Agent skill

Stepback

by team-attention in team-attention/hoyeon

One-shot perspective reset that surfaces blind spots mid-work.

MITAuto-check passed

Install Stepback

skills CLI
$ npx skills add team-attention/hoyeon --skill stepback -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install team-attention/hoyeon stepback --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/team-attention/hoyeon.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/stepback .claude/skills/stepback && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
stepback
GitHub stars
173
Token cost
~1.8k tokens
SKILL.md length
722 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
36
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

One-shot perspective reset that surfaces blind spots mid-work.

  • Works in 4 steps: PARSE → STEP-BACK → CHECK → …
  • Phrases: /stepback
  • SKILL.md covers Core Identity, Architecture, Stage 1: PARSE and Stage 2: STEP-BACK, plus 7 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Stepback is an agent skill from team-attention/hoyeon. One-shot perspective reset that surfaces blind spots mid-work. Scans what the user has been doing, generates one abstract reframing question, and runs 3 quick checks (scope drift, side effects, better approach) in under 10 lines. No dialogue, no code. Trigger phrases: "/stepback", "step back", "한발 물러서", "넓은 관점", "놓치는 거 없나", "방향 맞나", "zoom out", "큰 그림", "방향이 맞는 거야", "잠깐 멈춰", "지금 뭘 하고 있는 거야", "blind spot", "재확인"

Its SKILL.md is about 1.8k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: Requirements-first Harness — derive, verify, execute. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Phrases: /stepback

Example prompts

  • “/stepback”
  • “step back”
  • “zoom out”
  • “/stepback”

Requirements

  • Pre-approved tools (allowed-tools): Read, Grep, Glob

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. PARSE
  2. STEP-BACK
  3. CHECK
  4. OUTPUT

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 7cff032. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves these tools, so the agent can use them without asking each time:

    • Read
    • Grep
    • Glob

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are bash).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Stepback loads about 1.8k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 106 tokens; SKILL.md has 722 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~106
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~1.8k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from team-attention/hoyeon at commit 7cff032, republished under its MIT licence (© team-attention). 722 words, ~1,784 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/stepback/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
stepback
description
One-shot perspective reset that surfaces blind spots mid-work. Scans what the user has been doing, generates one abstract reframing question, and runs 3 quick checks (scope drift, side effects, better approach) in under 10 lines. No dialogue, no code. Trigger phrases: "/stepback", "step back", "한발 물러서", "넓은 관점", "놓치는 거 없나", "방향 맞나", "zoom out", "큰 그림", "방향이 맞는 거야", "잠깐 멈춰", "지금 뭘 하고 있는 거야", "blind spot", "재확인"
allowed-tools
Read, Grep, Glob
validate_prompt
Must contain a Step-Back Question (1 abstract question reframing the work). Must contain all 3 checks: Scope Drift, Side Effects, Better Approach. Output must…

/stepback — One-Shot Perspective Reset

You are a perspective shifter. Your job is to scan what the user has been doing, take one step back, and surface the abstract question they should be asking — plus 3 quick checks — in under 10 lines. Then hand control back immediately.

Core Identity

  • You are a one-shot analyst, not a dialogue partner
  • You surface blind spots and abstract questions, then stop
  • You do NOT ask follow-up questions, spawn agents, or generate code
  • You do NOT restate the user's request (that's /mirror)
  • You do NOT engage in Socratic rounds (that's /discuss)
  • You analyze work direction, not a specific change proposal (that's /scope)

Architecture

Conversation context (what user has been doing)
    ↓
[PARSE]      → Scan context for current work direction
    ↓
[STEP-BACK]  → Generate 1 abstract reframing question
    ↓
[CHECK]      → Run 3 checks (scope drift, side effects, better approach)
    ↓
[OUTPUT]     → Print concise findings (< 10 lines)
    ↓
[RETURN]     → Hand back to user's original workflow (no menu, no handoff)

Stage 1: PARSE

Scan the recent conversation context to extract:

  • Current work direction — what the user is actively doing or building
  • Original intent — why they started this work (may be implicit)
  • Scope signals — how large/small the current change is

If the user provided explicit text after /stepback, treat that as additional context about what they're working on. If no context is clear, work with "user seems to be exploring a problem" as the baseline.


Stage 2: STEP-BACK

Generate exactly 1 abstract question that reframes the current specific work at a higher level.

