Agent skill

Performance Cycle

by techwolf-ai in techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit

Evidence gathering for performance review cycles. An agent skill from techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit.

MITAuto-check passedBusiness, Finance & HR

Install Performance Cycle

skills CLI
$ npx skills add techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit --skill performance-cycle -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit performance-cycle --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/plugins/people-management/skills/performance-cycle .claude/skills/performance-cycle && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
performance-cycle
GitHub stars
132
Token cost
~2.1k tokens
SKILL.md length
961 words
Files
6 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
29
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Evidence gathering for performance review cycles. An agent skill from techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit.

  • Works in 10 steps: Identify Scope → Load Context → Gather Evidence Along Each Dimension → …
  • Tasks that involve Performance reviews
  • SKILL.md covers When to Use, Context: Performance Framework, Instructions and Important Notes
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Performance Cycle is an agent skill from techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit. Evidence gathering for performance review cycles. Gathers goal completion evidence, peer feedback, development progress, scope changes, and values alignment, organised along the org's performance framework dimensions, with organizational values as the 'how' lens. Surfaces evidence gaps. Never suggests ratings, only organises evidence for the manager's judgment.

Its SKILL.md is about 2.1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 6 other files, including reference files (for example `references/management-framework.md`, `references/operating-principles.md` and `references/output-template.md`).

It sits in Business, Finance & HR, covering Performance reviews. The repository describes itself as: Open-source Claude Code skills and Codex skills for AI-first work. Audit, re-engineer, and bootstrap projects with AI-first design principles. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Performance reviews

Example prompts

  • “s performance framework dimensions, with organizational values as the”
  • “/performance-cycle”

Workflow steps

10 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Identify Scope
  2. Load Context
  3. Gather Evidence Along Each Dimension
  4. Gather Values Evidence
  5. Check Peer Recognition
  6. Identify Evidence Gaps
  7. Produce the Evidence Summary
  8. For Batch Mode (All Reports)
  9. Present
  10. Sub-Agent Review

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 2ee7841. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Performance Cycle loads about 2.1k tokens when it runs, and up to ~4.9k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 95 tokens; SKILL.md has 961 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~95
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~2.1k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~4.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit at commit 2ee7841, republished under its MIT licence (© techwolf-ai). 961 words, ~2,115 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/performance-cycle/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 5 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
performance-cycle
description
Evidence gathering for performance review cycles. Gathers goal completion evidence, peer feedback, development progress, scope changes, and values alignment, organised along the org's performance framework dimensions, with organizational values as the 'how' lens. Surfaces evidence gaps. Never suggests ratings, only organises evidence for the manager's judgment.

Performance Cycle Assistant

Principle: "You are responsible." This skill gathers and organises evidence. Rating decisions and development assessments are the manager's alone.

Helps managers prepare evidence-based assessments for performance review cycles. The org's performance framework dimensions measure what was achieved and how the person developed. Organizational values measure how they showed up while doing it.

When to Use

  • During full review cycles (per the org's review cadence)
  • During lighter check-ins between full reviews
  • When the manager says "help me prep [name]'s review", "gather evidence for [name]'s performance"
  • Can be run for one team member or all reports in batch

Context: Performance Framework

Load the org's performance framework from manager-context/performance-framework.md (created during /setup). This defines:

  • Framework dimensions and sub-dimensions
  • Rating scale
  • Promotion readiness labels (if tracked)
  • Review cadence

If manager-context/performance-framework.md doesn't exist, ask the manager to run /setup first.

Instructions

If any MCP connector is unavailable, follow the connector unavailability protocol in references/operating-principles.md.

1. Identify Scope

Determine who to prepare for:

  • Single team member: "prep [name]'s review"
  • Whole team: "prep all reviews" (runs sequentially for each report)

Determine the review period:

  • Default: last 6 months (for bi-annual review) or last 3 months (for check-in)
  • Can be customised: "since [date]"
2. Load Context

For the target team member, read from manager-context/team/[name].md:

  • Their goals (locations in Notion/Drive)
  • Their development areas from last review
  • Their role and level (from Job Architecture)
  • Their projects and responsibilities

Also load:

  • manager-context/performance-framework.md: org-specific framework dimensions and rating descriptors (falls back to references/performance-framework.md defaults)
  • manager-context/management-framework.md: org-specific management dimensions (falls back to references/management-framework.md defaults)
  • references/values-guide.md: values definitions and signal guidance
  • manager-context/values.md: the organization's specific values
3. Gather Evidence Along Each Dimension

For each dimension and sub-dimension in the org's performance framework (from manager-context/performance-framework.md), gather evidence from connected sources.

