Agent skill

LLM Structured Output

by majiayu000 in majiayu000/claude-skill-registry

Get reliable JSON, enums, and typed objects from LLMs using responseformat, tooluse, and schema-constrained decoding across OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google APIs.

MITAuto-check passedAI & LLM Engineering

Install LLM Structured Output

skills CLI
$ npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill llm-structured-output -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install majiayu000/claude-skill-registry llm-structured-output --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/ai-llm/llm-structured-output .claude/skills/llm-structured-output && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
llm-structured-output
GitHub stars
666
Used in
3 other repos
Token cost
~3.9k tokens
SKILL.md length
1,667 words
Files
2
Skills in repo
1,273
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Get reliable JSON, enums, and typed objects from LLMs using responseformat, tooluse, and schema-constrained decoding across OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google APIs.

  • Works in 10 steps: Identify the target schema. Ask the user… → Choose the provider-appropriate method → Write the schema definition in the… → …
  • Tasks that involve Structured output and tool calling
  • SKILL.md covers What This Skill Does, When to Use This Skill, Core Workflow and Examples, plus 4 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

LLM Structured Output is an agent skill from majiayu000/claude-skill-registry. Get reliable JSON, enums, and typed objects from LLMs using responseformat, tooluse, and schema-constrained decoding across OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google APIs.

Its SKILL.md is about 3.9k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 1 other file (for example `metadata.json`).

It sits in AI & LLM Engineering, covering Structured output and tool calling. It works with OpenAI and Zod. The repository describes itself as: Searchable Claude Code skills catalog with source-linked guides and generated registry artifacts. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Structured output and tool calling

Example prompts

  • “/llm-structured-output”

Requirements

  • Python 3

Workflow steps

10 steps, taken from the first numbered list in SKILL.md.

  1. Identify the target schema. Ask the user what fields they need extracted. Define every field with its type, whether it's required or…
  2. Choose the provider-appropriate method
  3. Write the schema definition in the user's language. For Python, define a Pydantic BaseModel. For TypeScript, define a Zod schema and…
  4. Include field-level descriptions in the schema. Every field should have a description string that tells the model what to put there…
  5. Set the system prompt to reinforce structure. Tell the model its job is data extraction, not conversation. Example: "You are a data…
  6. If using OpenAI's json_schema mode, set "strict": true in the schema definition. This activates constrained decoding where the model can…
  7. If using Anthropic's tool_use approach, extract the structured data from response.content by finding the block where type == "tool_use"…
  8. Validate the response against the schema in your application code. Even with constrained decoding, validate with Pydantic's…
  9. Build a retry loop for validation failures. When validation fails, send the original input plus the failed output and the validation error…
  10. Log every structured output call with: the input, the raw response, the parsed result, and any validation errors. When structured output…

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit 2d14a69. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md (its code samples are python and typescript).

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

LLM Structured Output loads about 3.9k tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 46 tokens; SKILL.md has 1,667 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~46
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~3.9k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from majiayu000/claude-skill-registry at commit 2d14a69, republished under its MIT licence (© majiayu000). 1,667 words, ~3,886 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/llm-structured-output/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 1 other file; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
llm-structured-output
description
Get reliable JSON, enums, and typed objects from LLMs using response_format, tool_use, and schema-constrained decoding across OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google APIs.
risk
safe
source
community
date_added
2026-03-12

LLM Structured Output

What This Skill Does

Extract typed, validated data from LLM API responses instead of parsing free-text. This skill covers the three main approaches: OpenAI's response_format with JSON Schema, Anthropic's tool_use block for structured extraction, and Google's responseSchema in Gemini. You will learn when each approach works, when it breaks, and how to build retry logic around schema validation failures that every production system encounters.

