Agent skill

Top Web Vulnerabilities

by zebbern in zebbern/claude-code-guide

This skill should be used when the user asks to "identify web application vulnerabilities", "explain common security flaws", "understand vulnerability categories", "learn about injection attacks"…

MITAuto-check passedSecurity

Install Top Web Vulnerabilities

skills CLI
$ npx skills add zebbern/claude-code-guide --skill top-web-vulnerabilities -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install zebbern/claude-code-guide top-web-vulnerabilities --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zebbern/claude-code-guide.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/top-web-vulnerabilities .claude/skills/top-web-vulnerabilities && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
top-web-vulnerabilities
GitHub stars
4.7k
Used in
8 other repos
Token cost
~6.1k tokens
SKILL.md length
2,585 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
46
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

This skill should be used when the user asks to "identify web application vulnerabilities", "explain common security flaws", "understand vulnerability categories", "learn about injection attacks"…

  • Works in 12 steps: Injection Vulnerabilities Assessment → Authentication and Session Security → Sensitive Data Exposure → …
  • Asks to identify web application vulnerabilities
  • SKILL.md covers Purpose, Prerequisites, Outputs and Deliverables and Core Workflow, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Top Web Vulnerabilities is an agent skill from zebbern/claude-code-guide. This skill should be used when the user asks to "identify web application vulnerabilities", "explain common security flaws", "understand vulnerability categories", "learn about injection attacks", "review access control weaknesses", "analyze API security issues", "assess security misconfigurations", "understand client-side vulnerabilities", "examine mobile and IoT security flaws", or "reference the OWASP-aligned vulnerability taxonomy". Use this skill to provide comprehensive vulnerability definitions, root…

Its SKILL.md is about 6.1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Security, covering Web application vulnerabilities. The repository describes itself as: Claude Code Guide - Setup, Commands, workflows, agents, skills & tips-n-tricks from beginner to power user! The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Asks to identify web application vulnerabilities
  • Explain common security flaws
  • Understand vulnerability categories
  • Learn about injection attacks

Example prompts

  • “identify web application vulnerabilities”
  • “explain common security flaws”
  • “understand vulnerability categories”
  • “/top-web-vulnerabilities”

Workflow steps

12 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Injection Vulnerabilities Assessment
  2. Authentication and Session Security
  3. Sensitive Data Exposure
  4. Security Misconfiguration
  5. XML-Related Vulnerabilities
  6. Broken Access Control
  7. Insecure Deserialization
  8. API Security Assessment
  9. Communication Security
  10. Client-Side Vulnerabilities
  11. Denial of Service Assessment
  12. Server-Side Request Forgery

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit e62775c. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Top Web Vulnerabilities loads about 6.1k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 155 tokens; SKILL.md has 2,585 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~155
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~6.1k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from zebbern/claude-code-guide at commit e62775c, republished under its MIT licence (© zebbern). 2,585 words, ~6,064 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/top-web-vulnerabilities/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
top-web-vulnerabilities
description
This skill should be used when the user asks to "identify web application vulnerabilities", "explain common security flaws", "understand vulnerability categories", "learn about injection attacks", "review access control weaknesses", "analyze API security issues", "assess security misconfigurations", "understand client-side vulnerabilities", "examine mobile and IoT security flaws", or "reference the OWASP-aligned vulnerability taxonomy". Use this skill to provide comprehensive vulnerability definitions, root causes, impacts, and mitigation strategies across all major web security categories.
metadata.author
zebbern
metadata.version
1.1

Top 100 Web Vulnerabilities Reference

Purpose

Provide a comprehensive, structured reference for the 100 most critical web application vulnerabilities organized by category. This skill enables systematic vulnerability identification, impact assessment, and remediation guidance across the full spectrum of web security threats. Content organized into 15 major vulnerability categories aligned with industry standards and real-world attack patterns.

