Agent skill

Testing In Production

by petrkindlmann in petrkindlmann/qa-skills

Safe-release techniques DURING rollout: feature flags, progressive rollouts, canary analysis, guardrail metrics, production smoke tests, and synthetic users.

MITAuto-check passedDevOps & Cloud

Install Testing In Production

skills CLI
$ npx skills add petrkindlmann/qa-skills --skill testing-in-production -a claude-code

Project install by default; add -g for ~/.claude/skills/.

GitHub CLI
$ gh skill install petrkindlmann/qa-skills testing-in-production --agent claude-code

Project scope by default; add --scope user for a personal install. Needs GitHub CLI 2.90.0 or later (public preview).

Manual copy
$ git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/petrkindlmann/qa-skills.git skills-src && mkdir -p .claude/skills && cp -r skills-src/skills/testing-in-production .claude/skills/testing-in-production && rm -rf skills-src

Use ~/.claude/skills/ instead of .claude/skills for a personal install. The folder must contain SKILL.md.

Claude Code skills documentation · loads skills from .claude/skills/

Facts

Skill name
testing-in-production
GitHub stars
170
Token cost
~5.3k tokens
SKILL.md length
2,511 words
Files
3 (incl. references)
Skills in repo
45
Repo updated
First seen
Licence
MIT

At a glance

Safe-release techniques DURING rollout: feature flags, progressive rollouts, canary analysis, guardrail metrics, production smoke tests, and synthetic users.

  • Works in 5 steps: Production is the final test environment → Safety through blast radius control → Always have a tested rollback plan → …
  • : feature flag testing
  • SKILL.md covers Quick Route, Discovery Questions, Core Principles and Feature Flag Testing, plus 5 more sections
  • Calls npx

What it does

Testing In Production is an agent skill from petrkindlmann/qa-skills. Safe-release techniques DURING rollout: feature flags, progressive rollouts, canary analysis, guardrail metrics, production smoke tests, and synthetic users. Bridges QA and SRE practices. Use when: "feature flag testing," "canary deploy," "progressive rollout," "guardrail metrics," "dark launch," "safe rollout." Not for: scheduled probes that run continuously after release — use synthetic-monitoring. Not for: designing tests from prod telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: release-readiness…

Its SKILL.md is about 5.3k tokens, which your agent loads only when the skill is triggered. The skill folder holds 3 other files, including reference files (for example `references/patterns.md` and `references/rollout-policy.md`).

It sits in DevOps & Cloud, covering Deployment, QA and bug reports and Feature launches and release readiness. The repository describes itself as: 50 QA and test-automation skills for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and any Agent Skills Standard runtime. The licence is MIT.

When your agent uses it

  • : feature flag testing
  • Progressive rollout
  • Guardrail metrics
  • Safe rollout. Not for: scheduled probes that run continuously after release — use synthetic-monitoring

Example prompts

  • “feature flag testing,”
  • “canary deploy,”
  • “progressive rollout,”
  • “/testing-in-production”

Workflow steps

5 steps, taken from the step headings in SKILL.md.

  1. Production is the final test environment
  2. Safety through blast radius control
  3. Always have a tested rollback plan
  4. Monitoring is a prerequisite, not a nice-to-have
  5. Production tests must be non-destructive

What it can do on your machine

Read from SKILL.md and the folder at commit b3bb61b. It shows what the files ask for, not the result of running them.

  • Tool permissions

    Pre-approves nothing: there is no allowed-tools line, so your agent's usual permission prompts apply.

    From allowed-tools in the SKILL.md frontmatter.

  • Runs code

    Shell commands in SKILL.md call:

    • npx

    From the folder's file list and the shell code blocks in SKILL.md.

  • Network

    No URLs in SKILL.md. Its commands use npx, which can reach the network depending on how they are called.

    From URLs in SKILL.md, links to its own repository left out.

  • Credentials

    Names no API keys, tokens, secrets or passwords.

    From names ending in _API_KEY, _TOKEN, _SECRET, _KEY or _PASSWORD in SKILL.md.

Context cost

Testing In Production loads about 5.3k tokens when it runs, and up to ~8k if it reads all its reference files. Until then it costs about 151 tokens; SKILL.md has 2,511 words of instructions outside code blocks.

