Agent skill

Adversarial Deliberation

by yogsoth-ai in yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

Run structured attack/defense/adjudication over a claim, candidate, criterion set, or current winner.

Apache-2.0Auto-check passedTesting & QA

Install Adversarial Deliberation

skills CLI
$ npx skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill adversarial-deliberation -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine adversarial-deliberation --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/adversarial-deliberation .claude/skills/adversarial-deliberation && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
adversarial-deliberation
GitHub stars
505
Token cost
~1.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
382 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
12
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
Apache-2.0

At a glance

Run structured attack/defense/adjudication over a claim, candidate, criterion set, or current winner.

  • Works in 4 steps: You MUST load skill construct-critique… → You MUST load skill surface-assumptions… → You MUST load skill cross-examine to… → …
  • Testing & QA work in your project
  • SKILL.md covers Purpose, Input contract, Execution protocol and Output contract, plus 6 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Adversarial Deliberation is an agent skill from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine. Run structured attack/defense/adjudication over a claim, candidate, criterion set, or current winner. Perspective, target, escalation depth, loser-resurrection, and steelman/winner-stress modes are parameters; role execution is runtime-agnostic.

Its SKILL.md is about 1.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Testing & QA. The repository describes itself as: A 267-skill research graph in pure markdown — 51 research operations built from 216 single-purpose steps, composed in any order with explicit backtracking. One npx install, no… The licence is Apache-2.0.

When your agent uses it

  • Testing & QA work in your project

Example prompts

  • “/adversarial-deliberation”

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. You MUST load skill construct-critique to construct the strongest attack. You MUST load skill construct-defense to construct the strongest…
  2. You MUST load skill surface-assumptions to expose load-bearing assumptions. You MUST load skill construct-perspective-set to construct…
  3. You MUST load skill cross-examine to cross-examine each exchange. You MUST load skill assess-sensitivity to perturb load-bearing choices.
  4. You MUST load skill adjudicate-exchange to adjudicate against declared criteria. You MUST load skill calibrate-adversarial-confidence to…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit bdb3524. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are yaml).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Adversarial Deliberation loads about 1.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 68 tokens; SKILL.md has 382 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~68
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine at commit bdb3524, republished under its Apache-2.0 licence (© yogsoth-ai). 382 words, ~1,313 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/adversarial-deliberation/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
adversarial-deliberation
description
Run structured attack/defense/adjudication over a claim, candidate, criterion set, or current winner. Perspective, target, escalation depth, loser-resurrection, and steelman/winner-stress modes are parameters; role execution is runtime-agnostic.

adversarial-deliberation

Purpose

Run structured attack, defense, cross-examination, and adjudication over a claim, candidate, criterion set, or current winner.

Input contract

yaml
mode_contracts:
  critic-defender-judge: &deliberation_input
    required: [target, claim_or_candidate, criteria]
    optional: [perspectives, escalation_depth]
    constraints: [target_scope_and_criteria_must_be_explicit, evidence_provenance_required]
  courtroom: *deliberation_input
  winner-stress: *deliberation_input
  resurrection-advocacy: *deliberation_input
  criteria-interrogation: *deliberation_input
  stakeholder-objection: *deliberation_input
  counter-thesis: *deliberation_input

Execution protocol

Do not perform called SOP operations inline; each loaded SOP owns its contract and thresholds.

  1. You MUST load skill construct-critique to construct the strongest attack. You MUST load skill construct-defense to construct the strongest defensible case.
  2. You MUST load skill surface-assumptions to expose load-bearing assumptions. You MUST load skill construct-perspective-set to construct alternate perspectives.
  3. You MUST load skill cross-examine to cross-examine each exchange. You MUST load skill assess-sensitivity to perturb load-bearing choices.
  4. You MUST load skill adjudicate-exchange to adjudicate against declared criteria. You MUST load skill calibrate-adversarial-confidence to update calibrated confidence. If the task shifts from balanced exchange to direct attack-surface probing, consider structured-red-team. If an exposed assumption requires focused perturbation, consider assumption-stress-test. If the surviving claim needs a decisive falsification program, falsification-first-audit may be the better next tactic. Deviation: skip defense only when the target is explicitly exploratory; skip sensitivity only when no perturbable input is declared; otherwise retain all steps.

