Omh Cto Loop

Cto Loop

This is a Hermes-native cto-loop workflow skill.

Why This Exists

cto-loop exists to keep leadership work explicit, evidence-backed, and inside the Hermes/executor boundary instead of relying on ad hoc chat narration.

Do Not Use When

• The request is a settings-only change, one bounded edit that is explicitly low-risk and has a direct owner and verification path, or a direct answer/diagnosis; handle it directly or use strategy-brief for a decision brief instead of starting a leadership operating loop.

Examples

Good example:

• Prompt: cto-loop: run the PM, dev, QA, security, and ops loop for this risky billing launch.
• Expected behavior: Prepare the CTO operating model with role responsibilities, gates, blockers, and status boundaries.
• Why: The request needs a leadership operating loop, not just a generic plan.

Bad example:

• Prompt: cto-loop: treat casual chat or unaccepted work as if this workflow already produced verified results.
• Expected behavior: Ask a clarification question or route to a narrower workflow instead of forcing cto-loop.
• Why: The request lacks the required inputs or would overclaim work that Hermes did not observe.

Completion Checklist

• Confirm the workflow target, evidence boundary, and stop condition are named.
• Report which outputs are prepared, observed, blocked, or missing.
• Name the smallest next verification or handoff instead of claiming completion from narration.

Recovery Notes

• If required context is missing, ask one blocking question or route back to the narrower workflow.
• If runtime or wrapper evidence is unavailable, keep the status as not_observed and expose the next observable action.

Workflow Lane

• Current lane: Coding handoff (idea-to-deploy, llm-app-dev, cto-loop, deploy-and-monitor, code-review, build-failure-triage, verification-gate, security-safety-review, +28 more) - coding owners, handoffs, review, CI, and merge evidence.
• If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
• Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md.

Use When

Use when Hermes should run a leadership-style operating loop that turns signals into roadmap decisions, technical tradeoffs, delivery risk, release readiness, and explicit follow-up handoffs.

Strong routing signals: `cto-loop`, `cto loop`, `cto`, `cto pm`, `pm dev qa security ops`, `roadmap technical tradeoffs`, `technical tradeoff`, `delivery risk`, `release readiness`, `technical leadership loop`, `leadership operating loop`, `engineering leadership`, `CTO 구조`, `PM 구조`, `로드맵`, `아키텍처 트레이드오프`, `기술 리더십`, `출시 준비`

Catalog Metadata

Category: leadership Phase: operating-loop Hermes role: operator Quality tier: decision-gated Reasoning demand: heavy

Quality bar:

• Separate product priority, architecture tradeoff, delivery risk, release risk, and follow-up owner.
• Tie recommendations to observed signals or mark assumptions.
• Record accepted decisions separately from draft recommendations.
• Prepare executor handoffs only for accepted implementation follow-ups.

Handoff policy:

Keep CTO/PM-style synthesis, tradeoffs, risk ranking, decision notes, and status in Hermes; convert accepted implementation follow-ups into executor-neutral handoffs.

Required inputs:

• operating signals
• roadmap or release scope
• known risks
• decision owner

Expected outputs:

• priority frame
• architecture tradeoffs
• delivery risks
• decision note
• follow-up handoff candidates

Artifact expectations:

• leadership loop record or status summary when a wrapper captures decisions and follow-ups

Safety rules:

• Do not treat a CTO loop recommendation as an accepted roadmap decision.
• Do not imply CTO, PM, QA, Security, or Ops runtime agents exist without observed wrapper evidence.
• Separate strategy decisions from implementation handoffs and release evidence.