Always · name and description, kept in context so the agent knows when to use it
~151
When it runs · the whole SKILL.md, loaded when a task matches
~5.3k
With references · SKILL.md plus every file in references/, read only if the agent opens them
~8k

Estimates: characters ÷ 4, the usual rule of thumb; real counts depend on the model's tokenizer. Scripts and assets cost tokens only if the agent reads them.

Safety

Auto-check passed

The automated check found no risky patterns in SKILL.md.

Automated static check — not a guarantee. Review scripts before installing. It scans the text of SKILL.md for risky patterns (piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files, hidden Unicode, destructive commands); files beside SKILL.md are not scanned.

SKILL.md

The full file from petrkindlmann/qa-skills at commit b3bb61b, republished under its MIT licence (© petrkindlmann). 2,511 words, ~5,269 tokens.

Download SKILL.mdSave it as .claude/skills/testing-in-production/SKILL.md (or your agent's skills folder). This skill also uses 2 other files; get the full folder from GitHub.
name
testing-in-production
description
Safe-release techniques DURING rollout: feature flags, progressive rollouts, canary analysis, guardrail metrics, production smoke tests, and synthetic users. Bridges QA and SRE practices. Use when: "feature flag testing," "canary deploy," "progressive rollout," "guardrail metrics," "dark launch," "safe rollout." Not for: scheduled probes that run continuously after release — use `synthetic-monitoring`. Not for: designing tests from prod telemetry — use `observability-driven-testing`. Related: release-readiness, synthetic-monitoring, observability-driven-testing, qa-metrics.
license
MIT
metadata.author
kindlmann
metadata.version
2.0
metadata.category
production
<objective>
Production is the only environment that is production. Every other environment is an approximation — staging never replicates real data volume, traffic, or third-party quirks. This skill covers how to validate quality in production safely: controlled blast radius, automated rollback, guardrail metrics, and smoke tests that catch problems before users do. The recurring failure it prevents: shipping to 100% of users with no flag to flip, no baseline to compare against, and no tested way back.
</objective>

Quick Route

SituationGo to
Shipping a feature behind a flagFeature Flag Testing
Ramping traffic 1% → 100% with gatesProgressive Rollout + references/rollout-policy.md
Need post-deploy checks on every releaseProduction Smoke Tests + references/patterns.md
Deciding what numbers gate the rolloutGuardrail Metrics
New code path with no user-visible change yetDark Launches
Proving the rollback actually worksVerification

Discovery Questions

Check .agents/qa-project-context.md first. If it exists, use it as context and skip questions already answered there.

Feature flag system:

  • Do you have a feature flag platform? (LaunchDarkly, Statsig — now part of OpenAI, GrowthBook, Unleash, Flagsmith, Harness FME — formerly Split, custom, none)
  • How are flags managed? (Dashboard, config file, environment variables)
  • Can flags target specific users, percentages, or segments?
  • How many active flags exist today? Is there a cleanup process?

Rollout capability:

  • Can you deploy to a subset of traffic? (Canary infrastructure, weighted routing, feature flags)
  • How long does a deployment take? How long does a rollback take?
  • Do you have blue-green or rolling deployments?
  • Can you route traffic by region, user cohort, or percentage?

Monitoring maturity:

  • What observability is in place? (APM, logging, error tracking, metrics)
  • Do you have dashboards for error rate, latency, and business metrics?
  • Are alerts configured with appropriate thresholds?
  • Can you compare metrics between canary and baseline in real time?

Production access and safety:

  • Who has production access? Is there an approval process?
  • Are there dedicated test accounts in production?
  • Can you run operations in production without affecting real user data?
  • Is there a production incident response process?

Core Principles

1. Production is the final test environment

Staging approximates production. It does not replicate production's data volume, traffic patterns, third-party integrations, infrastructure quirks, or user behavior. Testing in production is not reckless — it is realistic. The question is not whether to test in production, but how to do it safely.

2. Safety through blast radius control

Every production test must answer: "If this goes wrong, how many users are affected?" The answer must be as small as possible. Feature flags, canary deploys, and traffic splitting exist to shrink the blast radius from 100% to 1% or less.

3. Always have a tested rollback plan

Before any production test begins, the rollback mechanism must be identified, tested, and fast. "Disable the flag" is a good rollback plan. "Redeploy the previous version" is acceptable. "We'll figure it out" is not a plan. A rollback you have never fired is a hypothesis, not a plan — see Verification for how to prove it works.

