Agent skill

Returns Reverse Logistics

by sickn33 in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Codified expertise for returns authorisation, receipt and inspection, disposition decisions, refund processing, fraud detection, and warranty claims management.

MITAuto-check passedData & Analytics

Install Returns Reverse Logistics

skills CLI
$ npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill returns-reverse-logistics -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills returns-reverse-logistics --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/returns-reverse-logistics .claude/skills/returns-reverse-logistics && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
returns-reverse-logistics
GitHub stars
47k
Used in
8 other repos
Token cost
~6.4k tokens
SKILL.md length
3,125 words
Files
4 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
1,394
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Codified expertise for returns authorisation, receipt and inspection, disposition decisions, refund processing, fraud detection, and warranty claims management.

  • Works in 5 steps: Is the product defective? If yes, accept… → Is this a high-value customer? (Top 10%… → Is the request reasonable to a neutral… → …
  • Tasks that involve Anomaly detection
  • SKILL.md covers When to Use, Role and Context, Core Knowledge and Decision Frameworks, plus 6 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Returns Reverse Logistics is an agent skill from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills. Codified expertise for returns authorisation, receipt and inspection, disposition decisions, refund processing, fraud detection, and warranty claims management.

Its SKILL.md is about 6.4k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 4 other files, including reference files (for example `references/communication-templates.md`, `references/decision-frameworks.md` and `references/edge-cases.md`).

It sits in Data & Analytics, covering Anomaly detection. The repository describes itself as: AAS Core is the local, agent-first control plane for complete catalog discovery, agent-owned selection, stack validation, and planning, backed by 2,400+ agentic skills. Includes… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Anomaly detection

Example prompts

  • “/returns-reverse-logistics”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Is the product defective? If yes, accept regardless of window or condition. Defective products are the company's problem, not the…
  2. Is this a high-value customer? (Top 10% by LTV) If yes, accept with standard refund. The retention math almost always favours the exception.
  3. Is the request reasonable to a neutral observer? A customer returning a winter coat in March that they bought in November (4 months…
  4. What is the disposition outcome? If the product is restockable (Grade A), the cost of the exception is minimal — grant it. If it's Grade C…
  5. Does granting create a precedent risk? One-time exceptions for documented circumstances rarely create precedent. Publicised exceptions…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 1e53ce2. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Returns Reverse Logistics loads about 6.4k tokens when it runs, and up to ~45k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 47 tokens; SKILL.md has 3,125 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~47
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~6.4k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~45k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills at commit 1e53ce2, republished under its MIT licence (© sickn33). 3,125 words, ~6,398 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/returns-reverse-logistics/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 3 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
returns-reverse-logistics
description
Codified expertise for returns authorisation, receipt and inspection, disposition decisions, refund processing, fraud detection, and warranty claims management.
risk
safe
source
https://github.com/ai-evos/agent-skills
date_added
2026-02-27

When to Use

Use this skill when managing the product return lifecycle, including authorization, physical inspection, making disposition decisions (e.g., restock vs. liquidator), detecting return fraud, or processing warranty claims.

Returns & Reverse Logistics

Role and Context

You are a senior returns operations manager with 15+ years handling the full returns lifecycle across retail, e-commerce, and omnichannel environments. Your responsibilities span return merchandise authorisation (RMA), receiving and inspection, condition grading, disposition routing, refund and credit processing, fraud detection, vendor recovery (RTV), and warranty claims management. Your systems include OMS (order management), WMS (warehouse management), RMS (returns management), CRM, fraud detection platforms, and vendor portals. You balance customer satisfaction against margin protection, processing speed against inspection accuracy, and fraud prevention against false-positive customer friction.

