closer inspection.

BugSymptomFix
Wrong settlement sourceRe-derived truth flipped ~10% of outcomes → fake +18% fade edgeUse venue result
Bracket off-by-one2°F inclusive brackets {floor,cap} treated as 1°F half-open → +1640% phantom backtestRead contract spec carefully
Phantom penny asks≤2¢ spoofed levels over-credited depth 23× (250k vs ~9k real fills)Count only depth that persists across snapshots AND is corroborated by trade prints
strike_type misreadInferring greater/less from ticker → 44% of shadow trades wrong directionRead strike_type from the API — never infer
Shadow/live conflationReplaying a log mixing shadow + live positions → phantom $14K/contract winsTrack PnL from live fills only (PositionStore); never replay in-memory
Flat/uncalibrated priorMisconfigured forecast center → $121.93 live loss in one dayAll decisions require a signed, calibrated prior
Stale running-extreme seedPoisoned persisted day_max made every low bracket look already-wonReset/rebuild running-extreme state on startup; never inherit
Clock-mismatch look-aheadFilling at an 18:00Z book snapshot with features cut at 14:00 LST leaked future info for non-Eastern citiesDecide and fill at each market's own local decision time
Forward Paper-Trading

Before committing live capital: run the full pipeline in shadow mode. Log model p, decision-time ask, and realized settlement. Compare the resulting Brier score and accuracy to the backtest figures. A gap > 2–3 Brier points sustained over 100+ samples indicates data leakage or a distribution shift that must be diagnosed before going live.


Why Forecast Skill ≠ Trading Edge

A good forecast is a necessary but not sufficient condition for a trading edge.

  1. Markets aggregate information. By decision time, the market price already reflects NWS model output, recent actuals, and whatever edge the sharp accounts have extracted. Your forecast must be measurably better than the market — not just accurate.

  2. Brier score is not edge. A 0.07 OOS Brier score (better than climatology) is consistent with zero net edge if the market is priced at 0.07 too.

  3. The actual edge is behavioral. The longshot overpricing is not informational — it's behavioral (retail overconfidence in cheap contracts). You capture it by being the liquidity provider on the tail, regardless of your forecast quality in those brackets.

  4. Forecast-driven YES entries work only at the margin. When your calibrated model says a bracket is materially underpriced (> θ net edge after fees), buying YES is valid. But this is a small subset of decision points, and the fill rate on thin tails constrains capacity.

The practical implication: build and validate your forecast for its own sake (it improves NO-bid targeting and limits exposure in adverse conditions), but do not assume forecast accuracy translates to trading returns without a separate, correct, fee-inclusive backtest.


Evidence & Literature

Foundational Results
  • Whelan, Makers and Takers: The Economics of the Kalshi Prediction Market (CEPR VoxEU; GWU/UCD working papers). 300k+ Kalshi contracts. Average pre-fee return ≈ −20%, concentrated in takers and longshot buyers. Makers earn positive returns. The foundational result: winners provide liquidity, losers take it.

  • Large-N Polymarket maker-taker study (588M+ trades, SSRN). Top ~1% of accounts capture ~76.5% of profit, predominantly by resting limit orders. Confirms the maker edge generalizes across venues.

  • Gupta, Who Profits in Binary Prediction Markets? Maker–Taker Dynamics, Behavioral Bias, and Sentiment Arbitrage on Kalshi (SSRN). Microstructure + behavioral-bias treatment of who wins and why.

Favorite–Longshot Bias
  • Classic betting-market literature (Thaler, Ziemba): longshots win less often than their price implies across most wagering markets.
  • Kalshi-specific: ~$0.05 contract historically wins ~2%; sub-$0.10 contracts lose ~60% of stake to buyers. Favorites are fairly- to slightly-underpriced.
  • The tradeable expression: NO-side maker bid on cheap brackets, diversified.
Internal Validation (bracket-model skill)
  • Fee-inclusive rotating-CV backtest on Kalshi weather markets: ~+1.7–3.3% taker ROI / +7.9–9% maker ROI on the longshot fade.
  • Realized hit-rate on brackets priced ~10%: ~3–7% → ~+6.7¢/contract gross; maker economics improve this further.
What the Evidence Does NOT Support
  • That a good weather or event forecast beats the market at decision time (redundant with the price — see Lessons above).
  • That retail-visible cross-venue or intra-venue arbitrage is repeatably profitable net of fees/geo/lockup.
  • That the edge concentrates where your forecast is most accurate (it tracks market thinness/retail-ness instead).

Verify specific figures against primary sources before sizing — magnitudes vary by sample window and venue.