4. Monitoring is a prerequisite, not a nice-to-have

You cannot test in production without monitoring. If you cannot measure error rates, latency, and business metrics in real time, you cannot detect problems. Fix monitoring gaps before adding production tests.

5. Production tests must be non-destructive

Production tests must never corrupt real user data, send real notifications to real users, charge real payment methods, or create side effects that require manual cleanup. Synthetic accounts, test flags, and isolated resources are mandatory.


Feature Flag Testing

Feature flags are the safest mechanism for production testing. They decouple deployment from release and provide instant rollback.

Test with flags ON and OFF

Every flagged feature needs tests in both states. The flag-off path is the rollback path and must work flawlessly — use setFeatureFlag(name, true|false, { userId: TEST_USER_ID }) to drive both. See references/patterns.md for the full ON/OFF test pair.

Flag lifecycle testing

Flags are not just on or off. They transition through states, and each transition must be validated.

Flag lifecycle:
  Created → Targeting internal users → Canary (1%) → Partial (10-50%) → Full (100%) → Cleanup (removed)

Test at each stage:
  - Internal: Feature works for internal accounts, hidden from external
  - Canary: Metrics are comparable between flag-on and flag-off cohorts
  - Partial: No performance degradation at scale
  - Full: All user segments work correctly
  - Cleanup: Code with flag removed behaves identically to flag-on
Stale flag cleanup

Flags left in code become technical debt. Run a weekly CI job that queries the flag provider for flags that are 100% rolled out and older than 14 days. These are candidates for code cleanup — remove the flag branching logic and retain only the enabled path. Removing the flag without removing the dead code is half a cleanup.

Flag combination testing

When multiple flags interact, test the combinations that matter. Do not test all 2^N combinations — focus on flags that affect the same user flow (e.g. new-checkout, express-pay, discount-engine-v2 all touch checkout). Pick the critical combinations: all-new, a representative mixed state, and all-legacy. See references/patterns.md for the combination-test loop.


Progressive Rollout

Vendor-native canary analysis. Before hand-rolling the rollout-policy YAML below, check whether your platform already does it: LaunchDarkly Guarded Rollouts (auto-monitored progressive rollouts with metric-based auto-rollback; uses a frequentist sequential-testing analysis model since early 2026), Statsig Auto-tune, Argo Rollouts AnalysisRun, Flagger, Harness Continuous Verification. If you have one, prefer it — the integration with your metrics and rollback mechanics is cheaper than maintaining a custom analysis loop.

AI feature rollout is its own pattern: model variant + prompt as a flag value, with cost guardrails and a kill switch. LaunchDarkly AI Configs / AgentControl (AI Configs rebranded under the AgentControl umbrella, announced May 2026) is the documented path for shipping LLM features behind progressive rollout. See release-readiness for the full pattern.

Canary stages: 1% to 100%

A structured rollout with explicit promotion criteria at each stage.

StageTrafficHold TimeKey Checks
Canary1%15-30 minError rate, crash rate, exceptions
Early adopters10%1-2 hoursLatency P95, conversion rate
Partial50%2-4 hoursAll guardrails, business metrics
Full100%24 hours monitoringLong-tail issues, batch job compatibility
Automated promotion and rollback

Define machine-checkable conditions for advancing between stages — hold_duration plus metric conditions (error_rate_5xx < 0.5%, latency_p95 < 500ms, crash_rate == 0). Automatic rollback fires when guardrails are breached, with no human approval needed: error_rate_5xx > 2x_baseline for 5m, latency_p99 > 3x_baseline for 5m, crash_rate > 0.1% for 2m, each notifying on-call. Gate on error-budget burn rate, not only raw multipliers, so slow burns that still blow the SLO are caught. See references/rollout-policy.md for the full promotion YAML, rollback triggers, and SLO-gate config.

Verify the rollback fired correctly

Auto-rollback firing is not the same as the incident being resolved. After a rollback triggers, do not declare "recovered" until you have confirmed the system is actually back:

  1. Re-run the health-check smoke test against production (GET /api/health returns healthy and the previous version).
  2. Confirm the flag/deploy state reverted — query the flag platform that the flag is off (or the deploy that the previous build is serving), don't assume.
  3. Confirm guardrail metrics returned to baseline — error rate, P99 latency, and crash rate back within their pre-deploy windows.
  4. Confirm the rollback notification reached on-call (Slack/PagerDuty) so the incident is owned.