Output contract

yaml
mode_contracts:
  critic-defender-judge: &full_deliberation_output
    produces: [attack_record, defense_record, adjudication, confidence_trace]
    delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
  courtroom: *full_deliberation_output
  winner-stress:
    produces: [attack_record, adjudication, confidence_trace]
    delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
  resurrection-advocacy: &defense_deliberation_output
    produces: [defense_record, adjudication, confidence_trace]
    delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
  criteria-interrogation:
    produces: [attack_record, defense_record, adjudication]
    delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]
  stakeholder-objection: *full_deliberation_output
  counter-thesis: *defense_deliberation_output

Thresholds and quality gates

  • A-class debate calibration: declared universe = all rounds and claims; numerator = rounds with evidence-linked confidence updates; batch increment = one completed exchange; stopping reason = confidence stabilizes or unresolved disagreement is explicitly reported; source references = evidence IDs and round IDs; direction/threshold reason = escalate when new evidence changes ranking, terminate only when criteria are adjudicated or a non-resolvable uncertainty is recorded.
  • Every verdict must cite criteria and preserve dissent.
Show full SKILL.md (133 more words)Show less

Failure and counterexamples

Do not treat rhetorical fluency as evidence. Mark unresolved when attack and defense share an untested assumption or criteria are absent.

Provenance map

  • resolved: multiagent-debate
  • resolved: critic-defender-judge
  • resolved: courtroom-structured
  • resolved: adversarial-escalation
  • resolved: steel-manning
  • resolved: resurrection-advocacy
  • resolved: winner-stress-testing
  • resolved: adversarial-debate-protocol
  • resolved: assumption-excavation
  • resolved: multi-perspective-attack
  • intermediate: Pass5/adversarial-debate
  • intermediate: Pass5/steelman-validation

Preserved source criteria ledger

sourcesource linekindsource criterion
v4 architecturenode desctextualStructured attack/defense/adjudication; loser-resurrection and steelman/winner-stress are parameters.

Context checkpoint / Delta notes

Append claim, criteria, attack/defense records, dissent, confidence changes, and unresolved questions.

Mode branches

  • critic-defender-judge: attack, defense, adjudication.
  • courtroom: add cross-examination and explicit evidentiary ruling.
  • winner-stress: perturb the current winner and record failure triggers.
  • resurrection-advocacy: re-open a rejected candidate with a steelman.
  • criteria-interrogation: challenge the criteria before ranking.
  • stakeholder-objection: add perspective-specific objections.
  • counter-thesis: require a mechanism-distinct opposing thesis.

© yogsoth-ai, Apache-2.0. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in skills/adversarial-deliberation of yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit bdb3524

Compare with similar skills

Adversarial Deliberation next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Adversarial Deliberation compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Adversarial Deliberation this skillyogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine505—~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Web Application Testinganthropics/skills180k51 repos~966Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Diagnosing Bugsfossasia/eventyay-interpretation1.6k32 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
TDDpietheinstrengholt/rssmonster56430 repos~906Automated safety check: PassMIT
TDD WorkflowhellangleZ/burn-in-cceverywhere-ralph11211 repos~2.4kAutomated safety check: PassNone
TDDsanity-io/sanity6.4k20 repos~1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Web Application Testing

    anthropics/skills

    Official

    Tests local web applications with Python Playwright scripts, checking frontend behavior, capturing screenshots and reading browser console logs.

    180k GitHub starsUsed in 51 repos~966 tokens
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • Diagnosing Bugs

    fossasia/eventyay-interpretation

    Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. An agent skill from fossasia/eventyay-interpretation.

    1.6k GitHub starsUsed in 32 repos~2.1k tokens
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • TDD

    pietheinstrengholt/rssmonster

    Test-driven development. An agent skill from pietheinstrengholt/rssmonster.

