Agent skill

RAG Observability Evals

by sickn33 in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Monitor and evaluate RAG systems with retrieval quality metrics, groundedness checks, hallucination detection, and continuous regression testing.

MITAuto-check passedAI & LLM Engineering

Install RAG Observability Evals

skills CLI
$ npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill rag-observability-evals -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills rag-observability-evals --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/rag-observability-evals .claude/skills/rag-observability-evals && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
rag-observability-evals
GitHub stars
47k
Used in
2 other repos
Token cost
~3.1k tokens
SKILL.md length
273 words
Files
2 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
1,493
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Monitor and evaluate RAG systems with retrieval quality metrics, groundedness checks, hallucination detection, and continuous regression testing.

  • Works in 4 steps: Curate a benchmark set with gold answers… → Run nightly offline evals for every… → Execute online shadow evals on sampled… → …
  • Tasks that involve Retrieval-augmented generation
  • SKILL.md covers Prerequisites, What to Measure, RAGAS Evaluation Script and Groundedness Scoring, plus 6 more sections
  • Calls git and kubectl

What it does

RAG Observability Evals is an agent skill from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills. Monitor and evaluate RAG systems with retrieval quality metrics, groundedness checks, hallucination detection, and continuous regression testing.

Its SKILL.md is about 3.1k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 2 other files, including reference files (for example `references/details.md`). Compatibility notes: Requires the relevant platform CLIs (kubectl, helm, terraform, git, CI runners) and authorized access to the target environment. Docs-only; helper scripts and…

It sits in AI & LLM Engineering, covering Retrieval-augmented generation, LLM evaluation and Observability. The repository describes itself as: AAS Core is the local, agent-first control plane for complete catalog discovery, agent-owned selection, stack validation, and planning, backed by 2,400+ agentic skills. Includes… The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Retrieval-augmented generation
  • Tasks that involve LLM evaluation
  • Tasks that involve Observability

Example prompts

  • “/rag-observability-evals”

Requirements

  • Python 3
  • Compatibility (from SKILL.md): Requires the relevant platform CLIs (kubectl, helm, terraform, git, CI runners) and authorized access to the target environment. Docs-only; helper scripts and templates not bundled.

Workflow steps

4 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Curate a benchmark set with gold answers and source docs.
  2. Run nightly offline evals for every retriever/model configuration.
  3. Execute online shadow evals on sampled production traffic.
  4. Gate releases on minimum quality + safety + latency thresholds.

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 680176d. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • git
    • kubectl

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    Links to these hosts (documentation or services it may open):

    • github.com

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

  • Compatibility

    Requires the relevant platform CLIs (kubectl, helm, terraform, git, CI runners) and authorized access to the target environment. Docs-only; helper scripts and templates not bundled.

    From compatibility in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

Context cost

RAG Observability Evals loads about 3.1k tokens when it runs, and up to ~4k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 42 tokens; SKILL.md has 273 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~42
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~3.1k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~4k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills at commit 680176d, republished under its MIT licence (© sickn33). 273 words, ~3,146 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/rag-observability-evals/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 1 other file; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
rag-observability-evals
description
Monitor and evaluate RAG systems with retrieval quality metrics, groundedness checks, hallucination detection, and continuous regression testing.
compatibility
Requires the relevant platform CLIs (kubectl, helm, terraform, git, CI runners) and authorized access to the target environment. Docs-only; helper scripts and templates not bundled.
category
devops
risk
critical
source
https://github.com/BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills
source_repo
BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills
source_type
community
date_added
2026-09-20
license
MIT
license_source
https://github.com/BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills/blob/main/LICENSE
metadata.author
devops-skills
metadata.version
1.0

RAG Observability and Evaluations

Run retrieval-augmented generation like a measurable production system, not a black box.