Only when all four hold is the rollback verified. See Verification for the staging dry-run that proves this chain before first production use.


Production Smoke Tests

Post-deploy critical path tests

Run immediately after every deployment as a pipeline stage (not only in pre-deploy CI). These verify core functionality works with production configuration, data, and infrastructure: a /api/health check, the authentication flow with synthetic credentials, core data loading, and search. Configure retries: 1 and a timeout so a flaky post-deploy run doesn't block the pipeline on the first blip. See references/patterns.md for the full production-smoke.spec.ts.

Synthetic user accounts

Production test accounts must be clearly distinguishable from real users: a reserved email pattern (smoke-test+{env}@yourcompany.com), an is_synthetic = true flag, and exclusion from analytics, billing, and email campaigns. Create them via admin API, and prefer short-lived OIDC / workload-identity tokens over long-lived passwords. See references/patterns.md for the full conventions.

Non-destructive assertions

Production smoke tests must read, not write. When writes are unavoidable, clean up in fixture teardown so cleanup runs whether the test passes or fails.

Do not call test.afterEach() inside a test() body — Playwright registers hooks at describe/file scope, so a hook registered mid-test never schedules teardown and throws test.afterEach() can only be called in a describe block. The data leaks. Use an auto-cleanup fixture that records created resource IDs and deletes them on teardown (or try/finally for a one-off script). See references/patterns.md for the fixture-based create-verify-cleanup pattern.


Guardrail Metrics

What to monitor during rollout
CategoryMetricComparison MethodAlert Threshold
ErrorsHTTP 5xx ratevs. pre-deploy baseline>2x baseline for 5 min
ErrorsUnhandled exception countvs. pre-deploy baselineAny new exception type
LatencyP50 response timevs. pre-deploy baseline>1.5x baseline
LatencyP95 response timevs. pre-deploy baseline>2x baseline
LatencyP99 response timevs. pre-deploy baseline>3x baseline
BusinessConversion ratevs. 7-day averageDrop >5%
BusinessRevenue per sessionvs. 7-day averageDrop >10%
ClientCrash rate (mobile)vs. previous release>0.1% increase
ClientJavaScript error ratevs. pre-deploy baseline>2x baseline
InfraCPU utilizationabsolute>80% sustained
InfraMemory utilizationabsolute>85% sustained
Baseline comparison

Compare canary metrics against a control group running the previous version, not against historical data alone.

Comparison approaches (best to worst):
  1. Canary vs. control: split traffic, compare groups in real time (best)
  2. Before/after: compare post-deploy metrics to pre-deploy window (good)
  3. Historical: compare to same time last week (acceptable for trends)
  4. Absolute thresholds: fixed thresholds regardless of baseline (fragile)
Statistical significance

For business metrics (conversion, revenue), small sample sizes produce noisy results. Wait for statistical significance before drawing conclusions.

Minimum sample sizes for rollout decisions:
  - Error rate: 1,000 requests (errors are rare events, need volume)
  - Latency: 500 requests (more stable, converges faster)
  - Conversion rate: 5,000 sessions (business metrics have high variance)
  - Crash rate: 10,000 app launches (crashes are rare events)

Rule of thumb: if you don't have enough traffic at 1% to reach
significance in 30 minutes, increase to 5% or extend the hold window.

Show full SKILL.md (1,003 more words)Show less

Dark Launches

Dark launches deploy new functionality to production but hide it from users. Real production traffic exercises the new code path without user-visible impact.

Traffic shadowing

Duplicate incoming requests to the new service. Compare responses without returning the new response to the user.

Request flow:
  User → Load Balancer → Production Service (returns response to user)
                       ↘ Shadow Service (processes request, logs result, discards)

What to compare:
  - Response status codes: shadow should match production
  - Response body: diff for semantic equivalence (ignore timestamps, IDs)
  - Latency: shadow should not be significantly slower
  - Error rate: shadow should not produce more errors
Parallel execution

For migrations (new database, new algorithm, new service), run both the old and new path in production. The old path returns the result to the user; the new path runs asynchronously, logs differences, and discards its result. Track the match rate over time — target 99%+ match before cutting over.