Prerequisites

  • Basic understanding of web application architecture (client-server model, HTTP protocol)
  • Familiarity with common web technologies (HTML, JavaScript, SQL, XML, APIs)
  • Understanding of authentication and authorization concepts
  • Access to web application security testing tools (Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP)
  • Knowledge of secure coding principles recommended

Outputs and Deliverables

  • Complete vulnerability catalog with definitions, root causes, impacts, and mitigations
  • Category-based vulnerability groupings for systematic assessment
  • Quick reference for security testing and remediation
  • Foundation for vulnerability assessment checklists and security policies

Core Workflow

Phase 1: Injection Vulnerabilities Assessment

Evaluate injection attack vectors targeting data processing components:

SQL Injection (1)

  • Definition: Malicious SQL code inserted into input fields to manipulate database queries
  • Root Cause: Lack of input validation, improper use of parameterized queries
  • Impact: Unauthorized data access, data manipulation, database compromise
  • Mitigation: Use parameterized queries/prepared statements, input validation, least privilege database accounts

Cross-Site Scripting - XSS (2)

  • Definition: Injection of malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users
  • Root Cause: Insufficient output encoding, lack of input sanitization
  • Impact: Session hijacking, credential theft, website defacement
  • Mitigation: Output encoding, Content Security Policy (CSP), input sanitization

Command Injection (5, 11)

  • Definition: Execution of arbitrary system commands through vulnerable applications
  • Root Cause: Unsanitized user input passed to system shells
  • Impact: Full system compromise, data exfiltration, lateral movement
  • Mitigation: Avoid shell execution, whitelist valid commands, strict input validation

XML Injection (6), LDAP Injection (7), XPath Injection (8)

  • Definition: Manipulation of XML/LDAP/XPath queries through malicious input
  • Root Cause: Improper input handling in query construction
  • Impact: Data exposure, authentication bypass, information disclosure
  • Mitigation: Input validation, parameterized queries, escape special characters

Server-Side Template Injection - SSTI (13)

  • Definition: Injection of malicious code into template engines
  • Root Cause: User input embedded directly in template expressions
  • Impact: Remote code execution, server compromise
  • Mitigation: Sandbox template engines, avoid user input in templates, strict input validation
Phase 2: Authentication and Session Security

Assess authentication mechanism weaknesses:

Session Fixation (14)

  • Definition: Attacker sets victim's session ID before authentication
  • Root Cause: Session ID not regenerated after login
  • Impact: Session hijacking, unauthorized account access
  • Mitigation: Regenerate session ID on authentication, use secure session management

Brute Force Attack (15)

  • Definition: Systematic password guessing using automated tools
  • Root Cause: Lack of account lockout, rate limiting, or CAPTCHA
  • Impact: Unauthorized access, credential compromise
  • Mitigation: Account lockout policies, rate limiting, MFA, CAPTCHA

Session Hijacking (16)

  • Definition: Attacker steals or predicts valid session tokens
  • Root Cause: Weak session token generation, insecure transmission
  • Impact: Account takeover, unauthorized access
  • Mitigation: Secure random token generation, HTTPS, HttpOnly/Secure cookie flags

Credential Stuffing and Reuse (22)

  • Definition: Using leaked credentials to access accounts across services
  • Root Cause: Users reusing passwords, no breach detection
  • Impact: Mass account compromise, data breaches
  • Mitigation: MFA, breach password checks, unique credential requirements

Insecure "Remember Me" Functionality (85)

  • Definition: Weak persistent authentication token implementation
  • Root Cause: Predictable tokens, inadequate expiration controls
  • Impact: Unauthorized persistent access, session compromise
  • Mitigation: Strong token generation, proper expiration, secure storage

CAPTCHA Bypass (86)

  • Definition: Circumventing bot detection mechanisms
  • Root Cause: Weak CAPTCHA algorithms, improper validation
  • Impact: Automated attacks, credential stuffing, spam
  • Mitigation: reCAPTCHA v3, layered bot detection, rate limiting
Phase 3: Sensitive Data Exposure

