Agent skill

Idea Evaluator

by sickn33 in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Evaluates an idea by hosting a multi-turn debate between a Pro and Con agent, delivering a final verdict on whether it's worth pursuing.

MITAuto-check passed

Install Idea Evaluator

skills CLI
$ npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill idea-evaluator -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills idea-evaluator --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/idea-evaluator .claude/skills/idea-evaluator && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
idea-evaluator
GitHub stars
47k
Used in
1 other repo
Token cost
~930 tokens
SKILL.md length
481 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
1,354
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Evaluates an idea by hosting a multi-turn debate between a Pro and Con agent, delivering a final verdict on whether it's worth pursuing.

  • Works in 3 steps: Initialize the Debate → The Debate (3 Turns) → Final Verdict
  • SKILL.md covers Overview, When to Use This Skill, How It Works and Examples, plus 3 more sections
  • Instructions only: no scripts, shell commands, URLs or credentials in SKILL.md

What it does

Idea Evaluator is an agent skill from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills. Evaluates an idea by hosting a multi-turn debate between a Pro and Con agent, delivering a final verdict on whether it's worth pursuing.

Its SKILL.md is about 930 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

The repository describes itself as: AAS Core is the local, agent-first control plane for complete catalog discovery, agent-owned selection, stack validation, and planning, backed by 2,400+ agentic skills. Includes… The licence is MIT.

Example prompts

  • “Use the idea-evaluator skill to evaluate an idea by hosting a multi-turn debate between a Pro and Con agent, delivering a final verdict on whether…”
  • “/idea-evaluator”

Workflow steps

3 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Initialize the Debate
  2. The Debate (3 Turns)
  3. Final Verdict

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit ec02547. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    No scripts in the folder and no shell commands in SKILL.md.

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Idea Evaluator loads about 930 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 38 tokens; SKILL.md has 481 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~38
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~930

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills at commit ec02547, republished under its MIT licence (© sickn33). 481 words, ~930 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/idea-evaluator/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
idea-evaluator
description
Evaluates an idea by hosting a multi-turn debate between a Pro and Con agent, delivering a final verdict on whether it's worth pursuing.
category
agent-orchestration
risk
safe
source
self
source_type
self
date_added
2026-09-18
author
Prince-1652
tags
ideation, validation, debate, multi-agent
tools
claude, gemini

Idea Evaluator Orchestrator

Overview

The Idea Evaluator skill acts as an impartial judge for evaluating new concepts, features, or project ideas. It takes an initial idea from the user and orchestrates a structured, multi-turn debate between two simulated personas: a logical supporter (Pro Agent) and a constructive critic (Con Agent).

By pitting these two perspectives against each other, it surfaces the strongest arguments for both sides before delivering a comprehensive final verdict on whether the idea is worth building.

When to Use This Skill

  • Use when you have a new idea but don't know if it's worth your time or effort to build.
  • Use when evaluating potential features for a product to decide on priorities.
  • Use when you want to rigorously stress-test an assumption before committing code.

How It Works

When triggered with an idea, you (the AI) will act as the Orchestrator and facilitate the following workflow:

Step 1: Initialize the Debate

You will assume the role of the Orchestrator. Introduce the debate and clearly state the idea being evaluated. Spawn or simulate the two participants:

  • @idea-evaluator-pro: The logical supporter.
  • @idea-evaluator-con: The constructive critic.
Step 2: The Debate (3 Turns)

Conduct a 3-turn debate where the Pro and Con agents respond to each other.

  • Turn 1 (Initial Pitches): Pro presents the strongest case for the idea. Con presents the strongest immediate risks and flaws.
  • Turn 2 (Rebuttals): Pro addresses Con's risks. Con challenges Pro's optimism.
  • Turn 3 (Closing Statements): Both agents summarize their final stance on why the idea will succeed or fail.

Note: Ensure the agents do not blindly agree/disagree but base their arguments on logic, market realities, and technical feasibility.

Show full SKILL.md (208 more words)Show less
Step 3: Final Verdict

Once the debate concludes, the Orchestrator steps in as the Judge. Provide a comprehensive summary formatted with:

  • Pros: The strongest validated points in favor.
  • Cons: The most critical risks identified.
  • Final Verdict: A definitive recommendation (e.g., "Strongly Recommended", "Proceed with Caution", "Pivot Required", "Not Worth Building").
  • Why: A brief justification summarizing the debate outcome.

Examples

Example 1: Evaluating a new app idea

User: "Evaluate this idea: A social network exclusively for houseplants where users post updates on their plant's growth."

Agent: (Proceeds to run the 3-turn debate between Pro and Con, followed by the Orchestrator's final verdict detailing the niche appeal versus retention challenges).

Best Practices

  • ✅ Ensure the Pro and Con agents directly address each other's points during rebuttals.
  • ✅ The Orchestrator must remain strictly neutral until the Final Verdict.
  • ❌ Don't let the agents devolve into generic AI pleasantries; keep the debate sharp and analytical.
  • ❌ Don't skip the debate steps; the back-and-forth is crucial for deep validation.

Limitations

  • The verdict is based on simulated reasoning and logic, not actual market data or user feedback.
  • This skill is for brainstorming and validation, not a guarantee of business success.
  • @idea-evaluator-pro - The supporting persona used in this debate.
  • @idea-evaluator-con - The critical persona used in this debate.