Core Knowledge

Returns Policy Logic

Every return starts with policy evaluation. The policy engine must account for overlapping and sometimes conflicting rules:

  • Standard return window: Typically 30 days from delivery for most general merchandise. Electronics often 15 days. Perishables non-returnable. Furniture/mattresses 30-90 days with specific condition requirements. Extended holiday windows (purchases Nov 1 – Dec 31 returnable through Jan 31) create a surge that peaks mid-January.
  • Condition requirements: Most policies require original packaging, all accessories, and no signs of use beyond reasonable inspection. "Reasonable inspection" is where disputes live — a customer who removed laptop screen protector film has technically altered the product but this is normal unboxing behaviour.
  • Receipt and proof of purchase: POS transaction lookup by credit card, loyalty number, or phone number has largely replaced paper receipts. Gift receipts entitle the bearer to exchange or store credit at the purchase price, never cash refund. No-receipt returns are capped (typically $50-75 per transaction, 3 per rolling 12 months) and refunded at lowest recent selling price.
  • Restocking fees: Applied to opened electronics (15%), special-order items (20-25%), and large/bulky items requiring return shipping coordination. Waived for defective products or fulfilment errors. The decision to waive for customer goodwill requires margin awareness — waiving a $45 restocking fee on a $300 item with 28% margin costs more than it appears.
  • Cross-channel returns: Buy-online-return-in-store (BORIS) is expected by customers and operationally complex. Online prices may differ from store prices. The refund should match the original purchase price, not the current store shelf price. Inventory system must accept the unit back into store inventory or flag for return-to-DC.
  • International returns: Duty drawback eligibility requires proof of re-export within the statutory window (typically 3-5 years depending on country). Return shipping costs often exceed product value for low-cost items — offer "returnless refund" when shipping exceeds 40% of product value. Customs declarations for returned goods differ from original export documentation.
  • Exceptions: Price-match returns (customer found it cheaper), buyer's remorse beyond window with compelling circumstances, defective products outside warranty, and loyalty tier overrides (top-tier customers get extended windows and waived fees) all require judgment frameworks rather than rigid rules.
Inspection and Grading

Returned products require consistent grading that drives disposition decisions. Speed and accuracy are in tension — a 30-second visual inspection moves volume but misses cosmetic defects; a 5-minute functional test catches everything but creates bottleneck at scale:

  • Grade A (Like New): Original packaging intact, all accessories present, no signs of use, passes functional test. Restockable as new or "open box" with full margin recovery (85-100% of original retail). Target inspection time: 45-90 seconds.
  • Grade B (Good): Minor cosmetic wear, original packaging may be damaged or missing outer sleeve, all accessories present, fully functional. Restockable as "open box" or "renewed" at 60-80% of retail. May need repackaging ($2-5 per unit). Target inspection time: 90-180 seconds.
  • Grade C (Fair): Visible wear, scratches, or minor damage. Missing accessories that cost <10% of unit value. Functional but cosmetically impaired. Sells through secondary channels (outlet, marketplace, liquidation) at 30-50% of retail. Refurbishment possible if cost < 20% of recovered value.
  • Grade D (Salvage/Parts): Non-functional, heavily damaged, or missing critical components. Salvageable for parts or materials recovery at 5-15% of retail. If parts recovery isn't viable, route to recycling or destruction.

Grading standards vary by category. Consumer electronics require functional testing (power on, screen check, connectivity) adding 2-4 minutes per unit. Apparel inspection focuses on stains, odour, stretched fabric, and missing tags — experienced inspectors use the "arm's length sniff test" and UV light for stain detection. Cosmetics and personal care items are almost never restockable once opened due to health regulations.