Prerequisites

  • RAG pipeline with instrumented retrieval and generation stages
  • Python 3.10+ with evaluation libraries (ragas, langchain, openai)
  • Prometheus endpoint for custom metrics export
  • Benchmark dataset with gold-standard question/answer/source triples
  • OpenTelemetry SDK integrated into the RAG service

What to Measure

Retrieval Quality
  • Recall@k and MRR for top-k chunks
  • Citation coverage and source freshness
  • Embedding drift and index staleness
Generation Quality
  • Groundedness score (answer supported by retrieved context)
  • Hallucination rate by route/use case
  • Instruction adherence and format validity
Reliability and Cost
  • p50/p95 latency split by retrieval vs generation
  • Token usage per stage
  • Cache hit rate and cost per successful answer

RAGAS Evaluation Script

python
# rag_eval.py
"""Evaluate RAG pipeline quality using RAGAS metrics."""
from ragas import evaluate
from ragas.metrics import (
    faithfulness,
    answer_relevancy,
    context_precision,
    context_recall,
    context_entity_recall,
    answer_similarity,
)
from datasets import Dataset
import json
import sys

def load_eval_dataset(path: str) -> Dataset:
    """Load evaluation dataset with required columns."""
    with open(path) as f:
        data = json.load(f)

    return Dataset.from_dict({
        "question": [d["question"] for d in data],
        "answer": [d["generated_answer"] for d in data],
        "contexts": [d["retrieved_contexts"] for d in data],
        "ground_truth": [d["reference_answer"] for d in data],
    })

def run_evaluation(dataset_path: str, output_path: str):
    """Run full RAGAS evaluation suite."""
    dataset = load_eval_dataset(dataset_path)

    metrics = [
        faithfulness,
        answer_relevancy,
        context_precision,
        context_recall,
        context_entity_recall,
        answer_similarity,
    ]

    results = evaluate(dataset, metrics=metrics)

    # Print summary
    print("=== RAG Evaluation Results ===")
    for metric_name, score in results.items():
        print(f"  {metric_name}: {score:.4f}")

    # Save detailed results
    with open(output_path, "w") as f:
        json.dump({
            "summary": {k: float(v) for k, v in results.items()},
            "dataset_size": len(dataset),
        }, f, indent=2)

    return results

if __name__ == "__main__":
    run_evaluation(sys.argv[1], sys.argv[2])

Groundedness Scoring

python
# groundedness.py
"""Score whether generated answers are grounded in retrieved context."""
from openai import OpenAI
import json
from typing import List

client = OpenAI()

GROUNDEDNESS_PROMPT = """You are evaluating whether an AI answer is fully grounded
in the provided context documents. Score each claim in the answer.

Context documents:
{contexts}

Answer to evaluate:
{answer}

For each distinct claim in the answer, determine:
1. SUPPORTED - the claim is directly supported by the context
2. PARTIALLY_SUPPORTED - the claim is partially supported
3. NOT_SUPPORTED - the claim has no support in the context

Return JSON:
{{
  "claims": [
    {{"claim": "...", "verdict": "SUPPORTED|PARTIALLY_SUPPORTED|NOT_SUPPORTED", "evidence": "..."}}
  ],
  "groundedness_score": <float 0-1>,
  "unsupported_claims": ["..."]
}}
"""

def score_groundedness(answer: str, contexts: List[str]) -> dict:
    """Score groundedness of a single answer against its contexts."""
    context_text = "\n---\n".join(
        f"[Document {i+1}]: {c}" for i, c in enumerate(contexts)
    )

    response = client.chat.completions.create(
        model="gpt-4o",
        messages=[{
            "role": "user",
            "content": GROUNDEDNESS_PROMPT.format(
                contexts=context_text, answer=answer
            ),
        }],
        response_format={"type": "json_object"},
        temperature=0,
    )

    return json.loads(response.choices[0].message.content)

def batch_groundedness(eval_data: list) -> dict:
    """Score groundedness for a batch of QA pairs."""
    scores = []
    unsupported_count = 0
    total_claims = 0

    for item in eval_data:
        result = score_groundedness(
            item["generated_answer"],
            item["retrieved_contexts"],
        )
        scores.append(result["groundedness_score"])
        unsupported_count += len(result["unsupported_claims"])
        total_claims += len(result["claims"])

    avg_score = sum(scores) / len(scores) if scores else 0
    return {
        "average_groundedness": avg_score,
        "total_claims": total_claims,
        "unsupported_claims": unsupported_count,
        "unsupported_rate": unsupported_count / total_claims if total_claims else 0,
        "sample_count": len(eval_data),
    }