For each sub-dimension:

  • Notion: Pull goals, project pages, status updates, metrics relevant to this dimension
  • Slack: Search for messages showing activity, feedback, recognition, or friction related to this dimension
  • Google Drive: Look for deliverables, reports, documents tied to this dimension
  • Calendar: Check for activities that signal growth or scope changes (new meetings, new stakeholders)
  • Compile: what evidence was found, with links

Common evidence patterns by dimension type:

  • Results/delivery dimensions: goal completion, shipped work, quality feedback, business outcomes
  • Growth/development dimensions: learning activities, new skills applied, scope expansion, behavioural changes
  • Collaboration/leadership dimensions: cross-team activity, mentoring, influence in discussions

For dimensions that are hardest to assess digitally (e.g., behavioural growth, leadership presence), explicitly flag that the manager's direct observations carry more weight.

4. Gather Values Evidence

Values are the "how": how this person delivered their results and showed up for the team. Search for evidence across the organization's values (from manager-context/values.md). See references/values-guide.md for guidance on finding value signals.

For each value defined in manager-context/values.md, search for evidence using the signal guidance stored there. Common evidence sources by value type:

Collaboration / teamwork values:

  • Slack: cross-team collaboration, helping unblock others, participating in team decisions
  • DMs (with manager): conversations about team dynamics, commitment to group decisions

Ambition / ownership values:

  • Slack/Notion: volunteering for stretch work, proposing ideas, driving outcomes
  • Evidence of taking things to completion without being pushed

Innovation / resourcefulness values:

  • Slack: creative problem-solving, finding workarounds, learning from obstacles
  • Evidence of unblocking themselves or the team under constraints

Transparency / communication values:

  • Slack: sharing context proactively, raising issues early, giving and receiving feedback
  • DMs (with manager): being open about challenges, asking for help

Care / wellbeing values:

  • Slack: celebrating others, recognising teammates, showing empathy
  • Calendar: sustainable work patterns or concerning overwork patterns

For each value, compile evidence as observations (not judgments):

  • Strong signal: Multiple visible examples
  • Some signal: 1-2 examples
  • Gap: No evidence found (note: absence of evidence ≠ absence of the behaviour)
Show full SKILL.md (359 more words)Show less
5. Check Peer Recognition

Search Slack for recognition this person received during the review period:

  • Direct shoutouts from teammates
  • Recognition in team channels
  • Reactions on their messages (high-reaction messages = valued contributions)
6. Identify Evidence Gaps

For each dimension, assess evidence strength:

  • Strong evidence: Multiple sources corroborate
  • Some evidence: 1-2 data points
  • Gap: No evidence found, manager needs to gather this manually
7. Produce the Evidence Summary

Read references/output-template.md for the full output template structure (individual and batch mode).

8. For Batch Mode (All Reports)

If preparing for the whole team, produce individual evidence summaries for each team member plus a team-level comparison view. See the batch mode template in references/output-template.md.

9. Present
Here's the evidence I gathered for [name]'s review. I've flagged gaps where you'll want to add your own observations.

Remember: this is evidence gathering only. Rating decisions and promotion assessments are yours to make based on the full picture, including things I can't see.
10. Sub-Agent Review

Spawn a sub-agent to review the evidence summary with fresh eyes. The reviewer should:

  • Check for recency bias: is most evidence from the last few weeks, or spread across the review period?
  • Check for dimension imbalance: are some dimensions well-evidenced while others are thin? Flag under-covered areas.
  • Check for interpretive language: flag any phrasing that crosses from evidence ("shipped X on time") into interpretation ("demonstrated strong execution").
  • Verify evidence gaps are honestly flagged, not papered over with weak data.
  • Check that values evidence is presented as "examples I found", not "the full picture."

Incorporate the reviewer's feedback before presenting the final summary to the manager.

Important Notes

Read references/operating-principles.md for shared operating principles (data scope, DM flagging, signals vs diagnoses, connector unavailability).

Additional notes specific to this skill:

  • NEVER suggest a rating. Not even hints. The manager decides ratings. Period.
  • NEVER compare team members to each other. Evidence is per-person. Calibration is the manager's job.
  • Evidence, not interpretation. "Shipped feature X on time" is evidence. "Demonstrated strong execution" is interpretation. Stick to evidence.
  • Flag gaps honestly. "I found no evidence for behavioral growth" is more useful than padding with weak data.
  • Recency bias warning. Note if most evidence is from the last month vs. spread across the review period.
  • Values evidence is hardest to gather digitally. Many values are lived in person, not in Slack. The manager's direct observations are more authoritative.
  • This supplements, not replaces. The manager has 6 months of direct observation.

