Qt C++ Code Review

Qt Code Review

A structured, read-only code review skill for Qt6 C++ code that combines deterministic linting with parallel agent-driven deep analysis across six focused domains.

When to use this skill

• When the user mentions review-related tasks: "review", "check", "audit", "look over", "code review", "sanity check"
• Suggest running this skill before committing code
• When the user asks to validate Qt6 C++ code quality

Arguments

• /qt-cpp-review — review using universal Qt6 C++ rules only
• /qt-cpp-review framework — also apply Qt framework/module development rules (BC, exports, d-pointers, qdoc, QML versioning)

Framework mode detection

If $ARGUMENTS contains "framework", enable framework mode.

If the argument is not passed, auto-detect by scanning the first few files in scope for framework signals. If two or more of the following are found, suggest to the user: "This looks like Qt framework/module code. Run /qt-cpp-review framework to also apply framework-specific rules (BC, exports, qdoc, QML versioning)?"

Framework signals (any two = likely framework code):

• QT_BEGIN_NAMESPACE / QT_END_NAMESPACE
• Q_CORE_EXPORT, Q_GUI_EXPORT, Q_WIDGETS_EXPORT, or any Q_*_EXPORT macro
• #include <QtModule/private/*_p.h> (private headers)
• Q_DECLARE_PRIVATE, Q_D(), Q_Q()
• qt_internal_add_module or qt_add_module in CMakeLists.txt
• sync.profile or .qmake.conf in the repository root

Do not auto-enable framework mode — only suggest it. Let the user confirm.

When framework mode is enabled:

1. Pass --framework to the linter (if supported)
2. Load references/qt-framework-checklist.md alongside the universal checklist
3. Include framework rules in each agent's mission context

Scope detection

Detect the user's intended scope from their language:

Diff/commit scope (narrow)

Triggered by language like: "this commit", "these changes", "the diff", "what I changed", "my changes", "staged changes", "outstanding changes", "before I commit"

Action: Run git diff (unstaged) and git diff --cached (staged) to obtain the changeset. If the user says "this commit", use git diff HEAD~1..HEAD. Review only the changed lines plus sufficient surrounding context (±50 lines) for understanding. Only report issues found in the changed lines — do not report issues in unchanged surrounding context.

Codebase scope (wide)

Triggered by language like: "review the codebase", "audit the project", "check the repository", "review src/", or when a specific file/directory path is given without commit language.

Action: Glob for *.cpp, *.h, *.hpp files in the specified scope. Review all matched files.

Execution order

The review proceeds in three phases. Never skip a phase.

Phase 1: Deterministic linting (scripts)

Run the unified Python linter against the target files. Requires Python 3.6+ (no external dependencies). If Python is not available, warn the user and skip to Phase 2.

python3 references/lint-scripts/qt_review_lint.py <files...>
# If python3 is not found, fall back to:
python references/lint-scripts/qt_review_lint.py <files...>

This single-pass scanner encodes all mechanically-checkable rules from the Qt review guidelines. It reads each file once and evaluates all rules per line. Output is deterministic and repeatable. The linter is authoritative — do not second-guess its output.

Collect all output before proceeding to Phase 2.

Rule categories (60+ checks):

• INC (Includes) — ordering, qglobal.h, qNN duplication
• DEP (Deprecated) — obsolete Qt/std class usage
• PAT (Patterns) — anti-patterns (min/max, std::optional, NRVO, COW detach, etc.)
• MDL (Model) — QAbstractItemModel contract (begin/end balance, dataChanged roles, flags, default: in data())
• ERR (Error Handling) — QFile::open, QJsonDocument::isNull, QNetworkReply::error, SSL, timeouts, arg() mismatch
• LCY (Lifecycle) — deleteLater, Q_ASSERT side effects, null guards, unbounded containers, qDeleteAll depth
• API (Naming) — get-prefix, enum hygiene, QList<QString>
• HDR/TMO/CND/VAL/TRN — headers, timeouts, conditionals, value classes, ternary operator

Phase 2: Agent-driven deep analysis (6 parallel agents)

Launch six focused review agents in parallel. Name each agent descriptively when launching (e.g. "Agent 1: Model Contracts") to provide progress visibility. Each agent has a tight scope and a specific checklist. Agents are READ-ONLY — they must never edit or write files.

Tool-agnostic agent contract: Each agent described below is a self-contained review mission. In Claude Code, launch them as general-purpose subagents. In other tools, implement each as whatever subprocess, prompt chain, or analysis pass the tool supports. The key requirement is that each agent:

• Has read access to all source files in scope
• Can search/grep the codebase to trace symbols
• Reports findings in the structured format below
• Applies confidence thresholds: >80 = confirmed finding, 60–79 = investigation target (max 10 total across all agents), <60 = suppress
• Does NOT duplicate findings from Phase 1 lint output (pass lint output as context to each agent)

See Agent missions below for the six agents.

Phase 3: Consolidation and reporting

Merge lint script output and all agent findings. Deduplicate (same file+line+issue = one finding). Apply confidence scoring. Format the final report using the output format below.

Agent missions

Launch all six agents in parallel. Pass each agent:

1. The list of files in scope
2. The Phase 1 lint output (so they skip already-flagged issues)
3. Their specific mission below

Each agent should read all files in scope, then focus on its assigned categories.

Agent 1: Model Contracts

Scope: QAbstractItemModel signal protocol, role system, index validity, proxy model correctness.

Check for:

• beginInsertRows/endInsertRows balance — every structural model change (add/remove/move) must use the correct begin/end pairs. layoutChanged is NOT a substitute for insert/remove.
• roleNames() returning roles that data() does not handle (missing switch cases, fall-through to default)
• dataChanged emitted with empty roles vector (forces full refresh instead of targeted update)
• beginRemoveRows called with first > last (edge case when container is empty — QAIM contract violation)
• flags() returning inappropriate flags (e.g. ItemIsEditable for non-editable items)
• setData() returning true without emitting dataChanged
• Proxy models accessing source model internals instead of going through data()/index() API
• Filter/proxy models using source-model indices to index into filtered containers (wrong index space)

References: references/qt-review-checklist.md § Model Contracts

Agent 2: Ownership & Lifecycle

Scope: Memory ownership, parent-child, resource cleanup, Rule of Five, RAII correctness.

Check for:

• Structs/classes with raw pointers where new is visible and no corresponding delete/deleteLater/smart-pointer wrapping exists (Rule of Five violation)
• Missing deleteLater() on QNetworkReply in finished handlers
• Q_ASSERT wrapping side-effectful expressions (compiled out in release builds — the side effect disappears)
• Q_ASSERT as the sole null guard (crashes in release)
• Polymorphic QObject subclasses missing Q_DISABLE_COPY_MOVE
• Polymorphic classes missing virtual destructor
• QTimer/QObject created with new but no parent and no other lifecycle management (scope, smart pointer, explicit delete)
• QObject::connect() called with potentially null sender/receiver outside a null guard (runtime warning)
• m_recentlyAccessed-style tracking lists that maintain pointers to objects that may be deleted elsewhere (dangling)
• Unbounded container growth (append without cap or trim)
• Destructor not cleaning up owned children recursively
• Abstract interfaces with no implementations beyond one class (YAGNI violation — codebase scope only)

References: references/qt-review-checklist.md § Ownership & Lifecycle, § Polymorphic Classes, § RAII Classes