Retrieval Quality Metrics

python
# retrieval_metrics.py
"""Compute retrieval quality metrics for RAG evaluation."""
from typing import List, Set
import numpy as np

def recall_at_k(
    retrieved_ids: List[str],
    relevant_ids: Set[str],
    k: int
) -> float:
    """Compute Recall@K for a single query."""
    top_k = set(retrieved_ids[:k])
    if not relevant_ids:
        return 0.0
    return len(top_k & relevant_ids) / len(relevant_ids)

def mrr(
    retrieved_ids: List[str],
    relevant_ids: Set[str]
) -> float:
    """Compute Mean Reciprocal Rank for a single query."""
    for i, doc_id in enumerate(retrieved_ids):
        if doc_id in relevant_ids:
            return 1.0 / (i + 1)
    return 0.0

def ndcg_at_k(
    retrieved_ids: List[str],
    relevant_ids: Set[str],
    k: int
) -> float:
    """Compute NDCG@K for a single query."""
    dcg = 0.0
    for i, doc_id in enumerate(retrieved_ids[:k]):
        if doc_id in relevant_ids:
            dcg += 1.0 / np.log2(i + 2)

    ideal_dcg = sum(1.0 / np.log2(i + 2) for i in range(min(len(relevant_ids), k)))
    return dcg / ideal_dcg if ideal_dcg > 0 else 0.0

def compute_retrieval_metrics(
    queries: list,
    k_values: list = [1, 3, 5, 10]
) -> dict:
    """Compute aggregate retrieval metrics across all queries."""
    results = {}
    for k in k_values:
        recalls = [
            recall_at_k(q["retrieved_ids"], set(q["relevant_ids"]), k)
            for q in queries
        ]
        mrrs = [mrr(q["retrieved_ids"], set(q["relevant_ids"])) for q in queries]
        ndcgs = [
            ndcg_at_k(q["retrieved_ids"], set(q["relevant_ids"]), k)
            for q in queries
        ]
        results[f"recall@{k}"] = np.mean(recalls)
        results[f"ndcg@{k}"] = np.mean(ndcgs)

    results["mrr"] = np.mean(mrrs)
    return results

Prometheus Metrics Export

python
# rag_metrics_exporter.py
"""Export RAG quality metrics to Prometheus."""
from prometheus_client import Histogram, Counter, Gauge, start_http_server
import time

# Latency histograms by stage
RETRIEVAL_LATENCY = Histogram(
    "rag_retrieval_duration_seconds",
    "Time spent in retrieval stage",
    ["index_name", "retriever_type"],
    buckets=[0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0],
)

GENERATION_LATENCY = Histogram(
    "rag_generation_duration_seconds",
    "Time spent in generation stage",
    ["model", "route"],
    buckets=[0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0, 30.0],
)

RERANKING_LATENCY = Histogram(
    "rag_reranking_duration_seconds",
    "Time spent in reranking stage",
    ["reranker_model"],
    buckets=[0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0],
)

# Quality gauges (updated from offline evals)
GROUNDEDNESS_SCORE = Gauge(
    "rag_groundedness_score",
    "Latest groundedness evaluation score",
    ["route", "model"],
)

FAITHFULNESS_SCORE = Gauge(
    "rag_faithfulness_score",
    "Latest faithfulness evaluation score",
    ["route", "model"],
)

CONTEXT_PRECISION = Gauge(
    "rag_context_precision_score",
    "Latest context precision score",
    ["route", "index_name"],
)

RECALL_AT_K = Gauge(
    "rag_recall_at_k",
    "Recall@K for retrieval",
    ["k", "index_name"],
)

# Operational counters
REQUESTS_TOTAL = Counter(
    "rag_requests_total",
    "Total RAG requests",
    ["route", "status"],
)

HALLUCINATION_DETECTED = Counter(
    "rag_hallucination_detected_total",
    "Detected hallucinations",
    ["route", "severity"],
)

FALLBACK_TRIGGERED = Counter(
    "rag_fallback_triggered_total",
    "Times RAG fell back to abstain/default",
    ["route", "reason"],
)

