Agent skill

Investigating Azure Incidents

by trilwu in trilwu/secskills

Investigate security incidents in Microsoft Azure (resource and subscription control plane) -- reconstruct attacker activity from the Azure Activity Log and resource/data-plane diagnostic logs…

MITAuto-check passedDevOps & Cloud

Install Investigating Azure Incidents

skills CLI
$ npx skills add trilwu/secskills --skill investigating-azure-incidents -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install trilwu/secskills investigating-azure-incidents --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/trilwu/secskills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/secskills-defense/skills/investigating-azure-incidents .claude/skills/investigating-azure-incidents && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
investigating-azure-incidents
GitHub stars
157
Token cost
~5.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
2,166 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
50
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Investigate security incidents in Microsoft Azure (resource and subscription control plane) -- reconstruct attacker activity from the Azure Activity Log and resource/data-plane diagnostic logs…

  • Responding to a suspected Azure resource compromise
  • SKILL.md covers When to Use, When NOT to Use, Log Sources and Where They Live and First-Hour Triage, plus 11 more sections
  • Calls az
  • Anomalous Azure Activity Log entries

What it does

Investigating Azure Incidents is an agent skill from trilwu/secskills. Investigate security incidents in Microsoft Azure (resource and subscription control plane) -- reconstruct attacker activity from the Azure Activity Log and resource/data-plane diagnostic logs, anchor the investigation on the identity that made the calls (a user, service principal, or managed identity), trace privilege escalation through role assignments, hunt managed-identity token abuse and VM run-command code execution, and detect storage or Key Vault data theft while correlating back to Entra sign-in logs…

Its SKILL.md is about 5.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in DevOps & Cloud, covering Secrets management, Red teaming and adversary simulation and Security operations. It works with Microsoft Azure and Microsoft Defender. The repository describes itself as: Transform Claude Code into your personal security engineer. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Responding to a suspected Azure resource compromise
  • Anomalous Azure Activity Log entries
  • A Microsoft Defender for Cloud alert
  • Managed-identity

Example prompts

  • “/investigating-azure-incidents”

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit ca53957. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • az

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use az, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Investigating Azure Incidents loads about 5.3k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 195 tokens; SKILL.md has 2,166 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~195
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~5.3k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from trilwu/secskills at commit ca53957, republished under its MIT licence (© trilwu). 2,166 words, ~5,349 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/investigating-azure-incidents/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
investigating-azure-incidents
description
Investigate security incidents in Microsoft Azure (resource and subscription control plane) -- reconstruct attacker activity from the Azure Activity Log and resource/data-plane diagnostic logs, anchor the investigation on the identity that made the calls (a user, service principal, or managed identity), trace privilege escalation through role assignments, hunt managed-identity token abuse and VM run-command code execution, and detect storage or Key Vault data theft while correlating back to Entra sign-in logs. Use when responding to a suspected Azure resource compromise, anomalous Azure Activity Log entries, a Microsoft Defender for Cloud alert, managed-identity or service-principal abuse, a crypto-mining VM, or storage-account exfiltration.
verified
2026-07-26

Investigating Azure Incidents

In Azure the control plane logs almost everything through Azure Resource Manager, so an incident is reconstructed from the Activity Log and the resource/data-plane logs, anchored on the identity that made the calls -- a user, a service principal, or a managed identity. The recurring trap is that identity lives in Entra while the damage lives in the subscription: you must correlate across both planes, because the Activity Log tells you what was done to a resource but the Entra sign-in log tells you who held the token and from where.