Shadow launch timeline:
  Week 1: Deploy shadow, start comparing, expect <50% match
  Week 2: Fix mismatches, match rate should climb to 90%+
  Week 3: Match rate stable at 99%+, handle remaining edge cases
  Week 4: Cut over: shadow becomes primary, old becomes shadow
  Week 5: Remove old path after 1 week of stability

Anti-Patterns

Testing in production without monitoring

Running production tests without dashboards and alerts is flying blind. You will not know if your tests caused an issue until a user reports it. Fix: Monitoring is a prerequisite. Before adding any production test, verify you can see error rates, latency, and key business metrics in real time. Set up alerts before the first test runs.

No rollback plan

"We'll deploy a fix if something goes wrong" is not a rollback plan. Under pressure, fixes take longer, introduce new bugs, and extend the outage. Fix: Every production test or rollout must have a documented rollback mechanism that takes less than 5 minutes to execute — feature flag disable, previous deployment, or traffic reroute — and a verification step that confirms it actually recovered the system (see Verification).

Destructive operations in production tests

Production tests that create real orders, send real emails, or modify real user data are not tests — they are incidents waiting to happen. Fix: Use synthetic accounts flagged as test data. Use sandbox modes for payment and email. Clean up created data in fixture teardown so it always runs. If a test cannot be made non-destructive, it does not belong in production.

Cleanup that only runs on success

A cleanup step placed after an assertion never runs when the assertion fails, leaking exactly the test data it was meant to remove. Calling test.afterEach() inside a test() body is the same trap — it throws or is ignored. Fix: Put teardown in an auto-cleanup fixture or a finally block so it runs on pass and fail alike. See references/patterns.md.

Testing in production instead of pre-production

Production testing supplements pre-production testing. It does not replace it. If staging is broken and you are "testing in production" because it is the only working environment, fix staging first. Fix: Maintain a working pre-production environment. Use production testing for what only production can validate: real traffic, real data volumes, real third-party integrations.

Canary deploys without comparison

Deploying to 1% of traffic but not comparing canary metrics against a control group misses the entire point. You are just deploying slowly, not detecting problems. Fix: Always compare canary metrics against a baseline. Use side-by-side dashboards or automated canary analysis tools (Kayenta, Argo Rollouts analysis).

Stale feature flags

Flags that are fully rolled out but never removed accumulate. After a year, you have 200 flags with unknown interactions, and every code path has branching logic that nobody understands. Fix: Every flag gets an expiration date at creation time. After full rollout + 2 weeks of stability, remove the flag and its dead branch. Track flag age and alert when flags exceed their expiration.


Verification

Prove the rollback path actually fires before the first production use — a rollback you have never triggered is a hypothesis. Smallest check first:

  1. Trip a guardrail in staging. Inject failure (e.g. force error_rate_5xx above 2x_baseline, or fail the health check 3 times) on a staged rollout wired to the same automatic_rollback policy. Confirm the rollback action fires within its for: window.
  2. Confirm the reverted state. Re-run the health-check smoke test and assert status === 'healthy' and the previous version. Query the flag platform/deploy that the previous build is serving — don't assume.
  3. Confirm metrics recovered. Error rate, P99 latency, and crash rate are back inside their pre-deploy windows.
  4. Confirm the notification fired. The rollback alert reached the on-call channel (Slack/PagerDuty).
  5. Smoke tests are wired into the pipeline. Run the deploy job against staging and confirm the post-deploy smoke stage executes and gates promotion — npx playwright test production-smoke.spec.ts exits 0.

If steps 1–4 cannot be demonstrated in staging, the rollback is unverified and the rollout is not ready.

Agent shortcut: vendor MCP servers exist for LaunchDarkly, GrowthBook, Unleash, Flagsmith, Statsig, and Harness FME, letting an AI agent flip flags and read rollout metrics directly during these checks rather than driving the dashboard by hand.


Done When

  • Feature flag rollout plan is documented with explicit percentage steps (1% → 10% → 50% → 100%) and named guardrail metrics at each stage.
  • Canary analysis is configured with automated pass/fail criteria so promotion and rollback decisions do not require manual metric comparison.
  • Production smoke tests run as a pipeline stage on every deploy (not only in CI pre-deploy) and the stage exits 0 against production.
  • Rollback trigger conditions are defined, documented, and demonstrated to fire correctly via the Verification staging dry-run (guardrail tripped → rollback fired → reverted state and recovered metrics confirmed) before first production use.
  • Production test data strategy is documented, specifying whether synthetic users or anonymized real users are used and how they are excluded from analytics and billing.

