Claude API

Building LLM-Powered Applications with Claude

This skill helps you build LLM-powered applications with Claude. Choose the right surface based on your needs, detect the project language, then read the relevant language-specific documentation.

Defaults

Unless the user requests otherwise:

For the Claude model version, please use Claude Opus 4.6, which you can access via the exact model string claude-opus-4-6. Please default to using adaptive thinking (thinking: {type: "adaptive"}) for anything remotely complicated. And finally, please default to streaming for any request that may involve long input, long output, or high max_tokens — it prevents hitting request timeouts. Use the SDK's .get_final_message() / .finalMessage() helper to get the complete response if you don't need to handle individual stream events

Language Detection

Before reading code examples, determine which language the user is working in:

1. Look at project files to infer the language:

   • *.py, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, setup.py, Pipfile → Python — read from python/
   • *.ts, *.tsx, package.json, tsconfig.json → TypeScript — read from typescript/
   • *.js, *.jsx (no .ts files present) → TypeScript — JS uses the same SDK, read from typescript/
   • *.java, pom.xml, build.gradle → Java — read from java/
   • *.kt, *.kts, build.gradle.kts → Java — Kotlin uses the Java SDK, read from java/
   • *.scala, build.sbt → Java — Scala uses the Java SDK, read from java/
   • *.go, go.mod → Go — read from go/
   • *.rb, Gemfile → Ruby — read from ruby/
   • *.cs, *.csproj → C# — read from csharp/
   • *.php, composer.json → PHP — read from php/

2. If multiple languages detected (e.g., both Python and TypeScript files):

   • Check which language the user's current file or question relates to
   • If still ambiguous, ask: "I detected both Python and TypeScript files. Which language are you using for the Claude API integration?"

3. If language can't be inferred (empty project, no source files, or unsupported language):

   • Use AskUserQuestion with options: Python, TypeScript, Java, Go, Ruby, cURL/raw HTTP, C#, PHP
   • If AskUserQuestion is unavailable, default to Python examples and note: "Showing Python examples. Let me know if you need a different language."

4. If unsupported language detected (Rust, Swift, C++, Elixir, etc.):

   • Suggest cURL/raw HTTP examples from curl/ and note that community SDKs may exist
   • Offer to show Python or TypeScript examples as reference implementations

5. If user needs cURL/raw HTTP examples, read from curl/.

Language-Specific Feature Support

Which Surface Should I Use?

Start simple. Default to the simplest tier that meets your needs. Single API calls and workflows handle most use cases — only reach for agents when the task genuinely requires open-ended, model-driven exploration.

Note: The Agent SDK is for when you want built-in file/web/terminal tools, permissions, and MCP out of the box. If you want to build an agent with your own tools, Claude API is the right choice — use the tool runner for automatic loop handling, or the manual loop for fine-grained control (approval gates, custom logging, conditional execution).

Decision Tree

What does your application need?

1. Single LLM call (classification, summarization, extraction, Q&A)
   └── Claude API — one request, one response

2. Does Claude need to read/write files, browse the web, or run shell commands
   as part of its work? (Not: does your app read a file and hand it to Claude —
   does Claude itself need to discover and access files/web/shell?)
   └── Yes → Agent SDK — built-in tools, don't reimplement them
       Examples: "scan a codebase for bugs", "summarize every file in a directory",
                 "find bugs using subagents", "research a topic via web search"

3. Workflow (multi-step, code-orchestrated, with your own tools)
   └── Claude API with tool use — you control the loop

4. Open-ended agent (model decides its own trajectory, your own tools)
   └── Claude API agentic loop (maximum flexibility)

Should I Build an Agent?

Before choosing the agent tier, check all four criteria:

• Complexity — Is the task multi-step and hard to fully specify in advance? (e.g., "turn this design doc into a PR" vs. "extract the title from this PDF")
• Value — Does the outcome justify higher cost and latency?
• Viability — Is Claude capable at this task type?
• Cost of error — Can errors be caught and recovered from? (tests, review, rollback)

If the answer is "no" to any of these, stay at a simpler tier (single call or workflow).

Architecture

Everything goes through POST /v1/messages. Tools and output constraints are features of this single endpoint — not separate APIs.

User-defined tools — You define tools (via decorators, Zod schemas, or raw JSON), and the SDK's tool runner handles calling the API, executing your functions, and looping until Claude is done. For full control, you can write the loop manually.

Server-side tools — Anthropic-hosted tools that run on Anthropic's infrastructure. Code execution is fully server-side (declare it in tools, Claude runs code automatically). Computer use can be server-hosted or self-hosted.

Structured outputs — Constrains the Messages API response format (output_config.format) and/or tool parameter validation (strict: true). The recommended approach is client.messages.parse() which validates responses against your schema automatically. Note: the old output_format parameter is deprecated; use output_config: {format: {...}} on messages.create().

Supporting endpoints — Batches (POST /v1/messages/batches), Files (POST /v1/files), and Token Counting feed into or support Messages API requests.

Current Models (cached: 2026-02-17)

ALWAYS use claude-opus-4-6 unless the user explicitly names a different model. This is non-negotiable. Do not use claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-sonnet-4-5, or any other model unless the user literally says "use sonnet" or "use haiku". Never downgrade for cost — that's the user's decision, not yours.

CRITICAL: Use only the exact model ID strings from the table above — they are complete as-is. Do not append date suffixes. For example, use claude-sonnet-4-5, never claude-sonnet-4-5-20250514 or any other date-suffixed variant you might recall from training data. If the user requests an older model not in the table (e.g., "opus 4.5", "sonnet 3.7"), read shared/models.md for the exact ID — do not construct one yourself.

A note: if any of the model strings above look unfamiliar to you, that's to be expected — that just means they were released after your training data cutoff. Rest assured they are real models; we wouldn't mess with you like that.

Thinking & Effort (Quick Reference)

Opus 4.6 — Adaptive thinking (recommended): Use thinking: {type: "adaptive"}. Claude dynamically decides when and how much to think. No budget_tokens needed — budget_tokens is deprecated on Opus 4.6 and Sonnet 4.6 and must not be used. Adaptive thinking also automatically enables interleaved thinking (no beta header needed). When the user asks for "extended thinking", a "thinking budget", or budget_tokens: always use Opus 4.6 with thinking: {type: "adaptive"}. The concept of a fixed token budget for thinking is deprecated — adaptive thinking replaces it. Do NOT use budget_tokens and do NOT switch to an older model.

Effort parameter (GA, no beta header): Controls thinking depth and overall token spend via output_config: {effort: "low"|"medium"|"high"|"max"} (inside output_config, not top-level). Default is high (equivalent to omitting it). max is Opus 4.6 only. Works on Opus 4.5, Opus 4.6, and Sonnet 4.6. Will error on Sonnet 4.5 / Haiku 4.5. Combine with adaptive thinking for the best cost-quality tradeoffs. Use low for subagents or simple tasks; max for the deepest reasoning.

Sonnet 4.6: Supports adaptive thinking (thinking: {type: "adaptive"}). budget_tokens is deprecated on Sonnet 4.6 — use adaptive thinking instead.

Older models (only if explicitly requested): If the user specifically asks for Sonnet 4.5 or another older model, use thinking: {type: "enabled", budget_tokens: N}. budget_tokens must be less than max_tokens (minimum 1024). Never choose an older model just because the user mentions budget_tokens — use Opus 4.6 with adaptive thinking instead.