When to Use This Skill

  • The user needs to extract structured data (JSON objects, arrays, enums) from an LLM response
  • The user is building a pipeline where LLM output feeds directly into code (database writes, API calls, UI rendering)
  • The user asks about response_format, json_mode, json_object, or json_schema in OpenAI
  • The user asks about using Anthropic's tool_use or tool_result blocks for data extraction (not for actual tool execution)
  • The user asks about Zod schemas with zodResponseFormat() from the openai npm package
  • The user needs to parse LLM output into Pydantic models using instructor, marvin, or manual validation
  • The user is getting malformed JSON, missing fields, or wrong types from LLM responses and needs a fix
  • The user asks about controlled generation, constrained decoding, or grammar-based sampling in local models

Do NOT use this skill when:

  • The user wants free-form text generation (summaries, essays, chat)
  • The user is asking about Zod for form validation or API input validation (use zod-validation-expert instead)
  • The user needs prompt engineering for better text quality (not structure)
  • The user wants to call real external tools/APIs (this skill covers using tool_use as a structured output hack, not actual tool orchestration)

Core Workflow

  1. Identify the target schema. Ask the user what fields they need extracted. Define every field with its type, whether it's required or optional, and valid enum values if applicable. Do not proceed without a concrete schema.

  2. Choose the provider-appropriate method:

    • OpenAI (gpt-4o, gpt-4o-mini): Use response_format: { type: "json_schema", json_schema: { ... } }. This enables Structured Outputs with guaranteed schema conformance via constrained decoding.
    • Anthropic (Claude): Define a single tool with the target schema as input_schema and set tool_choice: { type: "tool", name: "extract_data" }. Claude returns the structured data in the tool_use content block.
    • Google (Gemini): Use generationConfig.responseSchema with a JSON Schema object and set responseMimeType: "application/json".
    • Local models (llama.cpp, vLLM): Use GBNF grammars or --json-schema flag for constrained decoding at the token level.
  3. Write the schema definition in the user's language. For Python, define a Pydantic BaseModel. For TypeScript, define a Zod schema and convert it with zodResponseFormat(). For raw API calls, write JSON Schema directly.

  4. Include field-level descriptions in the schema. Every field should have a description string that tells the model what to put there. Models use these descriptions as implicit prompt instructions — a field described as "The user's sentiment as positive, negative, or neutral" produces better results than a bare sentiment: str with no context.

  5. Set the system prompt to reinforce structure. Tell the model its job is data extraction, not conversation. Example: "You are a data extraction system. Analyze the input and return the requested fields. Do not include explanations outside the JSON structure."

  6. If using OpenAI's json_schema mode, set "strict": true in the schema definition. This activates constrained decoding where the model can only output tokens that conform to the schema. Without strict: true, the model may still produce invalid JSON.

  7. If using Anthropic's tool_use approach, extract the structured data from response.content by finding the block where type == "tool_use" and reading its input field. Do not parse the text blocks — the structured data lives exclusively in the tool_use block.

  8. Validate the response against the schema in your application code. Even with constrained decoding, validate with Pydantic's model_validate() or Zod's .parse() before passing data downstream. This catches semantic issues (empty strings, out-of-range numbers) that schema conformance alone cannot prevent.

  9. Build a retry loop for validation failures. When validation fails, send the original input plus the failed output and the validation error back to the model with an instruction like "Your previous output failed validation: {error}. Fix the output." Cap retries at 3 attempts.

  10. Log every structured output call with: the input, the raw response, the parsed result, and any validation errors. When structured output breaks in production, you need these logs to determine whether the failure was a schema design issue, a prompt issue, or a model regression.

Examples

Example 1: OpenAI Structured Outputs with Pydantic (Python)
python
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
from openai import OpenAI
from enum import Enum

class Sentiment(str, Enum):
    positive = "positive"
    negative = "negative"
    neutral = "neutral"

class ReviewAnalysis(BaseModel):
    sentiment: Sentiment = Field(description="Overall sentiment of the review")
    key_topics: list[str] = Field(description="Main topics mentioned, max 5")
    purchase_intent: bool = Field(description="Whether the reviewer would buy again")
    confidence_score: float = Field(ge=0.0, le=1.0, description="Model confidence 0-1")

client = OpenAI()
response = client.beta.chat.completions.parse(
    model="gpt-4o-2024-08-06",
    messages=[
        {"role": "system", "content": "Extract structured review analysis."},
        {"role": "user", "content": "This laptop is amazing. The battery lasts forever and the keyboard feels great. Definitely buying the next version."}
    ],
    response_format=ReviewAnalysis,
)
result = response.choices[0].message.parsed
# result.sentiment == Sentiment.positive
# result.key_topics == ["battery life", "keyboard"]
# result.purchase_intent == True
Example 2: Anthropic tool_use for Structured Extraction (Python)
python
import anthropic

