Agent skill

Security Review

by selmakcby in selmakcby/claude-agents-skills

AI-powered security vulnerability detection. An agent skill from selmakcby/claude-agents-skills.

MITAuto-check passedSecurity

Install Security Review

skills CLI
$ npx skills add selmakcby/claude-agents-skills --skill security-review -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install selmakcby/claude-agents-skills security-review --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/selmakcby/claude-agents-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/my-project-demo/.claude/skills/security-review .claude/skills/security-review && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
security-review
GitHub stars
136
Token cost
~963 tokens
SKILL.md length
394 words
Files
1
Skills in repo
8
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

AI-powered security vulnerability detection. An agent skill from selmakcby/claude-agents-skills.

  • Works in 10 steps: Injection → Broken authentication → Sensitive data exposure → …
  • Tasks that involve Web application vulnerabilities
  • SKILL.md covers When to trigger, Scanning mode, What to check (OWASP Top 10… and AI-specific checks, plus 3 more sections
  • Calls npm

What it does

Security Review is an agent skill from selmakcby/claude-agents-skills. AI-powered security vulnerability detection. Use PROACTIVELY after writing code that handles user input, authentication, API endpoints, payments, or sensitive data. Flags OWASP Top 10 issues with diff-aware scanning.

Its SKILL.md is about 960 tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. It is a single SKILL.md file with no bundled scripts.

It sits in Security, covering Web application vulnerabilities, Security review and REST APIs. The repository describes itself as: Multi-Agent Claude Code setup — 4 uzman ajan (planner · ui-agent · builder · reviewer) + skills + Next.js demo projesi. YouTube Bölüm 1 video materyalleri. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • Tasks that involve Web application vulnerabilities
  • Tasks that involve Security review
  • Tasks that involve REST APIs

Example prompts

  • “/security-review”

Workflow steps

10 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Injection
  2. Broken authentication
  3. Sensitive data exposure
  4. XML/XXE
  5. Broken access control
  6. Security misconfiguration
  7. XSS
  8. Insecure deserialization
  9. Using components with known vulnerabilities
  10. Insufficient logging

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit ddcfb0c. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • npm

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    Links to these hosts (documentation or services it may open):

    • github.com

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Security Review loads about 963 tokens when it runs. Until then it costs about 58 tokens; SKILL.md has 394 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~58
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~963

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from selmakcby/claude-agents-skills at commit ddcfb0c, republished under its MIT licence (© selmakcby). 394 words, ~963 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/security-review/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder).
name
security-review
description
AI-powered security vulnerability detection. Use PROACTIVELY after writing code that handles user input, authentication, API endpoints, payments, or sensitive data. Flags OWASP Top 10 issues with diff-aware scanning.
<!--
  Source: anthropics/claude-code-security-review (official)
  File:   https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code-security-review/blob/main/.claude/commands/security-review.md
  Used by: reviewer agent
-->

Security Review

When to trigger

  • After writing code touching auth, payments, API endpoints, file I/O, or user input
  • Before commit on security-sensitive changes
  • When user asks /security-review

Scanning mode

Diff-aware: only analyze changed files in the current PR/commit. Focus on real vulnerabilities — filter out false positives aggressively.

What to check (OWASP Top 10 mapping)

1. Injection
  • SQL injection → parameterized queries?
  • NoSQL injection → $where clauses, user-controlled operators?
  • Command injection → exec() with user input?
  • Prompt injection (AI-specific) → user input flowing into system prompts?
2. Broken authentication
  • Missing auth checks on protected routes
  • Weak password hashing (bcrypt/argon2 required)
  • JWT misuse — missing signature verification, weak secrets, none algorithm accepted
  • Session fixation, missing session rotation on login
3. Sensitive data exposure
  • Hardcoded secrets in code
  • API keys in client bundles (import in "use client" components)
  • PII in logs
  • Missing HTTPS enforcement
  • Secrets in error messages
4. XML/XXE
  • XML parsers with external entity processing enabled
5. Broken access control
  • Missing authorization (authenticated but not authorized)
  • IDOR (accessing other users' data by changing an ID)
  • Privilege escalation paths
6. Security misconfiguration
  • Default credentials
  • Debug endpoints exposed in prod
  • Missing security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options)
7. XSS
  • dangerouslySetInnerHTML with user input
  • Rendering LLM output without sanitization
  • URL parameters reflected without escaping
8. Insecure deserialization
  • JSON.parse with user-controlled content (usually fine in JS, but watch for prototype pollution)
9. Using components with known vulnerabilities
  • Run npm audit mentally — are any flagged deps in critical paths?
Show full SKILL.md (158 more words)Show less
10. Insufficient logging
  • Security events unlogged (failed logins, permission denials)
  • Overlogging (logging PII, tokens, passwords)

AI-specific checks

  • Webhooks: signature verification present? (Stripe, GitHub, etc.)
  • Rate limiting: on public endpoints? On AI endpoints especially?
  • Input length: max length on LLM inputs?
  • Output validation: Zod schema on LLM responses before rendering?
  • CORS / CSRF: properly configured for auth endpoints?

Severity (same as code-review)

  • CRITICAL — exposed secret, missing auth, unverified webhook, SQL injection, missing rate limit on AI endpoint
  • HIGH — missing input validation, weak crypto
  • MEDIUM — logging gaps, overly verbose errors
  • LOW — defense-in-depth suggestions

Output format

markdown
## CRITICAL
- [`<file>:<line>`] <vulnerability> (OWASP: <category>)
  - Impact: <what an attacker could do>
  - Fix: <specific mitigation>

## HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
- ...

## Verdict
PASS | BLOCK (CRITICAL count: N)

Rules

  • Never hand-wave. "This might be a risk" is not enough — say if it is or isn't, with evidence.
  • Every finding: severity, OWASP category, file + line, attacker scenario, specific fix.
  • Rotate suspected exposed secrets immediately and flag at top of report.
  • False positives are worse than no review — if you're not sure, don't flag it.
  • AI endpoints get extra scrutiny — token limits, output sanitization, rate limits.