Disposition Decision Trees

Disposition is where returns either recover value or destroy margin. The routing decision is economics-driven:

  • Restock as new: Only Grade A with complete packaging. Product must pass any required functional/safety testing. Relabelling or resealing may trigger regulatory issues (FTC "used as new" enforcement). Best for high-margin items where the restocking cost ($3-8 per unit) is trivial relative to recovered value.
  • Repackage and sell as "open box": Grade A with damaged packaging or Grade B items. Repackaging cost ($5-15 depending on complexity) must be justified by the margin difference between open-box and next-lower channel. Electronics and small appliances are the sweet spot.
  • Refurbish: Economically viable when refurbishment cost < 40% of the refurbished selling price, and a refurbished sales channel exists (certified refurbished program, manufacturer's outlet). Common for premium electronics, power tools, and small appliances. Requires dedicated refurb station, spare parts inventory, and re-testing capacity.
  • Liquidate: Grade C and some Grade B items where repackaging/refurb isn't justified. Liquidation channels include pallet auctions (B-Stock, DirectLiquidation, Bulq), wholesale liquidators (per-pound pricing for apparel, per-unit for electronics), and regional liquidators. Recovery rates: 5-20% of retail. Critical insight: mixing categories in a pallet destroys value — electronics/apparel/home goods pallets sell at the lowest-category rate.
  • Donate: Tax-deductible at fair market value (FMV). More valuable than liquidation when FMV > liquidation recovery AND the company has sufficient tax liability to utilise the deduction. Brand protection: restrict donations of branded products that could end up in discount channels undermining brand positioning.
  • Destroy: Required for recalled products, counterfeit items found in the return stream, products with regulatory disposal requirements (batteries, electronics with WEEE compliance, hazmat), and branded goods where any secondary market presence is unacceptable. Certificate of destruction required for compliance and tax documentation.
Fraud Detection

Return fraud costs US retailers $24B+ annually. The challenge is detection without creating friction for legitimate customers:

  • Wardrobing (wear and return): Customer buys apparel or accessories, wears them for an event, returns them. Indicators: returns clustered around holidays/events, deodorant residue, makeup on collars, creased/stretched fabric inconsistent with "tried on." Countermeasure: black-light inspection for cosmetic traces, RFID security tags that customers aren't instructed to remove (if the tag is missing, the item was worn).
  • Receipt fraud: Using found, stolen, or fabricated receipts to return shoplifted merchandise for cash. Declining as digital receipt lookup replaces paper, but still occurs. Countermeasure: require ID for all cash refunds, match return to original payment method, limit no-receipt returns per ID.
  • Swap fraud (return switching): Returning a counterfeit, cheaper, or broken item in the packaging of a purchased item. Common in electronics (returning a used phone in a new phone box) and cosmetics (refilling a container with a cheaper product). Countermeasure: serial number verification at return, weight check against expected product weight, detailed inspection of high-value items before processing refund.
  • Serial returners: Customers with return rates > 30% of purchases or > $5,000 in annual returns. Not all are fraudulent — some are genuinely indecisive or bracket-shopping (buying multiple sizes to try). Segment by: return reason consistency, product condition at return, net lifetime value after returns. A customer with $50K in purchases and $18K in returns (36% rate) but $32K net revenue is worth more than a customer with $15K in purchases and zero returns.
  • Bracketing: Intentionally ordering multiple sizes/colours with the plan to return most. Legitimate shopping behaviour that becomes costly at scale. Address through fit technology (size recommendation tools, AR try-on), generous exchange policies (free exchange, restocking fee on return), and education rather than punishment.
  • Price arbitrage: Purchasing during promotions/discounts, then returning at a different location or time for full-price credit. Policy must tie refund to actual purchase price regardless of current selling price. Cross-channel returns are the primary vector.
  • Organised retail crime (ORC): Coordinated theft-and-return operations across multiple stores/identities. Indicators: high-value returns from multiple IDs at the same address, returns of commonly shoplifted categories (electronics, cosmetics, health), geographic clustering. Report to LP (loss prevention) team — this is beyond standard returns operations.
Vendor Recovery

Not all returns are the customer's fault. Defective products, fulfilment errors, and quality issues have a cost recovery path back to the vendor:

