Migrating Langchain To Pydantic AI

Migrate LangChain, LangGraph, and Deep Agents to Pydantic AI

Preserve behavior, not framework shape. Migrate the smallest behaviorally complete slice and leave application infrastructure outside that slice unchanged. LangChain, LangGraph, and Deep Agents are one source ecosystem; Pydantic AI, pydantic_graph, and Pydantic AI Harness are the matching target ecosystem, and this skill maps across all of it.

Work from the running application

1. Read repository instructions, dependency files, tests, and the actual runtime entrypoints. Identify the installed LangChain, LangGraph, Deep Agents, Pydantic AI, and Harness versions.
2. Trace one representative request through prompts, retrieval, model and tool calls, state, persistence, interrupts, emitted events, tracing/metrics callbacks, and the public result. Inspect every caller and sibling endpoint that consumes the migrated component; a narrow implementation slice can still have several public contracts. Include keyword parameter names and the sync, async, callback, and streaming forms callers actually use. Record only contracts those paths actually use.
3. Run the cheapest useful baseline. When the migration surface is broad or unclear, search dependency files and source for langchain, langgraph, langsmith, and deepagents, then confirm findings against imports, factories, and call sites. Resolve where create_deep_agent comes from: the upstream package and a vendored copy that reproduces its contracts both count as Deep Agents.
4. Classify the slice before choosing a target:
   • Chain or LCEL pipeline: keep deterministic retrieval and transformation in plain Python; use a Pydantic AI agent only where a model/tool loop adds value.
   • LangChain agent: normally use one reusable pydantic_ai.Agent with typed dependencies, tools, and outputs.
   • Direct LangGraph workflow: use plain async Python for simple fixed control flow, or pydantic_graph when explicit typed nodes and branching remain useful. Treat persistence as a separate design decision.
   • Deep Agents harness: create_deep_agent bundles file tools, shell execution, subagent delegation, summarization, skills, memory, permissions, prompt caching, and approval middleware on top of the LangChain agent loop, and a harness profile can add or hide more. Migrate the loop with the LangChain mappings, then map each bundled feature the slice actually uses to a Harness capability, a core primitive, or an application service with Deep Agents Mapping. Inventory implicit defaults the application code never mentions.
   • Product runtime: retain queues, configured database backends, sandboxes, auth, schedulers, webhooks, tracing, and transport adapters unless the user placed them in scope. Extend an existing application seam before creating a parallel persistence or provider subsystem.
5. Add or preserve deterministic characterization tests, then migrate one vertical slice behind the existing public boundary.
6. Run the original tests and focused parity tests. Classify each observed contract by its evidence; never describe the migration as one-to-one merely because the happy path or trace shape looks similar.

Read Concept Mapping for the detected source features. Read Deep Agents Mapping whenever deepagents is in the slice. Read Semantic Gaps only for state, middleware, retries, approval, concurrency, streaming, or other behavior where similar-looking APIs may differ. Use Workaround Recipes after a concrete gap is identified, not as a mandatory checklist. Read Logfire Verification when adding observability, comparing source and target runs, or debugging a semantic difference. Read Verification and Cutover before a production cutover.

Explain semantic differences

When an observed source contract has no direct equivalent, explain it to the user before making a consequential design choice. State the source behavior, how the proposed Pydantic AI design differs, the user-visible or operational impact, and the available choices. Recommend one option and name its residual risk. Keep this proportional: do not turn ordinary import or naming changes into semantic warnings.

Do not stop at "unsupported." When nothing maps directly, recommend an existing core or Harness composition, a narrow adapter or application service, a new capability built from public primitives, or a core change, in that order of preference. Ask before choosing only when the options materially change behavior, architecture, public API, or scope.

Match rigor to risk

• For a stateless chain or ordinary agent port, focused characterization tests and a short residual-risk note are enough. Do not require a semantic-gap register or durability exercise for behavior the source does not have.
• For middleware, structured output transport, retrieval, tool retries, or streaming, probe the affected contract against the installed versions.
• For checkpointed graphs, interrupts, approvals, durable execution, concurrent fan-out, or external side effects, create a migration ledger. Separate dependencies, messages, workflow state, checkpoint state, and long-term memory. Fit those owners into the repository's existing backend-selection and service interfaces where possible. Test restart, replay, correlation, authorization, and idempotency only to the extent the source promises them.
• A deepagents dependency alone changes nothing. When the active slice calls create_deep_agent or depends on its planning, filesystem, sandbox, skills, memory, subagent, permission, or deployment contracts, those are in-scope features with Harness or application owners, not a reason to stop. Files, sandboxes, permissions, subagents, and background work carry the same ledger and restart obligations as checkpointed graphs.