Reference Files (in references/)

  • rollout-policy.md — full promotion-criteria YAML, automatic-rollback triggers, and the error-budget / SLO-gate config.
  • patterns.md — flag ON/OFF and combination tests, the production-smoke.spec.ts suite, synthetic-account conventions, and the fixture-based non-destructive create-verify-cleanup pattern.
  • release-readiness — Go/no-go for the whole release; production testing is the post-deploy verification step inside it. Go there for the release checklist, not the rollout mechanics.
  • synthetic-monitoring — Scheduled probes that run continuously after the rollout is complete. Go there for ongoing SLA validation, not in-flight rollout safety.
  • observability-driven-testing — Uses prod traces and logs as the input to design new tests. Go there when telemetry tells you what to test, not when you need to ship safely.
  • qa-metrics — Where guardrail metrics and rollout criteria feed into dashboards and KPIs.
  • ci-cd-integration — Wiring the smoke-test stage and rollout gates into the pipeline.
  • test-environments — Pre-production environments that production testing complements, never replaces.

© petrkindlmann, MIT. Rendered from Markdown: HTML in the file is shown as text, images as links, and headings moved down two levels. Raw file

Files

SKILL.md and 2 other files (references) in skills/testing-in-production of petrkindlmann/qa-skills.

  • SKILL.md
  • references/patterns.md
  • references/rollout-policy.md

Open the folder on GitHubat commit b3bb61b

Compare with similar skills

Testing In Production next to the 5 skills that share the most tags, products or categories with it. Stars are the repository's; “used in” counts other GitHub owners with a copy.

Testing In Production compared with similar skills
SkillStarsUsed inTokensAuto-checkLicenceRepo updated
Testing In Production this skillpetrkindlmann/qa-skills170—~5.3kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Onboarding Validationopen-edge-platform/edge-ai-suites140—~3.3kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Frontmcp Production Readinessagentfront/frontmcp146—~6.5kAutomated safety check: PassApache-2.0
Deploying Scalable Agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners77k—~1.5kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Deploying Scalable Agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners77k—~1.6kAutomated safety check: PassMIT
Release Itwondelai/skills2.4k—~4kAutomated safety check: PassMIT

Similar skills

  • Onboarding Validation

    open-edge-platform/edge-ai-suites

    Validate the get-started experience of Open Edge Platform (OEP) software components from the perspective of a first-time user.

    140 GitHub stars~3.3k tokensUpdated today
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Pre-production audit, hardening, and go-live checklists for FrontMCP servers.

    146 GitHub stars~6.5k tokensUpdated today
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Deploying Scalable Agents

    microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners

    Official

    Take a working agent prototype to a scalable, observable production deployment on Microsoft Foundry.

    77k GitHub stars~1.5k tokensUpdated yesterday
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Deploying Scalable Agents

    microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners

    Official

    Take one working agent prototype go scalable, observable production deployment for Microsoft Foundry.

    77k GitHub stars~1.6k tokensUpdated yesterday
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Release It

    wondelai/skills

    Build production-ready systems with stability patterns: circuit breakers, bulkheads, timeouts, and retry logic.

    2.4k GitHub stars~4k tokensUpdated 29 days ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed
  • Platform Operations

    rsmdt/the-startup

    Unified platform operations guidance for CI/CD pipeline design, deployment strategies, observability, SLI/SLOs, and incident-ready rollouts.

    560 GitHub stars~991 tokensUpdated 2 mo ago
    DevOps & CloudAuto-check passed

More from petrkindlmann/qa-skills

All 45 skills in this repo
  • Accessibility Testing

    petrkindlmann/qa-skills

    Test for WCAG 2.2 AA compliance with axe-core + Playwright, keyboard navigation audits, screen reader testing, ARIA pattern validation, and legal compliance mapping (ADA, EAA, Section 508).

    170 GitHub stars~4.5k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Agentic Browser Testing

    petrkindlmann/qa-skills

    Goal-driven E2E testing where a browser agent (Playwright MCP / computer-use) reads a natural-language goal and explores the app via the accessibility tree to assert outcomes — no pre-written script.

    170 GitHub stars~4.5k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • AI Test Generation

    petrkindlmann/qa-skills

    Use AI to write NEW test code from specs, PRDs, user stories, code diffs, bug reports, or OpenAPI specs.

