Agent skill

Qualitative Research Guide

by wentorai in wentorai/research-plugins

Design and conduct qualitative research using grounded theory and case studies

MITAuto-check passedResearch & Science

Install Qualitative Research Guide

skills CLI
$ npx skills add wentorai/research-plugins --skill qualitative-research-guide -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install wentorai/research-plugins qualitative-research-guide --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wentorai/research-plugins.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/research/methodology/qualitative-research-guide .claude/skills/qualitative-research-guide && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
qualitative-research-guide
GitHub stars
298
Used in
1 other repo
Token cost
~2.2k tokens
SKILL.md length
321 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
405
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Design and conduct qualitative research using grounded theory and case studies

  • Research & Science work in your project
  • SKILL.md covers Major Qualitative Traditions, Interview Design, Coding and Analysis and Quality Criteria, plus 2 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Qualitative Research Guide is an agent skill from wentorai/research-plugins. Design and conduct qualitative research using grounded theory and case studies

Its SKILL.md is about 2.2k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Research & Science. The repository describes itself as: 350+ academic research skills, MCP configs, and plugins for Research-Claw and AI agents. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Research & Science work in your project

Example prompts

  • “/qualitative-research-guide”

Requirements

  • Python 3

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit bf44b3c. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are python and yaml).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Qualitative Research Guide loads about 2.2k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 26 tokens; SKILL.md has 321 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~26
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.2k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from wentorai/research-plugins at commit bf44b3c, republished under its MIT licence (© wentorai). 321 words, ~2,222 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/qualitative-research-guide/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
qualitative-research-guide
description
Design and conduct qualitative research using grounded theory and case studies

Qualitative Research Guide

A skill for designing and conducting rigorous qualitative research. Covers major qualitative traditions, data collection methods, coding and analysis techniques, and quality criteria for trustworthy qualitative findings.

Major Qualitative Traditions

Choosing an Approach
ApproachResearch Question TypeUnit of AnalysisSample SizeOutput
Grounded TheoryHow does a process work?Process/action20-60Theory
PhenomenologyWhat is the lived experience?Experience5-25Essence description
Case StudyHow/why does this case work?Bounded system1-5 casesCase description
EthnographyHow does this culture work?Cultural groupExtended fieldworkCultural portrait
NarrativeWhat is this person's story?Individual life1-5Narrative account
Thematic AnalysisWhat patterns exist in this data?Themes across dataVariableTheme map
Grounded Theory Process
Data Collection (interviews, observations)
       |
       v
Open Coding: Line-by-line coding of raw data
       |
       v
Axial Coding: Grouping codes into categories,
              identifying relationships
       |
       v
Selective Coding: Identifying the core category
                  that integrates all others
       |
       v
Theoretical Saturation: Stop when new data
                        no longer generates new codes
       |
       v
Substantive Theory: A grounded explanation of the phenomenon

Interview Design

Semi-Structured Interview Protocol
python
def create_interview_protocol(research_questions: list[str],
                                n_questions: int = 10) -> dict:
    """
    Generate a semi-structured interview protocol template.

    Args:
        research_questions: The study's research questions
        n_questions: Target number of interview questions
    """
    protocol = {
        'opening': {
            'rapport_building': [
                "Thank you for participating. Before we begin, could you "
                "tell me a little about yourself and your background?",
                "How did you first become involved in [topic]?"
            ],
            'time_estimate': '60-90 minutes'
        },
        'main_questions': [],
        'closing': {
            'wrap_up': [
                "Is there anything else you would like to share that we "
                "have not covered?",
                "Looking back, what stands out most to you about [topic]?",
                "Do you have any questions for me?"
            ]
        },
        'guidelines': [
            'Ask open-ended questions (how, what, tell me about)',
            'Avoid leading questions',
            'Use probes: "Can you give me an example?"',
            'Use follow-ups: "You mentioned X, tell me more about that"',
            'Allow silences -- do not rush to fill pauses',
            'Record field notes immediately after each interview'
        ]
    }