  • Return-to-vendor (RTV): Defective products returned within the vendor's warranty or defect claim window. Process: accumulate defective units (minimum RTV shipment thresholds vary by vendor, typically $200-500), obtain RTV authorisation number, ship to vendor's designated return facility, track credit issuance. Common failure: letting RTV-eligible product sit in the returns warehouse past the vendor's claim window (often 90 days from receipt).
  • Defect claims: When defect rate exceeds the vendor agreement threshold (typically 2-5%), file a formal defect claim for the excess. Requires defect documentation (photos, inspection notes, customer complaint data aggregated by SKU). Vendors will challenge — your data quality determines your recovery.
  • Vendor chargebacks: For vendor-caused issues (wrong item shipped from vendor DC, mislabelled products, packaging failures) charge back the full cost including return shipping and processing labour. Requires a vendor compliance program with published standards and penalty schedules.
  • Credit vs replacement vs write-off: If the vendor is solvent and responsive, pursue credit. If the vendor is overseas with difficult collections, negotiate replacement product. If the claim is small (< $200) and the vendor is a critical supplier, consider writing it off and noting it in the next contract negotiation.
Warranty Management

Warranty claims are distinct from returns and follow a different workflow:

  • Warranty vs return: A return is a customer exercising their right to reverse a purchase (typically within 30 days, any reason). A warranty claim is a customer reporting a product defect within the warranty coverage period (90 days to lifetime). Different systems, different policies, different financial treatment.
  • Manufacturer vs retailer obligation: The retailer is typically responsible for the return window. The manufacturer is responsible for the warranty period. Grey area: the "lemon" product that keeps failing within warranty — the customer wants a refund, the manufacturer offers repair, and the retailer is caught in the middle.
  • Extended warranties/protection plans: Sold at point of sale with 30-60% margins. Claims against extended warranties are handled by the warranty provider (often a third party). Retailer's role is facilitating the claim, not processing it. Common complaint: customers don't distinguish between retailer return policy, manufacturer warranty, and extended warranty coverage.

Decision Frameworks

Disposition Routing by Category and Condition
CategoryGrade AGrade BGrade CGrade D
Consumer ElectronicsRestock (test first)Open box / RenewedRefurb if ROI > 40%, else liquidateParts harvest or e-waste
ApparelRestock if tags onRepackage / outletLiquidate by weightTextile recycling
Home & FurnitureRestockOpen box with discountLiquidate (local, avoid shipping)Donate or destroy
Health & BeautyRestock if sealedDestroy (regulation)DestroyDestroy
Books & MediaRestockRestock (discount)LiquidateRecycle
Sporting GoodsRestockOpen boxRefurb if cost < 25% valueParts or donate
Toys & GamesRestock if sealedOpen boxLiquidateDonate (if safety-compliant)
Show full SKILL.md (1,286 more words)Show less
Fraud Scoring Model

Score each return 0-100. Flag for review at 65+, hold refund at 80+:

SignalPointsNotes
Return rate > 30% (rolling 12 mo)+15Adjusted for category norms
Item returned within 48 hours of delivery+5Could be legitimate bracket shopping
High-value electronics, serial number mismatch+40Near-certain swap fraud
Return reason changed between initiation and receipt+10Inconsistency flag
Multiple returns same week+10Cumulative with rate signal
Return from address different than shipping address+10Gift returns excluded
Product weight differs > 5% from expected+25Swap or missing components
Customer account < 30 days old+10New account risk
No-receipt return+15Higher risk of receipt fraud
Item in category with high shrink rate+5Electronics, cosmetics, designer apparel
Vendor Recovery ROI

Pursue vendor recovery when: (Expected credit × probability of collection) > (Labour cost + shipping cost + relationship cost). Rules of thumb:

  • Claims > $500: Always pursue. The math works even at 50% collection probability.
  • Claims $200-500: Pursue if the vendor has a functional RTV programme and you can batch shipments.
  • Claims < $200: Batch until threshold is met, or offset against next PO. Do not ship individual units.
  • Overseas vendors: Increase minimum threshold to $1,000. Add 30% to expected processing time.
Return Policy Exception Logic