Identify data protection failures:

IDOR - Insecure Direct Object References (23, 42)

  • Definition: Direct access to internal objects via user-supplied references
  • Root Cause: Missing authorization checks on object access
  • Impact: Unauthorized data access, privacy breaches
  • Mitigation: Access control validation, indirect reference maps, authorization checks

Data Leakage (24)

  • Definition: Inadvertent disclosure of sensitive information
  • Root Cause: Inadequate data protection, weak access controls
  • Impact: Privacy breaches, regulatory penalties, reputation damage
  • Mitigation: DLP solutions, encryption, access controls, security training

Unencrypted Data Storage (25)

  • Definition: Storing sensitive data without encryption
  • Root Cause: Failure to implement encryption at rest
  • Impact: Data breaches if storage compromised
  • Mitigation: Full-disk encryption, database encryption, secure key management

Information Disclosure (33)

  • Definition: Exposure of system details through error messages or responses
  • Root Cause: Verbose error handling, debug information in production
  • Impact: Reconnaissance for further attacks, credential exposure
  • Mitigation: Generic error messages, disable debug mode, secure logging
Phase 4: Security Misconfiguration

Assess configuration weaknesses:

Missing Security Headers (26)

  • Definition: Absence of protective HTTP headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS)
  • Root Cause: Inadequate server configuration
  • Impact: XSS attacks, clickjacking, protocol downgrade
  • Mitigation: Implement CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, HSTS

Default Passwords (28)

  • Definition: Unchanged default credentials on systems/applications
  • Root Cause: Failure to change vendor defaults
  • Impact: Unauthorized access, system compromise
  • Mitigation: Mandatory password changes, strong password policies

Directory Listing (29)

  • Definition: Web server exposes directory contents
  • Root Cause: Improper server configuration
  • Impact: Information disclosure, sensitive file exposure
  • Mitigation: Disable directory indexing, use default index files

Unprotected API Endpoints (30)

  • Definition: APIs lacking authentication or authorization
  • Root Cause: Missing security controls on API routes
  • Impact: Unauthorized data access, API abuse
  • Mitigation: OAuth/API keys, access controls, rate limiting

Open Ports and Services (31)

  • Definition: Unnecessary network services exposed
  • Root Cause: Failure to minimize attack surface
  • Impact: Exploitation of vulnerable services
  • Mitigation: Port scanning audits, firewall rules, service minimization

Misconfigured CORS (35)

  • Definition: Overly permissive Cross-Origin Resource Sharing policies
  • Root Cause: Wildcard origins, improper CORS configuration
  • Impact: Cross-site request attacks, data theft
  • Mitigation: Whitelist trusted origins, validate CORS headers

Unpatched Software (34)

  • Definition: Systems running outdated vulnerable software
  • Root Cause: Neglected patch management
  • Impact: Exploitation of known vulnerabilities
  • Mitigation: Patch management program, vulnerability scanning, automated updates

Evaluate XML processing security:

XXE - XML External Entity Injection (37)

  • Definition: Exploitation of XML parsers to access files or internal systems
  • Root Cause: External entity processing enabled
  • Impact: File disclosure, SSRF, denial of service
  • Mitigation: Disable external entities, use safe XML parsers

XEE - XML Entity Expansion (38)

  • Definition: Excessive entity expansion causing resource exhaustion
  • Root Cause: Unlimited entity expansion allowed
  • Impact: Denial of service, parser crashes
  • Mitigation: Limit entity expansion, configure parser restrictions

XML Bomb (Billion Laughs) (39)

  • Definition: Crafted XML with nested entities consuming resources
  • Root Cause: Recursive entity definitions
  • Impact: Memory exhaustion, denial of service
  • Mitigation: Entity expansion limits, input size restrictions

XML Denial of Service (65)

  • Definition: Specially crafted XML causing excessive processing
  • Root Cause: Complex document structures without limits
  • Impact: CPU/memory exhaustion, service unavailability
  • Mitigation: Schema validation, size limits, processing timeouts
Phase 6: Broken Access Control