When to Use

  • Suspected Azure resource compromise -- a subscription, resource group, or VM behaving as though someone else controls it
  • Anomalous Azure Activity Log entries -- writes from unfamiliar callers, IPs, or regions, or an AccessDenied storm that looks like enumeration
  • A Microsoft Defender for Cloud alert -- crypto-mining, anomalous resource deployment, suspicious sign-in, or IMDS token theft
  • Managed-identity or service-principal abuse -- tokens minted for an app or VM being used from somewhere they should never appear
  • A crypto-mining VM -- an unexpected spend spike, GPU/large SKUs, or new deployments in regions you do not operate in
  • Storage-account or Key Vault exfiltration -- key regeneration, SAS-token minting, public-access changes, disk-snapshot sharing, or secret dumps

When NOT to Use

  • The compromise is Entra identity / M365 mailbox, not Azure resources (though you will often need both) -- use investigating-m365-entra
  • The incident is in AWS -- use investigating-aws-incidents
  • The incident is in Google Cloud -- use investigating-gcp-incidents
  • You are the attacker against the tenant, not the responder -- use attacking-entra-id
  • The pivot is specifically into AKS / Kubernetes -- use attacking-eks-gke-aks; for defending the cluster, defending-kubernetes
  • The general IR process and host-level response -- use responding-to-incidents

Log Sources and Where They Live

Establish what you have before you query. Missing logs are a finding, not a reason to skip the question.

SourceScopeRetention (default)What it holds
Azure Activity LogSubscription control plane90 days unless exportedEvery ARM write/action/delete: roleAssignments, runCommand, listKeys, deployments
Resource / diagnostic logsPer-resource data planeNone until enabledBlob reads, Key Vault SecretGet, NSG flow -- only if a diagnostic setting ships them to a workspace
Log Analytics workspaceWherever logs are shippedWorkspace-configuredAzureActivity, AzureDiagnostics, StorageBlobLogs, AZKVAuditLogs tables
Entra sign-in / audit logsTenant identity plane30 days (export for more)Who authenticated the SP/MI, from where, CA/MFA context, credential adds
Microsoft SentinelWhatever it ingestsPer-tableCorrelated hunting across all of the above, incidents, watchlists

The trap: the Activity Log is a control-plane record. Data-plane operations -- reading a blob, fetching a Key Vault secret, querying a Cosmos DB -- are not in the Activity Log at all. They exist only if a diagnostic setting was configured on that resource before the incident. Absence in the Activity Log is never evidence that data was untouched (see Rationalizations).

Confirm what is actually being logged before you trust a gap: az monitor diagnostic-settings subscription list (is the Activity Log exported beyond 90 days?) and az monitor diagnostic-settings list --resource <id> (does this storage account / vault ship data-plane logs anywhere?).

First-Hour Triage

Three moves, in order: scope the caller identity, pull its recent activity, preserve before you contain.

Scope the caller identity. Resolve the report -- a Defender alert, a billing spike, a suspicious deployment -- to the identity in the caller / identity fields of the Activity Log. That principal (a UPN, or a service principal / managed identity object ID) is the anchor for everything else.

bash
# Everything a specific caller did across the subscription control plane
az monitor activity-log list --caller attacker@contoso.com \
  --start-time 2026-07-01T00:00:00Z -o json

# Who holds what right now -- role assignments are the escalation surface
az role assignment list --all --include-inherited \
  --query "[?roleDefinitionName=='Owner' || roleDefinitionName=='User Access Administrator']" -o table

Pull recent activity from KQL if a Log Analytics workspace exists -- it is faster and richer than the CLI once you are past the first look:

kusto
AzureActivity
| where TimeGenerated > ago(7d)
| where Caller == "attacker@contoso.com"
| project TimeGenerated, OperationNameValue, ActivityStatusValue,
    CallerIpAddress, ResourceProviderValue, ResourceId, CorrelationId
| order by TimeGenerated asc

Preserve, then contain. An attacker who sees a role assignment revoked mid-operation will burn persistence you have not found. For anything but active, ongoing damage: snapshot disks, export the relevant logs, map persistence, then contain everything at once. Live mining or active exfil is the exception -- stop the damage and accept the trade.