    # Generate question structure
    for i, rq in enumerate(research_questions):
        protocol['main_questions'].append({
            'research_question': rq,
            'interview_questions': [
                f'Grand tour question for RQ{i+1}',
                f'Follow-up probe for RQ{i+1}',
                f'Example-seeking probe for RQ{i+1}'
            ]
        })

    return protocol
Sampling Strategies
StrategyDescriptionWhen to Use
PurposiveSelect information-rich casesMost qualitative studies
Maximum variationSelect cases that differ on key dimensionsCapture range of experiences
SnowballParticipants refer othersHard-to-reach populations
TheoreticalDriven by emerging theoryGrounded theory studies
Critical caseSelect cases that are pivotalTesting theoretical propositions
ConvenienceReadily available participantsPilot studies only

Coding and Analysis

Thematic Analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006)
python
def thematic_analysis_workflow(transcripts: list[str]) -> dict:
    """
    Outline the six phases of reflexive thematic analysis.
    """
    phases = {
        'phase_1_familiarization': {
            'actions': [
                'Read and re-read all transcripts',
                'Note initial impressions in a research journal',
                'Transcribe recordings if not already done'
            ],
            'output': 'Familiarity with data, initial notes'
        },
        'phase_2_coding': {
            'actions': [
                'Code every data segment systematically',
                'Use open coding (inductive) or deductive codes from framework',
                'Code inclusively -- same segment can have multiple codes',
                'Maintain a codebook with definitions and examples'
            ],
            'output': 'Coded dataset, codebook'
        },
        'phase_3_generating_themes': {
            'actions': [
                'Collate codes into potential themes',
                'Create a thematic map showing relationships',
                'Distinguish between semantic and latent themes'
            ],
            'output': 'Candidate themes and sub-themes'
        },
        'phase_4_reviewing_themes': {
            'actions': [
                'Check themes against coded extracts',
                'Check themes against entire dataset',
                'Merge, split, or discard themes as needed'
            ],
            'output': 'Refined thematic map'
        },
        'phase_5_defining_themes': {
            'actions': [
                'Write a detailed description of each theme',
                'Identify the essence of each theme',
                'Name themes concisely and informatively'
            ],
            'output': 'Theme definitions and names'
        },
        'phase_6_writing_up': {
            'actions': [
                'Weave together analytic narrative and data extracts',
                'Select vivid, compelling quotes for each theme',
                'Connect themes to research questions and literature'
            ],
            'output': 'Final analysis write-up'
        }
    }

    return {
        'phases': phases,
        'n_transcripts': len(transcripts),
        'estimated_time': f'{len(transcripts) * 4}-{len(transcripts) * 8} hours'
    }
Codebook Structure
yaml
codebook:
  - code: "ADAPT"
    definition: "Participant describes adapting their behavior in response to a challenge"
    inclusion_criteria: "Explicit mention of changing approach or strategy"
    exclusion_criteria: "Passive acceptance without behavioral change"
    example_quote: "I started doing things differently after that..."
    theme: "Resilience Strategies"

  - code: "BARR"
    definition: "Participant identifies a barrier or obstacle"
    inclusion_criteria: "Something that prevented or hindered progress"
    exclusion_criteria: "General complaints without specific barrier"
    example_quote: "The main thing holding me back was..."
    theme: "Challenges"

Quality Criteria

Trustworthiness (Lincoln & Guba, 1985)
CriterionQuantitative EquivalentStrategies
CredibilityInternal validityMember checking, triangulation, prolonged engagement
TransferabilityExternal validityThick description, purposive sampling
DependabilityReliabilityAudit trail, peer debriefing
ConfirmabilityObjectivityReflexivity journal, negative case analysis
Inter-Coder Reliability

For team-based coding, calculate Cohen's kappa or percent agreement on a subset of data (at least 10-20% of the corpus). Aim for kappa > 0.70 before independent coding proceeds.

Software Tools

  • NVivo: Full-featured qualitative analysis (commercial)
  • ATLAS.ti: Comprehensive coding and analysis (commercial)
  • MAXQDA: Mixed-methods capable (commercial)
  • Dedoose: Cloud-based, collaborative (subscription)
  • Taguette: Free, open-source qualitative coding
  • QualCoder: Free, open-source Python-based tool

Reporting Standards

Follow the COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) checklist: report researcher positionality, sampling strategy, data collection methods, analysis approach, and provide sufficient quotations to evidence each theme.