client = anthropic.Anthropic()
response = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
    max_tokens=1024,
    system="You are a data extraction system. Use the provided tool to return structured data.",
    tools=[{
        "name": "extract_invoice",
        "description": "Extract invoice fields from text",
        "input_schema": {
            "type": "object",
            "properties": {
                "vendor_name": {"type": "string", "description": "Company that issued the invoice"},
                "total_amount": {"type": "number", "description": "Total amount in USD"},
                "line_items": {
                    "type": "array",
                    "items": {
                        "type": "object",
                        "properties": {
                            "description": {"type": "string"},
                            "quantity": {"type": "integer"},
                            "unit_price": {"type": "number"}
                        },
                        "required": ["description", "quantity", "unit_price"]
                    }
                }
            },
            "required": ["vendor_name", "total_amount", "line_items"]
        }
    }],
    tool_choice={"type": "tool", "name": "extract_invoice"},
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Invoice from Acme Corp: 3x Widget A at $10 each, 1x Widget B at $25. Total: $55."}]
)
# Find the tool_use block — do NOT parse text blocks
tool_block = next(b for b in response.content if b.type == "tool_use")
invoice = tool_block.input
# invoice["vendor_name"] == "Acme Corp"
# invoice["total_amount"] == 55.0
Example 3: TypeScript with Zod + zodResponseFormat
typescript
import OpenAI from "openai";
import { z } from "zod";
import { zodResponseFormat } from "openai/helpers/zod";

const EventSchema = z.object({
  event_name: z.string().describe("Name of the event"),
  date: z.string().describe("ISO 8601 date string"),
  location: z.string().describe("City and venue"),
  attendee_count: z.number().int().describe("Expected number of attendees"),
  is_virtual: z.boolean().describe("Whether the event is online-only"),
});

const client = new OpenAI();
const completion = await client.beta.chat.completions.parse({
  model: "gpt-4o-2024-08-06",
  messages: [
    { role: "system", content: "Extract event details from the text." },
    { role: "user", content: "Tech Summit 2025 in Austin at the Convention Center on March 15th. Expecting 2000 attendees, in-person only." },
  ],
  response_format: zodResponseFormat(EventSchema, "event_extraction"),
});
const event = completion.choices[0].message.parsed;
// event.event_name === "Tech Summit 2025"
// event.is_virtual === false

Never Do This

  1. Never use response_format: { type: "json_object" } without a schema. This is OpenAI's legacy JSON mode — it guarantees valid JSON syntax but not schema conformance. The model can return {"result": "hello"} when you expected {"name": str, "age": int}. Always use json_schema with a full schema definition instead.

  2. Never parse Anthropic's text blocks for structured data. When using tool_choice to force structured output, the data is in the tool_use content block, not in any text block. Parsing response.content[0].text will either return empty string or a conversational preamble — never the data you need.

  3. Never define schema fields without descriptions. A field named status with no description can mean HTTP status, order status, or review status. Models use field descriptions as extraction instructions. Omitting them is equivalent to omitting half your prompt.

  4. Never use additionalProperties: true in strict mode schemas. OpenAI's strict mode requires additionalProperties: false on every object in the schema. If you set it to true or omit it, the API rejects the request with a 400 error, not at response time — you will never get a response at all.

  5. Never put extraction instructions only in the user message and not the system prompt. The system prompt has higher attention weight for behavioral instructions. Putting "extract the following fields" only in the user message alongside the source text forces the model to split attention between the instruction and the data. System prompt defines behavior; user message provides input data.

  6. Never assume structured output means correct output. Constrained decoding guarantees the response matches the schema's types and structure. It does not guarantee the values are correct. A model can return {"sentiment": "positive"} for a negative review if the source text is ambiguous. Always validate semantics in application code after schema validation.

  7. Never use recursive or deeply nested schemas without testing. Recursive types ($ref pointing to the same definition) and schemas deeper than 3 levels increase decoding latency significantly and raise the probability of the model hitting max_tokens before completing the JSON structure. Flatten nested schemas where possible.