Assess authorization enforcement:

Inadequate Authorization (40)

  • Definition: Failure to properly enforce access controls
  • Root Cause: Weak authorization policies, missing checks
  • Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive resources
  • Mitigation: RBAC, centralized IAM, regular access reviews

Privilege Escalation (41)

  • Definition: Gaining elevated access beyond intended permissions
  • Root Cause: Misconfigured permissions, system vulnerabilities
  • Impact: Full system compromise, data manipulation
  • Mitigation: Least privilege, regular patching, privilege monitoring

Forceful Browsing (43)

  • Definition: Direct URL manipulation to access restricted resources
  • Root Cause: Weak access controls, predictable URLs
  • Impact: Unauthorized file/directory access
  • Mitigation: Server-side access controls, unpredictable resource paths

Missing Function-Level Access Control (44)

  • Definition: Unprotected administrative or privileged functions
  • Root Cause: Authorization only at UI level
  • Impact: Unauthorized function execution
  • Mitigation: Server-side authorization for all functions, RBAC
Phase 7: Insecure Deserialization

Evaluate object serialization security:

Remote Code Execution via Deserialization (45)

  • Definition: Arbitrary code execution through malicious serialized objects
  • Root Cause: Untrusted data deserialized without validation
  • Impact: Complete system compromise, code execution
  • Mitigation: Avoid deserializing untrusted data, integrity checks, type validation

Data Tampering (46)

  • Definition: Unauthorized modification of serialized data
  • Root Cause: Missing integrity verification
  • Impact: Data corruption, privilege manipulation
  • Mitigation: Digital signatures, HMAC validation, encryption

Object Injection (47)

  • Definition: Malicious object instantiation during deserialization
  • Root Cause: Unsafe deserialization practices
  • Impact: Code execution, unauthorized access
  • Mitigation: Type restrictions, class whitelisting, secure libraries
Phase 8: API Security Assessment

Evaluate API-specific vulnerabilities:

Insecure API Endpoints (48)

  • Definition: APIs without proper security controls
  • Root Cause: Poor API design, missing authentication
  • Impact: Data breaches, unauthorized access
  • Mitigation: OAuth/JWT, HTTPS, input validation, rate limiting

API Key Exposure (49)

  • Definition: Leaked or exposed API credentials
  • Root Cause: Hardcoded keys, insecure storage
  • Impact: Unauthorized API access, abuse
  • Mitigation: Secure key storage, rotation, environment variables

Lack of Rate Limiting (50)

  • Definition: No controls on API request frequency
  • Root Cause: Missing throttling mechanisms
  • Impact: DoS, API abuse, resource exhaustion
  • Mitigation: Rate limits per user/IP, throttling, DDoS protection

Inadequate Input Validation (51)

  • Definition: APIs accepting unvalidated user input
  • Root Cause: Missing server-side validation
  • Impact: Injection attacks, data corruption
  • Mitigation: Strict validation, parameterized queries, WAF

API Abuse (75)

  • Definition: Exploiting API functionality for malicious purposes
  • Root Cause: Excessive trust in client input
  • Impact: Data theft, account takeover, service abuse
  • Mitigation: Strong authentication, behavior analysis, anomaly detection
Phase 9: Communication Security

Assess transport layer protections:

Man-in-the-Middle Attack (52)

  • Definition: Interception of communication between parties
  • Root Cause: Unencrypted channels, compromised networks
  • Impact: Data theft, session hijacking, impersonation
  • Mitigation: TLS/SSL, certificate pinning, mutual authentication

Insufficient Transport Layer Security (53)

  • Definition: Weak or outdated encryption for data in transit
  • Root Cause: Outdated protocols (SSLv2/3), weak ciphers
  • Impact: Traffic interception, credential theft
  • Mitigation: TLS 1.2+, strong cipher suites, HSTS