© wentorai, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in skills/research/methodology/qualitative-research-guide of wentorai/research-plugins.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit bf44b3c

Used in 1 other repository

We found 1 copy of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in wentorai/research-plugins, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Qualitative Research Guide next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Qualitative Research Guide compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Qualitative Research Guide this skillwentorai/research-plugins2981 repos~2.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Hypothesis Generationspacering-net/codeg3.9k14 repos~3.6kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
GitHub Deep Researchbytedance/deer-flow84k4 repos~1.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Nature Paper CardYuan1z0825/nature-skills47k2 repos~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Content Research Writerweapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss1.9k25 repos~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Last30daysmvanhorn/last30days-skill64k—~7.9kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Hypothesis Generation

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured hypothesis formulation from observations. An agent skill from spacering-net/codeg.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 14 repos~3.6k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • GitHub Deep Research

    bytedance/deer-flow

    Researches a GitHub repository over four rounds using the GitHub API and web search, then writes a structured markdown report with timeline, metrics and Mermaid diagrams.

    84k GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~1.3k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Nature Paper Card

    Yuan1z0825/nature-skills

    Builds a structured deep-reading card for one scientific paper, covering methods, how experiments support claims, limitations and research ideas, with a script to prepare the source.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~2.1k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Content Research Writer

    weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss

    Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section.

    1.9k GitHub starsUsed in 25 repos~3.5k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Last30days

    mvanhorn/last30days-skill

    Research what people actually say about any topic in the last 30 days.

    64k GitHub stars~7.9k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes
  • Peer Review

    spacering-net/codeg

    Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation.

    3.9k GitHub starsUsed in 17 repos~5.9k tokens
    Research & ScienceAuto-check: notes

More from wentorai/research-plugins

All 405 skills in this repo
  • Abstract Writing Guide

    wentorai/research-plugins

    Craft structured research abstracts that maximize clarity and journal acceptance

    298 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.7k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Academic Citation Manager

    wentorai/research-plugins

    Manage academic citations across BibTeX, APA, MLA, and Chicago formats

    298 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.7k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Academic Paper Summarizer

    wentorai/research-plugins

    Summarize academic papers with structured extraction of key elements

    298 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.4k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Academic Study Methods

    wentorai/research-plugins

    Evidence-based study techniques for academic learning and retention

    298 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.8k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Academic Tone Guide

    wentorai/research-plugins

    Adjust writing tone and register for academic audiences and venues

    298 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.9k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Academic Translation Guide

    wentorai/research-plugins

    Academic translation, post-editing, and Chinglish correction guide

    298 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.6k tokens
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Qualitative Research Guide

What does Qualitative Research Guide do?

Design and conduct qualitative research using grounded theory and case studies. Qualitative Research Guide is an agent skill from wentorai/research-plugins.

When should I use Qualitative Research Guide?

Qualitative Research Guide fits situations like: research & Science work in your project.

How do I install Qualitative Research Guide in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add wentorai/research-plugins --skill qualitative-research-guide -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/research/methodology/qualitative-research-guide in wentorai/research-plugins) into .claude/skills/qualitative-research-guide in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Qualitative Research Guide in Codex?

Run `npx skills add wentorai/research-plugins --skill qualitative-research-guide -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/research/methodology/qualitative-research-guide in wentorai/research-plugins) into .agents/skills/qualitative-research-guide in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Qualitative Research Guide in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add wentorai/research-plugins --skill qualitative-research-guide -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/qualitative-research-guide, .gemini/skills/qualitative-research-guide, .github/skills/qualitative-research-guide and .opencode/skills/qualitative-research-guide in your project.

What does Qualitative Research Guide need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Qualitative Research Guide is instructions for the agent only. Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does Qualitative Research Guide access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Qualitative Research Guide safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Qualitative Research Guide use?

Qualitative Research Guide is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Qualitative Research Guide use?

About 2.2k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 8.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Qualitative Research Guide?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Qualitative Research Guide: Hypothesis Generation (spacering-net/codeg, 3.9k stars), GitHub Deep Research (bytedance/deer-flow, 84k stars), Nature Paper Card (Yuan1z0825/nature-skills, 47k stars) and Content Research Writer (weapp-tailwindcss/weapp-tailwindcss, 1.9k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Qualitative Research Guide?

wentorai (a GitHub user) maintains it in wentorai/research-plugins, which has 298 GitHub stars. The repository holds 405 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on June 19, 2026.

Source: wentorai/research-plugins on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.