Show full SKILL.md (582 more words)Show less

Edge Cases

  1. Long source text exceeding context window. When the input text is too long, the model may truncate its reading and return incomplete extractions. Split long documents into chunks, extract from each chunk independently, then merge results in application code. Do not rely on the model to handle 50-page documents in a single call.

  2. The model returns a refusal instead of structured data. OpenAI's structured output can return a refusal field when the model considers the request unsafe. Check response.choices[0].message.refusal before accessing .parsed. If refusal is not None, the parsed data will be None and accessing it throws an error.

  3. Array fields returning empty when data exists. Models sometimes return [] for array fields when the source text contains the data but the field description is too vague. Fix by making the description prescriptive: "List of all product names mentioned in the text. Return at least one if any product is referenced.".

  4. Enum values not matching due to casing. If you define an enum as ["Active", "Inactive"] but the model returns "active", validation fails. Either lowercase all enum values in the schema or add a normalization step before validation. OpenAI's strict mode respects exact casing; Anthropic may not.

  5. Streaming with structured output. OpenAI supports streaming structured output where partial JSON arrives chunk by chunk. You cannot parse intermediate chunks as valid JSON. Use the openai SDK's built-in partial parsing or buffer chunks until the stream completes. Anthropic's tool_use blocks arrive complete in a single content_block_stop event — no partial assembly needed.

Best Practices

  1. Start with the simplest schema that solves the problem. Flat objects with 3-5 fields produce higher accuracy than nested schemas with 20+ fields. If you need complex data, extract in two passes: first extract top-level entities, then make a second call to extract details for each entity.

  2. Use enums instead of free-form strings for categorical data. A field mood: str can return anything. A field mood: Literal["happy", "sad", "neutral", "angry"] constrains the model to exactly those values. This reduces downstream parsing logic to zero.

  3. Pin the model version in production. gpt-4o is an alias that changes when OpenAI releases new versions. Structured output behavior can change between versions. Use gpt-4o-2024-08-06 explicitly so that your schema+prompt combination remains stable until you deliberately upgrade.

  4. Test schema changes against 20+ real inputs before deploying. Schema changes (adding a field, changing a type, modifying a description) can break extraction on inputs that previously worked. Build a test suite of real inputs with expected outputs and run it on every schema change. This is the structured output equivalent of unit testing.

  5. Use default values in Pydantic models for optional fields. When a field might not have relevant data in the source text, define it as Optional[str] = None in Pydantic or .optional() in Zod. Without defaults, the model is forced to hallucinate a value for fields where the source text has no answer.

  6. Separate extraction schemas from application schemas. Your LLM extraction schema should match what the model can reliably produce. Your application database schema may have additional computed fields, foreign keys, or constraints. Map between them in application code — do not force the LLM to understand your database schema.

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

© majiayu000, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 1 other file in skills/ai-llm/llm-structured-output of majiayu000/claude-skill-registry.

  • SKILL.md
  • metadata.json

Open the folder on GitHubat commit 2d14a69

Used in 3 other repositories

We found 12 copies of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 3 other GitHub owners. This page covers the copy in majiayu000/claude-skill-registry, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

LLM Structured Output next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

LLM Structured Output compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
LLM Structured Output this skillmajiayu000/claude-skill-registry6663 repos~3.9kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
AI SDKvercel-labs/ai-facts16821 repos~1.2kAutomated safety check: PassNone
Perfupraullenchai/Rapid-MLX3.9k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: NotesCustom licence
Add AI Chat Toolryokun6/ryos1.3k—~2.2kAutomated safety check: PassAGPL-3.0
Bridgic LLMsbitsky-tech/bridgic155—~839Automated safety check: NotesMIT
Azure Openai To Responsesmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners77k—~6kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT

Similar skills

  • AI SDK

    vercel-labs/ai-facts

    Official

    Answer questions about the AI SDK and help build AI-powered features.

    168 GitHub starsUsed in 21 repos~1.2k tokens
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Perfup

    raullenchai/Rapid-MLX

    Autonomous performance optimization: research, PoC, benchmark, implement, review, PR

    3.9k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated today
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes
  • Add AI Chat Tool

    ryokun6/ryos

    Add or modify an AI chat tool ("Ask Ryo" capability) in ryOS.