Insecure SSL/TLS Configuration (54)

  • Definition: Improperly configured encryption settings
  • Root Cause: Weak ciphers, missing forward secrecy
  • Impact: Traffic decryption, MITM attacks
  • Mitigation: Modern cipher suites, PFS, certificate validation

Insecure Communication Protocols (55)

  • Definition: Use of unencrypted protocols (HTTP, Telnet, FTP)
  • Root Cause: Legacy systems, security unawareness
  • Impact: Traffic sniffing, credential exposure
  • Mitigation: HTTPS, SSH, SFTP, VPN tunnels
Show full SKILL.md (1,023 more words)Show less
Phase 10: Client-Side Vulnerabilities

Evaluate browser-side security:

DOM-based XSS (56)

  • Definition: XSS through client-side JavaScript manipulation
  • Root Cause: Unsafe DOM manipulation with user input
  • Impact: Session theft, credential harvesting
  • Mitigation: Safe DOM APIs, CSP, input sanitization

Insecure Cross-Origin Communication (57)

  • Definition: Improper handling of cross-origin requests
  • Root Cause: Relaxed CORS/SOP policies
  • Impact: Data leakage, CSRF attacks
  • Mitigation: Strict CORS, CSRF tokens, origin validation

Browser Cache Poisoning (58)

  • Definition: Manipulation of cached content
  • Root Cause: Weak cache validation
  • Impact: Malicious content delivery
  • Mitigation: Cache-Control headers, HTTPS, integrity checks

Clickjacking (59, 71)

  • Definition: UI redress attack tricking users into clicking hidden elements
  • Root Cause: Missing frame protection
  • Impact: Unintended actions, credential theft
  • Mitigation: X-Frame-Options, CSP frame-ancestors, frame-busting

HTML5 Security Issues (60)

  • Definition: Vulnerabilities in HTML5 APIs (WebSockets, Storage, Geolocation)
  • Root Cause: Improper API usage, insufficient validation
  • Impact: Data leakage, XSS, privacy violations
  • Mitigation: Secure API usage, input validation, sandboxing
Phase 11: Denial of Service Assessment

Evaluate availability threats:

DDoS - Distributed Denial of Service (61)

  • Definition: Overwhelming systems with traffic from multiple sources
  • Root Cause: Botnets, amplification attacks
  • Impact: Service unavailability, revenue loss
  • Mitigation: DDoS protection services, rate limiting, CDN

Application Layer DoS (62)

  • Definition: Targeting application logic to exhaust resources
  • Root Cause: Inefficient code, resource-intensive operations
  • Impact: Application unavailability, degraded performance
  • Mitigation: Rate limiting, caching, WAF, code optimization

Resource Exhaustion (63)

  • Definition: Depleting CPU, memory, disk, or network resources
  • Root Cause: Inefficient resource management
  • Impact: System crashes, service degradation
  • Mitigation: Resource quotas, monitoring, load balancing

Slowloris Attack (64)

  • Definition: Keeping connections open with partial HTTP requests
  • Root Cause: No connection timeouts
  • Impact: Web server resource exhaustion
  • Mitigation: Connection timeouts, request limits, reverse proxy
Phase 12: Server-Side Request Forgery

Assess SSRF vulnerabilities:

SSRF - Server-Side Request Forgery (66)

  • Definition: Manipulating server to make requests to internal resources
  • Root Cause: Unvalidated user-controlled URLs
  • Impact: Internal network access, data theft, cloud metadata access
  • Mitigation: URL whitelisting, network segmentation, egress filtering

Blind SSRF (87)

  • Definition: SSRF without direct response visibility
  • Root Cause: Similar to SSRF, harder to detect
  • Impact: Data exfiltration, internal reconnaissance
  • Mitigation: Allowlists, WAF, network restrictions

Time-Based Blind SSRF (88)