Activity Log Deep-Dive (KQL)

The AzureActivity table is the authoritative control-plane record. Learn its fields:

  • OperationNameValue -- the ARM operation, e.g. Microsoft.Authorization/roleAssignments/write. This is what you hunt on.
  • Caller -- the UPN or object ID that made the call.
  • CallerIpAddress -- external IPs on a managed identity that should only call from inside Azure are the IMDS-theft signature (below).
  • ResourceProviderValue -- Microsoft.Compute, Microsoft.Storage, Microsoft.KeyVault, Microsoft.Authorization.
  • ActivityStatusValue -- a run of Failure (often AuthorizationFailed) is enumeration: the attacker mapping what the stolen principal can reach.
  • CorrelationId -- ties the sub-operations of one logical action together; pivot on it to expand a single suspicious event into its full sequence.
kusto
// Enumeration storm -- authorization failures by operation
AzureActivity
| where TimeGenerated > ago(7d)
| where ActivityStatusValue == "Failure"
| summarize n = count() by Caller, OperationNameValue, CallerIpAddress
| order by n desc

// Expand one event's full correlated sequence
AzureActivity
| where CorrelationId == "<correlation-id>"
| project TimeGenerated, OperationNameValue, ActivityStatusValue, ResourceId
| order by TimeGenerated asc

Canonical Attacker Operations to Hunt

Grep the timeline for these OperationNameValue patterns -- they are the shape of nearly every Azure intrusion.

  • Privilege escalation via role assignment -- Microsoft.Authorization/roleAssignments/write granting Owner, Contributor, or User Access Administrator (UAA can grant itself anything). Watch for custom-role creation (Microsoft.Authorization/roleDefinitions/write) that hides * actions behind an innocuous name.
  • Credential adds to a service principal or app -- done in Entra, not the Activity Log: a new secret or certificate on an app registration gives persistent, MFA-independent access. Correlate to the Entra audit log ("Add service principal credentials" / "Update application - Certificates and secrets management").
  • Managed-identity token abuse -- a token minted for a compromised VM's system-assigned identity used to call ARM. The MI's object ID appears as Caller from an unexpected CallerIpAddress.
  • Code execution on VMs -- Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/runCommand/action and Custom Script Extension (Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines/extensions/write installing CustomScript) run attacker code as SYSTEM/root without any RDP/SSH.
  • Compute/serverless persistence -- Microsoft.Web/sites (App Service / Functions), Automation Runbooks, and Logic Apps as scheduled backdoors that re-mint credentials or re-grant roles.
  • Resource-level RBAC backdoors -- a role assignment scoped to a single storage account or vault rather than the subscription, easy to miss in a top-level review.
kusto
AzureActivity
| where TimeGenerated > ago(14d)
| where OperationNameValue has_any (
    "roleAssignments/write", "roleDefinitions/write",
    "runCommand/action", "virtualMachines/extensions/write")
| project TimeGenerated, Caller, CallerIpAddress, OperationNameValue, ResourceId
| order by TimeGenerated asc

The CLI equivalent filters the same operations: az monitor activity-log list --start-time <t> --query "[?contains(operationName.value,'roleAssignments/write')]".

Identity-Plane Correlation

The Activity Log names the principal but not the human behind it. Map the service principal or managed identity object ID back to Entra to see the authentication context -- this is the cross-plane step, and it usually means opening investigating-m365-entra.

kusto
// Where did this service principal / managed identity actually sign in from?
AADServicePrincipalSignInLogs
| where ServicePrincipalId == "<sp-or-mi-object-id>"
| where TimeGenerated > ago(30d)
| project TimeGenerated, AppId, ServicePrincipalName, IPAddress,
    ResourceDisplayName, ResultType
| order by TimeGenerated asc

// For an interactive user: sign-ins around the abusive Activity Log calls
SigninLogs
| where UserPrincipalName == "attacker@contoso.com"
| project TimeGenerated, IPAddress, Location, AppDisplayName,
    ConditionalAccessStatus, AuthenticationRequirement, ResultType

Check conditional-access status and whether MFA was actually satisfied -- a service principal bypasses interactive CA entirely, which is exactly why attackers pivot to SP/MI credentials.