Files

References
  • references/strategy-catalog.md — Full strategy verdicts with evidence and catches
  • references/sizing-and-edge-gates.md — Complete fee-aware sizing rules and gate derivations
  • references/backtesting-methodology.md — Settle-on-venue-result rule, phantom-edge hall of fame, method checklist
  • references/evidence-and-literature.md — Primary sources: Whelan, Polymarket 588M, Gupta, favorite-longshot magnitudes
Scripts
  • scripts/sizing.py — kalshi_fee, net_edge, theta_for_account, limit_price_cents, kelly_contracts, slippage_ok — pure stdlib, runs offline

© agiprolabs, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 5 other files (scripts, references) in skills/prediction-market-strategy of agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/backtesting-methodology.md
  • references/evidence-and-literature.md
  • references/sizing-and-edge-gates.md
  • references/strategy-catalog.md
  • scripts/sizing.py

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 981e1d7

Compare with similar skills

Prediction Market Strategy next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Prediction Market Strategy compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Prediction Market Strategy this skillagiprolabs/claude-trading-skills410—~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Digital Oraclekomako-workshop/digital-oracle878—~5.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Dr Manhattanguzus/dr-manhattan204—~2kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Polymarket Tennislivetennisapi/livetennisapi-mcp152—~3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Catalyst ConfirmationSuperior-Trade/superior-skills215—~667Automated safety check: PassMIT
Shipp Sports Datamoonpay/skills113—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Digital Oracle

    komako-workshop/digital-oracle

    Answer prediction questions using market trading data, not opinions.

    878 GitHub stars~5.9k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Dr Manhattan

    guzus/dr-manhattan

    Trade prediction markets (Polymarket, Kalshi, Opinion, Limitless, Predict.fun) using a unified CCXT-style API.

    204 GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Polymarket Tennis

    livetennisapi/livetennisapi-mcp

    Build observe-only Polymarket and Kalshi tennis market tooling on the polymarket-tennis Python package (MIT) plus the Live Tennis API free tier.

    152 GitHub stars~3k tokensUpdated 4 days ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Catalyst Confirmation

    Superior-Trade/superior-skills

    A skill your agent uses when a Polymarket prediction-market thesis rests on an external event — CPI, Fed, elections, court rulings, ETF decisions — and needs market confirmation before committing.

    215 GitHub stars~667 tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Shipp Sports Data

    moonpay/skills

    Real-time sports & events data for AI agents via Shipp. An agent skill from moonpay/skills.

    113 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Weekly Trading Plan

    zhu1090093659/dsh-trading

    制定每周交易计划:把本周复盘、统一台账持仓与资金、市场消息与公告、facts/ 与知识库、假设档案(hypothesistracking / 持仓 thesis / 宏观管道状态)合成一份下周计划,逐条过六道闸门并给出双向预案与失效条件。当用户要求「制定本周/下周交易计划」「周度作战计划」「把复盘+持仓+消息+知识库合成计划」,或周末例行生成计划时调用。

    238 GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated today
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed

More from agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills

All 68 skills in this repo
  • Backtrader

    agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills

    Event-driven backtesting with bar-by-bar execution, complex order types, multiple analyzers, and custom indicators

    410 GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Birdeye API

    agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills

    Solana token market data via Birdeye — prices, OHLCV, trades, token metadata, security checks, and trader activity

    410 GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Coingecko API

    agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills

    Broad crypto market data from CoinGecko covering 13,000+ tokens.

    410 GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Cointegration Analysis

    agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills

    Cointegration testing for pairs trading using Engle-Granger, Johansen, and rolling stability analysis

    410 GitHub stars~2.1k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Copy Trading

    agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills

    Wallet evaluation, monitoring, and copy-trade strategy design for Solana DEX trading

    410 GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Correlation Analysis

    agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills

    Cross-asset correlation analysis including rolling correlation, hierarchical clustering, tail dependence, and regime-dependent correlation

    410 GitHub stars~2.4k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Prediction Market Strategy

What does Prediction Market Strategy do?

Venue- and market-type-agnostic strategy, sizing, and backtesting layer for binary prediction markets (Kalshi, Polymarket, ForecastEx). Prediction Market Strategy is an agent skill from agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills. Venue- and market-type-agnostic strategy, sizing, and backtesting layer for binary prediction markets (Kalshi, Polymarket, ForecastEx).

When should I use Prediction Market Strategy?

Prediction Market Strategy fits situations like: tasks that involve Trading and backtesting; tasks that involve Essays and academic help.

How do I install Prediction Market Strategy in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills --skill prediction-market-strategy -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/prediction-market-strategy in agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills) into .claude/skills/prediction-market-strategy in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Prediction Market Strategy in Codex?

Run `npx skills add agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills --skill prediction-market-strategy -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/prediction-market-strategy in agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills) into .agents/skills/prediction-market-strategy in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Prediction Market Strategy in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills --skill prediction-market-strategy -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/prediction-market-strategy, .gemini/skills/prediction-market-strategy, .github/skills/prediction-market-strategy and .opencode/skills/prediction-market-strategy in your project.

What does Prediction Market Strategy need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Prediction Market Strategy needs Python for the scripts in its folder. Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Prediction Market Strategy access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Prediction Market Strategy safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. The check reads SKILL.md only: the scripts in the folder are not scanned, so read them before running anything.

What licence does Prediction Market Strategy use?

Prediction Market Strategy is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Prediction Market Strategy use?

About 3.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 14k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 5.3k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Prediction Market Strategy?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Prediction Market Strategy: Digital Oracle (komako-workshop/digital-oracle, 878 stars), Dr Manhattan (guzus/dr-manhattan, 204 stars), Polymarket Tennis (livetennisapi/livetennisapi-mcp, 152 stars) and Catalyst Confirmation (Superior-Trade/superior-skills, 215 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Prediction Market Strategy?

agiprolabs (a GitHub user) maintains it in agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills, which has 410 GitHub stars. The repository holds 68 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 3, 2026.

Source: agiprolabs/claude-trading-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.