TOKENS_USED = Counter(
    "rag_tokens_used_total",
    "Tokens consumed by stage",
    ["stage", "model"],
)

CACHE_HITS = Counter(
    "rag_cache_hits_total",
    "Semantic cache hits",
    ["cache_type"],
)

# Index health
INDEX_STALENESS_SECONDS = Gauge(
    "rag_index_staleness_seconds",
    "Seconds since last index update",
    ["index_name"],
)

INDEX_DOCUMENT_COUNT = Gauge(
    "rag_index_document_count",
    "Number of documents in index",
    ["index_name"],
)

def start_metrics_server(port: int = 9090):
    """Start Prometheus metrics HTTP server."""
    start_http_server(port)
    print(f"RAG metrics server running on :{port}/metrics")

Evaluation Pipeline

  1. Curate a benchmark set with gold answers and source docs.
  2. Run nightly offline evals for every retriever/model configuration.
  3. Execute online shadow evals on sampled production traffic.
  4. Gate releases on minimum quality + safety + latency thresholds.
yaml
# eval-pipeline-cron.yaml
apiVersion: batch/v1
kind: CronJob
metadata:
  name: rag-nightly-eval
  namespace: ai-evals
spec:
  schedule: "0 2 * * *"
  jobTemplate:
    spec:
      template:
        spec:
          containers:
            - name: eval-runner
              image: registry.internal/rag-eval:latest
              command:
                - python
                - -m
                - rag_eval
                - --dataset=/data/benchmark_v3.json
                - --output=/results/nightly-$(date +%Y%m%d).json
                - --push-metrics
                - --fail-on-regression
              env:
                - name: PROMETHEUS_PUSHGATEWAY
                  value: "http://pushgateway:9091"
                - name: MLFLOW_TRACKING_URI
                  value: "http://mlflow:5000"
              volumeMounts:
                - name: eval-data
                  mountPath: /data
                - name: results
                  mountPath: /results
          volumes:
            - name: eval-data
              persistentVolumeClaim:
                claimName: eval-benchmark-data
            - name: results
              persistentVolumeClaim:
                claimName: eval-results
          restartPolicy: OnFailure

Contents

When to Use This Skill

  • Deploying a RAG system to production and need quality monitoring
  • Setting up automated evaluation pipelines for retrieval and generation
  • Debugging hallucination or relevance regressions
  • Building dashboards for RAG-specific golden signals
  • Establishing quality gates for RAG pipeline changes

Limitations

  • Guidance executes against real environments: confirm target, blast radius, and rollback plan before applying anything.
  • Never deploy to production without explicit approval. Docs-only import: upstream scripts and templates not bundled.
Example
bash
git status && git diff --stat
kubectl diff -f manifest.yaml

Adapted from BagelHole/DevOps-Security-Agent-Skills (MIT); frontmatter, When to Use/Limitations, and safety boundaries added for upstream compliance. Docs-only import: helper scripts and templates not bundled.

© sickn33, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 1 other file (references) in skills/rag-observability-evals of sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/details.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 680176d

Used in 2 other repositories

We found 6 copies of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 2 other GitHub owners. This page covers the copy in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

RAG Observability Evals next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

RAG Observability Evals compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
RAG Observability Evals this skillsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills47k2 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Evalagentevals-dev/agentevals162—~904Automated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Exploring LLM EvaluationsPostHog/posthog40k—~5.7kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Dt Obs GenaiDynatrace/dynatrace-for-ai162—~4.5kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Failproof AI SDK IntegrationFailproofAI/failproofai5.3k—~6kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Looperksimback/looper710—~2.7kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • Eval

    agentevals-dev/agentevals

    Evaluate and score agent behavior against a golden reference.

    162 GitHub stars~904 tokensUpdated today
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Official

    Investigate AI observability evaluations — hog (deterministic code-based), llmjudge (LLM-prompt-based), and sentiment (user-message sentiment).

    40k GitHub stars~5.7k tokensUpdated today
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Dt Obs Genai

    Dynatrace/dynatrace-for-ai

    Analyze & debug GenAI/LLM apps: token cost & caching by prompt, model & provider; latency/errors; agent & tool loops/failures; conversations; guardrails; evaluations; OpenTelemetry/dt-evals setup.