Managed-Identity and SSRF Credential Theft

The Azure analogue of AWS IMDS theft: an SSRF or foothold on a VM / App Service reads the Instance Metadata Service to lift the managed identity's token, then uses it elsewhere.

http://169.254.169.254/metadata/identity/oauth2/token?api-version=2018-02-01&resource=https://management.azure.com/

The signature is unmistakable: the managed identity's calls appear in AzureActivity from a CallerIpAddress that is not the resource's own outbound IP. The token is minted for that resource, so any call from an unrelated or external IP means the token left the box.

kusto
AzureActivity
| where TimeGenerated > ago(7d)
| where Caller == "<managed-identity-object-id>"
| summarize ops = count() by CallerIpAddress, OperationNameValue
| order by ops desc     // flag IPs that are not the VM's egress

Correlate the theft window with NSG flow logs (if enabled) for the outbound SSRF and the reuse source. On App Service the token endpoint uses IDENTITY_ENDPOINT with a header secret rather than 169.254.169.254 -- the same off-resource-use logic applies.

Defender for Cloud Alert Triage

Defender for Cloud is a starting pistol, not the investigation. Each alert maps to a hypothesis you confirm in the Activity Log and diagnostic logs.

Alert (representative)Implication
Crypto-mining / Digital currency mining behaviorA VM is talking to a mining pool -- a principal with deploy rights was compromised.
Anomalous resource deployment / unusual RunInstances-equivalentAttacker spinning up compute, often in an unused region.
Suspicious sign-in / access from a Tor or known-malicious IPThe stolen principal called from attacker infrastructure.
Managed identity / metadata credential exfiltrationThe IMDS theft above -- confirm off-resource token use.
Access from anomalous location on a storage account / Key VaultData-plane access from an unexpected geography.
bash
az security alert list -o table
az security alert show --location <loc> -n <alert-name> -g <rg>

An alert older than the 90-day Activity Log window still carries the principal and IPs -- pivot on those even after the raw events have aged out.

Data-Theft Detection

  • Storage account key regeneration -- Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts/listKeys/action and regenerateKey hand the attacker a full-access key that works outside RBAC and outside the Activity Log thereafter.
  • SAS-token minting -- listAccountSas / listServiceSas produces a time-boxed exfil URL that leaves no per-object control-plane trail.
  • Blob exfil -- visible only if data-plane diagnostic logging is on: StorageBlobLogs shows GetBlob volume by caller.
  • Public-access changes on containers -- setting a container or account to allow anonymous/blob public access is exfil staging.
  • Disk snapshot export / sharing -- Microsoft.Compute/snapshots/write then /beginGetAccess/action mints a SAS download URL for a full disk image.
  • Key Vault secret dumps -- Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/read (VaultGet) to enumerate, then data-plane SecretGet reads (in AzureDiagnostics / AZKVAuditLogs, only if logging was enabled).
kusto
// Control-plane data-theft indicators
AzureActivity
| where TimeGenerated > ago(14d)
| where OperationNameValue has_any (
    "storageAccounts/listKeys", "storageAccounts/regenerateKey",
    "listAccountSas", "listServiceSas",
    "snapshots/write", "snapshots/beginGetAccess")
| project TimeGenerated, Caller, CallerIpAddress, OperationNameValue, ResourceId

// Key Vault data-plane reads -- only present if diagnostics were on beforehand
AzureDiagnostics
| where ResourceProvider == "MICROSOFT.KEYVAULT"
| where OperationName in ("SecretGet", "KeyGet", "VaultGet")
| project TimeGenerated, CallerIPAddress, identity_claim_upn_s, OperationName, id_s
Show full SKILL.md (866 more words)Show less

Anti-Forensics the Attacker Attempts

A capable attacker tries to blind you. The key operations to hunt -- and their defeat:

  • Diagnostic-setting deletion -- Microsoft.Insights/diagnosticSettings/delete stops data-plane logs from reaching the workspace.
  • Activity Log export removal / narrowing -- deleting the subscription-level diagnostic setting that ships the Activity Log to a workspace or storage.
  • Resource deletion -- deleting the VM, snapshot, or storage account to destroy the artifact and its logs.