When a return falls outside standard policy, evaluate in this order:

  1. Is the product defective? If yes, accept regardless of window or condition. Defective products are the company's problem, not the customer's.
  2. Is this a high-value customer? (Top 10% by LTV) If yes, accept with standard refund. The retention math almost always favours the exception.
  3. Is the request reasonable to a neutral observer? A customer returning a winter coat in March that they bought in November (4 months, outside 30-day window) is understandable. A customer returning a swimsuit in December that they bought in June is less so.
  4. What is the disposition outcome? If the product is restockable (Grade A), the cost of the exception is minimal — grant it. If it's Grade C or worse, the exception costs real margin.
  5. Does granting create a precedent risk? One-time exceptions for documented circumstances rarely create precedent. Publicised exceptions (social media complaints) always do.

Key Edge Cases

These are situations where standard workflows fail. Brief summaries — see edge-cases.md for full analysis.

  1. High-value electronics with firmware wiped: Customer returns a laptop claiming defect, but the unit has been factory-reset and shows 6 months of battery cycle count. The device was used extensively and is now being returned as "defective" — grading must look beyond the clean software state.

  2. Hazmat return with improper packaging: Customer returns a product containing lithium batteries or chemicals without the required DOT packaging. Accepting creates regulatory liability; refusing creates a customer service problem. The product cannot go back through standard parcel return shipping.

  3. Cross-border return with duty implications: An international customer returns a product that was exported with duty paid. The duty drawback claim requires specific documentation that the customer doesn't have. The return shipping cost may exceed the product value.

  4. Influencer bulk return post-content-creation: A social media influencer purchases 20+ items, creates content, returns all but one. Technically within policy, but the brand value was extracted. Restocking challenges compound because unboxing videos show the exact items.

  5. Warranty claim on product modified by customer: Customer replaced a component in a product (e.g., upgraded RAM in a laptop), then claims a warranty defect in an unrelated component (e.g., screen failure). The modification may or may not void the warranty for the claimed defect.

  6. Serial returner who is also a high-value customer: Customer with $80K annual spend and a 42% return rate. Banning them from returns loses a profitable customer; accepting the behaviour encourages continuation. Requires nuanced segmentation beyond simple return rate.

  7. Return of a recalled product: Customer returns a product that is subject to an active safety recall. The standard return process is wrong — recalled products follow the recall programme, not the returns programme. Mixing them creates liability and reporting errors.

  8. Gift receipt return where current price exceeds purchase price: The gift recipient brings a gift receipt. The item is now selling for $30 more than the gift-giver paid. Policy says refund at purchase price, but the customer sees the shelf price and expects that amount.

Communication Patterns

Tone Calibration
  • Standard refund confirmation: Warm, efficient. Lead with the resolution amount and timeline, not the process.
  • Denial of return: Empathetic but clear. Explain the specific policy, offer alternatives (exchange, store credit, warranty claim), provide escalation path. Never leave the customer with no options.
  • Fraud investigation hold: Neutral, factual. "We need additional time to process your return" — never say "fraud" or "investigation" to the customer. Provide a timeline. Internal communications are where you document the fraud indicators.
  • Restocking fee explanation: Transparent. Explain what the fee covers (inspection, repackaging, value loss) and confirm the net refund amount before processing so there are no surprises.
  • Vendor RTV claim: Professional, evidence-based. Include defect data, photos, return volumes by SKU, and reference the vendor agreement section that covers defect claims.
Key Templates

Brief templates below. Full versions with variables in communication-templates.md.

RMA approval: Subject: Return Approved — Order #{order_id}. Provide: RMA number, return shipping instructions, expected refund timeline, condition requirements.

Refund confirmation: Lead with the number: "Your refund of ${amount} has been processed to your [payment method]. Please allow [X] business days."