  • Definition: Inferring SSRF success through response timing
  • Root Cause: Processing delays indicating request outcomes
  • Impact: Prolonged exploitation, detection evasion
  • Mitigation: Request timeouts, anomaly detection, timing monitoring
Phase 13: Additional Web Vulnerabilities
#VulnerabilityRoot CauseImpactMitigation
67HTTP Parameter PollutionInconsistent parsingInjection, ACL bypassStrict parsing, validation
68Insecure RedirectsUnvalidated targetsPhishing, malwareWhitelist destinations
69File Inclusion (LFI/RFI)Unvalidated pathsCode exec, disclosureWhitelist files, disable RFI
70Security Header BypassMisconfigured headersXSS, clickjackingProper headers, audits
72Inadequate Session TimeoutExcessive timeoutsSession hijackingIdle termination, timeouts
73Insufficient LoggingMissing infrastructureDetection gapsSIEM, alerting
74Business Logic FlawsInsecure designFraud, unauthorized opsThreat modeling, testing
Phase 14: Mobile and IoT Security
#VulnerabilityRoot CauseImpactMitigation
76Insecure Mobile StoragePlain text, weak cryptoData theftKeychain/Keystore, encrypt
77Insecure Mobile TransmissionHTTP, cert failuresTraffic interceptionTLS, cert pinning
78Insecure Mobile APIsMissing auth/validationData exposureOAuth/JWT, validation
79App Reverse EngineeringHardcoded credsCredential theftObfuscation, RASP
80IoT Management IssuesWeak auth, no TLSDevice takeoverStrong auth, TLS
81Weak IoT AuthenticationDefault passwordsUnauthorized accessUnique creds, MFA
82IoT VulnerabilitiesDesign flaws, old firmwareBotnet recruitmentUpdates, segmentation
83Smart Home AccessInsecure defaultsPrivacy invasionMFA, segmentation
84IoT Privacy IssuesExcessive collectionSurveillanceData minimization
Phase 15: Advanced and Zero-Day Threats
#VulnerabilityRoot CauseImpactMitigation
89MIME SniffingMissing headersXSS, spoofingX-Content-Type-Options
91CSP BypassWeak configXSS despite CSPStrict CSP, nonces
92Inconsistent ValidationDecentralized logicControl bypassCentralized validation
93Race ConditionsMissing syncPrivilege escalationProper locking
94-95Business Logic FlawsMissing validationFinancial fraudServer-side validation
96Account EnumerationDifferent responsesTargeted attacksUniform responses
98-99Unpatched VulnerabilitiesPatch delaysZero-day exploitationPatch management
100Zero-Day ExploitsUnknown vulnsUnmitigated attacksDefense in depth

Quick Reference

Vulnerability Categories Summary
CategoryVulnerability NumbersKey Controls
Injection1-13Parameterized queries, input validation, output encoding
Authentication14-23, 85-86MFA, session management, account lockout
Data Exposure24-27Encryption at rest/transit, access controls, DLP
Misconfiguration28-36Secure defaults, hardening, patching
XML37-39, 65Disable external entities, limit expansion
Access Control40-44RBAC, least privilege, authorization checks
Deserialization45-47Avoid untrusted data, integrity validation
API Security48-51, 75OAuth, rate limiting, input validation
Communication52-55TLS 1.2+, certificate validation, HTTPS
Client-Side56-60CSP, X-Frame-Options, safe DOM
DoS61-65Rate limiting, DDoS protection, resource limits
SSRF66, 87-88URL whitelisting, egress filtering
Mobile/IoT76-84Encryption, authentication, secure storage
Business Logic74, 92-97Threat modeling, logic testing
Zero-Day98-100Defense in depth, threat intelligence
Critical Security Headers
Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
X-Frame-Options: DENY
X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=()
OWASP Top 10 Mapping
OWASP 2021Related Vulnerabilities
A01: Broken Access Control40-44, 23, 74
A02: Cryptographic Failures24-25, 53-55
A03: Injection1-13, 37-39
A04: Insecure Design74, 92-97
A05: Security Misconfiguration26-36
A06: Vulnerable Components34, 98-100
A07: Auth Failures14-23, 85-86
A08: Data Integrity45-47
A09: Logging Failures73
A10: SSRF66, 87-88