The defeat is the same shape as an AWS org trail: a tenant-level export to a central, locked destination the compromised principal cannot reach -- immutable-storage (WORM/legal-hold) blob export, or Sentinel ingestion in a segregated workspace with delete protection and resource locks. When export is immutable, the attacker's own diagnosticSettings/delete call is logged there before it takes effect, so cleanup becomes evidence rather than a gap. If you lack it, record the blind window as a scoping limitation.

kusto
AzureActivity
| where TimeGenerated > ago(14d)
| where OperationNameValue has_any (
    "diagnosticSettings/delete", "Microsoft.Insights/diagnosticSettings/write")
| project TimeGenerated, Caller, CallerIpAddress, OperationNameValue, ResourceId

Evidence Preservation

  • Snapshot the involved VMs' disks before touching them, and lock the snapshots so they cannot be deleted.

    bash
    az snapshot create -g <rg> -n IR-2026-042-osdisk \
      --source <os-disk-id> --tags case=IR-2026-042 legal-hold=true
    az lock create --name IR-2026-042-hold --lock-type CanNotDelete \
      --resource-group <rg> --resource-name IR-2026-042-osdisk \
      --resource-type Microsoft.Compute/snapshots
  • Export the relevant Activity Log window before it ages out of 90-day retention -- run the CLI/KQL and save the JSON to a preserved, locked store.

  • Apply resource locks / legal hold to evidence artifacts, and involve legal before collection if the incident may become a regulatory or litigation matter.

Containment

Do it all at once, after scoping. Partial containment alerts the attacker.

  • Disable or rotate the compromised principal. For a service principal / app, disable it and roll its credentials:

    bash
    az ad sp update --id <app-id> --set accountEnabled=false
    # remove attacker-added secrets/certs
    az ad app credential reset --id <app-id>

    For a user, disable the account and force a reset in Entra, then revoke sessions (below).

  • Revoke role assignments the attacker granted:

    bash
    az role assignment delete --assignee <object-id> \
      --role Owner --scope /subscriptions/<sub-id>
  • Revoke sessions / refresh tokens so existing tokens die (an Entra action -- Revoke-MgUserSignInSession / az ad user ...), because disabling alone leaves issued tokens valid up to an hour.

  • Isolate the VM by swapping its NSG to a deny-all outbound rule rather than deleting it, so disk and memory survive for analysis (az network nsg rule create ... --access Deny --direction Outbound --protocol '*').

  • Rotate storage keys and regenerate SAS -- renewing both keys invalidates every outstanding SAS and access key at once:

    bash
    az storage account keys renew --account-name <acct> -g <rg> --key primary
    az storage account keys renew --account-name <acct> -g <rg> --key secondary
  • Remove attacker persistence -- delete backdoor Functions/App Service, Automation runbooks, custom roles, and resource-scoped role assignments -- only after they are documented.

Reach for Azure CLI and KQL in Log Analytics / Sentinel for the investigation itself; MicroBurst and ROADtools for understanding the TTPs an attacker would run (and what each leaves behind); and Microsoft's Unified Audit correlation when the Azure story crosses into M365.