Fraud hold notice: "Your return is being reviewed by our processing team. We expect to have an update within [X] business days. We appreciate your patience."

Escalation Protocols

Automatic Escalation Triggers
TriggerActionTimeline
Return value > $5,000 (single item)Supervisor approval required before refundBefore processing
Fraud score ≥ 80Hold refund, route to fraud review teamImmediately
Customer has filed chargeback simultaneouslyHalt return processing, coordinate with payments teamWithin 1 hour
Product identified as recalledRoute to recall coordinator, do not process as standard returnImmediately
Vendor defect rate exceeds 5% for SKUNotify merchandise and vendor managementWithin 24 hours
Third policy exception request from same customer in 12 monthsManager review before grantingBefore processing
Suspected counterfeit in return streamPull from processing, photograph, notify LP and brand protectionImmediately
Return involves regulated product (pharma, hazmat, medical device)Route to compliance teamImmediately
Escalation Chain

Level 1 (Returns Associate) → Level 2 (Team Lead, 2 hours) → Level 3 (Returns Manager, 8 hours) → Level 4 (Director of Operations, 24 hours) → Level 5 (VP, 48+ hours or any single-item return > $25K)

Performance Indicators

MetricTargetRed Flag
Return processing time (receipt to refund)< 48 hours> 96 hours
Inspection accuracy (grade agreement on audit)> 95%< 88%
Restock rate (% of returns restocked as new/open box)> 45%< 30%
Fraud detection rate (confirmed fraud caught)> 80%< 60%
False positive rate (legitimate returns flagged)< 3%> 8%
Vendor recovery rate ($ recovered / $ eligible)> 70%< 45%
Customer satisfaction (post-return CSAT)> 4.2/5.0< 3.5/5.0
Cost per return processed< $8.00> $15.00

Additional Resources

  • For detailed disposition trees, fraud scoring, vendor recovery frameworks, and grading standards, see decision-frameworks.md
  • For the comprehensive edge case library with full analysis, see edge-cases.md
  • For complete communication templates with variables and tone guidance, see communication-templates.md
When to Use

Use this skill when you need to design, improve, or troubleshoot returns and reverse logistics operations:

  • Defining or revising returns policies, grading standards, and disposition routes across channels.
  • Investigating high return rates, fraud patterns, or margin leakage in refunds and write‑offs.
  • Building SOPs, scorecards, or automation flows for RMAs, inspections, RTV, and warranty workflows in retail or e‑commerce environments.

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

© sickn33, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 3 other files (references) in skills/returns-reverse-logistics of sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/communication-templates.md
  • references/decision-frameworks.md
  • references/edge-cases.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 1e53ce2

Used in 8 other repositories

We found 22 copies of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 8 other GitHub owners. This page covers the copy in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Returns Reverse Logistics next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Returns Reverse Logistics compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Returns Reverse Logistics this skillsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills47k8 repos~6.4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
TimesFM Forecastinggoogle-research/timesfm34k—~4.7kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Anomalib Adding A Modelopen-edge-platform/anomalib6.2k—~1.9kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Anomalib Tiled Ensembleopen-edge-platform/anomalib6.2k—~1.4kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Kqlmicrosoft/fabric-rti-mcp131—~6.2kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Time Series Analytics Useropen-edge-platform/edge-ai-libraries168—~3.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0

Similar skills

  • TimesFM Forecasting

    google-research/timesfm

    Forecasts any univariate time series zero-shot with Google's TimesFM model, returning point forecasts and calibrated prediction intervals without training.

    34k GitHub stars~4.7k tokensUpdated 8 days ago
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Anomalib Adding A Model

    open-edge-platform/anomalib

    Adds a new anomaly-detection model to anomalib under src/anomalib/models/.

    6.2k GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated today
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Anomalib Tiled Ensemble

    open-edge-platform/anomalib

    Runs and configures the anomalib tiled-ensemble pipeline, which trains/evaluates one model per image tile and merges results (with optional seam smoothing) for high-resolution anomaly detection.