Constraints and Limitations

  • Vulnerability definitions represent common patterns; specific implementations vary
  • Mitigations must be adapted to technology stack and architecture
  • New vulnerabilities emerge continuously; reference should be updated
  • Some vulnerabilities overlap across categories (e.g., IDOR appears in multiple contexts)
  • Effectiveness of mitigations depends on proper implementation
  • Automated scanners cannot detect all vulnerability types (especially business logic)

Troubleshooting

Common Assessment Challenges
ChallengeSolution
False positives in scanningManual verification, contextual analysis
Business logic flaws missedManual testing, threat modeling, abuse case analysis
Encrypted traffic analysisProxy configuration, certificate installation
WAF blocking testsRate adjustment, IP rotation, payload encoding
Session handling issuesCookie management, authentication state tracking
API discoverySwagger/OpenAPI enumeration, traffic analysis
Vulnerability Verification Techniques
Vulnerability TypeVerification Approach
InjectionPayload testing with encoded variants
XSSAlert boxes, cookie access, DOM inspection
CSRFCross-origin form submission testing
SSRFOut-of-band DNS/HTTP callbacks
XXEExternal entity with controlled server
Access ControlHorizontal/vertical privilege testing
AuthenticationCredential rotation, session analysis

References

  • OWASP Top 10 Web Application Security Risks
  • CWE/SANS Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Errors
  • OWASP Testing Guide
  • OWASP Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS)
  • NIST Cybersecurity Framework
  • Source: Kumar MS - Top 100 Web Vulnerabilities

© zebbern, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in skills/top-web-vulnerabilities of zebbern/claude-code-guide.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit e62775c

Used in 8 other repositories

We found 24 copies of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 8 other GitHub owners. This page covers the copy in zebbern/claude-code-guide, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Top Web Vulnerabilities next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Top Web Vulnerabilities compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Top Web Vulnerabilities this skillzebbern/claude-code-guide4.7k8 repos~6.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Security And Hardeningpenpot/penpot61k6 repos~4.7kAutomated safety check: NotesMPL-2.0
Security Auditoreigent-ai/eigent15k—~1.8kAutomated safety check: NotesApache-2.0
Security Reviewjewbetcha/opentrace11618 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Strix Code Vulnerability Scanusestrix/strix67k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Code Audit3stoneBrother/code-audit8931 repos~2.7kAutomated safety check: PassNone

Similar skills

  • Hardens code against vulnerabilities. An agent skill from penpot/penpot.

    61k GitHub starsUsed in 6 repos~4.7k tokens
    SecurityAuto-check: notes
  • Security Auditor

    eigent-ai/eigent

    Audits source code, dependencies and config files for vulnerabilities and hardcoded secrets, using two bundled Python scanners and an OWASP Top 10 checklist.

    15k GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated today
    SecurityAuto-check: notes
  • Security Review

    jewbetcha/opentrace

    A skill your agent uses when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features.

    116 GitHub starsUsed in 18 repos~3.1k tokens
    SecurityAuto-check: notes
  • Runs a Strix white-box security review that reads the source, then exploits what it finds in a sandbox so each reported issue has a proof-of-concept.

    67k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated today
    SecurityAuto-check passed
  • Code Audit

    3stoneBrother/code-audit

    Professional code security audit skill covering 55+ vulnerability types.

    893 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.7k tokens
    SecurityAuto-check passed
  • Triages findings from a Strix pentest by severity, fixes each root cause with a minimal change, and re-runs Strix to confirm the exploit no longer works.

    67k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated today
    SecurityAuto-check passed

More from zebbern/claude-code-guide

All 46 skills in this repo
  • Code To Diagram

    zebbern/claude-code-guide

    Analyze codebases and automatically generate architecture diagrams, flowcharts, and org charts.