Rationalizations to Reject

  • "The Activity Log shows nothing, so no data was touched." The Activity Log is control plane only. Blob reads, secret fetches, and DB queries are data-plane operations that are invisible unless diagnostic logging was enabled beforehand. Absence there is not evidence of no exfil.
  • "Defender for Cloud didn't alert, so there's no compromise." Defender covers a subset of behaviors and depends on the right plan and coverage. Absence of a finding is not evidence of absence -- the Activity Log timeline is authoritative.
  • "We disabled the user, so the account is contained." Issued access tokens stay valid up to an hour, and any service-principal credentials or role assignments the attacker created survive the disable. Revoke sessions and audit every persistence mechanism.
  • "It's a managed identity, it can only be used from inside Azure." That is the design, not a guarantee. SSRF/IMDS theft lifts the token off the resource; the off-resource CallerIpAddress is precisely the signature to hunt.
  • "The service principal only has Contributor, not Owner." Contributor can run runCommand on VMs, read storage keys, and mint SAS tokens -- code execution and data theft without ever touching role assignments. Trace what the role can reach; do not assume.
  • "It's just crypto-mining, low priority." Mining means a principal with deploy rights was compromised -- the same access could exfiltrate data or escalate through roleAssignments/write. Mining is the visible symptom, not the scope.
  • "Logs only go back 90 days, so the compromise started within 90 days." That is the Activity Log's default retention, your visibility limit -- not the attacker's timeline. Record it as a scoping gap and check the workspace / immutable export for longer retention.

References

  • investigating-m365-entra -- the sibling identity-plane skill; open it to correlate the SP/MI back to Entra sign-ins and audit
  • investigating-aws-incidents -- the sibling cloud-IR skill when the incident is in AWS
  • attacking-entra-id -- the offensive side; how these tenant/subscription TTPs are executed
  • attacking-eks-gke-aks -- when the pivot is specifically into AKS / Kubernetes
  • responding-to-incidents -- the general IR process, evidence handling, and host-level response
  • reporting-security-findings -- structuring the incident narrative and deliverable
  • Azure CLI (az) -- drive the control plane and pull the Activity Log
  • KQL in Log Analytics / Microsoft Sentinel -- query AzureActivity, AzureDiagnostics, and sign-in tables
  • Microsoft Defender for Cloud -- alert source and finding-type reference
  • MicroBurst and ROADtools -- emulate and understand Azure/Entra attack TTPs and what each leaves in the logs

© trilwu, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in secskills-defense/skills/investigating-azure-incidents of trilwu/secskills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit ca53957

Compare with similar skills

Investigating Azure Incidents next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Investigating Azure Incidents compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Investigating Azure Incidents this skilltrilwu/secskills157—~5.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Defender For Cloud Hardeningvinayaklatthe/microsoft-security-skills175—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Deploying Cloud Deception With Decoy Resourcesmukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34k—~2.8kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Detecting Compromised Cloud Credentialsmukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34k—~3.9kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Implementing Azure Defender For Cloudmukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills34k—~3.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Azure Kusto Irqlmicrosoft/GitHub-Copilot-for-Azure255—~2.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Defender For Cloud Hardening

    vinayaklatthe/microsoft-security-skills

    Guidance for Microsoft Defender for Cloud — cloud security posture management (CSPM) and cloud workload protection (CWPP) across Azure, AWS, and GCP.

    175 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    SecurityAuto-check passed
  • Deploying Cloud Deception With Decoy Resources

    mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

    Deploy cloud-native deception across AWS, Azure, and GCP using decoy (honey) resources whose only purpose is to generate a high-fidelity alert the instant an attacker touches them: canary IAM access…

    34k GitHub stars~2.8k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Detecting Compromised Cloud Credentials

    mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

    Detect compromised cloud credentials across AWS, Azure, and GCP by analyzing anomalous API activity, impossible-travel patterns, and credential-stuffing indicators using GuardDuty, Microsoft…

    34k GitHub stars~3.9k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Implementing Azure Defender For Cloud

    mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

    Enable Microsoft Defender for Cloud (CSPM + CWPP) across VMs, containers, SQL, storage, and Key Vault, using Azure Policy for evaluation, Log Analytics for telemetry, Azure Arc for hybrid coverage…

    34k GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Azure Kusto Irql

    microsoft/GitHub-Copilot-for-Azure

    Official

    Compose IRQL (Incident Response Query Language) queries for Kusto cybersecurity investigations.