    162 GitHub stars~4.5k tokensUpdated 7 days ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Failproof AI SDK Integration

    FailproofAI/failproofai

    Helps instrument a custom Python or TypeScript agent to record events for Failproof AI, verify what gets written, and run an evaluator worker that scores the runs.

    5.3k GitHub stars~6k tokensUpdated 2 days ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Looper

    ksimback/looper

    Scaffold a well-designed agent loop with best-practice coaching and a cross-model review council.

    710 GitHub stars~2.7k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes
  • Evaluate RAG

    ai-evals-course/evals-skills

    Guides evaluation of a RAG system by diagnosing failures in traces, building a retrieval test set and scoring retrieval and generation separately.

    1.5k GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 14 days ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed

More from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

All 1,493 skills in this repo
  • Liuguang Banlan UI

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Implements an interface in one of two named color modes, iridescent white or colorful black, from a parameterized starter that reports measured color intensity.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.5k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • User Thoughts Memory

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Saves a user's project decisions, rules and preferences into a project-local mdbase so later sessions and other agents can recover the intent.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.5k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Using LWC Memory and Graphs

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Keeps project decisions, research and verified results available across coding-agent sessions through LWC memory, a document Wiki graph and a CodeGraph code index.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Find Complementary Founders

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Guides an agent through assessing its own owner for cofounder fit, publishing an approved profile, and ranking complementary profiles other agents published for their owners.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.8k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Whatsapp Cloud API

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Integracao com WhatsApp Business Cloud API (Meta). An agent skill from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~4.5k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Cline Pilot

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Acts as a proxy for the Cline CLI, dispatching coding tasks one at a time, monitoring runs by hard evidence, relaying decisions to you and learning per-project preferences.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.6k tokens
    Auto-check passed

Questions about RAG Observability Evals

What does RAG Observability Evals do?

Monitor and evaluate RAG systems with retrieval quality metrics, groundedness checks, hallucination detection, and continuous regression testing. RAG Observability Evals is an agent skill from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills. Monitor and evaluate RAG systems with retrieval quality metrics, groundedness checks, hallucination detection, and continuous regression testing.

When should I use RAG Observability Evals?

RAG Observability Evals fits situations like: tasks that involve Retrieval-augmented generation; tasks that involve LLM evaluation; tasks that involve Observability.

How do I install RAG Observability Evals in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill rag-observability-evals -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/rag-observability-evals in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills) into .claude/skills/rag-observability-evals in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install RAG Observability Evals in Codex?

Run `npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill rag-observability-evals -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/rag-observability-evals in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills) into .agents/skills/rag-observability-evals in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use RAG Observability Evals in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill rag-observability-evals -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/rag-observability-evals, .gemini/skills/rag-observability-evals, .github/skills/rag-observability-evals and .opencode/skills/rag-observability-evals in your project.

What does RAG Observability Evals need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, RAG Observability Evals needs the command-line tools its instructions call (git and kubectl). Our summary lists: Python 3. Compatibility (from SKILL.md): Requires the relevant platform CLIs (kubectl, helm, terraform, git, CI runners) and authorized access to the target environment. Docs-only; helper scripts and templates not bundled..

Does RAG Observability Evals access the network?

SKILL.md names 1 domain. As links in the text: github.com. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is RAG Observability Evals safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does RAG Observability Evals use?

RAG Observability Evals is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does RAG Observability Evals use?

About 3.1k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 13k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 826 tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to RAG Observability Evals?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with RAG Observability Evals: Eval (agentevals-dev/agentevals, 162 stars), Exploring LLM Evaluations (PostHog/posthog, 40k stars), Dt Obs Genai (Dynatrace/dynatrace-for-ai, 162 stars) and Failproof AI SDK Integration (FailproofAI/failproofai, 5.3k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains RAG Observability Evals?

sickn33 (a GitHub user) maintains it in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, which has 47,379 GitHub stars. The repository holds 1,493 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 9, 2026.

Source: sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.