Repository
hyhmrright/brooks-lint agent skills
- skills
- 7
- GitHub stars
- 1.5k
GitHub description: “AI code reviews grounded in 12 classic engineering books — decay risk diagnostics with book citations, severity labels, and 6 analysis modes including full-sweep auto-fix”
- Stars
- 1,513 (69 forks)
- Licence
- MIT
- Last push
- Oct 2026
- Created
- Mar 2026
- Homepage
- hyhmrright.github.io/brooks-lint
- architecture-review
- code-quality
- code-review
- tech-debt
- claude-code-plugin
- clean-architecture
- code-smells
- refactoring
- test-quality
- gemini-cli-extension
- codex-cli-plugin
- ai-code-review
- developer-tools
- code-health
- auto-fix
- claude-code
Install all skills
npx skills add hyhmrright/brooks-lintAdd --skill <name> for a single skill and -a <agent> to choose the agent (see the agent guides).
Skills in hyhmrright/brooks-lint, ranked
Ranked by score. Sort bymost stars,trending,newest,recently updated
| # | Skill | Repository | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.Release Cut a brooks-lint release: set the version in package.json, propagate it across all four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file (README badges, docs site metadata), write the CHANGELOG… | hyhmrright/ | 1.5k | — | ~1.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 5 days ago |
| 2 | Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. | hyhmrright/ | 1.5k | 1 repo | ~537 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 5 days ago |
| 3 | Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. | hyhmrright/ | 1.5k | 1 repo | ~406 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 5 days ago |
| 4 | Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a single pass, drawing on twelve classic… | hyhmrright/ | 1.5k | 1 repo | ~425 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 5 days ago |
| 5 | PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. | hyhmrright/ | 1.5k | 1 repo | ~430 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 5 days ago |
| 6 | Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. | hyhmrright/ | 1.5k | 1 repo | ~508 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 5 days ago |
| 7 | Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy… | hyhmrright/ | 1.5k | 1 repo | ~432 | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 5 days ago |
Questions, answered from the data.
What is the best skill in hyhmrright/brooks-lint?
Release from hyhmrright/brooks-lint ranks first of the 7 skills in hyhmrright/brooks-lint listed here, with the highest score: its repository has 1.5k GitHub stars, its SKILL.md loads about 1.2k tokens and it passes the automated safety check with no findings. Next come Brooks Audit and Brooks Debt.
Are the skills in hyhmrright/brooks-lint official?
None yet. All 7 skills in hyhmrright/brooks-lint listed here come from community repositories; a skill counts as official when the product's own GitHub organization publishes it.
How do I install all skills from hyhmrright/brooks-lint?
Run npx skills add hyhmrright/brooks-lint in your project: the open-source skills CLI installs the repository's skills into your coding agent's skills folder. To install a single skill, open its page here for the exact command.
How are these skills ranked?
By Skill Navigator score, which combines the GitHub stars of the skill's repository (shared across that repo's skills and discounted for large collections), how many other GitHub owners carry a copy of the skill, and automated SKILL.md quality checks, minus penalties for safety-check warnings and for each further skill from the same repository. Skills that fail the safety check are not listed.