© sickn33, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in skills/idea-evaluator of sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit ec02547

Used in 1 other repository

We found 5 copies of this SKILL.md (exact, near-identical or edited) in other folders, from 1 other GitHub owner. This page covers the copy in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, which our catalogue first saw on October 7, 2026.

Compare with similar skills

Idea Evaluator next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Idea Evaluator compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Idea Evaluator this skillsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills47k1 repos~930Automated safety check: PassMIT
Research Idea EvaluatorHKUSTDial/Supervisor-Skills8.5k—~3.4kAutomated safety check: PassCC-BY-4.0
Arize Evaluatorgithub/awesome-copilot40k2 repos~8.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
LLM Evaluationdavila7/claude-code-templates32k13 repos~3.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
EvaluatorsArize-ai/phoenix12k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassCustom licence
Evaluating Startup IdeasRefoundAI/lenny-skills1.4k—~1.7kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Research Idea Evaluator

    HKUSTDial/Supervisor-Skills

    Evaluates a draft research idea like a top-venue reviewer and advisor, scoring it on five dimensions, checking fit with your capacity and returning a clear verdict.

    8.5k GitHub stars~3.4k tokensUpdated 1 mo ago
    Research & ScienceAuto-check passed
  • Arize Evaluator

    github/awesome-copilot

    Official

    Handles LLM-as-judge evaluation workflows on Arize including creating/updating evaluators, running evaluations on spans or experiments, managing tasks, trigger-run operations, column mapping, and…

    40k GitHub starsUsed in 2 repos~8.1k tokens
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check: notes
  • LLM Evaluation

    davila7/claude-code-templates

    Master comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications, from automated metrics to human evaluation and A/B testing.

    32k GitHub starsUsed in 13 repos~3.5k tokens
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed
  • Evaluators

    Arize-ai/phoenix

    Author or refine a Phoenix evaluator — code or LLM-as-a-judge — that scores a run's output.

    12k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated today
    EducationAuto-check passed
  • Evaluating Startup Ideas

    RefoundAI/lenny-skills

    Help users distinguish between deceptive tarpit ideas and high-potential opportunities by applying rigorous frameworks for market timing, business math, and user demand.

    1.4k GitHub stars~1.7k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Official

    Author continuously-running online evaluations in PostHog AI observability, grounded in real failure modes you've identified.

    40k GitHub stars~6.7k tokensUpdated today
    AI & LLM EngineeringAuto-check passed

More from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

All 1,354 skills in this repo
  • Liuguang Banlan UI

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Implements an interface in one of two named color modes, iridescent white or colorful black, from a parameterized starter that reports measured color intensity.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.5k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • User Thoughts Memory

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Saves a user's project decisions, rules and preferences into a project-local mdbase so later sessions and other agents can recover the intent.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.5k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Using LWC Memory and Graphs

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Keeps project decisions, research and verified results available across coding-agent sessions through LWC memory, a document Wiki graph and a CodeGraph code index.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Find Complementary Founders

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Guides an agent through assessing its own owner for cofounder fit, publishing an approved profile, and ranking complementary profiles other agents published for their owners.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.8k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Cline Pilot

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Acts as a proxy for the Cline CLI, dispatching coding tasks one at a time, monitoring runs by hard evidence, relaying decisions to you and learning per-project preferences.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~4.6k tokens
    Auto-check passed
  • Content Creator

    sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

    Drafts and reviews audience-specific content from supplied brand examples, with local scripts for brand voice and SEO diagnostics, channel templates and a content calendar.

    47k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.5k tokens
    Auto-check passed

Questions about Idea Evaluator

What does Idea Evaluator do?

Evaluates an idea by hosting a multi-turn debate between a Pro and Con agent, delivering a final verdict on whether it's worth pursuing. Idea Evaluator is an agent skill from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills. Evaluates an idea by hosting a multi-turn debate between a Pro and Con agent, delivering a final verdict on whether it's worth pursuing.

How do I install Idea Evaluator in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill idea-evaluator -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/idea-evaluator in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills) into .claude/skills/idea-evaluator in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Idea Evaluator in Codex?

Run `npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill idea-evaluator -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/idea-evaluator in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills) into .agents/skills/idea-evaluator in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Idea Evaluator in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill idea-evaluator -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/idea-evaluator, .gemini/skills/idea-evaluator, .github/skills/idea-evaluator and .opencode/skills/idea-evaluator in your project.

What does Idea Evaluator need to run?

SKILL.md names no scripts, command-line tools or credentials: Idea Evaluator is instructions for the agent only.

Does Idea Evaluator access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Any network use would come from the scripts or tools the agent runs. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Idea Evaluator safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Idea Evaluator use?

Idea Evaluator is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Idea Evaluator use?

About 930 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.7k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Idea Evaluator?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Idea Evaluator: Research Idea Evaluator (HKUSTDial/Supervisor-Skills, 8.5k stars), Arize Evaluator (github/awesome-copilot, 40k stars), LLM Evaluation (davila7/claude-code-templates, 32k stars) and Evaluators (Arize-ai/phoenix, 12k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Idea Evaluator?

sickn33 (a GitHub user) maintains it in sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, which has 47,343 GitHub stars. The repository holds 1,354 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on October 7, 2026.

Source: sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.