Pattern (DeepMind step-back): Replace the specific object of work with the general principle or system it belongs to.

Current WorkStep-Back Question
"Fix this null pointer bug""Is the error handling strategy for this module fundamentally correct?"
"Add a new API endpoint""Should this feature live in the API layer, or does it belong somewhere else?"
"Refactor this function""Should this function exist at all, or is the caller the problem?"
"Write tests for module X""Is module X's boundary designed in a way that makes it testable?"
"Optimize this query""Should this query be called at this point at all?"

The question should make the user pause and reconsider whether the current work is solving the right problem at the right level.


Stage 3: CHECK

Run these 3 checks. Each check = 1 sentence max.

Check 1: Scope Drift

"Are we drifting from the original goal?"

Compare the current work direction to the original intent. If there's drift, name it. If not, say "Scope is on track."

Check 2: Side Effects

"Could this change affect something else?"

Identify potential blast radius: other modules, teams, users, or systems that could be affected. If no obvious effects, say "No visible side effects."

Check 3: Better Approach

"Is there a more fundamental solution?"

If there's a clearly better or simpler alternative, name it in 1 sentence. If the current approach seems right, say "Current approach seems appropriate."


Show full SKILL.md (289 more words)Show less

Stage 4: OUTPUT

Print the findings in this exact format. No headers, no markdown tables, no extra structure. Keep it conversational and tight.

**Step-Back:** [1 abstract question]

**Scope Drift:** [1 sentence]
**Side Effects:** [1 sentence]
**Better Approach:** [1 sentence]

Total output: 4 key lines (1 step-back question + 3 checks) plus closing. Keep under 10 lines.

After the output, add exactly 1 line:

Carry on.

(or in Korean if the conversation was in Korean: "Carry on." translated appropriately)

Then stop. No follow-up questions. No handoff menu. No "would you like to...".


Hard Rules

  1. No AskUserQuestion — Output and return immediately. Never prompt for input.
  2. No agents — Runs entirely in main context. No Task() calls.
  3. No code generation — Analysis only. Never write or suggest code.
  4. No restating the request — Don't summarize what the user asked. Analyze what they're doing.
  5. Max 10 lines — If you can't fit it in 10 lines, you're overexplaining. Cut.
  6. One step-back question only — Resist the urge to generate multiple questions.
  7. Complete in one response — No continuation, no "to be continued."

Differentiators

SkillWhat it doesWhen to use
/stepbackOne-shot perspective reset on current workMid-work, when you feel something might be off
/discussMulti-round Socratic dialogue about an ideaBefore starting, to explore a concept
/mirrorConfirms your understanding of a requestTo verify Claude understood you correctly
/scopeAnalyzes blast radius of a specific change proposalWhen you have a concrete change to assess
/tribunalMulti-agent adversarial reviewFor high-stakes architectural decisions

Usage Examples

bash
# Triggered by keyword
/stepback

# With explicit context
/stepback currently refactoring the auth middleware

# English
/stepback I've been fixing edge cases in the payment flow for 2 hours

# Feeling lost
/stepback not sure if the direction is right

Example Output

User: "/stepback fixing a bug in auth token expiry handling"

**Step-Back:** Instead of fixing token expiry, is the auth state management as a whole consistent between server and client?

**Scope Drift:** If the original goal was improving the login flow, the expiry bug may be a symptom — not the root cause.
**Side Effects:** Changing token refresh logic could affect both the mobile app and web client.
**Better Approach:** Drawing an auth state diagram before the fix may reveal a different root cause.

Carry on.

Checklist Before Stopping

  • 1 step-back question generated (abstract reframe of current work)
  • All 3 checks present (scope drift, side effects, better approach)
  • Total output under 10 lines
  • No AskUserQuestion used
  • No agents spawned
  • No code written
  • "Carry on." (or equivalent in the conversation language) appended
  • Stopped immediately after output (no follow-up)

© team-attention, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in skills/stepback of team-attention/hoyeon.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 7cff032

Compare with similar skills

Stepback next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Stepback compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Stepback this skillteam-attention/hoyeon173—~1.8kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Blind Spot Scanlijigang/ljg-skills7.5k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Workspace Surface Auditaffaan-m/ECC274k3 repos~1.3kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Blind Spot Passsangrokjung/claude-forge849—~2.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Reset CSSthedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist74k—~415Automated safety check: PassMIT
Studio CSS Resetremotion-dev/remotion62k—~258Automated safety check: PassCustom licence

Similar skills

  • Blind Spot Scan

    lijigang/ljg-skills

    Reads yesterday's AI conversations, identifies one thinking blind spot, picks a WeRead book chapter to address it and writes an analysis note.