    564 GitHub starsUsed in 30 repos~906 tokens
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • TDD Workflow

    hellangleZ/burn-in-cceverywhere-ralph

    A skill your agent uses when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code.

    112 GitHub starsUsed in 11 repos~2.4k tokens
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • TDD

    sanity-io/sanity

    Official

    Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. An agent skill from sanity-io/sanity.

    6.4k GitHub starsUsed in 20 repos~1k tokens
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed
  • Context Driven Development

    Ibrahim-3d/orchestrator-supaconductor

    A skill your agent uses when working with Conductor's context-driven development methodology, managing project context artifacts, or understanding the relationship between product.md, tech-stack.md…

    381 GitHub starsUsed in 9 repos~2.9k tokens
    Testing & QAAuto-check passed

More from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

All 12 skills in this repo
  • Evaluate Scenario Impact

    yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

    Evaluate a fixed candidate, research path, or portfolio under one explicit scenario using stable criteria and return impact, tradeoffs, and failure triggers.

    505 GitHub stars~465 tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Evaluate Scenario Robustness

    yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

    Aggregate a candidate, strategy, or portfolio across explicit scenarios under a declared robust-decision rule such as worst-case score, minimax regret, maximin, threshold survival, or pivot-trigger…

    505 GitHub stars~478 tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Evaluate Optionality

    yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

    Evaluate the value of staging, deferral, reversible commitment, and information-gathering options under uncertainty; return decision-relevant option value and trigger conditions.

    505 GitHub stars~424 tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Adjust Abstraction Scope

    yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

    Move a scientific object up/down in abstraction or narrow/broaden selected scope dimensions (population, mechanism, context, outcome, timeframe, system boundary) until the representation has useful…

    505 GitHub stars~584 tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Aggregate Ranking

    yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

    Aggregate criterion or comparison results into an ordered recommendation under an explicit rule.

    505 GitHub stars~561 tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Analogical Discovery

    yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine

    Abstract relational structure from source domains, map it to the target, validate depth, and instantiate transferable mechanisms.

    505 GitHub stars~633 tokensUpdated 10 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Adversarial Deliberation

What does Adversarial Deliberation do?

Run structured attack/defense/adjudication over a claim, candidate, criterion set, or current winner. Adversarial Deliberation is an agent skill from yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine. Run structured attack/defense/adjudication over a claim, candidate, criterion set, or current winner.

When should I use Adversarial Deliberation?

Adversarial Deliberation fits situations like: testing & QA work in your project.

How do I install Adversarial Deliberation in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill adversarial-deliberation -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/adversarial-deliberation in yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine) into .claude/skills/adversarial-deliberation in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Adversarial Deliberation in Codex?

Run `npx skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill adversarial-deliberation -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/adversarial-deliberation in yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine) into .agents/skills/adversarial-deliberation in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Adversarial Deliberation in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill adversarial-deliberation -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/adversarial-deliberation, .gemini/skills/adversarial-deliberation, .github/skills/adversarial-deliberation and .opencode/skills/adversarial-deliberation in your project.

What does Adversarial Deliberation need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Adversarial Deliberation is instructions for the agent only.

Does Adversarial Deliberation access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Adversarial Deliberation safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Adversarial Deliberation use?

Adversarial Deliberation is published under the Apache-2.0 licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Adversarial Deliberation use?

About 1.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 5.3k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Adversarial Deliberation?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Adversarial Deliberation: Web Application Testing (anthropics/skills, 180k stars), Diagnosing Bugs (fossasia/eventyay-interpretation, 1.6k stars), TDD (pietheinstrengholt/rssmonster, 564 stars) and TDD Workflow (hellangleZ/burn-in-cceverywhere-ralph, 112 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Adversarial Deliberation?

yogsoth-ai (a GitHub organization) maintains it in yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine, which has 505 GitHub stars. The repository holds 12 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 29, 2026.

Source: yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.