    1.3k GitHub stars~2.2k tokensUpdated yesterday
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Bridgic LLMs

    bitsky-tech/bridgic

    LLM provider initialization for bridgic projects. An agent skill from bitsky-tech/bridgic.

    155 GitHub stars~839 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes
  • Azure Openai To Responses

    microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners

    Official

    Migrate Python apps from Azure OpenAI Chat Completions to the Responses API.

    77k GitHub stars~6k tokensUpdated 19 days ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes
  • Afm

    scouzi1966/maclocal-api

    Maintain and extend AFM (maclocal-api), a Swift OpenAI-compatible local LLM server and CLI for Apple Foundation Models, MLX models, API gateway proxying, and Vision OCR.

    345 GitHub stars~1.2k tokensUpdated 3 days ago
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed

More from majiayu000/claude-skill-registry

All 1,273 skills in this repo
  • Deep Research

    majiayu000/claude-skill-registry

    Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. An agent skill from majiayu000/claude-skill-registry.

    666 GitHub starsUsed in 6 repos~1.1k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Exa Search

    majiayu000/claude-skill-registry

    Neural search via Exa MCP for web, code, and company research.

    666 GitHub starsUsed in 5 repos~856 tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Fal AI Media

    majiayu000/claude-skill-registry

    Unified media generation via fal.ai MCP — image, video, and audio.

    666 GitHub starsUsed in 5 repos~1.7k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Pyzotero

    majiayu000/claude-skill-registry

    Interact with Zotero reference management libraries using the pyzotero Python client.

    666 GitHub starsUsed in 5 repos~1.6k tokens
    Auto-check: notes
  • Bgpt Paper Search

    majiayu000/claude-skill-registry

    Search scientific papers and retrieve structured experimental data extracted from full-text studies via the BGPT MCP server.

    666 GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~619 tokens
    Auto-check: notes
  • Bio Alignment Pairwise

    majiayu000/claude-skill-registry

    Perform pairwise sequence alignment using Biopython Bio.Align.PairwiseAligner.

    666 GitHub starsUsed in 4 repos~1.7k tokens
    Auto-check passed

Works with

Questions about LLM Structured Output

What does LLM Structured Output do?

Get reliable JSON, enums, and typed objects from LLMs using responseformat, tooluse, and schema-constrained decoding across OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google APIs. LLM Structured Output is an agent skill from majiayu000/claude-skill-registry. Get reliable JSON, enums, and typed objects from LLMs using responseformat, tooluse, and schema-constrained decoding across OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google APIs.

When should I use LLM Structured Output?

LLM Structured Output fits situations like: tasks that involve Structured output and tool calling.

How do I install LLM Structured Output in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill llm-structured-output -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/ai-llm/llm-structured-output in majiayu000/claude-skill-registry) into .claude/skills/llm-structured-output in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install LLM Structured Output in Codex?

Run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill llm-structured-output -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/ai-llm/llm-structured-output in majiayu000/claude-skill-registry) into .agents/skills/llm-structured-output in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use LLM Structured Output in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add majiayu000/claude-skill-registry --skill llm-structured-output -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/llm-structured-output, .gemini/skills/llm-structured-output, .github/skills/llm-structured-output and .opencode/skills/llm-structured-output in your project.

What does LLM Structured Output need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: LLM Structured Output is instructions for the agent only. Our summary lists: Python 3.

Does LLM Structured Output access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is LLM Structured Output safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does LLM Structured Output use?

LLM Structured Output is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does LLM Structured Output use?

About 3.9k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 16k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to LLM Structured Output?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with LLM Structured Output: AI SDK (vercel-labs/ai-facts, 168 stars), Perfup (raullenchai/Rapid-MLX, 3.9k stars), Add AI Chat Tool (ryokun6/ryos, 1.3k stars) and Bridgic LLMs (bitsky-tech/bridgic, 155 stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains LLM Structured Output?

majiayu000 (a GitHub user) maintains it in majiayu000/claude-skill-registry, which has 666 GitHub stars. The repository holds 1,273 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 7, 2026.

Source: majiayu000/claude-skill-registry on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.