    170 GitHub stars~4.8k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • API Testing

    petrkindlmann/qa-skills

    Test REST and GraphQL APIs with Playwright APIRequestContext, Supertest, or standalone HTTP clients.

    170 GitHub stars~2.7k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • CI CD Integration

    petrkindlmann/qa-skills

    Design CI/CD pipelines that run test suites. An agent skill from petrkindlmann/qa-skills.

    170 GitHub stars~4.8k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed
  • Compliance Testing

    petrkindlmann/qa-skills

    Test for regulatory compliance: GDPR/CMP consent verification, Google Consent Mode v2, Global Privacy Control (GPC), CCPA/US state opt-out, EU AI Act Article 50 transparency, Better Ads Standards…

    170 GitHub stars~4.6k tokensUpdated 4 mo ago
    Auto-check passed

Categories

Questions about Testing In Production

What does Testing In Production do?

Safe-release techniques DURING rollout: feature flags, progressive rollouts, canary analysis, guardrail metrics, production smoke tests, and synthetic users. Testing In Production is an agent skill from petrkindlmann/qa-skills. Safe-release techniques DURING rollout: feature flags, progressive rollouts, canary analysis, guardrail metrics, production smoke tests, and synthetic users.

When should I use Testing In Production?

Testing In Production fits situations like: : feature flag testing; progressive rollout; guardrail metrics; safe rollout. Not for: scheduled probes that run continuously after release — use synthetic-monitoring.

How do I install Testing In Production in Claude Code?

Run `npx skills add petrkindlmann/qa-skills --skill testing-in-production -a claude-code`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/testing-in-production in petrkindlmann/qa-skills) into .claude/skills/testing-in-production in your project. Claude Code loads it when a task matches its description.

How do I install Testing In Production in Codex?

Run `npx skills add petrkindlmann/qa-skills --skill testing-in-production -a codex`. Or copy the skill folder (skills/testing-in-production in petrkindlmann/qa-skills) into .agents/skills/testing-in-production in your project. Codex loads it when a task matches its description.

Can I use Testing In Production in Cursor, Gemini CLI or GitHub Copilot?

Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot and OpenCode also load SKILL.md folders. With the skills CLI, run `npx skills add petrkindlmann/qa-skills --skill testing-in-production -a cursor` (or -a gemini-cli, github-copilot or opencode for the others). To copy it by hand, put the folder in .cursor/skills/testing-in-production, .gemini/skills/testing-in-production, .github/skills/testing-in-production and .opencode/skills/testing-in-production in your project.

What does Testing In Production need to run?

Going by SKILL.md and its folder, Testing In Production needs the command-line tools its instructions call (npx).

Does Testing In Production access the network?

SKILL.md contains no URLs. Its commands use npx, which can reach the network depending on how they are called. This is read from the text; nothing was executed.

Is Testing In Production safe to install?

Our automated static check of SKILL.md found no risky patterns, such as piping downloads into a shell, reading credential files or hidden Unicode. It is not a guarantee. Review the folder before installing.

What licence does Testing In Production use?

Testing In Production is published under the MIT licence (declared in SKILL.md). It allows redistribution, so the full SKILL.md is shown on this page.

How many tokens does Testing In Production use?

About 5.3k tokens (SKILL.md is roughly 21k characters). Agents keep only the skill's name and description in context until a task matches; then they load SKILL.md in full. Its references folder adds about 2.7k tokens, read only when the agent opens those files.

What are the alternatives to Testing In Production?

Skills that share tags, products or a category with Testing In Production: Onboarding Validation (open-edge-platform/edge-ai-suites, 140 stars), Frontmcp Production Readiness (agentfront/frontmcp, 146 stars), Deploying Scalable Agents (microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners, 77k stars) and Deploying Scalable Agents (microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners, 77k stars). The comparison table on this page puts their stars, adoption, token cost, safety result and licence side by side.

Who maintains Testing In Production?

petrkindlmann (a GitHub user) maintains it in petrkindlmann/qa-skills, which has 170 GitHub stars. The repository holds 45 skills in this directory. The repository was last updated on June 10, 2026.

Source: petrkindlmann/qa-skills on GitHub. Facts on this page come from the repository at the commit we read; the author's words are quoted as theirs.