GitHub organization
Agent skills by aipoch, page 12
Skills by aipoch, ranked
Ranked by score. Sort bymost stars,trending,newest,recently updated
| # | Skill | Repository | Stars | Used in | Tokens | Auto-check | Licence | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 529 | Analyze data with forest-plot-styler using a reproducible workflow, explicit validation, and structured outputs for review-ready interpretation. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 530 | 530.Histolab Digital pathology image processing toolkit for whole slide images (WSI). | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~5.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 531 | Retrieve the latest journal issue's table of contents and abstracts from URL/DOI/PMID/RSS/TOC sources, then generate Chinese key points locally (no external translation APIs) when a new issue needs… | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 532 | 532.Litbase Academic paper reading and research development system for biomedical researchers. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~1.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 533 | 533.Pathml A full-featured computational pathology toolkit for advanced WSI analysis, including multiplexed immunofluorescence (CODEX, Vectra), nuclei segmentation, tissue graph construction, and machine… | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 534 | Use pathology roi selector for data analysis workflows that need structured execution, explicit assumptions, and clear output boundaries. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~1.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 535 | Designs discovery, modeling, and validation workflows for prognostic biomarkers in biomedical and clinical research. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~5.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 536 | Advanced sample size and power calculations for complex study designs including survival analysis, clustered designs, and multiple comparisons. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 537 | 537.Shap Model interpretability and explainability using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~4.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 538 | Kaplan-Meier survival analysis tool for clinical and biological research. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 539 | Orchestrates a systematic review and meta-analysis workflow following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, from protocol development through multi-database search, screening, data extraction, and evidence… | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~1.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 540 | Statistical modeling and regression analysis for biomedical data. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~5.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 541 | Designs studies for predicting treatment response or resistance in biomedical and clinical research. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~6.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 542 | Generates complete FAERS pharmacovigilance study designs for multi-drug or class-level safety comparison inside one predefined SOC or AE family using active comparators, disproportionality analysis… | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~4.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 543 | Turns reviewer comments into structured, professional point-by-point responses linked to manuscript revisions, clarifications, rebuttals, and additional analyses. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 544 | Design a structured case-control study framework with explicit source population logic, control selection rules, matching decisions, exposure measurement planning, and bias-control checkpoints. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 545 | Calibrates manuscript claim strength so wording matches the actual evidence level, study design, and validation status. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 546 | Checks consistency across title, abstract, methods, results, figures, tables, and supplements to identify internal contradictions and version drift in biomedical manuscripts. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 547 | Explains why studies on the same biomedical topic reach different or opposing conclusions by auditing differences in population, endpoint definition, sample source, assay or platform, study design… | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 548 | Design evidence-discovery and validation workflows for drug repurposing studies by integrating disease mechanisms, drug-target logic, expression reversal, real-world evidence, and validation routes… | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 549 | Organizes the evidence and competitive landscape around a drug, target, or pathway by separating disease relevance, tractability, preclinical evidence, clinical evidence, modality fit, and crowding. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 550 | Ranks papers by evidence family, methodological quality tier, validation depth, and claim discipline; assigns anchor, context-setting, mechanistic support, or caution citation roles; prevents… | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 551 | Reads a paper figure by figure before re-integrating the full narrative, so the user can identify the core findings quickly and check whether each visual actually supports the authors' main claims. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 552 | Converts a biomedical study storyline into a graphical abstract and, when direct image capability is available, generates the graphical abstract directly; otherwise it falls back to prompts, Mermaid… | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 553 | Quickly judges whether a biomedical paper is worth deep reading by screening for question fit, design quality, sample adequacy, methodological novelty, and reproducibility value. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 554 | Builds background-gap-objective logic for biomedical manuscript introductions with clear study positioning and disciplined narrative structure. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 555 | Writes the full Introduction section of a biomedical manuscript based on an approved or sufficiently clear study logic, while preserving evidence boundaries and introduction discipline. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 556 | Converts existing manuscript content into LaTeX format aligned with a target journal, conference, or template while preserving manuscript meaning and structural integrity. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 557 | Improves medical English precision without changing the underlying facts, evidence boundaries, or intended scientific meaning. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 558 | Matches a user’s biomedical research direction, disease problem, study aim, data modality, and resource constraints to the most relevant recent algorithms and method papers. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 559 | Identifies real, evidence-audited, topic-specific research gaps in medical research by first retrieving and verifying literature from trusted sources, then mapping the current evidence landscape… | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.4k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 560 | Assesses whether a medical research topic is worth starting now by separating true novelty from pseudo-novelty, auditing real feasibility under stated resource constraints, and forcing a concrete… | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 561 | Checks whether manuscript references are accurately matched to claims, appropriately scoped, and not overextended, misquoted, or second-hand cited. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 562 | Checks biomedical manuscripts against reporting guidelines such as CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, and TRIPOD to identify missing or weak reporting elements before submission or revision. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 563 | Assesses whether study results are trustworthy by auditing design integrity, sample structure, statistical handling, bias control, validation chain, and claim discipline. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 564 | Organizes biomedical figures, analyses, and result blocks into a clear Results section structure with disciplined narrative ordering and evidence-aware presentation. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 565 | Writes the full Results section of a biomedical manuscript from a sufficiently clear result structure, figure inventory, or analysis summary while preserving evidence boundaries and result hierarchy. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.9k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 566 | Builds prioritized manuscript revision plans for major or minor revisions by separating comments that require experiments, analyses, clarification, restructuring, or wording changes. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 567 | Plans sample size estimation logic, power assumptions, feasibility checks, and fallback enrollment strategies for clinical and translational study protocols. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3.1k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 568 | Generates complete FAERS pharmacovigilance study designs for one-drug whole-profile safety mapping using signal detection, subgroup analysis, onset/seriousness characterization, and conservative… | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~4.2k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 569 | Structures research progress into focused and actionable slides for lab meetings or project reviews without inventing missing content. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.8k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 570 | Identifies the real underlying study design used in a medical or biomedical paper, distinguishes primary and secondary design components when papers are hybrid, and converts the paper into an… | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 571 | Converts biomedical table content into clear manuscript or presentation narrative by prioritizing meaningful patterns, contrasts, and interpretation boundaries rather than restating every number. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 572 | Optimizes manuscript titles and abstracts for information density, factual accuracy, and submission fit in biomedical research writing. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.5k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 573 | AI-driven patient-to-trial matching for precision medicine and oncology. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.6k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 574 | Designs a translational blueprint for moving a biomedical finding toward diagnosis, prognosis, treatment response prediction, patient stratification, or therapeutic development, with explicit… | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~3.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |
| 575 | Designs internal, external, temporal, and functional validation strategies at the protocol stage for medical research studies. | aipoch/ | 2k | — | ~2.7k | Automated safety check: Pass | MIT | 21 days ago |