    7.5k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Knowledge ManagementAuto-check passed
  • Audit the active repo, MCP servers, plugins, connectors, env surfaces, and harness setup, then recommend the highest-value ECC-native skills, hooks, agents, and operator workflows.

    274k GitHub starsUsed in 3 repos~1.3k tokens
    Agent WorkflowsAuto-check: notes
  • Blind Spot Pass

    sangrokjung/claude-forge

    Use before starting work in a domain you don't know well, to surface the "unknown unknowns" — the things you don't even know to ask about — and learn just enough to prompt and decide well.

    849 GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Media & CreativeAuto-check passed
  • Reset CSS

    thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist

    A skill your agent uses when reviewing stylesheets, component styles, and responsive behavior related to Use a CSS reset or normalize stylesheet.

    74k GitHub stars~415 tokensUpdated yesterday
    Frontend & DesignAuto-check passed
  • Studio CSS Reset

    remotion-dev/remotion

    Official

    Style Remotion Studio UI inside .css-reset containers without relying on inherited reset properties.

    62k GitHub stars~258 tokensUpdated today
    Media & CreativeAuto-check passed
  • Spot

    LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills

    Binance Spot request using the Binance API. An agent skill from LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills.

    2.2k GitHub stars~6.2k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Backend & APIsAuto-check passed

More from team-attention/hoyeon

All 36 skills in this repo
  • Skill Session Analyzer

    team-attention/hoyeon

    This skill should be used when the user asks to "analyze session", "evaluate skill execution", "check session logs", provides a session ID with a skill path, or wants to verify that a skill executed…

    173 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check: notes
  • Browser Work

    team-attention/hoyeon

    Recon-first browser automation. An agent skill from team-attention/hoyeon.

    173 GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Check

    team-attention/hoyeon

    This skill should be used when the user wants to verify their changes before pushing, or update the project's rule checklists.

    173 GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check: notes
  • Compound

    team-attention/hoyeon

    This skill should be used when the user says "/compound", "compound this", "document learnings", "save what we learned", or after completing a PR.

    173 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check: notes
  • QA

    team-attention/hoyeon

    Systematically QA test any application — web apps, native macOS apps, Electron apps, CLI tools, interactive REPLs, or anything on screen.

    173 GitHub stars~2.6k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check: notes
  • Tech Decision

    team-attention/hoyeon

    This skill should be used when the user asks about "technical decision", "what to use", "A vs B", "comparison analysis", "library selection", "architecture decision", "which one to use"…

    173 GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Stepback

What does Stepback do?

One-shot perspective reset that surfaces blind spots mid-work. Stepback is an agent skill from team-attention/hoyeon. One-shot perspective reset that surfaces blind spots mid-work.

When should I use Stepback?

Stepback fits situations like: phrases: /stepback.

How do I install Stepback in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add team-attention/hoyeon --skill stepback -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/stepback in team-attention/hoyeon) into .claude/skills/stepback in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Stepback in Codex?

Run `npx skills add team-attention/hoyeon --skill stepback -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/stepback in team-attention/hoyeon) into .agents/skills/stepback in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Stepback in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add team-attention/hoyeon --skill stepback -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/stepback, .gemini/skills/stepback, .github/skills/stepback and .opencode/skills/stepback in your project.

What does Stepback need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Stepback is instructions for the agent only. Its frontmatter pre-approves these tools: Read, Grep, Glob.

Does Stepback access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Stepback safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Stepback use?

Stepback is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Stepback use?

About 1.8k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 7.1k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Stepback?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Stepback: Blind Spot Scan (lijigang/ljg-skills, 7.5k stars), Workspace Surface Audit (affaan-m/ECC, 274k stars), Blind Spot Pass (sangrokjung/claude-forge, 849 stars) and Reset CSS (thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist, 74k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Stepback?

team-attention (a GitHub organization) maintains it in team-attention/hoyeon, which has 173 GitHub stars. The repository holds 36 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on May 21, 2026.

Source: team-attention/hoyeon on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.