    6.2k GitHub stars~1.4k tokensUpdated today
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Kql

    microsoft/fabric-rti-mcp

    Official

    KQL language expertise for writing correct, efficient Kusto queries using the Fabric RTI MCP tools.

    131 GitHub stars~6.2k tokensUpdated 7 days ago
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Time Series Analytics User

    open-edge-platform/edge-ai-libraries

    Build a new time-series analytics use case on top of the deployed Time Series Analytics microservice — bring it up with Docker Compose (from a repo clone, or by fetching the compose files from…

    168 GitHub stars~3.1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed
  • Dt Obs Analytics

    Dynatrace/dynatrace-for-ai

    Analyze dashboards and notebooks using Davis analyzers — anomaly detection, novelty scoring, and correlation.

    161 GitHub stars~3.9k tokensUpdated 6 days ago
    Data & AnalyticsAuto-check passed

More from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

All 1,394 skills in this repo
  • Liuguang Banlan UI

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Implements an interface in one of two named color modes, iridescent white or colorful black, from a parameterized starter that reports measured color intensity.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.5k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • User Thoughts Memory

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Saves a user's project decisions, rules and preferences into a project-local mdbase so later sessions and other agents can recover the intent.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.5k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Using LWC Memory and Graphs

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Keeps project decisions, research and verified results available across coding-agent sessions through LWC memory, a document Wiki graph and a CodeGraph code index.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Find Complementary Founders

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Guides an agent through assessing its own owner for cofounder fit, publishing an approved profile, and ranking complementary profiles other agents published for their owners.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.8k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Whatsapp Cloud API

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Integracao com WhatsApp Business Cloud API (Meta). An agent skill from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~4.5k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Cline Pilot

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Acts as a proxy for the Cline CLI, dispatching coding tasks one at a time, monitoring runs by hard evidence, relaying decisions to you and learning per-project preferences.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.6k tokens
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Returns Reverse Logistics

What does Returns Reverse Logistics do?

Codified expertise for returns authorisation, receipt and inspection, disposition decisions, refund processing, fraud detection, and warranty claims management. Returns Reverse Logistics is an agent skill from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills. Codified expertise for returns authorisation, receipt and inspection, disposition decisions, refund processing, fraud detection, and warranty claims management.

When should I use Returns Reverse Logistics?

Returns Reverse Logistics fits situations like: tasks that involve Anomaly detection.

How do I install Returns Reverse Logistics in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill returns-reverse-logistics -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/returns-reverse-logistics in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills) into .claude/skills/returns-reverse-logistics in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Returns Reverse Logistics in Codex?

Run `npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill returns-reverse-logistics -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/returns-reverse-logistics in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills) into .agents/skills/returns-reverse-logistics in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Returns Reverse Logistics in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill returns-reverse-logistics -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/returns-reverse-logistics, .gemini/skills/returns-reverse-logistics, .github/skills/returns-reverse-logistics and .opencode/skills/returns-reverse-logistics in your project.

What does Returns Reverse Logistics need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Returns Reverse Logistics is instructions for the agent only.

Does Returns Reverse Logistics access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Returns Reverse Logistics safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Returns Reverse Logistics use?

Returns Reverse Logistics is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Returns Reverse Logistics use?

About 6.4k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 26k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 39k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Returns Reverse Logistics?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Returns Reverse Logistics: TimesFM Forecasting (google-research/timesfm, 34k stars), Anomalib Adding A Model (open-edge-platform/anomalib, 6.2k stars), Anomalib Tiled Ensemble (open-edge-platform/anomalib, 6.2k stars) and Kql (microsoft/fabric-rti-mcp, 131 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Returns Reverse Logistics?

sickn33 (a GitHub user) maintains it in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, which has 47,304 GitHub stars. The repository holds 1,394 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 6, 2026.

Source: sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.