    255 GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated yesterday
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Sentinel

    vinayaklatthe/microsoft-security-skills

    Guidance for designing and operating Microsoft Sentinel, the cloud-native SIEM and SOAR delivered through the Defender portal.

    175 GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated 3 mo ago
    SecurityAuto-check passed

More from trilwu/secskills

All 50 skills in this repo
  • Audit source code for exploitable vulnerabilities using threat-model-driven review, taint tracing, invariant checking, and variant analysis.

    157 GitHub stars~3.2k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Perform OSINT, subdomain enumeration, port scanning, web reconnaissance, email harvesting, and cloud asset discovery for initial access.

    157 GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check: notes
  • Securing AI Systems

    trilwu/secskills

    Assess and harden LLM applications and agentic systems against prompt injection, tool misuse, excessive agency, memory poisoning, RAG data leakage, and model supply-chain risk, mapped to the OWASP…

    157 GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Analyzing Binaries

    trilwu/secskills

    Reverse engineer compiled binaries, firmware, and mobile app packages using triage, static disassembly, decompilation, and dynamic instrumentation.

    157 GitHub stars~2.9k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Analyzing Go Binaries

    trilwu/secskills

    Reverse engineer Go binaries by recovering function names and types from pclntab and moduledata using GoReSym, redress, and IDA/Ghidra Go plugins, and by reading Go's non-standard calling…

    157 GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Analyzing iOS Binaries

    trilwu/secskills

    Analyze iOS applications at the binary level — decrypting FairPlay-protected IPAs with frida-ios-dump or bagbak, inspecting Mach-O load commands, recovering Objective-C headers with class-dump, and…

    157 GitHub stars~2k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Investigating Azure Incidents

What does Investigating Azure Incidents do?

Investigate security incidents in Microsoft Azure (resource and subscription control plane) -- reconstruct attacker activity from the Azure Activity Log and resource/data-plane diagnostic logs…. Investigating Azure Incidents is an agent skill from trilwu/secskills.

When should I use Investigating Azure Incidents?

Investigating Azure Incidents fits situations like: responding to a suspected Azure resource compromise; anomalous Azure Activity Log entries; A Microsoft Defender for Cloud alert; managed-identity.

How do I install Investigating Azure Incidents in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add trilwu/secskills --skill investigating-azure-incidents -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (secskills-defense/skills/investigating-azure-incidents in trilwu/secskills) into .claude/skills/investigating-azure-incidents in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Investigating Azure Incidents in Codex?

Run `npx skills add trilwu/secskills --skill investigating-azure-incidents -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (secskills-defense/skills/investigating-azure-incidents in trilwu/secskills) into .agents/skills/investigating-azure-incidents in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Investigating Azure Incidents in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add trilwu/secskills --skill investigating-azure-incidents -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/investigating-azure-incidents, .gemini/skills/investigating-azure-incidents, .github/skills/investigating-azure-incidents and .opencode/skills/investigating-azure-incidents in your project.

What does Investigating Azure Incidents need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Investigating Azure Incidents needs the command-line tools its instructions call (az).

Does Investigating Azure Incidents access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Investigating Azure Incidents safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Investigating Azure Incidents use?

Investigating Azure Incidents is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Investigating Azure Incidents use?

About 5.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 21k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Investigating Azure Incidents?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Investigating Azure Incidents: Defender For Cloud Hardening (vinayaklatthe/microsoft-security-skills, 175 stars), Deploying Cloud Deception With Decoy Resources (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills, 34k stars), Detecting Compromised Cloud Credentials (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills, 34k stars) and Implementing Azure Defender For Cloud (mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills, 34k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Investigating Azure Incidents?

trilwu (a GitHub user) maintains it in trilwu/secskills, which has 157 GitHub stars. The repository holds 50 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 4, 2026.

Source: trilwu/secskills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.