© techwolf-ai, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 5 other files (references) in plugins/people-management/skills/performance-cycle of techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/management-framework.md
  • references/operating-principles.md
  • references/output-template.md
  • references/performance-framework.md
  • references/values-guide.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 2ee7841

Compare with similar skills

Performance Cycle next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Performance Cycle compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Performance Cycle this skilltechwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit132—~2.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Wp Performance Reviewelvismdev/claude-wordpress-skills2351 repos~4.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Align Humanagentscope-ai/OpenJudge868—~3.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Performance ReportAffitor/affiliate-skills6991 repos~2.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Run Mv Hoi Reconstructionnvidia-isaac/video_to_data850—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Company Analysiszhu1090093659/dsh-trading231—~4.2kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Wp Performance Review

    elvismdev/claude-wordpress-skills

    WordPress performance code review and optimization analysis.

    235 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.5k tokens
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Align Human

    agentscope-ai/OpenJudge

    A skill your agent uses when the user has a judge/grader and human-labeled data, and wants to measure how well the judge agrees with humans, detect systematic biases, determine whether automatic…

    868 GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated 27 days ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Performance Report

    Affitor/affiliate-skills

    Generate affiliate performance reports with KPIs and recommendations.

    699 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.5k tokens
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Run Mv Hoi Reconstruction

    nvidia-isaac/video_to_data

    Run and validate the repository-local multi-view camera calibration and human-object reconstruction pipelines.

    850 GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated today
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Company Analysis

    zhu1090093659/dsh-trading

    A skill your agent uses when the user wants to analyze a listed company, stock, business, or investment target; challenge or revise an existing company report; compare A/H or primary-listing/ADR…

    231 GitHub stars~4.2k tokensUpdated 5 days ago
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed
  • Windbg Diagnostic Method

    microsoft/win-dev-skills

    Official

    Use with every WinDbg plugin investigation to apply evidence-first reasoning, confidence calibration, contrarian review, structured reporting, and deterministic validation.

    462 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated today
    Business, Finance & HRAuto-check passed

More from techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit

All 29 skills in this repo
  • Task Profile

    techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit

    Mine the user's Claude Code + Cowork session history into a structured task profile, what they do with AI, how often, how successfully where friction lives, then propose atomic skills that would…

    132 GitHub stars~3.6k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Session Search

    techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit

    Find context from past Claude Code (CLI) and Claude Cowork (desktop) sessions on this Mac.

    132 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~1.1k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Token Doctor

    techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit

    Personal diagnosis of where your Claude Code + Cowork spend goes.

    132 GitHub stars~4.1k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Write Blog Post

    techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit

    Write or develop a blog post. An agent skill from techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit.

    132 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Write Opinion

    techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit

    Write or develop an opinion piece (opiniestuk/op-ed). An agent skill from techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit.

    132 GitHub stars~695 tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Firstify

    techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit

    Analyze, re-engineer, or bootstrap projects to align with AI-first design principles.

    132 GitHub stars~646 tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Performance Cycle

What does Performance Cycle do?

Evidence gathering for performance review cycles. An agent skill from techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit. Performance Cycle is an agent skill from techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit. Evidence gathering for performance review cycles.

When should I use Performance Cycle?

Performance Cycle fits situations like: tasks that involve Performance reviews.

How do I install Performance Cycle in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit --skill performance-cycle -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/people-management/skills/performance-cycle in techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit) into .claude/skills/performance-cycle in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Performance Cycle in Codex?

Run `npx skills add techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit --skill performance-cycle -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (plugins/people-management/skills/performance-cycle in techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit) into .agents/skills/performance-cycle in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Performance Cycle in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit --skill performance-cycle -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/performance-cycle, .gemini/skills/performance-cycle, .github/skills/performance-cycle and .opencode/skills/performance-cycle in your project.

What does Performance Cycle need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Performance Cycle is instructions for the agent only.

Does Performance Cycle access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Performance Cycle safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Performance Cycle use?

Performance Cycle is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Performance Cycle use?

About 2.1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 8.5k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 2.8k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Performance Cycle?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Performance Cycle: Wp Performance Review (elvismdev/claude-wordpress-skills, 235 stars), Align Human (agentscope-ai/OpenJudge, 868 stars), Performance Report (Affitor/affiliate-skills, 699 stars) and Run Mv Hoi Reconstruction (nvidia-isaac/video_to_data, 850 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Performance Cycle?

techwolf-ai (a GitHub organization) maintains it in techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit, which has 132 GitHub stars. The repository holds 29 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on September 29, 2026.

Source: techwolf-ai/ai-first-toolkit on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.