    4.7k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~972 tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Localization Toolkit

    zebbern/claude-code-guide

    This skill should be used when setting up, auditing, or enforcing internationalization/localization in UI codebases (React/TS, i18next or similar, JSON locales), including installing/configuring the…

    4.7k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.3k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Audit Flow

    zebbern/claude-code-guide

    Interactive system flow tracing across CODE, API, AUTH, DATA, NETWORK layers with SQLite persistence and Mermaid export.

    4.7k GitHub stars~4.2k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Chart Image

    zebbern/claude-code-guide

    Generate publication-quality PNG chart images from data, supporting line, bar, area, candlestick, pie, and heatmap charts.

    4.7k GitHub stars~2.7k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Code Vuln Audit

    zebbern/claude-code-guide

    Scan code for security issues: dependency vulnerabilities (npm/pip audit), secret leaks (regex and entropy analysis), and OWASP anti-patterns like SQL injection, XSS, or command injection.

    4.7k GitHub stars~1.3k tokensUpdated today
    Auto-check passed
  • Linux Shell Scripting

    zebbern/claude-code-guide

    This skill should be used when the user asks to "create bash scripts", "automate Linux tasks", "monitor system resources", "backup files", "manage users", or "write production shell scripts".

    4.7k GitHub starsUsed in 9 repos~3.1k tokens
    Auto-check: notes

Categories

Questions about Top Web Vulnerabilities

What does Top Web Vulnerabilities do?

This skill should be used when the user asks to "identify web application vulnerabilities", "explain common security flaws", "understand vulnerability categories", "learn about injection attacks"…. Top Web Vulnerabilities is an agent skill from zebbern/claude-code-guide. This skill should be used when the user asks to "identify web application vulnerabilities", "explain common security flaws", "understand vulnerability categories", "learn about injection attacks", "review access control weaknesses", "analyze API security issues", "assess security misconfigurations", "understand client-side vulnerabilities", "examine mobile and IoT security flaws", or "reference the OWASP-aligned vulnerability taxonomy".

When should I use Top Web Vulnerabilities?

Top Web Vulnerabilities fits situations like: asks to identify web application vulnerabilities; explain common security flaws; understand vulnerability categories; learn about injection attacks.

How do I install Top Web Vulnerabilities in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add zebbern/claude-code-guide --skill top-web-vulnerabilities -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/top-web-vulnerabilities in zebbern/claude-code-guide) into .claude/skills/top-web-vulnerabilities in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Top Web Vulnerabilities in Codex?

Run `npx skills add zebbern/claude-code-guide --skill top-web-vulnerabilities -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/top-web-vulnerabilities in zebbern/claude-code-guide) into .agents/skills/top-web-vulnerabilities in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Top Web Vulnerabilities in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add zebbern/claude-code-guide --skill top-web-vulnerabilities -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/top-web-vulnerabilities, .gemini/skills/top-web-vulnerabilities, .github/skills/top-web-vulnerabilities and .opencode/skills/top-web-vulnerabilities in your project.

What does Top Web Vulnerabilities need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Top Web Vulnerabilities is instructions for the agent only.

Does Top Web Vulnerabilities access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Top Web Vulnerabilities safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Top Web Vulnerabilities use?

Top Web Vulnerabilities is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Top Web Vulnerabilities use?

About 6.1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 24k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Top Web Vulnerabilities?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Top Web Vulnerabilities: Security And Hardening (penpot/penpot, 61k stars), Security Auditor (eigent-ai/eigent, 15k stars), Security Review (jewbetcha/opentrace, 116 stars) and Strix Code Vulnerability Scan (usestrix/strix, 67k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Top Web Vulnerabilities?

zebbern (a GitHub user) maintains it in zebbern/claude-code-guide, which has 4,650 GitHub stars. The repository holds 46 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 8, 2026.

Source: zebbern/claude-code-guide on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.