© selmakcby, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

Just SKILL.md in my-project-demo/.claude/skills/security-review of selmakcby/claude-agents-skills.

Open the folder on GitHubat commit ddcfb0c

Compare with similar skills

Security Review next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Security Review compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Security Review this skillselmakcby/claude-agents-skills136—~963Automated safety check: PassMIT
Security Reviewjewbetcha/opentrace11618 repos~3.1kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Security Reviewaffaan-m/ECC276k1 repos~3.2kAutomated safety check: NotesMIT
Security Auditoreigent-ai/eigent15k—~1.8kAutomated safety check: NotesApache-2.0
Strix Code Vulnerability Scanusestrix/strix68k—~1.1kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Code Audit3stoneBrother/code-audit8921 repos~2.7kAutomated safety check: PassNone

Similar skills

  • Security Review

    jewbetcha/opentrace

    A skill your agent uses when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features.

    116 GitHub starsUsed in 18 repos~3.1k tokens
    SecurityAuto-check: notes
  • Security Review

    affaan-m/ECC

    Kimlik doğrulama eklerken, kullanıcı girdisi işlerken, secret'larla çalışırken, API endpoint'leri oluştururken veya ödeme/hassas özellikler uygularken bu skill'i kullanın.

    276k GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~3.2k tokens
    SecurityAuto-check: notes
  • Security Auditor

    eigent-ai/eigent

    Audits source code, dependencies and config files for vulnerabilities and hardcoded secrets, using two bundled Python scanners and an OWASP Top 10 checklist.

    15k GitHub stars~1.8k tokensUpdated yesterday
    SecurityAuto-check: notes
  • Runs a Strix white-box security review that reads the source, then exploits what it finds in a sandbox so each reported issue has a proof-of-concept.

    68k GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated yesterday
    SecurityAuto-check passed
  • Code Audit

    3stoneBrother/code-audit

    Professional code security audit skill covering 55+ vulnerability types.

    892 GitHub starsUsed in 1 repo~2.7k tokens
    SecurityAuto-check passed
  • Wooyun Legacy

    tanweai/wooyun-legacy

    WooYun business logic vulnerability methodology — 22,132 real cases across 6 domains (authentication bypass, authorization bypass, payment tampering, information disclosure, logic flaws…

    1.8k GitHub stars~1.9k tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    SecurityAuto-check passed

More from selmakcby/claude-agents-skills

All 8 skills in this repo
  • API Design

    selmakcby/claude-agents-skills

    Backend API design specialist. An agent skill from selmakcby/claude-agents-skills.

    136 GitHub stars~1.1k tokensUpdated 5 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Plan

    selmakcby/claude-agents-skills

    Implementation planning specialist. An agent skill from selmakcby/claude-agents-skills.

    136 GitHub stars~548 tokensUpdated 5 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • UI UX Pro Max

    selmakcby/claude-agents-skills

    UI/UX design intelligence for web and mobile. An agent skill from selmakcby/claude-agents-skills.

    136 GitHub stars~777 tokensUpdated 5 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • UI UX Pro Max

    selmakcby/claude-agents-skills

    UI/UX design intelligence. An agent skill from selmakcby/claude-agents-skills.

    136 GitHub stars~393 tokensUpdated 5 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Code Review

    selmakcby/claude-agents-skills

    Senior code review specialist. An agent skill from selmakcby/claude-agents-skills.

    136 GitHub stars~746 tokensUpdated 5 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Code Review

    selmakcby/claude-agents-skills

    Senior code review specialist. An agent skill from selmakcby/claude-agents-skills.

    136 GitHub stars~363 tokensUpdated 5 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Security Review

What does Security Review do?

AI-powered security vulnerability detection. An agent skill from selmakcby/claude-agents-skills. Security Review is an agent skill from selmakcby/claude-agents-skills. AI-powered security vulnerability detection.

When should I use Security Review?

Security Review fits situations like: tasks that involve Web application vulnerabilities; tasks that involve Security review; tasks that involve REST APIs.

How do I install Security Review in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add selmakcby/claude-agents-skills --skill security-review -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (my-project-demo/.claude/skills/security-review in selmakcby/claude-agents-skills) into .claude/skills/security-review in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Security Review in Codex?

Run `npx skills add selmakcby/claude-agents-skills --skill security-review -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (my-project-demo/.claude/skills/security-review in selmakcby/claude-agents-skills) into .agents/skills/security-review in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Security Review in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add selmakcby/claude-agents-skills --skill security-review -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/security-review, .gemini/skills/security-review, .github/skills/security-review and .opencode/skills/security-review in your project.

What does Security Review need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Security Review needs the command-line tools its instructions call (npm).

Does Security Review access the network?

SKILL.md names 1 domain. As links in the text: github.com. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Security Review safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Security Review use?

Security Review is published under the MIT licence (the repository's licence). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Security Review use?

About 963 tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 3.9k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full.

What are the alternatives to Security Review?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Security Review: Security Review (jewbetcha/opentrace, 116 stars), Security Review (affaan-m/ECC, 276k stars), Security Auditor (eigent-ai/eigent, 15k stars) and Strix Code Vulnerability Scan (usestrix/strix, 68k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Security Review?

selmakcby (a GitHub user) maintains it in selmakcby/claude-agents-skills, which has 136 GitHub stars. The repository holds 8 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on April 21, 2026.

Source: selmakcby/claude-agents-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.